Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Veterans Department Creates Roadblocks to Voter Registration for Injured Vets

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted April 10, 2008.


VA secretary says registering voters in VA facilities is a "partisan" distraction.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Steven Rosenfeld

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

On the same day the Pentagon's commander in Iraq told the Senate that new troop withdrawals could not considered for months, Secretary of Veterans Affairs James B. Peake told two Democratic senators that his department will not help injured veterans at VA facilities to register to vote before the 2008 election.

"VA remains opposed to becoming a voter registration agency pursuant to the National Voter Registration Act, as this designation would divert substantial resources from our primary mission," Peake said in an April 8 letter to Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and John Kerry, D-Mass. He was referring to a 1993 federal law that allows government agencies to host voter registration efforts.

Both Sens. Feinstein and Kerry said they were frustrated with Peake's position.

"The Department of Veterans Affairs should provide voter materials to veterans," Feinstein said. "I believe the cost of providing these voter materials is minimal. It's a small price to pay for the sacrifice these men and women have made in fighting for our nation's freedom. I am disappointed."

"You'd think that when so many people give speeches about keeping faith with our veterans, the least the government would do is protect their right to vote, after they volunteered to go thousands of miles from home to fight and give that right to others," Kerry said. "And yet we've seen the government itself block veterans from registering to vote in VA facilities, without any legal basis or rational explanation.

"I will keep fighting with Sen. Feinstein to ensure that veterans aren't facing unnecessary hurdles just to exercise their voting rights."

Peake's letter was the latest response to a year-old request by Kerry and Feinstein to give veterans using VA facilities the opportunity to register to vote, just as people who apply for a driver's license are given that chance at state motor vehicle agencies. Veterans who have not previously registered, as well as registered voters who move, must reregister with new addresses in order to vote. By not helping the injured veterans to do so, it is likely that former soldiers seeking care at VA facilities will lose their right to vote in 2008.

The secretary's letter explained the decision by citing ongoing litigation where a federal court recently "found that the VA's restriction on partisan political activities in VA facilities... does not on its face violate the First Amendment" rights of veterans.

Peake also said the VA was "considering" the issue for future departmental action, telling the two senators, "VA shares your commitment to assisting veterans in exercising their constitutional right to vote."

While Senate staffers were studying Peake's letter for ways to keep pressing the issue, the letter brought swift condemnation from veterans' advocates.

Veterans advocates dismayed

"During a time of war, our nation has a special and sacred duty to assist our fellow citizens who have defended our Constitution with their lives -- our military veterans -- with registering to vote and with voting," said Paul Sullivan, Veterans for Common Sense executive director. "We encourage VA to allow nonpartisan voter registration drives at VA facilities so that as many veterans as possible can actively participate in our democracy -- we owe our veterans no less for standing between a bullet and our Constitution."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: voter registration, veterans

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and co-author of "What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election," with Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman (The New Press, 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Sublime Ironies!!
Posted by: talkville on Apr 10, 2008 3:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How strange that in all the talk of "supporting the troops" and calling any war critics from treasonous to un-patriotic to immoral, the ONLY sector that has consistently and continuously demonstrated utter contempt, disregard, dis-valuation and downright disgust towards these same troops has been the Pentagon, the White House and the VA!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sublime Ironies!! Posted by: andrushka
» RE: Sublime Ironies!! Posted by: Pax99
» RE: Sublime Ironies!! Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Sublime Ironies!! Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Sublime Ironies!! Posted by: willymack
» RE: Sublime Ironies!! Posted by: Pax99
Catch-22
Posted by: KeepsonTickn on Apr 10, 2008 5:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It doesn't seem entirely clear in the article, but the VA refuses to allow outside voter-registration groups to assist veterans, while at the same time failing to provide that service itself. This effectively disenfranchises hospitalized veterans.

Another thing I would be very interested in seeing someone investigate. A friend of mine works for the VA, and she tells me that progressive websites are blocked from VA computers. I wonder if this policy is applied to right-wing sites as well. I would assume that hospitalized veterans have access to Internet terminals - so they are apparently being allowed only an extremely filtered world-view.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Catch-22 Posted by: VZEQICVA
Mr. Peake obviously needs to have a combat boot rammed up his ass.
Posted by: thekidde on Apr 10, 2008 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GOOD CITIZENSHIP?
Posted by: soowee on Apr 10, 2008 8:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
VA Secretary James B. Peake is an utter fool, in my opinion. He OBVIOUSLY cannot distinguish good citizenship from "partisanship."

How do these idiots get into such high office? How do they stay there, but for a complacent Congress and complicit President?

H. Watkins Ellerson
PO Box 90
Hadensville, VA 23067
(804) 457-4243

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Republicans will do anything to win elections
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 10, 2008 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In February 2004 while surfing the Internet for information about George W.'s AWOL Guard service, I found a falsified biography of his that had been inadvertently published on a U.S. State Department website.

Brazenly, the fabricated White House document claimed Bush had flown F102 interceptors almost SIX years when the actual time was 27 months, according to official ANG records.

Suspecting an aborted GOP scheme to deceive voters in 2000 by covering up Dub-ya's REAL military record, I called the Boston Globe. Impressed, it reported my discovery the next morning (02/28/04) under the headline, “Bush Bio on Web Inflates Guard Service,” and gave me credit as the source.

Reacting to the disclosure, the Bush administration refused to say who wrote the false ANG history and how it ended up on the Internet. Instead, White House communications director Dan Bartlett, who later became Bush's legal counsel, explained lamely that the State Department bio did not "reflect the facts of his service" and would be "corrected."

Bartlett’s response is typical of the GOP's arrogant attitude toward democratic elections: Win anyway Republicans can, including lying about their candidates, and if the they get caught, so what?

Now I can add another undemocratic tactic to the GOP's treasonous list: preventing patients in VA hospitals from becoming registered absentee voters.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican, ARDENT Obama supporter and the editor of www.PhonyFighterPilot.com, the only website about George W. Bush that presents irrefutable, smoking-gun proof of White House corruption (Dub-ya's bogus bio).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You know what? The VA does a damn fine job, in general...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Apr 10, 2008 11:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...at providing critical medical care to veterans at cut-rate costs to the taxpayers.

They still need to do better, though--the heme/onc ward that I'm seen on typically has 60-80 year old cancer patients standing in line for an hour or two waiting to see a doc, or waiting for their chemo, or bouncing between blood/diagnostics labs, where they wait some more. I'm (relatively) young, so it doesn't bother me so much--personally--to have to stand around for hours two or three times a year for follow-ups. I worry, however, about whether the old timers will give up on their screenings/preventative care due to the long wait.

VA's mission is to deliver services which Congress approves as necessary to our Veterans. If Congress decides to mandate that VA care facilities be converted into voter registration booths, then VA will have to do exactly that. But...there is this little thing I like to call "priority":

Health care > voter registration.

Until then, keep up the good work, and strive to do even better, please. The care and the people are wonderful; ready access is still a challenge, at least in my neck of the woods, pilgrim.

Now, there's nothing in the world wrong with picking veteran's up outside the VA facility and transporting them to a Voter registration center, and best of luck, and thank you for helping with voter empowerment. They're vets, no prisoners.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

'leave no veteran behind'?
Posted by: husher on Apr 10, 2008 9:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a disabled Iraq vet, I do find a bit of irony in the voter registration issue. Given the fact that I, like so many others, remember guarding voting precincts in Iraq during various elections. The VA could so easily have fixed this. Possible support of the DAV, VFW, AL, ETC. At least a once a year registration for severly injured/assisted living/etc. This could have been a perfect PR coup for them. But no!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Peake has really gotta go!
Posted by: honest on Apr 13, 2008 4:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only is he impeding reasonable accommodations for hospitalized veterans to vote (Americans with Disabilities Act), but also betraying the right to vote in general. All over the country - for years - absentee voting was facilitated if you were hospitalized, or early voting. It can all be done properly, fairly. Officially sanctioned election commission people can do it. Except, apparently, if you are a Bush troglodyte who thinks it must be partisan (because that's the way you do things.) Again, VA "leadership" is not only out of step, they are embarrassing. Fire Peake and get new staff who will, in fact, serve veterans promptly, expertly, and appreciatively.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]