Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Who's Illegal? The Politics of Immigration

By Scott Thill, WireTap. Posted April 30, 2008.


For every Minuteman who beats his chest at the border, there are many more immigration rights supporters.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Scott Thill

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Students of political science may look to their discipline's greats to describe what's going on in today's volatile social environment, but they might as well turn to the physical sciences -- to Isaac Newton, in particular. It was Newton's legendary third law of motion that stated for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, an axiom that easily encapsulates the United States' supercharged battle over immigration.

Criminalizing immigration has become a right-wing attack plan that's worked with precision in Congress and mainstream conservative media like CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight. But the clarion calls for so-called reform have actually had the opposite effect: they have galvanized the immigrant community into ever-increasing political participation, rebutting Republican efforts.

In fact, one reason that the Republicans had come to power in recent years was due to the Latino vote, which often leans toward more conservative value systems. As Senator Gil Cedillo told me for an earlier Wiretap piece on Latino politics, "I think there is an assumption that Latino electives will be progressives, and I don't think that's the case. In truth, Latinos are known to be more conservative than most progressives. Frankly, they are as poised to be Republicans as they are to be Democrats, and probably would be if Republicans didn't hate them or promote hysteria about them."

The overall lesson to be learned, Cedillo indirectly argued, was not to bite the hand that feeds you. But the Republicans have done exactly that, with the media following suit. And not enough pundits or politicians have countered those attacks by pointing out the obvious: We are, all of us, a nation of immigrants, occupying lands that once belonged to someone else, including Mexico.

Myths, Power and False Patriots

"Unfortunately, the history of the United States as popularized on TV or classrooms seems like it was made by Disney," explains journalist Roberto Lovato, who's written on the subject for diverse publications like The Nation, Los Angeles Times and more, and also served as executive director of the Central American Resource Center (CARECEN), one of America's largest immigrant rights organizations. "It's not real. We talk a lot about the Holocaust, but we don't talk about Native Americans. There's no Holocaust museum for them. We don't have an Ellis Island for the black slaves. Most of the slaves came through Sullivan's Island, and it should be a monument, but it's not. A sense of history is profoundly and institutionally lacking, and so you're going to have a population that looks at this treatment of immigrants as natural."

Such a permissive attitude toward criminalization has led to everything from the boom in the immigrant security complex, which has turned into a billion-dollar bonanza, to the tacit endorsement of militias like The Minuteman Project, whose border patrols and presence at immigrant rights protests and rallies has caused no shortage of damage and controversy.

But for every so-called Minuteman who has showed up to inflate patriotism or disrupt undocumented day laborers at work, it seems there have been many more immigration rights supporters, including groups such as The Center for Community Change, The Coalition For Humane Immigrant Rights, Immigrant Legal Resource Center, Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition, International ANSWER, Brown Berets, and many more. That imbalance mirrors the national battle over immigration criminalization; indeed, most election-year polls have shown that the public doesn't rate immigration as a higher priority for candidates than other topics, such as the economy or the Iraq war.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: democrats, republicans, immigrants, illigal immigration

Scott Thill runs the online mag Morphizm.com. His writing has appeared on Salon, XLR8R, All Music Guide, Wired and others.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Immigration Terminology 101
Posted by: zeezil on Apr 30, 2008 8:00 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Immigration Terminology 101

With the vitriolic immigration debate roiling in all parts of our country, it is important to understand terminology. Be prepared to dispel the half-truths and no truths of the way those who are illegally in our country are described by their advocates. Knowledge is power:

ILLEGAL:
1.) Unlawful; illegitimate; illicit; unlicensed.
2.) Illegal, unlawful, illegitimate, illicit, criminal can all describe actions not in accord with law.
3.) Illegal refers most specifically to violations of statutes.
4.) Prohibited by law

ALIEN:
1.) a person who is not a citizen of the country.
2.) in the United States any person born in another country to parents who are not American and who has not become a naturalized citizen. There are resident aliens officially permitted to live in the country and illegal aliens who have sneaked into the country or stayed beyond the time allowed on a visa.

INVADE:
1. to enter like an enemy: Locusts invaded the fields
2. to enter as if to take possession: To invade a neighbor's home
3. to enter and affect injuriously or destructively, as disease: Viruses that invade the bloodstream.
4. to intrude upon: To invade the privacy of a family.
5. to encroach or infringe upon: to invade the rights of citizens.
6. to permeate: The smell of baking invades the house.
7. to penetrate; spread into or over: The population boom has caused city dwellers to invade the suburbs

Those illegally in a country are not "immigrants". There is no such thing as an "illegal immigrant". An immigrant is involved with an established and orderly procedure of immigration (entering a country to which one is not native in order to settle there by legal process).

They are not immigrants, not undocumented immigrants (Kennedy and the PC fan favorite), not undocumented workers, not undocumented Americans (Harry Reid’s favorite), not economic immigrants (Big Business and Wall Street favorite), not immigrants without work papers, not people who are working (Enrique Morone’s favorite), not migrant workers, not entrants, not day laborers and not the “unbanked” (Bill Clinton and Arnold Schwarzenegger’s favorite).

The government has defined them as "illegal aliens" and explicitly uses that term in all its laws and statutes. So keep it simple…a spade is a spade…they are illegal aliens. Or, if you’d prefer, another term that would be just as correct to use is "invaders". I would consider the two interchangeable.

One other definition is exceedingly useful since you’ll hear with every piece of amnesty legislation, the open border lobbyists, facilitators and illegal alien advocates declaring that it isn’t amnesty in the hope that you will think so. Here’s the definition of amnesty so you can decide for yourself:

AMNESTY is legislation to forgive the breaking of immigration laws and to make it possible for illegal aliens to live permanently in the United States. Amnesty represents a system of federal rewards and assistance for illegal aliens, and they entice an even greater number of foreign nationals to illegally enter a country. Amnesty is providing the ultimate goal of the perpetrators illegal entry...legalization of their presence.

AMNESTY:
1. A general pardon for offenses against a government
2. An act of forgiveness for past offenses, esp. to a class of persons as a whole
3. Forgetting or overlooking any past offense

There you have it, folks. Knowledge is power…use it wisely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fiscal Cost of Immigration
Posted by: zeezil on Apr 30, 2008 8:02 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After careful review, anyone with a even a modicum of logic can come to no other conclusion: illegal immigration must be halted, illegal immigrants here now must be deported and legal immigration needs decreased from the approx. 2 million allowed in per year currently.

Please review the following report on the FISCAL COST OF IMMIGRATION by economist Edwin Rubenstein just released this past week:
http://www.esrresearch.com/Rubensteinreport.pdf

A partial summary of the report:

The impact on 15 Federal Departments surveyed was: $346 billion in fiscal related costs in FY 2007.

Each immigrant cost taxpayers more than $9,000 per year.

An immigrant household (2 adults, 2 children) cost taxpayers $36,000 per year.

Legal immigrants were not separated out from illegal immigrants for the fiscal impact study, but if they had been, the fiscal cost per ILLEGAL immigrant would be even more shocking than the figures quoted above.

The most extensive and authoritative study, prior to economist Edwin Rubenstein's "The Fiscal Impact of Immigration" (April 2008) , is the National Research Council (NRC)’s The New Americans: Economic, Demographic and Fiscal Effects of Immigration (1997).

The NRC staff analyzed federal, state, and local government expenditures on programs such as Medicaid, AFDC (now TANF), and SSI, as well as the cost of educating immigrants’ foreign- and native-born children.

NRC found that the average immigrant household receives $13,326 in federal annual expenditures and pays $10,664 in federal taxes—that is, they generate a fiscal deficit of $2,682 (1996 dollars)per household.

In 2007 dollars this is a deficit of $3,408 per immigrant household.

With 9 million households currently headed by immigrants, more than $30 billion ($3,408 x 9 million) of the federal deficit represents money transferred from native taxpayers to immigrants.

Our national immigration policies have to work for the United States. While improving the plight of the world’s poor is a laudable goal, the finite resources we have available to fulfill that goal would be swamped if there wasn’t some orderly and manageable system in place to limit entry into the United States to what this nation can actually support. The more illegal aliens that are permitted to subvert the immigration system, the fewer immigrants we can accommodate who might actually produce a positive benefit for our country.

The more we become a nation of illegal immigrants, the deeper we fall into anarchy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here we go again
Posted by: rickiey on Apr 30, 2008 9:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Same old, same old

We have people like me who think that immigration is great, and illegal immigration is a problem.

And then there are the idiots who refuse to read what I'm writing, and instead just label me a racist.

The ROOT problem, is that legal immigration is too slow. That is a much bigger problem than illegal immigration, and the one that should be solved FIRST. Immigration is vital to the United States, it always has been, and always will be.

Illegal immigration, to the US, is a problem that should be curbed.

The funny part, is that successfully solving the first and major problem, will ameliorate the second problem significantly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How long will it take until English is a 2nd language in America?
Posted by: ptown on Apr 30, 2008 9:30 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How long will it take until English is a 2nd language in America? We need to be prepared for this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Send them home
Posted by: Susan R on May 1, 2008 11:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LOL latinos want to over run white people. Better be careful. White people will leave and all they will have is a bigger Mexico with the same Mexican problems. Too many uneducated having too many children with no whites to cover the cost of welfare for them to change a motel bed.

Sorry...we do not need Spanish welfare problems.
Send them home. I make my own bed, mow my own lawn and raised my own kids. Don't need them.
Want pickers, bus them in, employers take care of their health problems while here and then send them home. Any babies born here are Mexican not American. NO one even a baby should be rewarded for illegal activity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Send them home Posted by: desidid
Thinking versus Impulse
Posted by: Last Chance on May 5, 2008 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tribal instinct drives macho husbands to force their wives to birth more children than they can support. Idiotic church dogma drives priests to threaten poor people with hellfire if they use modern birth control. Greed drives businessmen to look for illegal immigrants to exploit. Political myopia drives left wing activists to favor open borders and amnesty. But if Mexico and the other Latin American nations protected all women's right to decide when and if to birth children, there would be no masses of immigrants assaulting the border, and with a smaller human population, there would be plenty of land and jobs for everyone. If Saving the Earth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blame the foreigners
Posted by: frantaylor on May 6, 2008 6:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The most effective political strategy ever invented. It's been toppling empires for thousands of years.

Walls have never worked. The Great wall of China didn't work. Hadrian's wall didn't work. The Berlin Wall didn't work. What makes you think it's going to work this time? Insanity is defined as doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different outcome.

Our founders dedicated our country to the proposition that all men are created equal. It doesn't say anything about treating foreigners any differently.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]