Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Iraq's Police Refuse to Support Attacks on Insurgent Army

By Patrick Cockburn, CounterPunch. Posted March 31, 2008.


The recent explosion of violence is making a mockery of Bush's claim that America had turned the corner in Iraq.
Advertisement

US and British forces are increasingly playing a supporting role in the Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's stalled offensive against the Mehdi Army militia. American aircraft launched air strikes in Basra yesterday and fought militiamen on the streets in Baghdad while British advisers have also been assisting Iraqi troops in Basra.

Mr Maliki retreated from his demand that militiamen hand over their weapons by yesterday and extended the deadline to April 8. This is a tacit admission that the Iraqi army and police have failed to oust the Mehdi Army from any of its strongholds in the capital and in southern Iraq. The Iraqi army has either met stubborn resistance from Mehdi Army fighters or soldiers and police have refused to fight or changed sides. "We did not expect the fight to be this intense," said the officer from a 300-strong commando unit that has been pinned down in the Tamimiyah district in Basra, where the supporters of Muqtada al-Sadr, the leader of the Mehdi Army, have strong support.

The officer said four of his men were killed and 15 wounded in the fighting. "Some of the men told me that they did not want to go back to the fight until they have better support and more protection," he added. The Interior Ministry threatened that the men would be court-martialled for refusing to fight. Government troops arriving in Basra complain that they are being fired on by local police loyal to Mr Sadr. Members of one police unit had fist fights with their officers after they refused to join the battle.

The failure of Mr Maliki to make good his threat so far to eliminate the Mehdi Army and growing signs of dissent in army units is damaging his authority, "It is possible that Muqtada and the Mehdi Army will emerge from this crisis stronger than they were before," warned one Iraqi politician who did not want his name published.

Fears that Mr Maliki's surprise assault on the Mehdi Army is faltering without any real gains on the ground probably explains why US aircraft are dropping bombs in Basra and US armored vehicles made an incursion into Sadr City in Baghdad. The explosion of violence over the past four days is making a mockery of George Bush's claim that America had turned the corner in Iraq.

The crisis has also presented the British Government with a dilemma. If the 4,100 British troops at the airport remain spectators to the battles in the city, critics will ask what they are doing there. But if they intervene in what is essentially a battle between two Shia factions they will be dragged back into the struggle for Basra in which nobody is likely to emerge the winner.

Mystery surrounds Mr Maliki's motive in launching an assault on the Mehdi Army after Mr Sadr renewed his six-month ceasefire last month. A likely explanation is that Mr Maliki, who has little support outside the holy city of Kerbala, was under pressure from the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI), his main ally, to attack the Sadrists now. The Sadrists were expected to do well against ISCI in provincial elections which are to be held in October under an agreement brokered by the US Vice-President Dick Cheney during his visit to Baghdad earlier in the month.

ISCI wanted to crush the Sadrists before the poll and this would be easier to do before the US reduces the numbers of its troops in Iraq. But, unless Mr Maliki's attack picks up steam over the next week, he will have done nothing except damage his own standing. Demonstrators have already been denouncing him as an American puppet and demanding that he go.

A measure of the anarchy in Iraq is that it is unclear who controls large swaths of the country. By one report the Mehdi Army has taken over the centre of the city of Nassariya. The Green Zone in Baghdad, the headquarters of the Iraqi government and of US political influence, is being mortared every day. One mortar round killed two guards outside the Vice-President's office in the zone.

Nobody knows on whose side sections of the security services belong. In a further blow to the belief that the surge has restored law and order, one of the two Iraqi spokesmen for the Baghdad security plan, which is at the heart of the surge strategy, was kidnapped and three of his bodyguards killed before his house was set on fire. The victim was Tahseen Sheikhly, a Sunni who often appeared with American officials to proclaim the success of the surge.

A curfew was in force in the capital yesterday.The Iraqi army's offensive against the Shia militia of the radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr in Basra is failing to make significant headway despite a pledge by the Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to fight "to the end".


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, sadr, mehdi army

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
NEOCONS: Just keep repeating to yourself......
Posted by: xvictor on Mar 31, 2008 5:14 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The surge is working

The surge is working

The surge is working

The surge is working

The surge is working

The surge is working

......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

END GAME
Posted by: jeffreytaos on Mar 31, 2008 5:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could it be that there is a sabotage of US policy by launching an offensive that could not win. Demoralizing the police and the government is one way to dig the US in deeper and create failure of the policies, resulting in possible gridlock, or worse, loss of control leading to a peoples insurection. he hell people have to pay for freedom. Last night I watched CNN as British forces tiptoed across the poppy fields trying to avoid landmines, and a small boy walked them home. So, Poppy production is back, Bechtel is rich, the money is missing from the oil revenues, and Bush is going to his retirement lodge in Texas, leaving the shit for the rest of us to worry about. I say Bush should be in jail, and Maliki fired, and a new election held in Iraq, and any real war would have taken the ammunition and guns out of the country, but instead, the insurgents appear to be better armed than ever before. I have been re-directed to a movie on the net, called...END GAME, meanwhile, Why should China treat Tibetans with kid gloves, when they can accuse them of inciting terror in the region? Thanks to the US role model, human rights are at an all time low.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Jeffrey..... Posted by: David/Daoud
Two points...
Posted by: adp3d on Mar 31, 2008 5:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. What Bush says about anything has about zero credibility.
2. It would be more accurate if the press referred to al-Sadr as the nationalist cleric instead of the "radical cleric" as he and his have minimal contact and support from Iran as compared to the other two main Shia groups in Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Two points... Posted by: JSquercia
Behind the Curve?
Posted by: Dadster3 on Mar 31, 2008 5:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This report seems to be more history than current events. Sadr, according to reporting yesterday, has taken his troops off the street. Why did he do that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Behind the Curve? Posted by: mike1997
» RE: Behind the Curve? Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Behind the Curve? Posted by: johnclark
Iraq Needs a New Government
Posted by: David/Daoud on Mar 31, 2008 5:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article has filled in some gaps in my understanding of the dynamics taking place in southern Iraq. Just on the face of it, if the Sadrists are thinking that Al-Maliki needs to be replaced because they see him as a puppet of "Bush and Cheney", surely most of the general population is thinking this way. Just as what recently happened in Pakistan, new elections in Iraq would likely bring a leadership more representative of the people, not servants of America, that is if they are conducted honestly.
How terrible it must be for those Iraqis who have recently been forced to return home from Syria after running out of money!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

grindermonkey
Posted by: grindermonkey on Mar 31, 2008 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do any other readers see similarities between this article and descriptions of the Tet offensive?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Could someone please explain the wisdom of.....
Posted by: chuckjs on Mar 31, 2008 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1)Maliki attacking a group of people, who are upholding a ceasefire and partly responsible for the reduction in violence, without any provocation that I have seen?

2) The US saying "that an attack on the Shia militias is a wholly Iraqi affair" while they are launcing air strikes in support of this action?

3)The US government, who is promoting a UNIFIED democratic Iraq, is actually siding with the people who support partitioning of Iraq.

As usual I am very confused NOT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What does the Wall Street Journal says....
Posted by: xvictor on Mar 31, 2008 6:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An article in today's WSJ doesn't extend credit for the lull in violence in the last few months to the U.S. troops or to the "surge". It justifiably gave it to Sadr who had called for a 6 month truce. That's a real slap in the face to Bushie and McCain.

The truth does sometimes leak out from the MSM.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cheney/Petraeus Behind This Offensive
Posted by: David/Daoud on Mar 31, 2008 6:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
See this article:
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/mar2008/iraq-m31.shtml

Quotes:
Friday’s Wall Street Journal:
"In his visit last week to the Middle East, Vice President Dick Cheney held one-to-one meetings with Sunni, Shiite and Kurdish leaders in Iraq to speed up the passage of a law opening up petroleum reserves to more efficient production by global oil companies”.

"There is no doubt that Cheney was intimately involved in discussing not only the oil law, but the military offensive in Basra."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» think globally Posted by: e rice
BUSH HAS BECOME IRRELEVANT IN IRAQ
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 31, 2008 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Green Zone is under attack and the fighting has nothing to do with what Bush thinks or says. Our soldiers are left to defend themselves as best they can in what has become serious street fighting. At this point it's hard to imagine a way to get in to get them out and bring them home. The Green Zone people get preferential treatment, of course.
I wonder about an Iraqi cease fire to allow Americans to leave. I think that's what they want. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing New
Posted by: FSadley on Mar 31, 2008 8:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't this just the way we alway do things. We say we're bringing democracy to Iraq. But we haven't let the people of Iraq determine what it should look like. The Malaiki government is the one we pushed for, yeah they "voted" them in, and didn't see another thing happen that would make their lives better (that's kind of typically American too). According to other articles here on Alter net Sadir is opposed to Iranian influence, and against Al Quida, what else could we want? Oh, he's also for nationalizing the oil, we don't want that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cheney's visit
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 31, 2008 9:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to Iraq was to give Maliki the orders to launch this offensive against al-Sadr. And, somehow, tying Iran to the Mahdi Army's activities will give justification and political cover for when they decide to attack Iran, sometime before the elections in November.

And to try to "finalize" the oil deal.

Trying to tie up all the loose ends, are you Dick?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All the troubles in Iraq
Posted by: willymack on Mar 31, 2008 11:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stem from one inescapable fact: The Iraqis are not stupid. They KNOW why we're there, namely to steal their oil and establish a presence, the better to intimidate the entire region. They don't believe all the bullshit about democracy any more than most of us do here, and they DON'T WANT US THERE any more than we would want an occupying army HERE. OK, that's more than one fact, so sue me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lookout!
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Mar 31, 2008 4:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice article by Patrick Cockburn. The president is right-we have indeed turned a corner-but around the corner is perpetual darkness.
A darkness of an ongoing drama played out along the Tigris and Euphrates. Nothing good has happened since we landed there. And lookout! When the sun came out it has blinded Bush & Co. to such a degree they're blinded by their own delsuions of shifting rationales and low morale among the soldiers.
No matter if it's night or day, we'll keep turning corners and encounter the same bloody mess.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

militia fighters and criminals
Posted by: jimmyaj on Mar 31, 2008 10:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"George The Chimp sez: [Maliki] faces a 'tough battle against militia fighters and criminals'."

HA!!! Maliki's biggest problem is the bunch of criminals who put him in power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mnola101
Posted by: mnola101 on Apr 1, 2008 7:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Imperialism, though much more subtle and sophisticated as applied to today's world, refuses to learn one very important lesson: THE PEOPLE WHOM YOU ARE TRYING TO CONTROL, NO MATTER HOW YOU MAY TRY TO DISGUISE IT, HAVE NO WHERE ELSE TO GO, AND UNLESS YOU ARE WILLING TO COMMIT TOTAL GENOCIDE, WILL OUTLAST YOU BECAUSE YOU YOU ARE IN THEIR HOME AND YOURS IS FAR AWAY.
The imperialist country, because of it's superior technolgy and belief in it's racial superiority, is unable to recognize that it's subjects, though different in most ways, are human and have the pride common to us all.
Whether it is 1, 5, 100, or 1000 years from now, our experiment in behind the scenes imperialism will fail and we will be left with a nation ruined in spirit, reputation, morality and as is now clear to all, except the ruling class, economy.
Let's swallow our pride, admit our wrong, make reparations, try and imprison our leaders and learn a very valuable lesson the Iraqis have taught us.
That may be something beyond the reach of our ignorant, racist, and arrogant country, and, if so, just another failed empire on the scrap heap of history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]