Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

McCain's 'Maverick' Myth Is the Media's Creation

By David Brock and Paul Waldman, Anchor Books. Posted March 31, 2008.


The bizarre tale of how the media turned a crooked Republican into the mirage of a principled politician.
freeridecoverart
free ride

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by David Brock Paul Waldman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The following is an excerpt from "Free Ride: The Media and John McCain" (Anchor Books, 2008) by David Brock and Paul Waldman.

Perhaps no word better defines John McCain in the public imagination than "maverick." It's a word that, more than "straight talk" or "moderate" or "reformer," has come to occupy a seemingly permanent place next to the senator's name in the media. It is also distinct from those other modifiers that have come to identify McCain. As critical as the idea of ideological moderation is to the Myth of McCain, his status as a maverick is not about what he believes but about who he is-something far more important in the personality-driven world of today's politics.

In later years, when asked to name his proudest moment in Congress, John McCain would go all the way back to his first year in the House of Representatives to point to a case in which he stood against a Republican president. In 1983, McCain voted against Ronald Reagan's decision to deploy U.S. troops to Lebanon. "I do not see any obtainable objectives in Lebanon," he said at the time, "and the longer we stay there, the harder it will be to leave."43 McCain sees the act as a defining moment: the neophyte lawmaker breaking ranks with his party and his political hero. (The actual vote was 270-161 in favor of deployment; McCain was joined by twenty-seven Republicans in opposition.) The dissenters would later be vindicated when a truck bomber slammed into the Marine barracks in Lebanon, killing 241 U.S. servicemen and precipitating a U.S. withdrawal. "It demonstrated to me that you really have to do, at the end of the day, what you fundamentally know is right," McCain told the National Journal years later.

At the time, McCain's decision to object was barely noted (a New York Times story on the House vote buried a quote from him at the bottom of its story). McCain evidently sees his 1983 vote as the moment where his political identity as a maverick began to form, but that reputation did not really take hold until much later. In fact, McCain's early years in Congress did not attract much national attention, nor did they evince much evidence of what would become the Myth of McCain. It wasn't until the late 1980s that the press even began to take notice of his self-proclaimed penchant for breaking with party orthodoxy. Early in his career, McCain was seldom described as someone too principled to be bound by party loyalty or the momentary dictates of partisanship. The first time anyone referred to him as a "maverick" in the press appears to be a February 1989 States News Service story, which quoted Dan Casey, then-executive director of the American Conservative Union, saying about McCain, "He is a good conservative but somewhat of a maverick."There was no explanation of what made him a maverick, other than the fact that the group had given him a rating of merely 80 out of 100. Other such descriptions are few and far between. Another story from 1989, in Newsday, described him as a Republican expected to "break ranks" on Dick Cheney's proposed budget cuts to the F-14D aircraft program. But apart from these faint glimmers, there was little indication of the McCain image that would eventually form in the press.

In 1992, McCain was one of three Republican senators to vote for Democratic campaign finance reform legislation (all the Senate Democrats except two voted in favor). The bill called for the provision of taxpayer funds and other incentives to urge candidates to abide by voluntary spending limits; it was vetoed by then-president George H. W. Bush, a veto that the Senate failed to override. In 1993, McCain again cast himself in the role of party rebel in the campaign finance debate. In deliberations over an identical measure to the one Bush had vetoed in 1992, McCain proposed amendments that caught the attention of the media. McCain offered one amendment that barred candidates from using campaign money for personal expenses such as vacations, mortgage payments, and clothing purchases, among others. Another amendment pushed for the campaign reforms, if enacted, to go into effect in 1994 instead of 1996, as originally proposed. Little noted was that McCain's amendment was identical to one that his Arizona colleague, Senator Dennis DeConcini (D), was set to introduce to the Senate, before McCain beat him to the punch by a day-a move that won McCain credit for the amendment.

The early returns to these maneuvers were encouraging. In 1993, the Washington Post noted that McCain was one of five "maverick" Republicans for his work on campaign finance reform legislation. Another Post reference two months later offered a continuation of the theme, describing McCain as a "conservative with maverick instincts."But if the media had taken a closer look, talk of McCain as a maverick may have been a little premature. As news stories at the time made clear, the 1992 campaign finance bill was preordained to be vetoed by Bush, making it easier for McCain and his fellow Republican rebels to back it. That motive became starker in 1993 when the Clinton administration, pushing a nearly identical bill, was told by McCain and his fellow "renegades" that they would support a Republican filibuster of the legislation. Predictably, Clinton expressed his dismay at the "rebels" who changed their tune when faced with a bill that might actually become law. "The thing that particularly troubles me about this one is that several Republicans voted for a bill not unlike this last year which contained public financing," Clinton said. The Associated Press reported that Republican moderates admitted to voting for the original bill only because they knew it would be vetoed. Eventually, McCain and his band of mavericks broke with their GOP colleagues on the filibuster, but only after the bill was gutted to remove most of the public financing features of the measure. The compromise legislation "left almost no one happy" and was derided by advocacy groups like Public Citizen and US PIRG as watered down. The bill eventually died a quiet death in the House. McCain's maverick gestures, though revealed to be less than substantial under scrutiny, nonetheless left their imprint on the media.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: john mccain, election 2008, free ride, maverick

David Brock is the President and CEO of Media Matters for America. Paul Waldman is a Media Matters senior fellow.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yes But...
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Mar 31, 2008 12:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain has been so emphatic in his support of the war and the surge that his credibility is bound to suffer as things go from bad to worse. His embrace of voodoo economics will eventually hit home, too. The question is whether the eventual Democratic nominee, probably Obama, will by that point have been fatally wounded by 'friendly fire." In that case even a wounded McCain could limp to the finish line.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain reminds me of Nixon
Posted by: DrSuess on Mar 31, 2008 1:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am old enough to remember Nixon, and I am constantly reminded of the similarites. Both were rather "gruff" men who want/wanted to win an unwinnable war. Nixon took us further into Vietnam in order to militarily defeat the Vietnamese. If Vietnam could have been won by military force, Nixon would have won it. But it is very hard to defeat people on their own soil.

If America elects McCain, I think we will see a repeat of the Nixon presidency. Bush has enough media/political savy to stop an impeachment vote. I don't think McCain has that level of savy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Inventors, Copyrights and Patents
Posted by: talkville on Mar 31, 2008 1:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hobsbawm has written on the phenomenon of inventing traditions; intervening creatively back into historical facts or events and moulding a Story, a Tale, a Saga. Here in the USA, we sure like stories.

In McCain we have apparently an individual of extra-Ordinary and Superlative endowments that simply boggle our poor impoverished and starving imaginations. But where is truth in all of this?

Not the child of a school Custodian, or one of a Single Mother teaching in a high-school, or one of a factory worker or a family farmer. Nope, here we have the child of an Admiral - well to do and well connected, "blessed" as the story goes.

Here we have an individual who enters military services, becomes an pilot and during the Viet-Nam conflict flies several times, high above the canopies of the jungle, and releases bombs to fall upon the flora, the fauna and the humans who fate has brought there, whether viet-cong, farmers, men, women or children. He is shot down and captured, remaining a pow for the remainder of the war. He did what he was trained to do, just like thousands, hundreds of thousands of others did in those days. Today, he is a "War Hero", of the stature of Achilles, even Mars, floating high, very high, above all those thousands of others who did what they were trained to do in those days. (This prior information I gained from an interesting article in CounterPunch a few months back -- can't locate it, but it's there and I'm sure accessible for those who might have interest in it).

And we end up now with a "maverick war hero", bravely presented to us by our reporters (story-makers) to give us a Saga of Sound and Fury, a Blockbuster Rambo, an Individual, to lead us all into another Story, a Promised one.

Inflation has surely reached triple-digit numbers if we seek so desperately and with so little attention to historical facts to set the bar so easily and so low for words such as "hero" or "maverick" even in their ordinary dictionary definitions. This inflation is not of the Market Economy, it is one much more significant and deeper; one that affects such things as Integrity, Honesty and Respect for the truth.

Are gods made so cheaply?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tucker Carlson says nyet to McCain!!!
Posted by: xvictor on Mar 31, 2008 5:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In an interview by a WABC radio rightwing broadcaster, neocon guest whore Tucker Carlson said the RepubliCONvicts are totally doomed. He says the mood in the country is very clearly against the Republigoons and McCain will be devastatingly humiliated come election day.

Well, I guess he oughta know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maniacal maverick
Posted by: Democritus on Mar 31, 2008 5:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps the media employs the "maverick" soubriquet to describe McCain because of his famous choleric dispositon and his tendency to speak off the top of his head without choosing his words carefully. We got a taste of that recently when he claimed that al-qaeda fighters were being trained in Iran. A politician who shoots from the lip is not recognized as one of the normal herd, even though his actions belie his words.

Without the media gloss, McCain is just another underachiever (5th from the bottom in his
Annapolis class) and phony war hero. It's unclear whether some of his fellow POWs were correct in calling him "Songbird" for his collaboration with the North Vietnamese, but what is clear is that had his father not been and admiral and CINCPAC, he probably would have died in captivity. The North Vietnamese recognized what an important prisoner he was and kept him alive. As an A-4 pilot, McCain was always pushing the envelope to bomb targets that were declared off limits, not caring that these targets endangered civilian populations. Even when a fire on the U.S.S. Forrestal almost killed him, and he thought about what his napalm was doing to the Vietnamese, it didn't give him more than a brief moral moment before he was bombing again.

His trying to bail out his friend, Charles Keating, and the Lincoln Savings Bank, earned him membership in "The Keating Five," and a rebuke by the Senate Ethics Committee. Not letting a little thing such as ethics stand in his way, he rewarded his lobbyist friends by voting for legislation they favored. Then he said that he never took money from special interests, while at the same time collecing campaign cash from lobbyists.

John McCain is a tired old pol whose reputation as a straight talker is belied by the facts. If he becomes our next president he will be worse than the one we have now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only the conservative main stream media...
Posted by: adp3d on Mar 31, 2008 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...would use the term "mavrick" to describe what seems to me to be centrist or "safe" positions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Eliyahu59
Posted by: gemajabe on Mar 31, 2008 5:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My first choice was Kucinich, with John Edwards as his running mate. However, while you are sharp enough to see the media hype building up the "McCain Maverick Myth," you ignore your own role in doing something quite similar with Barack Obama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» the media is complicit Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Flippen and floppen
Posted by: solrev on Mar 31, 2008 6:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain can push his maverick label using some of his Senate votes as bullets, however he lost the value of that label during this presidential run. He has flipped and flopped all over this land on every issue in search of votes. He has made to many “what’s the exit strategy” speeches over the years and the demons have yet to capitalize on that. It will be a big mistake if the demons do not attack him head-on, just because he was a POW.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well, of course...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Mar 31, 2008 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The media was actively DEFENDING McCain when he made his comments about Iran training Al Queda. He "misspoke" from the second the words left his mouth, and no one in the media dare say anything else. And, of course, not a one of them questioned for a second their own media myth that he was the one with experience who knew what he was doing, despite the fact that he completely confused (if he even knew in the first place) the two main religious factions involved in this major conflict. Keep in mind that is akin to saying that Catholics were training Protestant militants in Northern Ireland. Would YOU make that mistake? Would you want the PRESIDENT making a mistake of those proportions? Mainstream media sure has no problem with it... they went so far as to actively defend McCain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OVER RATED FOR MANY YEARS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 31, 2008 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain got a pass on so many things because we genuinely respect our military. But when Bush trashed him and lied in the 2000 election in NC, McCain did nothing to retaliate. I lost all respect for him and he hasn't impressed me since then. He was a poor student, a lousy husband, a non-achiever, like Bush. Making the most of mediocrity & family. He failed to change anything about Bush's Torture program, which is still intact. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

STOP the politics of personal destruction!
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 31, 2008 8:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a Vietnam veteran and former USAF pilot, I deeply resent the "Songbird" accusations and other reckless assertions made against Senator McCain by some Alternet bloggers.

It's time to end the politics of personal destruction -- against John, Obama and Hillary. Instead, think in terms of their energy, intellect and love for ALL Americans.

In my mind, Obama is head and shoulders above his two opponents. He will make a great president!

Hugh E. Scott, lifelong registered Republican and author of George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT, published in 2004.

To read a sample chapter and learn about the only smoking-gun proof of White House corruption ever found on the Internet, visit www.PhonyFighterPilot.com.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain as symbolic end of the line for conservatives
Posted by: jebpgh on Mar 31, 2008 8:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Despite all the efforts to paint McCain into a corner for the purposes of the general election, the inescapable fact is that from the Republican point of view, McCain wasn't supposed to be here at all. The conservatives lined up one guy after another to take on the mantle - Romney, Guilliani, Huckabee, Thompson - and the Republican voters rejected all of them. There is no other way to view this result except as a complete defeat of the social conservatives and even the neo-conservatives given McCain's open door on multilateralism, closure of Gitmo, restart of Kyoto, etc. That this historic wave of rejection has taken place without hardly a comment reflects on the shallow-ness of the media.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I heard Bob Schieffer...
Posted by: motamanx on Mar 31, 2008 9:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...turn one of McCain's inanities into the sophistry of a brilliant political Methuselah last Sunday. It was scary; exactly the opposite of the same McCain gaffes featured on Olbermann's show, Countdown.

So what's the skinny? Does being incarcerated in a bamboo cell for 6 years make for good presidential leadership or not? My guess it's about the same as being AWOL instead of serving, or getting five deferments because you had "other priorities."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Convict would be appropriate
Posted by: MikeOckhurtz on Mar 31, 2008 9:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The maverick should be in jail for his corrupt behaviour as a Senator.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mccain & bush
Posted by: willymack on Mar 31, 2008 10:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In many ways are as peas in a pod. They're BOTH manufactured persons and as such, are as phony as a three dollar bill. What you see (for most of us) is definitely NOT what you get. When the Democratic dogfight is over and a clear winner is declared, a REAL debate with mccain sorely needs to be broadcast, without the usual ass-kissers like Tim Russert or Chris Matthews in attendance.Care should be taken to avoid a repeat of the shameful setup where bush enjoyed every advantage that his handlers could think of. If mccain is the REAL DEAL, then he should have no trouble with either Clinton OR Obama. If the debate is an actual one-on-one contest with no canned "softball" questions for either candidate, but a set of questions from voters, randomly selected, UNREHEARSED, and UNEXPECTED by either candidate, then the debate would be as fair as possible, in my opinion. In any FAIR debate, mccain would be utterly destroyed by either Clinton or Obama, and that's why the rethugs will go to ANY length to rig and falsify any and all "debates" as they did with the 2000 & 2004 "elections". Remember the talking heads following the bush/Kerry "debates"? Kerry won all of those, hands down, but not according to the "experts" in the controlled press. A REAL debate or debates would show mccain for what he is, a bad-tempered neonut who doesn't know doodley-squat,and who is completely unfit to be our President, just like that other pea, bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain perfects shadow corruption
Posted by: cognitorex on Mar 31, 2008 10:42 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nobody seems to have noticed that McCain has a methodology he uses to push lobbyist causes without doing so in the daylight.
In two recent reported incidents one where his , ahem, donor friend wanted a favorable communication industry ruling and one where he took money from the non US military air tanker competitor, McCain writes letters to the committee Chairmen.
He doesn't say make the outcome in favor of his client. He uses a pretext such as this should be concluded soon or this needs a timely yes or no.
Has he then promoted one side over the other which is ethically incorrect even by Republican standards? No. Not in writing, per se. Have the committee' Congressmen and staffers been put on notice that a Senator has a dog in the hunt.
Absotute-ly.

Oh, if you didn't catch this the other night. Pat Buchanan referenced McCain's flip flopping on tax cuts, ethics , religious leaders and using public funds in his Presidential race.
His comment was. "When you talk about the 'Straight Talk Express' you should have a sign on the side of the bus that says" "This bus makes U-turns."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fellow POW: "Why I will not vote for John McCain"
Posted by: fanny666 on Mar 31, 2008 11:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain = Draft
Posted by: Alcid on Mar 31, 2008 4:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Army Chief of Staff General George Casey tells us that our military is way overstretched, and that tours-of-duty will have to become shortened. General (ret) Barry McCaffrey has said that we are so lowering recruitment standards just to keep our numbers up that he is concerned for the long-term quality of the military. Republican presidential candidate John McCain states he “is confident" that Americans will be patriotic enough to answer the call to duty and volunteer in sufficient numbers for the military. McCain is dead serious when he talks about his war policy. He wants to continue the Iraq War. He pledges to increase the US commitment to fight al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan. He wants to follow Osama bin Laden to the gates of hell. He also speaks of other wars. If we continue along the path our president has us locked into and that McCain supports, we will need more quality ‘volunteers’ than are willing. That means McCain must recruit folks who don’t want to be recruited. That means the return of the draft.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Manchurian Candidate
Posted by: Jersey Devil on Mar 31, 2008 6:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After his stay at the Hanoi Hilton, John has sought to make up for lost time and income by selling his elected office with disgusting regularity. As a member of the Keating five John is the poster child for corrupt politicians. He is sundowning before our eyes and would be our second Alzheimer's President if elected. His pent-up anger and irrational overreaction to challenges is likely due to "self-help" re-programming administered by one of the bellhops at during his stay at the Hanoi Hilton.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain right on target
Posted by: carbon-based on Mar 31, 2008 7:28 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain has shown that he possess the understanding and foresight to know what it would take to accomplish the goals we have in Iraq. Democrats have been calling for withdrawal even before giving the surge a chance. Democrats have also spouted how america has lost and can never win and are gloating about it.

This is why you'll never here a democrat say the surge seems to be working. They are more concerned with making the republicans look bad than they are about making sure our country looks good!

Also remember that Kerry approached McCain for a vice presidency - democrats thought he looked pretty good at the time when they weren't running against him. Politics can make one look pretty transparent!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: McCain right on target Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Mar 31, 2008 8:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
See the on / off button on your remote?

Push it!


Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Heeeeeeeeeeere's Johnny!
Posted by: HeKnew on Mar 31, 2008 8:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ya gotta wonder what 5 years in a POW camp does to a guys mind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John McCain's Brain
Posted by: eskit on Apr 2, 2008 1:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know if was the Vietnamese prison or just his intellectual mediocrity, but something is definitely up with McCain's coconut. For further information (and a good laugh), go to youtube.com and search for "john mccain's brain".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

better than most republican senators
Posted by: whealeydj on Apr 5, 2008 3:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but not worthy of vote as deeply ingrained militarist who will keep us in Iraq as long as he lives. liberals should see who he picks for vice president to see how right wing his presidency will be. The fact he was born in Canal Zone makes we wonder if he Consitutionally qualified to be President. I encourage peopl to read fanny66 link from fellow POW Butler why he wont vote for John McCain. the article most important point was that he voted for strong campaign reform when he knew it would be vetoed in 1992, but not when it had a chance in 1993.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IF YOU LIKED GEO BUSH - YOU'LL LOVE JOHN MCCAIN
Posted by: larryracies on Apr 5, 2008 10:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Title says it all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]