Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Are Cell Phones 'More Dangerous Than Smoking'?

By Geoffrey Lean, Independent UK. Posted March 30, 2008.


Brain expert warns of huge rise in tumors and calls on industry to take immediate steps to reduce radiation.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Egyptian Marine: Soldiers Often 'Racialize' the Enemy to Cope With Stress
Aaron Glantz

More stories by Geoffrey Lean

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Mobile phones could kill far more people than smoking or asbestos, a study by an award-winning cancer expert has concluded. He says people should avoid using them wherever possible and that governments and the mobile phone industry must take "immediate steps" to reduce exposure to their radiation.

The study, by Dr Vini Khurana, is the most devastating indictment yet published of the health risks.

It draws on growing evidence -- exclusively reported in the IoS in October - that using handsets for 10 years or more can double the risk of brain cancer. Cancers take at least a decade to develop, invalidating official safety assurances based on earlier studies which included few, if any, people who had used the phones for that long.

Earlier this year, the French government warned against the use of mobile phones, especially by children. Germany also advises its people to minimize handset use, and the European Environment Agency has called for exposures to be reduced.

Professor Khurana -- a top neurosurgeon who has received 14 awards over the past 16 years, has published more than three dozen scientific papers -- reviewed more than 100 studies on the effects of mobile phones. He has put the results on a brain surgery website, and a paper based on the research is currently being peer-reviewed for publication in a scientific journal.

He admits that mobiles can save lives in emergencies, but concludes that "there is a significant and increasing body of evidence for a link between mobile phone usage and certain brain tumors". He believes this will be "definitively proven" in the next decade.

Noting that malignant brain tumors represent "a life-ending diagnosis", he adds: "We are currently experiencing a reactively unchecked and dangerous situation." He fears that "unless the industry and governments take immediate and decisive steps", the incidence of malignant brain tumors and associated death rate will be observed to rise globally within a decade from now, by which time it may be far too late to intervene medically.

"It is anticipated that this danger has far broader public health ramifications than asbestos and smoking," says Professor Khurana, who told the IoS his assessment is partly based on the fact that three billion people now use the phones worldwide, three times as many as smoke. Smoking kills some five million worldwide each year, and exposure to asbestos is responsible for as many deaths in Britain as road accidents.

Late last week, the UK Mobile Operators Association dismissed Khurana's study as "a selective discussion of scientific literature by one individual". It believes he "does not present a balanced analysis" of the published science, and "reaches opposite conclusions to the WHO and more than 30 other independent expert scientific reviews".

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: cancer, cell phones

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Cel dummies
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 30, 2008 12:01 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If there is a link between cel abuse and brain cancer, it would explain the dumbing down of America -- i.e. idiots who believe Saddam was chummy with Al Qaeda, Obama is a Muslim, remote-controlled B757s crashed into the Twin Towers, etc.

iPhone "texing" appears safe, but it, too, contributes to diminished mental capacity, such as the growing inability of teenagers to spell complete words.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Cel dummies Posted by: Deadbeat Dad
» RE: Cel dummies Posted by: Deadbeat Dad
» RE: Cel dummies Posted by: bg41
» RE: Cel dummies Posted by: onevoter
» RE: Cel dummies Posted by: Rapunzel
» spelling Posted by: EKSwitaj
Concerns?
Posted by: mcstewey on Mar 30, 2008 1:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are some interesting posts above - most notable the one about the link between technology and the dumbing down of Americans. Many can't spend more than 2 minutes without some kind of electronic stimuli.
But what about the health risks put forth in this article? I remember there were concerns when the cellphone first made waves, but they were quickly dismissed as the radiation levels dropped quickly. How valid and reliable is this study? Furthermore, how much research like this is kept silent by telecommunication corporations?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Best use a long cord on that handset...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Mar 30, 2008 2:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Microwaves from cell phones are in the frequency range of 1.8-2 megahertz. By comparison, visible light (sunlight) is about a million times more energetic. The difference is that your skin absorbs or reflects all the sunlight falling on it, while microwaves can penetrate through your whole body. That means they can potentially interfere with sensitive brain chemistry, i.e. DNA replication, i.e. potential cancer:

Heavy Cell Phone Use Linked To Cancer, Israeli Study Suggests, 2008

"Dr. Sadetzki, a physician, epidemiologist and lecturer at Tel Aviv University, published the results of a study recently in the American Journal of Epidemiology, in which she and her colleagues found that heavy cell phone users were subject to a higher risk of benign and malignant tumors of the salivary gland.

Those who used a cell phone heavily on the side of the head where the tumor developed were found to have an increased risk of about 50% for developing a tumor of the main salivary gland (parotid), compared to those who did not use cell phones.

The fact that the study was done on an Israeli population is significant. Says Sadetzki, "Unlike people in other countries, Israelis were quick to adopt cell phone technology and have continued to be exceptionally heavy users. Therefore, the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation found in this study has been higher than in previous cell phone studies.

"This unique population has given us an indication that cell phone use is associated with cancer," adds Sadetzki, whose study investigated nearly 500 people who had been diagnosed with benign and malignant tumors of the salivary gland."


On the other hand, there are studies that purport to show no link at all, such as Cell Phone Use Not Linked To Cancer Risk

That study, however, was financed in part by the International Epidemiology Institute - and who are they? Yet another non-profit institute receiving corporate funding:

"Until October 15, 2000, IEI listed "Corporate Counseling" and "Litigation Support" among the list of services published on its website.

Tobacco science institutes are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to fraudulent corporate science orchestrated by public relations professionals. What are they trying to hide?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You need to go clean to think straight
Posted by: Bobsays on Mar 30, 2008 3:09 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another study found men over 40 with bellies get stupider: other studies show 60 per cent and more are obese. I think that says it all.

People need to eat less, exercise, and only use mobile phones for emergencies.

Then you will get your brains back!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There are many peer reviewed papers that have found health effects from cell phone use
Posted by: Rune on Mar 30, 2008 3:39 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and there are many that did not arrive at such a finding. You can find a very useful list of such papers here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another wireless health time-bomb is
Posted by: fifthworld on Mar 30, 2008 6:06 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wifi, wireless internet. In Europe this has gotten a lot of study and press, and there has been legislation passed in Britain and elsewhere to keep wifi out of schools and other public facilities and institutions.

Meanwhile here in zombieland, whole cities are slated to go public-place-wifi, and folks with wifi transmitters in their homes have no idea that the microwave radiation goes right through walls and easily affects neighbors, not to mention themselves, as it's necessarily always on, unlike a cell phone; and a lot more radiation to be had.

I can be in a cafe here in Santa Fe that has wifi (they almost all do now) and immediately feel the effect, being seizure-prone. I was going to this place for a year before knowing about wifi, but then it made sense. But there are manifold manifestations of said sensitivity; workers at this place talk about feeling it themselves - anxiety, headaches, etc, similar to cell phone use.

If you want to know more there are some good websites; emfacts.org is but one; we have one here for local activists in New Mexico: whyfry.org

Paz.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I smell pseudo-science and..
Posted by: daniel1982 on Mar 30, 2008 6:21 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
shoddy reporting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And no sourcing at all? Posted by: PeaceLove
removal of benign parotid salivary gland
Posted by: caru on Mar 30, 2008 7:19 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i hope a good researcher will test the population in the bay area aka 'silicon valley'. i used cell phones heavily from 1989 - 1998 and on and off since. in the last year, i had a parotid salivary gland removed on the right side.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

no cell for me....
Posted by: onevoter on Mar 30, 2008 8:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm probably one of the few people who doesn't have a cell phone. I'm not a Luddite, but really haven't felt the need to get one. Seems like so many people are tied to their phones, something which I don't want. Call me and leave a message on the answering machine if I'm not home. I do understand that they would be good in emergencies, but I have somehow managed to live without one for years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: no cell for me.... Posted by: myanh44
Dying To Be Available
Posted by: Ohjin on Mar 31, 2008 1:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Got rid of my cell phone 6 months ago and I admit the first week involved some withdrawal, now I do not miss it at all.

Where does the never ending quest to be more available end?

And who beyond the almighty $$$ are we so anxious to hear from that we must maintain multiple electronic leashes to be at their beck and call 24 X 7??

As the number of ways we have to communicate increases, it seems our ability to communicate with each other in a quality manner about important issues, decreases.

Most often simpler is better...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Sidebar
Posted by: fg on Mar 31, 2008 2:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During the administration (so-called) of Bush pere, the EPA was culminating its study of the health effects of low-level electric and magnetic fields. The final draft of the ERA's findings, which could be obtained in hard copy by the public, contained the statement that low-level electric and magnetic fields must be classed as human carcinogens.

When the draft was reviewed by the White House science board (isn't this body made up of lawyers?), the conclusion pertaining to the carcinogenicity of low-level EMFs was stricken. It's always business before health with the "G"OP.

Will the administration of Bush fils--what remains of it--try likewise to shove under the rug the dangers to human health posed by cell phones?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Want Fries With That?
Posted by: NoPCZone on Apr 1, 2008 10:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Holding a device with near microwave radiation against your head is not a smart thing to do. Likewise, all these cell towers are flooding our environment with EMF that is, in this instance, not well understood.

As has been said before, use you cell phone as little as possible and switch ears to minimize exposure to one area. You'll be glad you did.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not peer reviewed, therefore not "published"
Posted by: gutertag on Apr 17, 2008 8:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was a personal review, placed on a webpage, therefore may be biased, etc.

I agree however that precautions are quite necessary and that science is always on the backburner of greed and politics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement