Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Republican War on Voting

By Art Levine, The American Prospect. Posted April 4, 2008.


The Republican Party is trying to suppress low-income minority votes by propagating the myth of voter fraud.
Advertisement

One week before the close of voter registration in Kentucky last fall, in an election that culminated with the victory of Democratic gubernatorial candidate Steve Beshear, Johanna Sharrard, a fresh-faced 26-year-old national organizer for the low-income advocacy group ACORN, gathered her canvassers in a run-down Louisville office and told them some good news: "We got 396 people yesterday -- that's really great!" Then she added what could have seemed a jarringly discordant note: "We know it's getting harder to reach people with the cards in this area. It's really important that you guys are not slipping up and turning to filling out your own applications or other fraudulent activity. Just yesterday we had to let another person go because she did not follow protocols." Sharrard continued sternly, "What's important is that we get 15,000 new voters. We're not out there to get 10,000 new voters and 5,000 false applications."

Indeed, the voter registration waged by ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) in Kentucky was also an effort to test the group's new system for rooting out any fraud. The organization is readying itself for the challenges to voter participation that the poor and minorities -- and Democrats -- are sure to face in 2008.

Sharrard's cautionary tone was a response to the Republican Party's ongoing nationwide campaign to suppress the low-income minority vote by propagating the myth of voter fraud. Using various tactics -- including media smears, bogus lawsuits, restrictive new voting laws and policies, and flimsy prosecutions -- Republican operatives, election officials, and the GOP-controlled Justice Department have limited voting access and gone after voter-registration groups such as ACORN. Which should come as no surprise: In building support for initiatives raising the minimum wage and kindred ballot measures, ACORN has registered, in partnership with Project Vote, 1.6 million largely Democratic-leaning voters since 2004. All told, non-profit groups registered over three million new voters in 2004, about the same time that Republican and Justice Department efforts to publicize voter fraud and limit voting access became more widespread. And attacking ACORN has been a central element of a systematic GOP disenfranchisement agenda to undermine Democratic prospects before each Election Day.

Revelations that U.S. attorneys were fired for their failure to successfully prosecute voter fraud have revealed how fictitious the allegations of widespread fraud actually were -- but the allegations haven't gone away. They live on in all the vote-suppressing laws and regulations that will likely affect this year's election, in GOP rhetoric and, most recently, in the arguments presented by champions of Indiana's restrictive voter-identification law in a case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Unfortunately, progressives have tended to pay more attention to Election Day dirty tricks and to electronic voting machines than to a more systemic threat: the Republican campaign to suppress the votes of low-income, young, and minority voters through restrictive legislation and rulings, all based on the mythic specter of voter fraud. Those relatively transient voters, drawn to the polls this year by the Obama and Clinton campaigns, could find themselves thwarted in November and thereafter by the GOP-driven regime of voting restrictions -- particularly if, as many observers believe, the Court upholds Indiana's restrictive law before it adjourns this June.

Voter fraud is actually less likely to occur than lightning striking a person, according to data compiled by New York University's Brennan Center for Justice. As Lorraine Minnite, a Columbia University professor, observed in the Project Vote report, The Politics of Voter Fraud, "The claim that voter fraud threatens the integrity of American elections is itself a fraud." In October 2002, then-Attorney General John Ashcroft launched an intensive "Ballot Access and Voting Integrity Initiative" that required all U.S. attorney offices to coordinate with local officials in combating voter fraud. Yet even after the Justice Department declared the war against voter fraud a "high priority," only 24 people were convicted of illegal voting in federal elections between 2002 and 2005 -- and nobody was even charged by Justice with impersonating another voter. (The Justice Department declined to answer questions about more recent fraud prosecutions.) And despite the anti-immigrant frenzy fueling photo-ID laws, only 14 noncitizens were convicted of illegally voting in federal elections from 2002 through 2005 -- mostly because of their ignorance of election law.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: republicans, voter fraud, election 2008, vote suppression

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Apr 4, 2008 2:07 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pursue the Bush administration beyond January 20 until they are brought to justice.


Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Discussion Posted by: chuckjs
Thank You
Posted by: chuckjs on Apr 4, 2008 2:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For finally posting a story that covered a real issue! And thank you for pointing out corruption within your government rather than talk about useless "Sex Scandal's"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fraud
Posted by: Tom Degan on Apr 4, 2008 3:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it a coincidence that in 2000 and 2004, for the first time since modern polling began, the election results did not conform with the exit polls in certain states?

And now these computorized Die Bolt - or whatever the hell they're called - are installed in enough swing states to steal the next election. Keep a wary eye on the polls and the results in November. The chances of something like that happening again are so astronomical, it would take a firm like Loyd's of London to even calculate the odds. If something like that does indeed happen again, here's something you can take to the bank: The proverbial substance is going to hit the fan.

When the results are tabulated on election night next November, if it is obvious that the election was stolen, we should stop funding this government. Hoe does the idea of a national tax strike sound to you? Sounds pretty good to me!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
Thom Hartmann

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fraud Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Fraud Posted by: willymack
» RE: fraud - TAX STRIKE YES Posted by: Striker
Ron Paul
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Apr 4, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The way the republican party reacted to Ron Paul is another example of how republicans declare war on voting. How did they respond to an opportunity to grow their party? By closing down their primaries and pushing up registration deadlines. The chairman of the MI republican party tried to have Ron Paul excluded from the debates.

And now they've nominated some old koot who, judging by that poll released today, really only has the support of 19% of americans. The other 81% believes the country is on the wrong track. McCain supports this current wrong track. (Of course, so do the democrats. But the democrats might at least slow the currency devaluation.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: on Paul Posted by: redbridge
» RE: on Paul Posted by: Joe
Great piece! More people need to know about this.
Posted by: Ambercat on Apr 4, 2008 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Ohio's Republican legislature pushed through its ID law two years ago, it mounted the soap box of "voter" fraud, of course, intending the public to mistakenly conflate that with the widespread ELECTION fraud we endured in 2004. The Ohio League of Women Voters found only 4 (FOUR) verifiable cases of "voter" fraud in the entire state in the 2002 and 2004 elections combined. In the first ID election, 2006, our then-Secretary of State, Ken Blackwell (thankfully the election where he was voted out of public office, losing the governorship by 24% points), typically declined to issue clear directives on aceptable ID in order to create maximum confusion and was taken to court by Democrats over it.
Working in an almost all-black polling place on Cleveland's east side, I found virtually no one who did not have ID but a lot of angry, grumbling people felt they were being demeaned and insulted by being asked for ID when they had been voting for 20, 30, 40 years without it. Many older folk were griping about the civil rights workers who died for their right to vote and this modern-day attempt at disenfranchisement.

Luckily we now have a SoS who has been clear, and as broad as possible under the statute, in defining acceptable ID. But it was still a problem in search of a solution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Turn it back on them
Posted by: aonghus36 on Apr 4, 2008 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Talk about voter fraud! With all these rigable voting machines, the chage of fraud should be turned back on the repubs along with the more traditional charge of voter fraud. Don't the Repubs have a way of accusing Dems of the very things they(the Repubs) are doing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not just Republicans...
Posted by: carcinoid112 on Apr 4, 2008 6:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ask the precinct delegates to last Saturday's caucuses in Dallas, Texas.

In order to not sully a reputation already fairly sullied, one candidate 'requested' that lawyers be there to challenge possible supporters of another candidate. How?? By racial profiling.

This obnoxious behavior, and trying to screw with a system that the particular candidate has been unsuccessful in negating by lawsuit, kept people in their caucus locations until well after midnight, something TOTALLY unneeded, except to assuage the greed and manipulativeness of that candidate.

Texas WILL have some suggestions soon on how to handle frivolous and excessive challenges.

More's the shame for us ALL when there's such dishonor among our own that we've got to be prepared for behavior that would have disgusted us 40 years ago, and now gets a "So? That's politics."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not just Republicans... Posted by: Quannah
So, is it as bad f the Democrats do it?
Posted by: MikeOckhurtz on Apr 4, 2008 7:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats had ways of stuffing the ballot box. Instead of repressing the vote they would add to the totals. Is there a difference to what the Rovians do? It's all cheating. We probably have never had a truly fair election for President in this country since the first one. Voting for a president is a crock of crap anyway. Hundreds of millions of dollars are pedaled around and no one knows where it goes, or who gets it. It's a big scam and the outcome is going to be the same no matter who wins. We are told who will win based on how much money they get. Not based on if they are saying anything important. it a big scam.

The next president will be:
1. A puppet to the Israel Lobby
2. A puppet to corporate lobbyists
3. A millionaire who's background contains sleazy deals and
corruption
4. a puppet to the Military Industrial Complex
5. Unable to change the course of our do-called Democracy from slipping away from the founding framers of the constitutions intent of have three branches of government - checks and balances - (and one day when you to try to protest at a government event, you will be corralled behind barbed wire prison yards and told that is your free speech zone - use it as you wish but when you leave it you are no longer free.)
America is done, put a fork in it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Republican Anti-Vote Movement
Posted by: sunlakedude on Apr 4, 2008 9:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Republicans are amongst themselves and they can talk freely and say things they normally wouldn't in "mixed company", they will admit that they believe that only white, land-owning males should vote. This is the way it was when our country was founded. Back then women couldn't vote, blacks couldn't vote and native Americans couldn't vote. Only the white, landed male gentry could vote. And they think that is how it should still be today more than 225 years later. They will allow a woman to vote, if she votes the way they want her to but that's about it. So everything they are doing now including the trumped up "voter fraud" movement is to that end. And they won't stop until they get it. This archaic world-view is rampant throughout the G.O.P. Is there any wonder we're teetering on the brink of collapse?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Agree, Do Something, Support the Green Party
Posted by: Andie927 on Apr 4, 2008 9:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The ONLY Party that doesn't acept Corporate donations! Has a real Party Platform tha t Every candidate agrees to!
The support, Public Campaign Financing, Instant Run-Off Elections, Single-Payer healthCARE, Reduced Military Industrial Complex!

It's a Party that's Truely 'By the People, For the People'; Corporations NOT Welcome! And their Growing all the time!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Going to see, Massive Caging!
Posted by: Andie927 on Apr 4, 2008 10:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democrats, have absolute proof, that the Republican Party (Rove) in 2000 and 2004!

The Republican Party is already under a Court Order, to NOT Cage, because they were caught doing back in the 80's!

No one held their feet to the fire, and therefore it will get worse! What is it? The Republican State Voter Registra, (or party) send out letters, that look very official, with 'Do Not Forward' stamped on them! they send them to voters, they know aren't at their residence during certain times of the year! College Communities, are deserted, three months out of the year! Military get sent on Deployments, or menuvers, on a scheduled basis. Seniors, that are Snow Birds.

Once the letter comes back, they got ya!You go to vote, your registration is questioned, your given a provisional ballot, and their never counted!

And who are Obama's biggest group of supporters?? Just warning you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

myth of voter fraud?
Posted by: e rice on Apr 4, 2008 10:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
does that include the inaccurate computer program jeb bush used to deny the votes to american citizens whose names were similar to or exactly the same as other americans who were in jail? myth?

the county--wasn't in ohio?-that registered four times more votes for bush than there were registered voters in the county? myth?

the responses of the computerized machines in florida in '04, reported by voters to register a voter's first two votes for kerry as votes for bush? myth?

i'm so disappointed. i had hoped bush ended up in the white house because of dishonesty, not because americans actually voted for him.

as for ID, i always carry my voter registration card and driver's license. i have no problem showing them. i've been registered so long i can't remember what ID i had to show in order to be registered. since voting is restricted to citizens over a certain age, why is simply demanding ID a problem? is the assumption that, merely because one is poor, one is undocumented or too irresponsible to carry ID?

there is a major problem with voter fraud in this country, but this article does little to address the most serious aspects of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: myth of voter fraud? Posted by: Quannah
» RE: myth of voter fraud? Posted by: e rice
» RE: myth of voter fraud? Posted by: Quannah
Republicans will do anything to win elections, including lying about their candidates
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 4, 2008 10:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In February 2004 while surfing the Internet for information about George W.'s AWOL Guard service, I found a falsified biography of his that had been inadvertently published on a U.S. State Department website.

Brazenly, the fabricated White House document claimed Bush had flown F102 interceptors almost SIX years when the actual time was 27 months, according to official ANG records.

Suspecting an aborted GOP scheme to deceive voters in 2000 by covering up Bush's REAL military record, I called the Boston Globe. Impressed, it reported my discovery the next morning (02/28/04) under the headline, “Bush Bio on Web Inflates Guard Service,” and gave me credit as the source.

Reacting to the disclosure, the Bush administration refused to say who wrote the false ANG history and how it ended up on the Internet. Instead, White House communications director Dan Bartlett, who later became Bush's legal counsel, explained lamely that the State Department bio did not "reflect the facts of his service" and would be "corrected."

Bartlett’s response is typical of the GOP's arrogant attitude toward democratic elections: Win anyway Republicans can, including lying about their candidates, and if the they get caught, so what?

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican, ARDENT Obama supporter, and author of George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT, published in 2004.

To read a sample chapter and learn about the only smoking-gun proof of White House corruption (bogus Bush bio) ever found on the Web, visit www.PhonyFighterPilot.com.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fraud? Republicans?
Posted by: willymack on Apr 4, 2008 11:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The two go hand in hand. They are synonimous. In the old Soviet Union, those rats had a bad habit of accusing others of being or doing exactly what they were doing themselves. The rethugs are experts on fraud, having illegally and fraudulently foisted the Texas turd on us, TWICE, and gotten us into a disasterous, brutal "war" in Iraq and "war" on terror, all based on FRAUD and dirty lies. Stalin would've been green with envy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Vote caging" according to Greg Palast will be the issue in 2008.
Posted by: joeunix on Apr 4, 2008 1:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I first heard the term "vote caging" my reaction was, "What the Hell is 'vote caging'?"

Vote caging is an illegal trick to suppress minority voters by having them knocked off the voter rolls if they fail to answer registered mail sent to homes they aren't living at because they are, for example, at college or in Iraq.

Greg Palast started reporting on Republican vote caging for the BBC in 2004. He's been almost alone on the story since that time.

Greg Palast uncovered evidence linking Tim Griffin, former research director for the RNC, to this caging plot. To be specific, a series of confidential e-mails to Republican Party insiders with the name "RE: caging." The e-mails were accidentally sent to an anti-George Bush site. They also contained multiple spreadsheets, headed "caging", as well.

Tim Griffin, refused to speak to Palast about the "Caging lists".

Part 1- PBS Caging Story.

Part 2- PBS Caging Story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ISN'T JUST MORE FUN THAN YOU CAN HANDLE....THE 67% PRODUCTIVITY INCREASE
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Apr 4, 2008 11:17 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
created by working Americans went to a tiny wealthy minority. They now use this money to lie, cheat, and steal even more. If they can't lie to you fast enough to keep you dazzled and confused, they will steal the elections.

They pay Rush Limbaugh 20 million a year to deliver the message they want delivered. I occasionally ask the morning coffee drinkers what kind of a lie they would tell for 20 million. They assure me that they would tell a good one. Some even admited that they had been known to tell lies for free. If Rush were to turn his politics inside he would be gone and it wouldn't have anything to do with his listeners.

The Heritage foundation gets 200 million a year to hire the best liars to invent the current republican 'talking points'. More lies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]