Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Cheney Hunting Adventures: If Someone Eats the Game, It Looks Less Like Killing

By Martha Rosenberg, AlterNet. Posted April 24, 2008.


Cheney and members of "Sportsmen Against Hunger" are attaching themselves to charitable causes to put a positive spin on killing animals.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Martha Rosenberg

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When your organization promotes canned shooting of lions, elephants, zebras and leopards in Africa it needs a lot of PR.

That's why Safari Club International (SCI), the trophy hunting organization supported by former President George H. Bush, former Vice President Dan Quayle and Retired Gen. H. Norman Schwarzkopf, created Sportsmen Against Hunger.

Dumping carcasses makes hunters look like they just like to kill.

But find someone who will actually eat the game -- staff at canned hunting clubs for example or the poor -- and you are suddenly a humanitarian.

Vice President Dick Cheney's hunting parties are known for donating the pen raised pheasants they shoot during an afternoon to hunting club workers who presumably don't mind the cleaning and pellet removal.

And few think George H. Bush, Dan Quayle and Schwarzkopf ate the lions they allegedly killed in a canned hunt in Botswana in 1999 themselves. Especially when donating the meat would increase their Great White Hunter status. (see: We're Helping Local Economies and Preserving Big Game By Killing It.)

In fact Sportsmen against Hunger worked so well as a concept -- "hunters are doing something they love and helping others at the same time" said spokesmen -- SCI spun off a second do-good group called Sportsmen Against Cancer stumped by Stormin' Norman himself.

"I'm a health nut," Schwarzkopf, a cancer survivor, told the Fort Myers News-Press in 2006. "However, some people can't afford organic foods, and Sportsmen Against Cancer provides meat at no cost."

Hormones are not good for cancer patients added Angie Hall of the Naples/Fort Myers Safari Club coordinating the program and it's "not very likely that wild animals were injected with hormones."

Until, that is, chronic wasting disease (CWD), a terminal neurological illness similar to mad cow, surfaced in U.S. deer and elk five years ago.

Suddenly no one wanted to eat the meat they harvested or even clean it.

Or let it in the house.

"If the hunter cuts up his/her own deer, he or she should wear surgical gloves and not have any open cuts or sores on their hands," Jon C. McCabe of Watertown, WI warned hunters in the Capital Times.

But that still didn't mean he was out of the woods.

"If the hunter has the deer processed, does that processor sterilize its equipment after each deer is cut up so cross contamination does not occur?" asked McCabe.

Colorado hunter Al Samuelson wasn't afraid of contamination from the other guy's deer; he worried about contamination from his own buck when it tested CWD positive -- and the risks from blood on his steering wheel and hunting clothes which his wife washed.

Mounds of headless deer piled up in places like Wisconsin awaiting elaborate lab tests on their brains and horrifying the public.

And suddenly the tons of limp and headless game hunters tried to donate looked less like generosity than, well, dumping.

Less like helping the poor than dosing them. (see: blankets; smallpox).

Some food pantries refused the "donations" outright; others gave recipients an informed consent flier which told them the meat was probably fine but there was a slight chance it was not fine and actually lethal. Bon Appetit.

Nor did anyone want the meat in a landfill "where other animals can eat it and the blood can be filtered through the soil and enter the ground water," as McCabe wrote.

Now comes news there's a second problem with Sportsmen Against Hunger's heartfelt donations: lead poisoning.

Last month health officials in North Dakota told food pantries to throw out donated meat after 53 packages of ground venison out of 95 revealed lead fragments from bullets when X-rayed.

Health officials in Minnesota and Iowa promptly followed suit.

This leaves Sportsmen Against Hunger with 1.2 million perfectly good meals no one wants on their plate.

317,000 pounds of meat "harvested" for no reason.

And looking less like humanitarians than criminals trying to find someone to dispose of the evidence.

"This is disheartening, and we certainly don't think this program should come to an end on the unscientific assessment that has occurred here," lamented SCI lawyer Doug Burdin upon hearing the states' decrees.

"Deer venison provided through the generosity of our hunters, is a highly valuable food source for some of Iowa's less fortunate citizens," echoed Ross Harrison, coordinator of Iowa's Help Us Stop Hunger (H.U.S.H) program. "We certainly have an obligation to ensure its safety, but we also don't want to be wasteful of this valuable resource if we don't need to."

Maybe Safari Club International needs to do more PR.

The meat may contain CWD and lead fragments but it still has no injected hormones, after all.

And it didn't end up in the School Lunch Program.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: cheney, hunger, dick cheney, hunting, humanitarian, chronic wasting disease, cheney and hunting

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Boring rant, Martha.
Posted by: colinmeister on Apr 24, 2008 4:00 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A rant against hunting. Which animal kills the most people in North America? The deer. Deer run onto roads and are hit by drivers, or the drivers, many with Martha's sentiments, swerve to miss the deer and hit another vehicle or a tree. At least deer hunters keep the deer population somewhat under control, saving human lives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Boring rant, Martha. Posted by: Philor
» RE: Boring rant, Martha. Posted by: Kcanadensis
» RE: Boring rant, Martha. Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Boring rant, Martha. Posted by: blitzmesser
» Actualy he's not an idiot. He's right. Posted by: Illiteratilumen
When in trouble, expand
Posted by: GPFrank on Apr 24, 2008 3:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as in the Corporate World. Maybe some cannibalism would help.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reply to boring Martha
Posted by: GPFrank on Apr 24, 2008 4:09 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's because of killing wolves faster than deer.
You trigger happies killed off the wolves so you would have more deer that had less chance against you. So much fun to prove "white superiority" or something to demonstrate the weakness of animals.
And to show how easy it is to give women more work to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» idiot Posted by: Phenix
» Wolves and farming Posted by: ohb0b
» RE: Wolves and farming Posted by: mainspark
if...
Posted by: aislinnluv on Apr 24, 2008 4:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
dick cheney's hunting buddy had died from his shotgun blast to the face, would they have tried to "donate" him?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing wrong with feeding people
Posted by: Allstar Cookie on Apr 24, 2008 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Outside of some of the concerns raised in this article, there's absolutely nothing wrong with hunters providing pantry's/food shelter's with meat from their kills regardless of their motivation. Local hunters in our area have been doing this for years, giving away turkey and deer meat.

Supermarkets, co-ops and farmers markets provide food for profit, and not any humanitarian reason.

I don’t think people that wind up in a shelter are going to turn away food that was provided on alternative intentions.


Allstar Cookie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Martha - where does your food come from........
Posted by: carbon-based on Apr 24, 2008 5:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lets see, "corporate" food is so much more humane... buy it in a package in the supermarket..no killing..it just appears there...!!!

Think again, the recent stories of the horrible and inhumane conditions in slaughter houses are beyond description - you can still eat meat after seeing those stories!!

Many towns hire hunters to thin the deer population then donate the meat to shelters.

It's a win win all around, Martha is just a uninformed consumer who thinks food magically appears in the supermarket!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Martha, you ignorant slut!
Posted by: sausage on Apr 24, 2008 6:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You don't like Dick Cheney (rhymes with wienie), neither do I.

You don't like hunting, that's you opinion.

However you seem to prefer deer, and other wild animals, starving to death, due to overpopulation and degradation of habitat, or dying from collisions with automobile and trucks.

I'm sure, like so many white suburbanites, you love the deer until they wander into your yard and eat all your hostas.

After that they're a nuisance, so the DNR simply must do something!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Martha, you ignorant slut! Posted by: darsimaj
» Its not hunting Posted by: ohb0b
» RE: Martha, you ignorant slut! Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Martha, you ignorant slut! Posted by: blitzmesser
And..
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 24, 2008 6:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it all goes to highlight one simple fact... when we pollute our entire world with industrial wastes, etc.. there is no safe food supply.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

let's hear it for misinterpretation
Posted by: e rice on Apr 24, 2008 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
according to the article, these 'hunters', who have to have their game PENNED before they shoot it (i thought REAL HUNTERS stalked, or lured, or waited for the game to appear--you know, actually hunted), have donated even lions as 'food'. but let's concentrate on the deer.

so, a woman criticizes a bunch of incompetent, lazy men who call themselves 'hunters' for a cynical, self-serving spin campaign. if the venison were edible, this would be bad enough.

but it turns out the venison is potentially dangerous--so even real hunters could be risking their health.

do the fake hunters say, 'ooops, we really don't want to endanger anyone's health'?

no, they call the evidence 'unscientific' and go right on spouting their self-righteous lies.

and, instead of criticizing the manipulative, dishonest FAKE hunters, almost everyone attacks the author of the article.

concentrate here, people, stop letting the manipulative weasels distract you from their actual behavior.

which is: all those reactionary, rich FAKE hunters will do anything rather than be responsible or honest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» lets hear it for deliberate obfuscation Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» You clearly know nothing about hunting. Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» Word count Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: Word count Posted by: e rice
Misleading and horribly written tripe - CWD not that widespread
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Apr 24, 2008 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a horribly slanted and misleading article. First off there are no populations of deer in Iowa that have tested positive for CWD. It is not that hard for a hunter to do a little research and figure out if the meat he or she is harvesting is likely safe and most states have some type of testing program.

Donated venison feeds a lot of hungry people and, where I lived in Michigan for many years, hunting is a matter of survival for many families. So Cheney is associated with an organization that donates venison. The whole program must be evil then! This is exactly the type of program that progressives should be getting behind. Everyone wins here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

i prefer hunters who admit they love to kill
Posted by: ptown on Apr 24, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i prefer hunters who admit they love to kill over folks who give money to the humane society to protect cats and dogs but still, by their shopping and cooking habits, perpetuate cruelty and death for billions of factory farmed "food animals" every day ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Donated Venison Cleared for Distribution to Needy," IowaDNR
Posted by: sausage on Apr 24, 2008 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Posted: April 1, 2008

DES MOINES — Food pantries in Iowa have been given approval to resume serving deer venison to the needy after sampling of the ground meat for lead indicated only trace amounts.

A total of 10 samples of ground venison from a food pantry were tested by the University of Iowa Hygienic Laboratory over the weekend. All 10 samples had less than 1 part per million of lead, eight had no detectable amounts and two had only trace amounts.

Distribution of venison donated to the food pantries by hunters was temporarily halted last week until the ground meat could be sampled for lead. More than 25,000 deer have been donated to hunger programs through the Department of Natural Resources (DNR)-administered HUSH (Help Us Stop Hunger) program in the last five years representing more than 4 million meal servings. HUSH is a cooperative effort among deer hunters, the Food Bank of Iowa, meat lockers and the Iowa DNR. The two main goals of HUSH include reducing the deer population while providing high-quality red meat to the needy in Iowa.

http://www.iowadnr.gov/

Sorry, Martha, a little fact checking might have given your rant a tad more credibility.

That being said, I have as much respect for the "don't-shoot-Bambi-he's-so-cute" crowd as I do for the "tie-Bambi-up-so-I-can-shoot-him" crowd of Dick Cheney. You both suck!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

By this argument
Posted by: frantaylor on Apr 24, 2008 10:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iraqis must be delicious! Hey Dick, do you use barbeque sauce?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rule of thumb: Anything Dick Cheney is involved in has to be evil!
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 24, 2008 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Enough said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

meat from a hunted animal
Posted by: vasumurti on Apr 24, 2008 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keith Akers in "A Vegetarian Sourcebook" (1983), responds to the argument that killing animals for food is natural:

"The main problem with this argument is that it does not justify the practice of meat-eating or animal husbandry as we know it today; it justifies hunting. The distinction between hunting and animal husbandry probably seems rather fine to the man in the street, or even to your typical rule-utilitarian moral philosopher. The distinction, however, is obvious to an ecologist. If one defends killing on the grounds that it occurs in nature, then one is defending the practice as it occurs in nature.

"When one species of animal preys on another in nature, it only preys on a very small proportion of the total species population. Obviously, the predator species relies on its prey for its continued survival. Therefore, to wipe the prey species out through overhunting would be fatal. In practice, members of such predator species rely on such strategies as territoriality to restrict overhunting and to insure the continued existence of its food supply.

"Moreover, only the weakest members of the prey species are the predator's victims: the feeble, the sick, the lame, or the young accidentally separated from the fold. The life of the typical zebra is usuallly placid, even in lion country; this kind of violence is the exception in nature, not the rule.

"As it exists in the wild, hunting is the preying upon isolated members of an animal herd. Animal husbandry is the nearly complete annihilation of an animal herd. In nature, this kind of slaughter does not exist. The philosopher is free to argue that there is no moral difference between hunting and slaughter, but he cannot invoke nature as a defense of this idea.

"Why are hunters, not butchers, most frequently taken to task by the larger community for their killing of animals? Hunters usually react to such criticism by replying that if hunting is wrong, then meat-hunting must be wrong as well. The hunter is certainly right on one point--the larger community is hypocritical to object to hunting when it consumes the flesh of domesticated animals. If any form of meat-eating is justified, it would be meat from a hunted animal."

In his 1975 book, Animal Liberation, Australian philosopher Peter Singer writes:

"Killing an animal is in itself a troubling act. It has been said that if we had to kill our own meat we would all be vegetarians. There may be exceptions to that general rule, but it is true that most people prefer not to inquire into the killing of the animals they eat.

"Very few people ever visit a slaughterhouse; and films of slaughterhouse operations are rarely shown on television...Yet those who, by their purchases, require animals to be killed have no right to be shielded from this or any other aspect of the production of the meat they buy.

"If it is distasteful for humans to think about, what can it be like for the animals to experience it?"

Peter Singer concludes in Animal Liberation that "by ceasing to rear and kill animals for food, we can make extra food available for humans that, properly distributed, it would eliminate starvation and malnutrition from this planet. Animal Liberation is Human Liberation, too."

The number of animals killed for food in the United States is 70 times larger than the number of animals killed in laboratories, 30 times larger than the number of animals killed by hunters and trappers, and 500 times larger than the number of animals killed in animal pounds.

"If anyone wants to save the planet," says Paul McCartney, "all they have to do is stop eating meat. That's the single most important thing you could do. It's staggering when you think about it. Vegetarianism takes care of so many things in one shot: ecology, famine, cruelty."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: meat from a hunted animal Posted by: YogiBear
Surprised to see...
Posted by: tbone on Apr 24, 2008 11:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only did Alternet post another gotcha piece of trash based on "some" of the facts, and never delving into the "other side", but then the readers were paying enough attention to call it out AND provide that other side. It's almost like things are changing...GASP!!!

First and foremost, yes commercial "hunting" is a joke, most of the people that hunt in the US can not afford such crap (I think the median income of hunters is probably well under 100K, ie its the elites!), and when they do pay for it (ON TOP OF a typical STATE permit, here in Colorado/Wyoming resident tags for ELK are easily $100 typically more for more desirable areas, season, etc., out of state can be as high as $1000!), they will take the meat too. Ask around, read some of the publications, Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation has some really good info if you are curious.

Secondly, CWD has NOT BEEN PROVEN TO CROSS SPECIES, sure the consensus is that its not a good idea to ingest PRIONS but the fact remains, no SCIENTIFIC PROOF has been produced that shows ungulate CWD can transfer to humans, through fluids much less through ingesting meat. For now most of the DWR offices here in the west only SUGGEST having your animal tested, the obvious solution is to COOK YOUR MEET THOUROUGHLY. Also, LEAD POISONING is a much more serious threat, and most hunters realize this, and either choose their ammo/shot taking carefully or are sure to not harvest meat from areas suspected of having lead pieces in them. A good hunter will go for one clean shot thru heart/lungs that damages neither of the front shoulders (where most of the ground burger comes from, as it can be quite tuff). Poor shooters and irresponsible hunters can and do put themselves and others at risk, when donating meat, by not observing these COMMON SENSE RULES.

Lastly, if you have never hunted, eaten wild meat, or been around the culture, then you have no idea what you are talking about. Go learn before you rant about "everyone should be vegetarian". I choose wild elk from the Medicine Bow National Forest, that my father kills, I help clean, then pack out on my back for 4-8 miles over the Con-Agra/Mosanto stuff...and I do it without getting on my HIGH HORSE everytime I run across a vegetarian here in Boulder (every day!).

To all you veg attackers, here is my pre-emptive response...

PFFFFFFFFT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Let me join in the debunking fun. Posted by: Illiteratilumen
By now
Posted by: willymack on Apr 24, 2008 12:04 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Almost everyone knows that cheney is a sadistic, evil degenerate with a criminal record, so it comes as no surprise that he gets a charge out of wasting defenseless creatures, wild or not. There's something of cheney in EVERY hunter, in that they ENJOY killing things, regardless of how much they try to minimize that fact by calling themselves "sportsmen" or piously stating crap like "I eat everything I shoot".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: By now Posted by: YogiBear
Good Old One Eye, Dead Eye Dick, The Hunchback of Halliburton!
Posted by: williameon on Apr 24, 2008 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Goodbye Dick!
Goodbye Dick!
Goodbye!

Soon your Robot Heart
Will give out.
You'll have to say
Goodbye!

All of The Shurb's
Horses and Men
Can ever get
His Black Heart
Pumping Again!

I'll say my goodbyes Now!
Goodbye Dick!
Goodbye Dick!
Goodbye!

Why wait?
Get the Shish Ka-Blobs ready
I hear it is Hot in Hell
This time of year.

Goodbye
DEAD EYE!
Good Riddance and
Goodbye.

You'll have to go
See the Baker?
Sorry!

Thumbs Down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On the plus side...
Posted by: YogiBear on Apr 24, 2008 2:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... every animal is dangerous and Cheney might just buy it, even on a canned hunt. Unlike Bush, his time really isn't running out. Anyone think the end of this presidency is the last we'll see of Dr. Doom?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What total ignorance and deliberate misstatements
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Apr 24, 2008 3:26 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
are made not only in the article butt, also by the more obvious commenters.

I am NOT a "rich' whate man.
I AM a white man.
I work for a living, enjoy many different recreational pursuits and am omnivorous.
I wonder if the bleedingheart types here understand what the various types of human teeth are designed to do.

I am also a fisherman and former hunter.
When I go fishing, I take the kinds of fish I love to eat~~bluegills and walleye.
They're wonderful.
I ONLY take enough for a couple of meals for myself.
I used to hunt and, the reasin I no longer hunt is that the people who composed our group of friends have moved to different parts of the country.
That eliminated the NUMBER ONE reason why we got together during hunting season.
That reason was the cameraderie of being together with our friends.
There were more than a dozen of us.
We were men, women and kids who had gone through a safety course which would have been required by all of us even if the state did not.

There was NOT ONE OF US who "enjoyed" killing a deer. In fact, we talked about this often as, we all knew some of the hysterical anti types who are actually ONLY anti someone else's things or pursuits.
I remember sitting around one of our houses talking and asking everyione, "Do you enjoy killing a deer?"
Every one of said NO, including the kids.

There is a truism which follows quite reasonably in this.
It is:
Those who are against guns are the ones who actually know nothing about them.

BTW-I eat all sorts of different vegetables.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You pro-activist hunters are kidding right? I mean no one is that stupid not even me.
Posted by: Nightstallion on Apr 25, 2008 1:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok, here I open by stating categorically I am an ageist! If you are under forty you don’t know the orifice of your fundament from a hole in terra firma. I am an ageist with a will, and I am going to use it on you!

In 1954 I was eight years old even I knew the smell of DDT floating on the water because it SMELLED LIKE BUG SPRAY! Now the family sat down to dinner of fish they had caught from The Tippecanoe which at that time of the year smelled like bug spray because of the mosquito kills going on. They sprayed all the backwater shallows. I pitched a bitch because the fucking fish smelled like bug spray. WRONG you do not tell adults that fish smell like bug spray when they are drunk having a good time and, just shut up you little whelp or I’ll beat your ass! Now eat your fish! I refused needless to say I went to bed with out supper. Around 3 AM everyone started heaving their guts up.

All fish today contain minute quantities of Mutagens, thank you Monsanto! All fish from the oceans and many of the freshwater fish near wood processing plants contain 13-22 ppm* of DMSO and 18-69 ppm of Mercury! Small numbers on a national average, but they can jump to noticeable and deadly amounts in just a few meters of water space.

Now there isn’t any wildlife that is not beleaguered by parasites. Some of them are deadly like the liver fluke in deer muscle and Elk liver. Nevertheless, hey it’s all good right? Just cook the shit out of it. Oh, and being fed pellets that may or may not be infected with Prions, you could come down with mad cow disease, neat huh?

Hey, we are just romping stomping good ol’ boys who never meant any harm! What’s it to you whether we poison our kids or not? In addition, who’s to say we will? You are no expert, you’ve admitted that yourself! Very true little red neck and I think you all deserve the Darwin award anyway. So gobble up that shit and rid the planet of your surly selves.

*ppm, Parts Per Million

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the Above by the way!? Posted by: Nightstallion
Oh please
Posted by: PandaBear on Apr 25, 2008 6:01 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is relevent because the deer invented cars and put the highways through their living space? Do you think they enjoy the sport of being killed by fast-moving vehicles? Give me a break!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DMSO?
Posted by: pball on Apr 25, 2008 9:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only thing dimethyl sulfoxide in fish is going to do is give it a lovely pre-seasoned garlic flavor. DMSO is widely used in medicine for cryoprotectant properties (if you ever gt a bone marrow transplant, you're getting a lot more than 20ppm injected) and more importantly its property of crossing the skin extremely effectively while carrying whatever's dissolved in it.

In chem labs where its purity isn't assured, you do need to exercise some caution with it in case it's contaminated with something nasty you don't want in your body, but in and of itself it's perfectly benign.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimethyl_sulfoxide#Medicine
http://www.drugs.com/dict/dimethyl-sulfoxide.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hunting is for impotent adolescents anyway.
Posted by: wisegalah on Apr 25, 2008 8:38 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hunting with powerful guns is not about real hunting or provision of food for anybody. It is about the personally powerless, impotent and adolescent getting a power thrill which the adequate members of the human race can get without any props like guns or bleeding animals.
If you really want to hunt then go out with a spear and a bow and arrow and match your wits with the animals. Then you might learn something. The japanese insist that they have the right to hunt whales because it is a traditional pursuit. Really? With powerful vessels? With explosive harpoons?
I am happy to let them go out as they did in the past with hand held harpoons etc. Now that would be traditional.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hunting a big cause of deer accidents
Posted by: Tricia on Apr 26, 2008 12:09 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By far the largest number of car/deer accidents occur during hunting season when panicked animals seeking to escape hunters run blindly out on roads where they would normally move more cautiously. If you want to cut down on these accidents, stop hunting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hookem for the hungry.
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave on Apr 29, 2008 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I notice no mention of Hookem for the Hungry was mentioned. Many hunters and fisherman produce massive amounts of food for people that are having trouble getting by. I fish for the month of April and donate all fish caught to Hookem for the hungry. I donate at least one deer a season to Hunting for the hungry. If I am harming people as the writer of this article claims then maybe I need to keep my fish and my deer in my own freezer for my own family. We have been eating these animals for years with no ill effects. But as I contemplate this article more and more I see the light. I will spare the hungry and needy from this danger of lead poisoning and blood poisioning. I will only endanger me and mine. Soon I maybe exposed to a lawsuit if food I donate caused sickness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement