Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A Yuppie Heads 'Back to the Land'

By Anneli Rufus, AlterNet. Posted April 5, 2008.


Author Doug Fine traded his metropolitan lifestyle for an eco-lifestyle on a New Mexico farm. If only the rest of us could afford to do the same.
lbsubarucovershadow
subaru

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Anneli Rufus

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

When Doug Fine decided to move cross-country from his native New York to an arid rural outpost 20-plus miles from the nearest town, he brought along "four big goals" for the coming year, which were:

  1. Use a lot less oil.
  2. Power my life by renewable energy.
  3. Eat as locally as possible.
  4. Don't starve, electrocute myself, get eaten by the local mountain lions, get shot by my U.N.-fearing neighbors or otherwise die in a way that would cause embarrassment.

That's one behemoth of an ambitious plan for a man who admits right up front: "I like my Netflix, wireless email and booming subwoofers" and who can't imagine living without toast, ice cream or toilet paper. How, then, on earth to achieve it?

On the first page of his book about that year, Farewell My Subaru (Villard, 2008), Fine -- a journalist who has written for Wired, Salon and other venues -- recounts a scene in which his inexpertly parked Subaru Legacy slid backward down a grade and barely missed crashing into an outbuilding. This incident occurred "a few days after I moved into the sprawling, crumbling, 41-acre New Mexico spread" where Fine had come to live. "Moved into" is a coy way of putting it. Presently, he mentions that he owns the place, that he bought this vast tract of land to go green on.

And while it's exciting in a fairytale way, this notion of legally owning your surroundings as far as the eye can see and transforming them into a solarized organic Xanadu, it lends the undertaking a certain "well ... but" dimension. Well, we all aspire to sustainability, but how many of us could actually afford to buy 41 acres? Well, property in rural New Mexico is less expensive than in much of the United States, but how many of us could afford taking a year or more off work just to see whether we could hack it? Well, getting off the grid is great, but who among us has the bodily stamina to manage, while living solo, animal husbandry and organic gardening and the aerobic, acrophobic, bloodletting workouts (think: windmills, wrenches, tanks, pipes, panels and pumps) required to transition a ranch from electrical to solar power?

Fine bought solar panels "to power my new, fabulously expensive solar-powered well pump. The pump came from Denmark, where they don't employ slave labor and where they don't retail at Wal-Mart. Poor people in Chad don't own this pump. The boutique device was ... buried a hundred forty feet below the ground" -- at further expense, presumably. These expenses just pile up. In order to get "serious about kicking unleaded once and for all" -- quite an aspiration when the nearest town, and thus the nearest supply outpost, lies across "spine-rattling New Mexico dirt roads" and requires fording an actual river -- Fine had to ditch the Subaru and buy a four-wheel-drive diesel Monster Truck. Purchased secondhand, the Ford F-250 -- it dwarfs Hummers on the freeway -- was still "quite a bit over Blue Book." Replacing its standard fuel system with a biodiesel fuel system that allowed it to run on food grease salvaged from restaurants cost another crate of ducats: The website for Albuquerque Alternative Energies, where Fine had his conversion done, lists the charge as $4,000 plus installation.

Add the price of building materials, fencing, animals, feed ... and the whole project, to borrow Fine's own adjective, starts to sound a bit boutique. Which isn't to say that it isn't still admirable in principle.

After a suburban childhood and young adulthood spent backpacking around Third World war zones as a reporter, Fine yearned to know "whether it was possible, whether I was firmly on the way to independent, local, oil-reduced surivival or doomed to the fate of those, like most of my family and friends still, who believe that the current McGlobal Economy is eternal" -- i.e., that "unlike any society that came before, we'll figure out a way to keep this Super Bowl-watching, espresso-drinking, GPS-guided-car-driving party going no matter what the ice caps, a couple of Jihadists … and some nasty microbes in the Hot Zone have to say. It's the societal equivalent of not thinking about dying."

And he went west with a workable plan. An expensive plan, sure, but credit the guy for at least calculating this in advance. Because it was a long-term plan, its initial hassle and high cost were pretty much mandatory to ensure less hassle, lower cost and less hypocrisy in perpetuity. Fine admits knowing from the outset "that even if I wanted to, I couldn't completely cut out petroleum and Chinese slave factory products … in the first year or two." The reasons for this were partly technical, partly emotional: In the latter case, he likes ice cream a whole lot. But he planned for that, too, buying female goats via Craigslist almost immediately after arriving at the ranch.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: farewell my subaru

Anneli Rufus is the author of several books, including Party of One: The Loners' Manifesto.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
You don't have to go to that extreme to make a difference...
Posted by: asilsfable on Apr 5, 2008 12:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've weatherized my home and and now use only a quarter of the electricity I did before. I'm planting fruit trees and saving money to put the new artificial turf (grass-like) for my son's play area.

We walk to his daycare. I walk to the library where we borrow movies and shows to watch. We walk to the local Trader Joe's.

And this is all in Los Angeles--arguably the most car centered place in America. It's doable, this notion of a smaller carbon footprint--and you don't have to go Amish to attain it.

Soon, I'll have saved up enough to get solar panels to go off the grid--if I want. Now that I've lowered my consumption, it's much cheaper.

It's not as difficult as one might imagine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» off the grid? Posted by: toddcory
» RE: off the grid? Posted by: bittershaman
Good point
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Apr 5, 2008 1:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If someone wants to write a useful book, it should be called "Saving the Planet and Simplifying Your Life for Regular Shmucks". It should have practical ideas that ordinary folks can afford. We've seen enough of these "voluntary simplicity" stories written by management consultants, systems analysts, and investment bankers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good point Posted by: phatkhat
» RE: Good point Posted by: bittershaman
gag me with a spoon
Posted by: profmarcus on Apr 5, 2008 3:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i have family roots in new mexico - albuquerque, las vegas, roswell, and santa fe - and one of my fondest dreams was to live in northern new mexico and soak in the magnificent landscape, breathe the rarefied air, and bathe in the preternaturally vivid light... i did that... for nearly five years, i lived the rural new mexico life among the other transplanted seekers, eco-freaks, aging hippies, new age woo-woo nut jobs, shirley mcclaines, and struggling artists who sprinkled themselves among the 8th generation hispanics and pueblo native americans who looked around and wondered what the hell they had done to deserve this latest visit from the conquistadors...

right now, i'm sitting at my desk in kabul, afghanistan, reading the above drivel and thanking my lucky stars that i had the good sense to get the hell out before i too became just another gringo transplant, staking out my own personal shangri-la, and congratulating myself on how much smarter, cooler, greener, and more spiritual i am than all those other poor bastards...

puh-le-e-e-e-eze... spare me...

And, yes, I DO take it personally

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: gag me with a spoon Posted by: writer7
» RE: gag me with a spoon Posted by: Dboy
» RE:Oh yeah. Posted by: boydranchitos
» RE: Oh yeah. Posted by: Moira61
» RE: Oh yeah. Posted by: boydranchitos
» RE:you should be gagged . Posted by: The Big Raven
» when yuppies hit nature Posted by: AlineSE
» RE: when yuppies hit nature Posted by: AlineSE
» RE: gag me with a spoon Posted by: acidrain69
» RE: gag me with a spoon Posted by: DeaconJ
If
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line on Apr 5, 2008 4:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
someone wants to do this, and can afford to do this.. by all means have at it. Anybody who is willing to raise food and maybe even sell it is fine by me. So what if he has money? Hes putting it good use and living out his dreams. How many people here on alternet can say that? You have a choice as to how you live your life and how you react to what life throws you. This article is a whole lot of sour grapes and I fully support ANYONE who is willing to change their lives and try and hack it as a farmer or even a homesteader. He likes netflix? So what? get over it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: If Posted by: g's_r_fan
» RE: If Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: If Posted by: peacefullaim
Good for Him!
Posted by: Pirate Queen on Apr 5, 2008 4:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a trip! NM is certainly primordial in places, and it's nice to read that someone is getting off the grid in a life-style more pleasant than that of the local "mesa rat."

And yes, it is sad to note the high cost of simplifying. Another irony ~ like the higher cost of organic foods.

I'm glad the book author was young, savvy, good-valued and yes, wealthy enough, to realize his dream. Now do something about the chem trials out there, please!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good for Him! Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
jealous...
Posted by: JVG on Apr 5, 2008 4:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The envy of the reviewer was palpable. It's so interesting how people pick up on "spin."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

privilege
Posted by: mary-alias on Apr 5, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This reminds me of a construction company I know that prides itself on using reclaimed /recycled wood (trucked in from other parts of the country) and every solar, wind etc. doodad they can find on multi-million sprawling "rustic" summer homes reminiscent of the Vanderbilts' "rustic" cottages.The builders and the owners prided themselves on going green. Makes me wanna puke- green bile.

If this writer really wanted to do it right he could have stayed where he was, stopped consuming so much, moved to a cheaper apartment, stopped eating out as much, etc. and given his savings to the people who need a well in Chad, or the kids who need a decent school in Harlem, or those poor New Mexico neighbors who can't get decent medical and dental care.

Feeling self-righteous for buying green often crumbles when you start to wonder where the money goes next, follow the money. To put it simplistically,if I go out out and trade in my 10 year old car that runs just fine for a $50,000 hybrid (not that I have the resources to do so) and then that $50,000 goes into the pockets of people who want "rustic" summer homes have I done any good?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: privilege Posted by: Cooltruth
» RE: privilege Posted by: mary-alias
» Don't Be Daft Posted by: pdxstudent
» RE: Don't Be Daft Posted by: Cooltruth
» You're Still Being Daft Posted by: pdxstudent
» RE: You're Still Being Daft Posted by: Cooltruth
» In The City Posted by: pdxstudent
» lipstick on a pig Posted by: toddcory
Country Yuppies
Posted by: Sparks56 on Apr 5, 2008 5:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I heard Mr. Fine yesterday on NPR's "How We Live". Wouldn't it be nice if we all could afford to follow him and then write a book about it.
Yuppies are moving into my neighborhood of old farmsteads and building McMansions. I wish they would think about doing a little farming. They love to eat organic food but none of them seem to think of growing it. Too much work. Plus, you can't puill a plow with a Porsche. I did hear you can pull a manure spreader with a Ferrari.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Country Yuppies Posted by: Dboy
» Shipping containers? Posted by: Cooltruth
» RE: Shipping containers? Posted by: jazzyj
» RE: manure spreader Posted by: wittler youth
» RE: Country Yuppies Posted by: Vic Fedorov
» Yo Vic! Posted by: Sparks56
» RE: Country Yuppies Posted by: Shey
» RE: Country Yuppies Posted by: Sparks56
Am I rich?
Posted by: mwildfire on Apr 5, 2008 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, and I'm not looking at New Mexico, and gave up on Vermont because it was too expensive. But land in West Virginia is still cheap. As it turned out, we joined a land trust and the land didn't cost anything, but you can still buy land here for $1000 an acre. The local culture is very redneck and the jobs are scarce. But it rains all year here.
We're not as far along; we've been graveling the road and are about to start building the shed which will store building materials and then be a woodshed; this year we'll build a very energy efficent house and put up solar panels. Next year I'll get the gardens going, plant fruit trees, get checkens and ducks and maybe goats. I won't have the problems this guy did because I've lived here thirty years and done it all before.
So how can we afford to build a house and buy solar panels and fencing, etc? I had jobs for almost four years--the first one paid $24K a year, the second one $20K. This is listed as being below what the average HS graduate earns, tho both required a college degree. But in this economically depressed area, wages are lower--and so are living costs. My boyfriend is a geek but earns much less, because of the area and because most of his clients are non-profits. So, my big secret: we didn't blow money on all manner of junk. I saved more than half my income. I chose not to have health insurance; my car gets 43 MPG (and has 218,000 miles on it); we cook at home. We will do all of the work on our hopuse ourselves.
I quite agree that the article, and some of the comments, reek of jealousy, and I want to point out that it isn't envy only of someone who has money. What this lifestyle conversion requires is not so much money as energy--and boldness. Willingness to work hard, to experience change, to live differently than friends. It is NOT necessary to be wealthy, and as someone above pointed out, a rural lifestyle is not necessary for reducing one's carbon footprint. There isn't room in the country for everyone--but if city people begin buying locally, and "if" we are forced to use much less fossil fuel soon, we will need a whole lot more farmers. Getting started now while there's still fossil fuel for certain energy-intensive but one-time investments to be made (building a house, putting up solar panels and/or windmills, constructing barns) makes a lot of sense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Am I rich? Posted by: wal55
» RE: Am I rich? Posted by: estelevistaban
» RE: Am I rich? Posted by: mwildfire
» RE: Am I rich? Posted by: estelevistaban
» RE: Am I rich? Posted by: estelevistaban
Sorry...
Posted by: wal55 on Apr 5, 2008 5:20 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
…but this write-up reminds me of bush playing "cowboy" on his "ranch”…

41 acres? That's not "owning the land for as far as you can see" - it's just an overgrown playground (unless one is able to grow AND SELL specialty crops). It might provide a wonderful place to live, but you’d better have an off-farm source of income; a small farm can quickly become a money sink.

I wonder how long Mr. Fine will remain enamored of this "project" - will his interest in living there last long enough to justify his investment? Or will all of the expense of "going green" be thrown away - just like everything else in our throw-away culture?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sorry... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Sorry... Posted by: cab
» RE: Sorry... Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
And don't come back
Posted by: MikeOckhurtz on Apr 5, 2008 5:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If this "dude" truly wanted to go green he would have set up a non-profit and granted money to homeowners to help them weatherize or put up solar. Instead, this boy is on safari dahling, what an adventurer. Oh, the danger of the locals and Lions too!

I'm willing to be that his fellow elitists in a piece of old Mexico will accept his money just fine. soon enough he'll too be complaining of the dangerous wetbacks criss crossing his landscape. Must be nice to be rich.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And don't come back Posted by: mwildfire
» RE: And don't come back Posted by: MikeOckhurtz
Nice fantasy
Posted by: Artkansas on Apr 5, 2008 5:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the end of the day he's paying for this by writing a book about his adventures. How many trees will be cut to publish this book? Where are the books made. Will he really be able to stay on his farm living ecologically, or will he be staying in hotels and pumping the lecture circuit?

Some good ideas no doubt. But for most, a fantasy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nice fantasy? Posted by: Cooltruth
» Not sure you understood. Posted by: Artkansas
» RE: Not sure you understood. Posted by: Cooltruth
» RE: Not sure you understood. Posted by: Artkansas
» RE: Nice fantasy Posted by: cab
» RE: Nice fantasy Posted by: estelevistaban
» RE: Nice fantasy Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Another "Yes, but"
Posted by: GPFrank on Apr 5, 2008 5:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is the annual rainfall and how much water is being "mined" and do you hear about all of the water rights disputes?
The problems and catastrophes associated with
trying to build paradise and luxury in arid regions was chronicled and predicted in "A Country In the Mind"
by Stegner and Devoto, (Routledge, NY,2000)
Remember all the homesteaders who couldn't make it
on the 160 acres and the land swindles that followed?
Would not Minnesota or Wisconsin have been more feasible?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: you are too right.... Posted by: boydranchitos
Going Green -- Making Green?
Posted by: taxidriver on Apr 5, 2008 6:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing wrong with going green ... but the goal seems to be to record all his funky adventures with the local flora and fauna, then sell the fantasy to those of us stuck in our respective ruts -- thereby making lots of green. Isn't this just a variation on those "Tuscany" and "Year in Provence" books? More navel-gazing and self-congratulation, with a little self-deprecation thrown in for "humility" and humor? I guess if you like it, buy it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ruts Posted by: Dboy
So who gets to tell the story?
Posted by: hagwind on Apr 5, 2008 6:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any experience that shows affluent urban dwellers that they can't control everything is a step in the right direction, IMO. If Doug Fine is telling everybody to do likewise, he's full of manure. (OTOH, composted manure can help good things grow.) If his example gives lots of people some insight into what they're doing -- great. The worth of a symphony or a painting or book doesn't depend on its ability to make people run out and compose their own symphonies, paint their own paintings, write their own books, or otherwise follow in the creator's footsteps.

We do have a little problem here, and Anneli Rufus seems to have overlooked it. I can't overlook it because I live in a place where many affluent urban people come to get away from their affluent urban lives, and in creating their alternatives they've made it hard-to-impossible for the rest of us to live here. What I can't help noticing is that nearly all the stories about such places are written by the affluent urban people who move in, not by the people who've been there forever (or at least for a long time). There are many reasons for this. One is that even those of us who have stories to tell and the skills to tell them well have a real hard time getting the kind of access to agents and publishers and big-circulation magazines that the Doug Fines have, and when we do get it, we're expected to tell the stories that the agents and publishers and big-circulation magazines think their readers want to read.

Affluent liberal oh-so-well-intentioned readers, from "yuppie farmers" to eco-tourists, don't like to be compared to imperial colonizers -- the ones who arrive in a new place, don't recognize that it's already inhabited by sentient beings, and proceed to make it over into their idea of paradise. So we don't get to tell our side of the story. We do get bit parts as "local color" in other people's stories.

Oh yeah -- and we get to read liberal commentators taking each other's inventory in print. Big fun!

P.S. 41 acres would be a fair-size farm in New England -- the mere idea of clearing 41 acres of rocks every year wears me out. I'm not familiar with the soil and weather conditions in New Mexico. How many acres does it take to sustain X number of sheep and goats and grow Y amount of vegetables? Is a 41-acre farm in New Mexico all that big?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» err....check yer math! dude! Posted by: lexicon
» RE: So who gets to tell the story? Posted by: estelevistaban
» RE: So who gets to tell the story? Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Urban Sprawl Sucks!!!!
Posted by: craigandrew on Apr 5, 2008 6:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We don't need yuppies moving out into rural areas to start an "eco-friendly lifestyle", we need yuppies to stay in the cities and start an eco-friendly lifestyle... and spend their money on social issues and the like.

Rich people moving out of the cities and into the country side to raise lamas is just another example of rich people avoiding the problems they created.

Poor people can't use money to avoid their problems, so why should we get all excited when rich people do it.

OK, rant over... :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Urban Sprawl Sucks!!!! cab Posted by: Basenjis
» RE: Urban Sprawl Sucks!!!! cab Posted by: mwildfire
I Like Bumbling Heroes!
Posted by: PaulK on Apr 5, 2008 6:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your Earth is unhealthy!

Humans then fall into two classes. The first class pays someone else to tell them how rotten and ineffectual they are, then they shrug their shoulders and go off and be ineffectual.

The second class of human does something stupid, and we can all throw tomatoes at their stupidity. Isn't that what life is all about? In general, throwing tomatoes at someone who tried and failed? OK, the guy took his wealth and went off and did something that most of us couldn't afford, and he occasionally got burned. Then he figured out how to do things a bit better. And he has a writer's skills to record his failures and successes.

Do yourself a favor and be this second class of human being.

If you play guitar, try some new lyrics. If you succeed, our world will be a bit more liberated. If you goof up, you'll learn why.

If you build or invent, make some kind of solar energy 1% more cost-efficient.

Take your life in your hands if you can, otherwise at least stick your toe in the water. "Why on Earth are you here? / You're not the little thing of fear" -- John Lennon, "Instant Karma".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You can't run, you can't hide, and retreat is not an option.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 5, 2008 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's the nature of the modern world. You can't go escape to your idyllic in-touch-with-nature retreat - because the whole planetary system is changing, it's warming - and the American Southwest is drying out.

The tough little juniper trees will probably do fine - but not the big soft wet humans who've tried to export their east coast water-rich lifestyles to the middle of the southwestern desert - the freaking Anvil of the Sun - and who are still relying on coal power for most of their electricity.

Smog from coal fills the entire Southwestern region - you can see it in the most remote areas. 90% of New Mexico's electricity is coal-generated - in a state that has among the highest solar power potentials of anywhere in the U.S. Are our "back-to-nature-yuppies" going to try and change that situation?

Or will they simply take what wealth they've managed to accumulate during their baby boomer careers, and head off to some patch of high ground to sip martinis and slowly watch the sun go down?

Oh, it's understandable enough. I think they used to call what Mr. Fine did "dude ranching." Here's a blurb on it from "A History of Dude Ranching":

"Dude ranches got their start in the West in the 1880s not long after the Battle of the Little Big Horn. Many wealthy foreigners made hunting trips and sight seeing excursions to the American West which was home to abundant wild game and provided magnificent unspoiled scenery. A famous early dude was Theodore Roosevelt. After World War I the popularity of dude ranches increased enormously and during the 20s and 30s they were the main tourist attraction in the Rocky Mountain area. Writers like Owen Wister, Zane Grey and Mary O’Hara and painters like Remington and Russell brought the fabulous romance of cowboy life on an open frontier to millions throughout the world. Buffalo Bill’s Wild West Show was an unprecedented success in Europe and the East.

At the same time the industrial revolution was transforming the East Coast, polluting and scarring the countryside and destroying wildlife. It is no wonder that the mystic of the West attracted many talented and sometimes eccentric people who felt hemmed in at home by social constraints and dense populations. Galloping horses, wild Indians, hard riding cowboys, magnificent scenery and, above all, the intoxicating freedom of the frontier captured the imagination of the Western World. In the West a man was judged for his courage, ability and performance; not for his family background.


Hmmmmm... Manifest Destiny, anyone?

As far as the droughts, floods and heatwaves - this is global warming in action, not "a long drought." It's only going to get worse across the American Southwest. People always talk about wanting to "get in touch with Nature" - but when Nature decides to get in touch with you, she won't take no for an answer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Mother Nature Posted by: Cathyc
Beautiful people with beautiful feelings
Posted by: chlamor on Apr 5, 2008 7:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is much pretending throughout the progressive and liberal community.

Success and the good life, credentials and status, position and privilege must be protected, at least for people like "us." At the same time, our position and privilege is dependent upon playing a certain role. We must pretend that we are not defending privilege and position and must pretend that we are for the downtrodden. We must pretend that privilege and position is all earned, and that anyone could have anything that we have. We must defend the system of dog-eat-dog competition

When our bluff is called, there is no amount of time and energy we will spare in internecine warfare arguing fine points of what a liberal is, or what our position should be on each and every minute issue and sub-issue and variations on every issue. These arguments can never be resolved, because there is no basis of consensus. Actually there is a consensus, but an important component of the consensus is that we never talk about it and we must pretend that it isn't there.

The consensus from which liberals-progressives-Democrats operate:

"We are the better people. We are smarter, we are humane, we are more compassionate, we are better informed. We are better citizens, we are more cooperative and realistic. We are winners, not losers, and we deserve everything we get. We are spiritually superior. We are centered and balanced, calm and insightful. We are on the right side of history. We are building a better world.

Most of the problems in the world are the result of stupid people running things. If we smart people were in charge, all of the problems could be solved with science and technology and rational social planning.

Class analysis, and the struggles of working class people against tyranny have no place in modern society. They are obsolete and passe, and only something that we read about or see in movies. Romantic as those stories are, they are no substitute for hard-headed practical reality, whether we like it or not. This is a matter of being a mentally healthy, modern, well-adjusted adult in society. None of the lessons from history apply, because things are different now. Only strange maladjusted people are attracted to obsolete political ideas. They are all obviously losers, and are a great danger, almost as much of a danger as the Republicans are.

Since politics and economics in the traditional sense are dead, we embrace a new paradigm of self improvement and self-actualization. Anything that interferes with our focus on ourselves and our pursuit of creating ourselves as an actualized being is to be rejected. The way to achieve the perfect society is first to create a perfect self. Meanwhile, so long as the authorities do not interfere with our self-actualization, we must comply in all ways with that authority. This allows us perfect self-expression within perfect social conformity. Anyone who attacks our personal choices is the enemy, and anyone who attacks the social system based on personal choice is also the enemy.

Others, however, who do not share our values are not to be given personal choice, when and as we can prove that their personal choices are wrong, often with convoluted claims that their choice impacts us somehow. We support the police state and massive incarceration of people, so long as they are being harassed and imprisoned for the right reasons. Any variance from our idea as to how people should be is the right reason, by definition.

We believe that we must “be the change we wish to see,” and the change we wish to see is more people like us: polite, talented, beautiful, intelligent, calm, successful, clever, enlightened. So we merely need to be ourselves, focus on ourselves, and serve ourselves. Those who cannot or will not become like us need to back down and get out of the way."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Information is Out There
Posted by: Southern Gal on Apr 5, 2008 7:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The October/November 2007 issue of Mother Earth News featured this article -"75 Ways To Live On Less And Love It". There are some practical and easy things that can be implemented by anyone, anywhere. In the process of living for less money there is also the opportunity to go more green.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The only manure here is from the writers
Posted by: Jim Swanson on Apr 5, 2008 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As someone who fell for the "get in touch with nature" movement decades ago I slowly came to realize that rural living has a considerably greater impact on the environment and is usually rooted in an attempt to escape reality: the poor, the homeless, the different. I had never lived in such a narrow minded and bigoted environment before that attempt.
A little reality: urban residents pay the taxes to support rural lifestyles. In some rural areas the residents receive 7 times what they pay in taxes in government benefits. The costs of roads, utilities, deliveries, and on and on are paid for by poor people working in cities (they usually receive less than 70% of what they pay in taxes while most rural residents try to live outside the tax laws, thus paying even less).
The most environmentally friendly lifestyle would be to take the marginal plains lands back to their natural state, limit most rural living to those actually involved in agricultural activities and encourage the majority of us (less than 3% of Americans are involved in agriculture) to live in high density, energy efficient cities. Laws mandating energy efficiency for all buildings, focusing on renewable energy, public transportation and easy walking and bicycle access, hydroponic and other high density food growth within the cities, and more could decrease our footprint. The authors have magnified theirs while creating the illusion that they are somehow holier than the rest of us. Bullshit (actually most bulls are now gone so it should probably be cowshit). They are just trying to escape from the reality of life: Americans come in all colors, sizes, cultures, sexualities, and we must all learn to live together.
I believe I should repeat what I have experienced: the new rurals adopt the racist, sexist, overly religious, and narrow minded behaviors of the indigenous populations and even try to expand the bigotry. Some of the worst schools are in areas with large "return to the earth" populations. Get real.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Cowshit and other crap Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Cowshit and other crap Posted by: Rapunzel
» Gurus and Disciples Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Gurus and Disciples Posted by: Rapunzel
His rules are poorly thought-out
Posted by: janvdb on Apr 5, 2008 7:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rule 1) OK, no problem.
Rule 2) Eat locally. The fuel used to transport food is only one aspect of its ecological cost. Buy organic, OK. Local? Why? Some careful work has been done on that and the results are that it makes no sense to be rigid about distance transported only. What about processing? What about greenhouse heat for sprouting the sets in cold climates? Why refuse the produce of the world's poor farmers? Mexican tomatoes, if organic, are excellent, feed Mexicans and are far better for the environment than locally-grown greenhouse output, for instance.

Rule 3) Now this is really wrong-headed. Biofuels have already lead to food riots from Bangladesh to Senegal. Food prices are shooting up, largely due to the use of food to produce fuel.

Millions will starve due to biofuels.

If you only use only would-have-been-discarded McDonald's grease, sure, that works but there isn't NEARLY enough of it. This is just dumb.

Rule 4) What good is this going to do? Once children have been born, they have to live somewhere. Don't fight "sprawl," fight population growth where it starts -- at conception. Which brings us to what should be his Rule 1 -- have no children or one child. And support international family planning.

Finally, even with all this author's actions, he is doing more damage to the environment living out there in the woods than would be a common city-dweller. I live in rural Colorado and we don't really want a lot of these types moving in here pushing up the price of land, building more housing and encouraging the splitting of the land down into these little tiny 40-acre parcels.

Also, there isn't enough water for everyone to camp out and write books like this guy.

Stay in the city, eat organic and don't have kids. That's my advice.

Jan VanDenBerg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: His rules are poorly thought-out Posted by: boydranchitos
edgeofnowhere
Posted by: edgeofnowhere on Apr 5, 2008 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read "THE LONG EMERGENCY" by James Howard Kunstler. Regardless of where you are in the world, you will soon be making some unpleasant choices regarding your lifestyle. Very interesting book.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Unpleasant choices Posted by: Cathyc
urban refugee
Posted by: rawles on Apr 5, 2008 8:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the effort that matters. Good on ya!

No one person can ever be truly self-sufficient, but one can find creative ways to be more self-dependent when it comes to food, shelter or transportation regardless of where we live.

In today's world we do everything with money, sacrificing ALL our time to earn money to buy things. The modern American paradigm that 'time is money' needs to go. In my mind, the essence of the author's quest is learning how to do more for one's self. How can I become more self-reliant?

Where DOES my food come from? What IS in my water? Why am I worn out from working a job to pay the bills with minimal time to be creative, or simply relax?

Is my lifestyle sustainable?

Real change happens one person at a time, inch by inch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: urban refugee Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: To bad Fine doesn't make an effort. Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: To bad Fine doesn't make an effort. Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» A Sustainable Lifestyle Posted by: pdxstudent
» RE: urban refugee Posted by: cab
» RE: urban refugee Posted by: HillbillyBob
I've seen my share come and go
[