Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Keeping MLK's Green Legacy Alive

By Jeremy Brecher and Tim Costello and Brendan Smith, AlterNet. Posted April 3, 2008.


MLK, Jr. died fighting to make green-collar jobs good jobs. Now, others at Green For All have taken on his work.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Today they'd be called "green-collar jobs" cleaning up the environment. Back then, the workers who performed those jobs were just garbage men. And they were treated like garbage. Martin Luther King, Jr. died fighting to make their green-collar jobs be good jobs.

On the 40th anniversary of King's assassination, the green-collar jobs group Green for All is bringing people from all over the country to Memphis, Tennessee April 4-6 for The Dream Reborn, a celebration of the life of Dr. King -- and a call to create millions of good green-collar jobs as a pathway out of poverty.

The Dream Reborn will "bring together a generation of new leaders who are taking on the chief moral obligation of the 21st century, building a green economy for all."

The gathering will dramatize the message that "today we must respond with the same courage to perhaps the biggest crises our species has ever collectively faced, global warming."

We believe that if Dr. King were with us today, he would be working to build a green economy -- strong enough to lift people out of poverty and restore hope to America. He would be standing with those communities that have been locked out of the last century's pollution-based economy. And he would indeed be working to ensure that ALL our people, the entire beloved community, is included in the emerging clean and renewable economic vision.

As Michael Honey shows in his magisterial new book Going Down Jericho Road: The Memphis Strike, Martin Luther King's Last Campaign (New York: Norton, 2007), by 1967 Dr. King was calling for a "radical reordering of our nation's priorities." He proposed to match civil rights and voting rights laws with laws creating jobs or income. Government redistribution would abolish poverty by providing training for displaced black workers while shoring up their incomes, so that they could become self-sufficient citizens who could work their way out of poverty. The program would stimulate the economy and cut poverty-induced crime, drugs, and imprisonment. The money squandered on the Vietnam war could end poverty in a decade.

Green for All, a new organization created by local green-job organizers around the country and sponsor of The Dream Reborn, brilliantly updates King's vision. Its mission is "to help build a green economy strong enough to lift people out of poverty."

By advocating for a national commitment to job training, employment and entrepreneurial opportunities in the emerging green economy - especially for people from disadvantaged communities -- we fight both poverty and pollution at the same time. We are committed to securing one billion dollars by 2012 to create "green pathways out of poverty" for 250,000 people in the United States, by greatly expanding federal government and private sector commitments to "green-collar" jobs.

Van Jones, an organizer in Oakland, California and one of the initiators of Green for All, says he was getting burned out going to court hearings and funerals for kids in his community. Then, I just had this epiphany in mind and said, you know, these kids in America need green jobs, not jails . . . . We want to lift a quarter million people out of poverty into the green economy by creating green-collared job training, employer incentives and entrepreneur opportunities. As in King's vision, training and good jobs could give disadvantaged young people a "pathway out of poverty."

If you teach a young person how to put up solar panels, that kid is on their way to becoming an electrical engineer. They could join the United Electrical Workers Union. If you teach a kid how to weatherize a building, double-pane the glass so that it doesn't leak so much energy, that kid is on his way to becoming a glazer that can join a union.

The green-jobs vision is working its way into the political mainstream. At the end of 2007, Congress passed and President Bush signed the Green Jobs Act that provides $125 million for workforce training programs that target veterans, displaced workers, at-risk youth and individual families who fall 200 percent under the poverty line. Democratic candidates Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama have both called for the creation of millions of green-collar jobs to combat global warming. Even Republican John McCain says he is willing to invest in research and development of green technology, calling it the "path to restore the strength of America's economy."

Martin Luther King understood that good jobs in the service of community needs could be the basis for ending poverty and creating equality for America's poor and oppressed. As he arrived in Memphis to support the sanitation workers' strike, King asserted that the person who picks up garbage is as essential to the health of society as the physician, and that the city's sanitation workers "work day in and day out for the well-being of the total community." As we face the global catastrophe of global warming, nothing could do more for the "well-being of the total community" that creating a path out of poverty through jobs that protect the well-being of the total planet.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: environment, martin luther king, mlk, green jobs, green collar jobs

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Couple of issues...
Posted by: warreno on Apr 3, 2008 3:12 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Attempting to adopt Dr. King's protection of wages for certain classes of jobs as "protecting green-collar employment" is a stretch, to say the least. I doubt he was anywhere near as concerned with ecology as he was about the livelihood of the people doing those jobs.

2. Who let the contraction 'MKL' past? In future, perhaps spelling the full name of your subject will reduce confusion, and be implicitly more respectful of that subject.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Didn't MLK call for bringing hemp back into the market?
Posted by: maxpayne on Apr 4, 2008 8:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Never mind. The FBI would have killed him for that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

King advocated a "citizens' dividend"
Posted by: Geonomist on Apr 4, 2008 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bolder than his present-day admirers, MLK promoted an extra income for all from the surplus in society's economy, now finding its way into very few pockets. Those lucky elite don't work to earn it. The fact that reformers see people as entitled to income only by working shows such lack of self-esteem that it fails to inspire, it presents people as "work objects" perfect for exploiting. So, if you want higher wages, shift the leverage to negotiate them by sharing our society's surplus equitably; with that income floor, better wages and jobs follow automatically.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah, it's a problem in the renewable energy industry, actually.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 4, 2008 11:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem is still low wages. Entry level solar installers get perhaps $10-$15 an hour in California. With current prices and rents, that's permanent subsistence-level existence.

It's an across-the-board problem in the U.S., and is largely a result of the labor-export practices written into the law under NAFTA and other free trade agreements. This is not new:

Growing class inequality and stagnant wages are by design not accident, say six UC Berkeley sociologists in a combined analysis, 1996

"Hout said the link between wages and economic growth, which rose together from the turn of the century, was broken in the mid 1970s.

As graphic evidence of this change, the UC Berkeley group points to new data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics which shows that compared to earlier years, workers' wages have not kept pace with increases in productivity since 1974. Instead, the gains in productivity -- which has continued to climb upwards for 40 years -- have all been taken in the past twenty years by corporate officers and stockholders, say the authors.

The UC Berkeley group cites evidence that, in 1974, American chief executive officers made $35 for every worker's dollar. American CEOs now make over $200 for every worker's dollar, a 500 percent increase in twenty years. By comparison, the ratio of CEO-to-worker compensation in Germany is DM21 to 1.

Also, between 1974 and today, the Dow Jones Industrial Average has more than tripled, from 1500 to more than 5500. By contrast, the average working wage has remained static and blue-collar wages have actually declined, the sociologists show.

As another example of inequality by design, the sociologists point out that American CEO's, who receive stock options, have a direct stake in what happens to shares on the stock market. By contrast, in Japan, top corporate officials cannot own stock in their own company and therefore have no personal incentive for driving up its price.

"We choose to make these rules," said Claude Fischer, one of the six authors who wrote the book's final draft. "To assume they are natural and can't be changed is silly."


This will apply just as much to the renewable energy industry as to any other industry. Government has a responsibility to regulate business and labor in order to ensure a level playing field for competitive free enterprise.

This means providing a basic level of health care for all U.S. citizens, and not forcing business to bear those costs. It also means changing rules about corporate ownership - such as doing away with holding companies entirely, as well as with the legal fiction of "corporate personhood".

For example, image a mid-size renewable energy corporation of several hundred employees, in which the employees were the only ones allowed to vote for their corporate board: the CEO, the CFO, etc. Shareholders could invest as truly silent partners, but would have no say over management decisions. Radical? It's an entirely democratic notion, loyal to basic free market principles, isn't it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]