Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rapists in the Ranks

By Jane Harman , Los Angeles Times. Posted April 2, 2008.


Women in the U.S. military are more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than killed by enemy fire. When will Congress and the DOD take notice?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Jane Harman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The stories are shocking in their simplicity and brutality: A female military recruit is pinned down at knifepoint and raped repeatedly in her own barracks. Her attackers hid their faces but she identified them by their uniforms; they were her fellow soldiers. During a routine gynecological exam, a female soldier is attacked and raped by her military physician. Yet another young soldier, still adapting to life in a war zone, is raped by her commanding officer. Afraid for her standing in her unit, she feels she has nowhere to turn.

These are true stories, and, sadly, not isolated incidents. Women serving in the U.S. military are more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than killed by enemy fire in Iraq.

The scope of the problem was brought into acute focus for me during a visit to the West Los Angeles VA Healthcare Center, where I met with female veterans and their doctors. My jaw dropped when the doctors told me that 41% of female veterans seen at the clinic say they were victims of sexual assault while in the military, and 29% report being raped during their military service. They spoke of their continued terror, feelings of helplessness and the downward spirals many of their lives have since taken.

Numbers reported by the Department of Defense show a sickening pattern. In 2006, 2,947 sexual assaults were reported -- 73% more than in 2004. The DOD's newest report, released this month, indicates that 2,688 reports were made in 2007, but a recent shift from calendar-year reporting to fiscal-year reporting makes comparisons with data from previous years much more difficult.

The Defense Department has made some efforts to manage this epidemic -- most notably in 2005, after the media received anonymous e-mail messages about sexual assaults at the Air Force Academy. The media scrutiny and congressional attention that followed led the DOD to create the Sexual Assault and Response Office. Since its inception, the office has initiated education and training programs, which have improved the reporting of cases of rapes and other sexual assaults. But more must be done to prevent attacks and to increase accountability.

At the heart of this crisis is an apparent inability or unwillingness to prosecute rapists in the ranks. According to DOD statistics, only 181 out of 2,212 subjects investigated for sexual assault in 2007, including 1,259 reports of rape, were referred to courts-martial, the equivalent of a criminal prosecution in the military. Another 218 were handled via nonpunitive administrative action or discharge, and 201 subjects were disciplined through "nonjudicial punishment," which means they may have been confined to quarters, assigned extra duty or received a similar slap on the wrist. In nearly half of the cases investigated, the chain of command took no action; more than a third of the time, that was because of "insufficient evidence."

This is in stark contrast to the civilian trend of prosecuting sexual assault. In California, for example, 44% of reported rapes result in arrests, and 64% of those who are arrested are prosecuted, according to the California Department of Justice.

The DOD must close this gap and remove the obstacles to effective investigation and prosecution. Failure to do so produces two harmful consequences: It deters victims from reporting, and it fails to deter offenders. The absence of rigorous prosecution perpetuates a culture tolerant of sexual assault -- an attitude that says "boys will be boys."

I have raised the issue with Defense Secretary Robert Gates. Although I believe that he is concerned, thus far, the military's response has been underwhelming -- and the apparent lack of urgency is inexcusable.

Congress is not doing much better. Although these sexual assault statistics are readily available, our oversight has failed to come to grips with the magnitude of the crisis. The abhorrent and graphic nature of the reports may make people uncomfortable, but that is no excuse for inaction. Congressional hearings are urgently needed to highlight the failure of existing policies. Most of our servicewomen and men are patriotic, courageous and hardworking people who embody the best of what it means to be an American. The failure to address military sexual assault runs counter to those ideals and shames us all.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: rape, iraq war, military, department of defense

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Always happened - always blown off
Posted by: DivaDeb on Apr 2, 2008 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our company in Germany back in 1987 had a huge party - they provided the beer - and I was not used to that much beer, it was hot, etc. I was date-raped, in essence. No violence, no real force, just had sex with me while I was passed out.

He felt bad and confessed to the commander and first sergeant, who then talked to my boss, who was my best friend, and SHE talked me out of doing anything about it. I felt so betrayed, but she told me it was no big deal, to suck it up.

Something like this screws you up forever. When everyone you trust and look to for protection betrays you, that screws you up for life. No matter how much you want to "get over it" and get on with your life, it doesn't seem to go away.

Even the Veterans Administration local office blew me off, after I started a disability claim back in 1996. I still haven't completed paperwork. I have not been able to keep jobs, I don't work well with men because I feel intimidated, and I don't trust ANYONE to help me or take care of me. I am having anxiety writing this.

This is WIDESREAD and has been.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Even more disgusting is its implications
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Apr 2, 2008 5:16 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If american soldiers are willing to treat their own countrywomen in this way, imagine what they are willing to do to Iraqi women. Or Afghani women. Or El Salvadoran women. Or Panamanian women. Or their families. Or even their puppies...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No need to imagine.. Posted by: ankhet
Something I read on Baghdad Burning that stuck in my head...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 2, 2008 6:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tales from Abu Ghraib...March 2004

Here you go:

"Umm Hassen had been telling the story up until that moment, M. was only nodding her head in agreement and listening raptly, like it was someone else's story. She continued it from there… M. and her mother were taken to the airport for interrogation. M. remembers being in a room, with a bag over her head and bright lights above. She claimed she could see the shapes of figures through the little holes in the bag. She was made to sit on her knees, in the interrogation room while her mother was kicked and beaten to the ground.

M.'s hands trembled as she held the cup of tea Umm Hassen had given her. Her face was very pale as she said, "I heard my mother begging them to please let me go and not hurt me… she told them she'd do anything- say anything- if they just let me go." After a couple hours of general abuse, the mother and daughter were divided, each one thrown into a seperate room for questioning. M. was questioned about everything concerning their family life- who came to visit them, who they were related to and when and under what circumstances her father had died. Hours later, the mother and daughter were taken to the infamous Abu Ghraib prison- home to thousands of criminals and innocents alike.

In Abu Ghraib, they were seperated and M. suspected that her mother was taken to another prison outside of Baghdad. A couple of terrible months later- after witnessing several beatings and the rape of a male prisoner by one of the jailors- in mid-January, M. was suddenly set free and taken to her uncle's home where she found her youngest brother waiting for her. Her uncle, through some lawyers and contacts, had managed to extract M. and her 15-year-old brother from two different prisons. M. also learned that her mother was still in Abu Ghraib but they weren't sure about her three brothers.

M. and her uncle later learned that a certain neighbor had made the false accusation against her family. The neighbor's 20-year-old son was still bitter over a fight he had several years ago with one of M.'s brothers. All he had to do was contact a certain translator who worked for the troops and give M.'s address. It was that easy.

Abu Hassen was contacted by M. and her uncle because he was an old family friend and was willing to do the work free of charge. They have been trying to get her brothers and mother out ever since. I was enraged- why don't they contact the press? Why don't they contact the Red Cross?! What were they waiting for?! She shook her head sadly and said that they *had* contacted the Red Cross but they were just one case in thousands upon thousands- it would take forever to get to them. As for the press- was I crazy? How could she contact the press and risk the wrath of the American authorities while her mother and brothers were still imprisoned?! There were prisoners who had already gotten up to 15 years of prison for 'acting against the coallition'... she couldn't risk that. They would just have to be patient and do a lot of praying.

By the end of her tale, M. was crying silently and my mother and Umm Hassen were hastily wiping away tears. All I could do was repeat, "I'm so sorry... I'm really sorry..." and a lot of other useless words. She shook her head and waved away my words of sympathy, "It's ok- really- I'm one of the lucky ones... all they did was beat me."

Rumsfeld, Bush and Cheney gave the orders, Miller and Abizaid carried them out, and Gonzales and Yoo provided a legal justification... they all belong in prison.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When will Congress and the DOD take notice?
Posted by: ankhet on Apr 2, 2008 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They won't. They're fine with it. It's part of the deal. The military uses misogynist language as part of their training - what do you expect?

A cousin of mine is still waiting for the miltary authorities to deal with an attempted rape - 40 years ago. (She was peacefully sleeping in her own bed when he, drunk, broke in through a window - boy, was she asking for it!

That'll teach those b*tches to horn in on male territory, eh? Hehehheh, nudge, wink.

I'll never understand why women even want to be in the military, especially in combat roles. It's such a hostile environment to them. I can see them in emergency response forces, where they're helping people after disasters, not in the battle scenario. But that doesn't make them fair game for their buddies. Would I help a fellow soldier who had attacked me and was now in trouble? Not a chance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just a minor correction
Posted by: rickiey on Apr 2, 2008 7:47 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and 201 subjects were disciplined through "nonjudicial punishment," which means they may have been confined to quarters, assigned extra duty or received a similar slap on the wrist

NJP is not a slap on the wrist. NJP is the military equivalent of the defendant pleading guilty, giving up the right to a lawyer or jury trial, and accepting whatever sentence the judge hands out. While the examples of punishments handed out are accurate with respect to the majority of NJP's, that is because the majority of NJP's are very minor violations (speeding tickent equivalents).

When the NJP is for a rape, or equivalent crime, those examples listed above are NOT representative. Just because the punishmente was assigned via NJP, does not mean it wasn't significant. A common one is bread and water in the brig for an amount of time comparative to an equivalent civilian sentence. And a civilian prison is a day at the health spa compared to a brig.

Just some facts from former military.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» prove it Posted by: e rice
» RE: prove it Posted by: rickiey
» my apologies Posted by: e rice
» Correct the correction Posted by: Axiom69
» RE: Correct the correction Posted by: e rice
» RE: Correct the correction Posted by: Axiom69
» thank you for the response Posted by: e rice
Rape is Recruitment Tool
Posted by: vkobaya on Apr 2, 2008 7:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the generals stated that women in the military were considered a morale tool. He was essentially admitting that rape is going to be overlooked and ignored because it is good for the morale of the male soldiers. Reverend Wright said it best. Goddamn America!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ape is Recruitment Tool Posted by: vkobaya
let's compare
Posted by: e rice on Apr 2, 2008 8:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the number of rapes in the israeli military, or the british military, to the number in the american military.

then let's compare the punishments.

part of the problem is with the appalling standards of male identity in this country. of course women and gay men are hated--and feared--in the military. if women and gay men can prove they can kill the enemy as well or even better than the he-man heterosexual, how will the he-man ever 'prove' his masculinity?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gee Ms Harmen, you supported the FUCKING wars for oil !!
Posted by: maxpayne on Apr 2, 2008 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course you should expect this kind of shit for all the wars for oil that the US happily produces !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

With so much testosterone...
Posted by: VickyinSD on Apr 2, 2008 8:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in the "Military Machine", it's no wonder that women are treated the way they are.

They are, and always have been, treated as second class citizens in a mostly male community, who's members are heavily trained in violence and aggression.

It's a sad statement about how screwed up the mentality of our armed forces really is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The buck stops at the top.
Posted by: thekidde on Apr 2, 2008 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a former infantry officer (RVN), this kind of story sends my 63-year-old blood pressure through the roof. The senior officers and NCOs involved in this should be stripped of rank and sentenced to long prison terms. The actual perpetrators should be shot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

American vs. Other Military
Posted by: goldengrain on Apr 2, 2008 10:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is only a theory, but I think our fighting guys may be being drugged by the armed forces to fight harder, to be more vicious. Perhaps, if this were so, it would increase testosterone and also make them more sexually ugly.

It would explain why other nations do not have this problem. It would also explain why we did not want women in the military, and why, when they are raped, the chain of command are instructed to blow it all off.

In 'killed by friendly fire' incidents, are the US service people more guilty of this than other nations? The Brits do not mix their troops with ours, nor do they allow us to command them. They like to have details away from the US positions. I am told this is because too many of their guys have been killed by accident by our guys.

It is hard for me to believe that our troops are any more primitive, brutal, cruel, and stupid than those of other countries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rape in the Military
Posted by: donl51 on Apr 2, 2008 10:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gee!!! I' wonder why!!need I spell it out? we have rape in our prisons man on man, generally speaking rape is not about sex but about power so the Phyc's claim, I say it's a little of each!, now w/young people, it's generally lust, out in the middle of no-fuck where, horny! give me a break, if it can happen it will happen, ww1-2 korea,vietnam to name a few there were no females in a position of warring! in vietnam, I'd heard of one or two rapes, never really looked into it, Israel has women in the identical warring position as men, you don't hear about it but women in their Mil. get raped too!...to me it's the DUH! factor, you wish it to cease create an army of cyborgs, I do believe our geeks out at area 51 are working on this anyway. Rape anywhere is bad news .....anywhere! to anyone! for any reason is unacceptical, but don't wonder why it happens in the milatary ,your ignorance shows!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Boy, have things changed
Posted by: willymack on Apr 2, 2008 12:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since I was in the Navy (12/56 to 04/78). At that time female Navy members (WAVES) were a very small minority and NEVER served aboard ships or in combat zones. One night, a buddy of mine and I had a couple (or eleven) beers at the service club, and thought it'd be a good idea to grace the girls at the WAVE barracks with our charming presence. We proceeded to make so much noise chasing the ladies through the barracks that the Master-at-Arms woke up and called Security. At No time did any form of assualt ever enter our minds, and the women were having as much fun as us. We spent the night in a cell and went to Captain's Mast a few days later. (Commanding Officer's Non-Judicial Punishment-Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice). We were lucky to not have thrown into the brig. If memory serves me right the Captain had a hard time keeping a straight face throughout the proceedings, and we undoubtedly got a good report from the Master-at-Arms. I think that the Iraq tragedy has caused recruiters to have to scrape the bottom of the dumpster for warm bodies dumb enough to join the Army, and that NO man with any moral substance to his character would dream of hurting a woman.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I proudly served, and now you know why I don't want my daughters to serve
Posted by: dave.macgeek on Apr 2, 2008 12:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I proudly served in the Army. I was in an MI unit with lots of women. At one point, the first three people in my chain of command were all women. There were no reports of rape or sexual assault, but then our unit had a lot of college grads paying off their student loans, and the best and brightest (it being an MI unit and all).

There is no way in hell I would encourage my daughters to serve, and I have explained to them exactly why I DON'T want them to server, that being the rapes and sexual abuse that get ignored and unpunished.

Very sad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» SAD? Posted by: e rice
There is an other side to this story.
Posted by: Rustman on Apr 2, 2008 3:19 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an Infantryman in the Army, my view is that the simple fact of the matter is that the large majority of women in the military are not soldiers. They may wear a uniform...even passed basic training..but they are not soldiers. They are chicks who like to dress like soldiers. They expect special treatment for being female (and often get it), have lower standards, have almost no respect for military courtesy and discipline, payslipservice to equality and then cry foul when they get treated the same as their male co-workers, and all to often, their advance in paygrade is tied not to their job performance, but who they are sleeping with. Men don't take them seriously because they don't take the job, the standards of military culture, thier fellow servicepeople, or themselves seriously. I have no doubts that there are legitimate cases of rape and assault within the military, but since the military became coed, fraternization has gone rampant and it is very hard...very hard....to be able to distinguish the legitimate cases from the ones where a female is screaming sour grapes because she tried to trade sex for rank and lost out on the deal...particularly if the "victim" already has a reputation of sleeping around to get things she wants. That is why so many cases get dropped because of lack of evidence. I'm not saying that women shouldn't be in the military or that all of them are bad soldiers. On the contrary, I've met some that are excellent soldiers. I served with one in NCO Academy that beat me by one point for class distinguished honor graduate. I have nothing but the highest respect for her as a person, as a soldier, and as a Non-Commissioned Officer. She took the job seriously, was good at it, expected to be held to the same standards of conduct and performance as her male colleagues, and had enough self respect to not sleep with her colleagues (had even more contempt for her fellow female co-workers who slept-around than the men in her unit did). I couldn't have been beat by a better soldier for that honor..we all felt that way. Her career was built entirely on merit, as it should be. It's too bad that women like that in the military are too few and far between.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It will remain SOP until units are segregated by sex
Posted by: billwald on Apr 2, 2008 5:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Didn't happen very often when the military was segregated by sex. You pays your money and makes your choice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

While military rapists run free 6 year children get punished
Posted by: PakiBoy on Apr 3, 2008 10:49 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From WashPost today, they story of a 6 year old boy with a permanent record of sexual harassment on his school report!

what a fucking country!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

myrak
Posted by: myra on Apr 4, 2008 12:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lance Cpl Maria Lauterbach and her unborn 9-month old child in the womb were murdered by the Marine she accused of rape; then their bodies were burned in a fire pit in Cpl Cesar Laurean's backyard. This death pyre was later the site of Cpl Cesar Laurean holding a Christmas celebration.

The U S Marine Corps Camp Lejeune JAGs said that LCPL Maria Lauterbach was not afraid of Laurean. However, Lauterbach had gotten one protective order and had requested a second one. The JAGs lied on National TV. The Camp Lejenue Marine JAGs said they didn't think Cpl Cesar Laurean was a danger and they did not consider him a ''flight risk.'' THEY WERE WRONG !! DEAD WRONG !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

check the numbers
Posted by: raywigton on Apr 4, 2008 9:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2,212 sexual assaults including 1259 rape cases resulting in 181 court martial 218 administrative actions and 201 non-judicial punishments. That's 600 punished in some way and as I‘ve seen this number before, I can say it was an estimate.

Now take California numbers by comparison. 44% arrested and 64 % of those were prosecuted. That's about 622 from the same starting number of cases. Not much different. How many resulted in a conviction? My comments aren't intended to diminish the crimes, only to point out the numbers.

I served many years on remote assignments and I have always felt that the military has an inherent problem that has never been addressed. Someone who has no military experience of serving remote tours is never going to understand the culture that leads to the problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

California's numbers aren't much to be proud of
Posted by: VAGreen on Apr 6, 2008 10:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, 44% of reported rapes result in arrest, and 64% of those cases are prosecuted. Let's see...

0.44 * 0.64 = 0.28

So that means that there is only about a 1 in 4 chance of even BEING prosecuted for a REPORTED rape. When you factor in the acquittals, unreported rapes, and convictions that don't result in serious jail time, it looks like open season on California women. Sickening.

Why on earth are we sending the police after people for smoking weed when there are so many violent sociopaths on the loose and hunting for their next victim?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What else can happen?
Posted by: purereason on Apr 8, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What else can happen when unrelated males and females are put together? This is happening on the mainland too. For sanity males and females must be given separate accommodation, but even in American Universities they are put together. So they live like cattle and then nobody can complain. This degradation is not the advancement of the civilization as it affects the family structure. Recently the female students of an American University were protesting against the rising cost of birth controls, they said they have to spend more than $40 on such items. Freedom does not mean absence of control in living.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]