Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Questions Remain About Clinton Strategist Mark Penn's Campaign Role

By Ari Berman, TheNation.com. Posted April 7, 2008.


Despite being "demoted" for pushing a free trade deal with Colombia that Hillary opposes, Penn is still plotting her campaign strategy.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Ari Berman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Mark Penn has resigned as Hillary Clinton's chief strategist. But questions remain about what role he'll play inside the Clinton campaign (his firm will still provide polling) and why he had such a prominent position in the Clinton orbit to begin with.

The news about conflicts of interests stemming from Penn's business work was hardly new. The Nation reported last May, in an investigative profile, that Penn's massive PR and lobbying firm, Burson-Marsteller, was running a union-busting division and helping a number of unsavory characters (big tobacco, oil companies, etc) that Democratic politicians, including Hillary Clinton, have distanced themselves from.

"[I] have never personally participated in any anti-union activity," Penn told me last May. "Personally my father was for many years a union organizer in the poultry workers union and so I find these attempts to connect me to work done by a firm I then had no connection with to have absolutely no relevance and a complete distortion of my views and my own work."

But Penn was only half telling the truth. Even after joining the Clinton campaign, he continued to work on projects that labor and Democratic politicians bitterly opposed, like a free trade deal with Colombia, a country with a history of murdering union organizers -- which eventually led to his resignation. He never took a formal leave of absence from Burson-Marsteller, as other figures in the Clinton campaign did from their prior jobs. He said that he was only helping Microsoft, his biggest client, which we now know wasn't the case. And after the publication of my article, Burson and its subsidiaries assisted a number of controversial clients, including Countrywide, a leading subprime mortgage lender, the private mercenary company Blackwater and Aqua Dots, maker of tainted Chinese toys.

Unlike many bogus resignations this campaign season, Penn's departure was long overdue. "The only real question was, why did it not happen sooner?" former Dean and Edwards strategist Joe Trippi told the Washington Post today. "The conflicts have been a problem for the campaign from the start."

Only the mainstream media chose to initially ignore them. Shortly before the publication of my article, the Washington Post wrote a glowing profile about Penn and his "undisputed brilliance." Fortunately publications like The Nation, The American Prospect, The Huffington Post and others chose to dig deeper, scrutinizing Penn's business interests and his approach to politics.

It was a "fairy tale," to paraphrase Bill Clinton, to expect that a pollster who (along with Dick Morris) had coined the strategy of triangulation for Clinton in '96 and had worked for the DLC and Joe Lieberman could convincingly package Hillary as an authentic populist and progressive. Instead Penn chose to sell Clinton as a hawkish, technocratic quasi-incumbent--a terrible strategy in a change election. His bite-sized approach to the electorate and pro-corporate centrism represented the Democratic Party of the past, not the future.

After a disastrous performance in Iowa, Penn became a punching bag in the media and a polarizing and unpopular presence inside the campaign, where his gruff and arrogant manner led to shouting matches with Clinton loyalists like adviser Harold Ickes. When things really turned sour for Penn, after the Wall Street Journal reported that he had met with Colombia's ambassador to push for the trade deal, the chief strategist had few defenders left inside the campaign. He was forced to resign.

Yet reports of Penn's demise may still be premature. Will his demotion represent a real change of strategy inside the campaign or more of a PR move to push Penn out of the spotlight while he continues to have the Clintons' ear? That's the real question worth asking. The buck stops at the top.

UPDATE: According to Marc Ambinder of The Atlantic, Penn is still on the campaign's conference calls and still plotting strategy. A senior Clinton aide says Penn "is still going to be very much involved." His reported resignation looks more like a subtle demotion at this point in time.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: hillary clinton, mark penn

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Burson-Marsteller never met a deadly corporate scam it didn't want to promote
Posted by: Rune on Apr 7, 2008 2:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Burson-Marsteller, the P.R. firm that Penn leads, is not only a darling of anti-labor efforts at home and abroad. The firm helped big tobacco dodge liability suits for years by setting up a campaign claiming that evidence linking tobacco use to various lung ailments was "junk science" because no one could definitively prove which cigarette would lead to which ailment on which day. Then, the same firm used the same tactics (and even some of the same media pundits and web sites) to run a multi-million dollar campaign for players in the oil industry who said that climate destabilization evidence could all be written off as "junk science," using the same absurd standards of "proof" (though almost never using actual climate scientists to make their case).

The front men hired by the Blackwater mercenary firm that is under fire for needlessly killing Iraqis have also retained Burson-Marsteller to help them create a smoke screen in the MSM to protect their murderous client.

This is an ultra-pro-business, right wing spin machine and Penn is a leader of it because he is an right wing, ultra-pro-business spin-meister who could care less about ordinary working people, to say nothing of those being exploited by international corporations in the poorest corners of the world. That Hillary Clinton hired and is still relying on such a person to direct her campaign speaks volumes about where she is coming from and who she will protect or sell out to get where she wants to be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Assume the obvious.
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 7, 2008 3:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's get real. Hillary doesn't oppose a free trade agreement with Colombia. Otherwise, she would've FIRED Penn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sinking ship
Posted by: RobNLA on Apr 7, 2008 5:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary is just rearranging chairs on her sinking ship of a campaign.

She keeps losing ground in the delegate numbers. Her last hope for a huge PA win are looking pretty slim.

Even superdelegates strongly in support of her suggest they'll support Obama if he keeps the delegate lead and the popular vote too. And there are no signs that Clinton come from behind on the popular vote either.

The only hope for her is to go negative again on Obama just before PA. But Clinton already has played that card before and it will be harder for her to play it again. The Rev. Wright issue has been worn out...it's a dead horse. In contrast, many new issues have come up regarding Clinton...Penn being just the latest in her staffing problems.

It's time for the Refs (superdelegates) to call this one for Obama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FREE TIBET!
Posted by: sleepingdog on Apr 7, 2008 9:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
has anyone heard of any candidate positions on the conflict in Tibet?



FREE TIBET - the torch is coming to SF CA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The only thing the Hillary campaign did with Mark Penn
Posted by: Quannah on Apr 8, 2008 10:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is make an announcement that he stepped down.

That doesn't mean a thing.

He's still working for her, still conducting polls, still preparing her for her debate this weekend, still on board.

So, the only thing Hillary did in regards to Mark Penn is... lie! No surprise there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

compared to Wright, Penn (and thus Clinton) is Wrong
Posted by: jeff97005 on Apr 8, 2008 4:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
compared to Wright, Penn (and thus Clinton) is Wrong

I'm a believer that Rev. Jeremiah Wright of Trinity UCC did not cross the bounds of decency and basic patriotism when he --

one) amidst a life time of other sermons and proclamations that were right on track with a caring, faithful ministry to his congregation and their neighbors, and

two) in the context of his congregation that knew and expected him to be forceful and challenging about the issues at the intersection of life and faith, and

three) in the tradition of the United Church of Christ which expects and celebrates conversation and critical as well as supportive response to what is shared from a free and prophetic pulpit

-- made the remarks that caused such an uproar. As many who have watched the fuller video accounts of the sermons from which a few short seconds of sound bite were excerpted, I think the proclamation of good news, hope in the face of challenge, courage in the face of the powerful and encouragement towards increased responsibility and faithful action by his own congregation is in the best tradition of the preaching art.

The key, I submit, is that Rev. Wright was preaching to a congregation that had the power and the responsibility to call him as their pastor, to continue his call, or - if needed - to curtail his call. Barack Obama is a member of that church, and with thousands of other members had a less than 0.05 % voice and vote in the continuation or curtailing of Rev. Wright's tenure at Trinity UCC.

HOWEVER: Mark Penn was serving solely at the determination of Hillary Clinton as the top and highest paid staff member of her campaign. Clinton had and has 100% voice and vote to continue or to curtail Mark Penn's call to his position in her campaign.

Now we know that Penn was serving the cause of Blackwater,Countrywide, and Columbia amidst the specific outrage voiced by Clinton. So, Hillary Clinton announces over the weekend that Penn is out. Good, she has that 100% voice and vote.

And yet, now we learn that Penn is not really out, but will continue to do paid work for Clinton and was publicly present on the daily campaign leadership call to the news media covering the campaign.

I want to ask "what the hell?" Instead, I ask "how in heaven's name does Rev. Wright and Trinity UCC get to be a huge issue to the Obama campaign while Mark Penn may not become a concern at all for those supporting Hillary Clinton?"

Barack Obama is right to engage in higher and deeper issues, with better and more solid integrity, and with a wider variety of Americans of every experience, perspective, and vision. I commend Obama for continuing - carefully and thoughtfully - his connection to and conversation towards better engagement with his church and his pastors. Especially as he was not and is not the lone voice and vote that can or should make such a decision.

Clinton keeps claiming to be Ready on Day One She's ready already to do anything, to pay anyone, to break any commitment, to toss any kitchen sink, as she seeks to become the Democratic Nominee for the Presidential Election of 2008? Mark Penn and Hillary Clinton are 100% wrong. Yet Clinton would leave a church if the pastor was controversial even as she won't really fire an employee who is actively taking money to work against her announced interests.

I am one ready on this day to believe and announce that Obama is the only candidate remaining who is ready to engage, involve and offer leadership to the country I still hope and pray we might someday become.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]