Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

4,000 Troop Deaths: A Number That Just Scratches the Surface

By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted March 24, 2008.


The death of the 4,000th U.S. soldier in an IED attack on Sunday is big news, but what does it tell us?
Advertisement

I'm in rare agreement with former Bush spokesman Tony Snow, who said of an earlier milestone -- the 2,500th U.S. fatality in Iraq -- "It's a number."

For those who have lost a loved one to this disastrous conflict, the important number is 1 -- and he or she has a name. For the rest of us, the 4,000th U.S. military death is a data point that obscures the reality of the Iraq conflict as much as it illuminates it.

I don't say that only because Iraqis have suffered so much higher losses, or because it doesn't account for the hundreds of billions of dollars that have been hemorrhaged to support the occupation -- the "opportunity costs" of this conflict -- although both of those things are true.

The number is insignificant because it only scratches the surface of the damage done to the (very) young men and women we've sent into the meatgrinder, most of whom were filled with idealism and a real sense of purpose before being deployed to Iraq.

The innovations in trauma medicine over the past 25 years -- a field that has advanced in leaps and bounds since the Vietnam conflict -- has resulted in a death toll that belies the level of violence those troops face in Iraq every day.

In 2005, USA Today reported on the "signature wound" of the Iraq war:

A growing number of U.S. troops whose body armor helped them survive bomb and rocket attacks are suffering brain damage as a result of the blasts. It's a type of injury some military doctors say has become the signature wound of the Iraq war.

Known as traumatic brain injury, or TBI, the wound is of the sort that many soldiers in previous wars never lived long enough to suffer. The explosions often cause brain damage similar to "shaken-baby syndrome," says Warren Lux, a neurologist at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington.

Almost 30,000 American troops have been wounded in Iraq, according to official counts. But that's just the official figure; the Pentagon doesn't have adequate mechanisms in place to accurately track the number of wounded soldiers, and unofficial estimates range to 100,000. How many of those soldiers and Marines suffered wounds so severe that they would have been KIA in any of America's previous conflicts? Nobody knows for sure, but it's clear that 4,000 is a number that doesn't tell the whole story of this war's impact on U.S. servicemen and women.

Many of them will return home to find a society that idealizes the troops in abstraction, but largely ignores their real physical and psychological needs. They will face terrible struggles to rebuild broken lives with inadequate support from the nation they believed they were defending. Many will suffer from undiagnosed psychological trauma, and far too many will take their own lives -- becoming casualties of the Iraq war years after the fact, casualties that will appear in none of the official numbers historians will record.

The greatest significance of this morbid milestone may be that it focuses Americans' attention on the horrific consequences of this occupation for a moment or two. As Agence France Presse reported recently, Iraq has largely become out-of-sight out-of-mind for too many of us:

A sharp fall in US media coverage of the Iraq war has left Americans less interested in and knowledgeable about the conflict, a report by the independent Pew Research Center showed Wednesday.

A scant three percent of news stories in February were devoted to the Iraq war, compared with around 15 percent in July last year, and the US public has not perceived the war, which began nearly five years ago, as a top news story since October, the report noted.

Those numbers say a lot about this conflict, and why we're still not close to bringing it to an end.

A better number to measure the impact on U.S. military personnel from the five-year conflict in Iraq is around one million. That's the estimated number of U.S. troops that have had at least one deployment to Iraq, and all of them will be changed, in ways great and small, for the rest of their lives.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, u.s. casualties

Joshua Holland is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
To let you know
Posted by: chlamor on Mar 24, 2008 9:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of the hyperlinks embedded in the article return one right back to the article.

Might need a little repair to help get the referenced material.

Cheers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Same problem at 12:30 p.m. Posted by: Ellie1
» Sorry Posted by: Joshua Holland
4,000 or 55,000 dead....
Posted by: CatDad on Mar 24, 2008 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This nation has clearly demonstrated that will will NOT admit defeat and will gladly keep sending it's sons/daughters in a Gallipoli-type slaughter to avoid such an acknowledgment....In 1968 after Tet it was clear that the war in Vietnam was lost...but it went on for five agonizing more years as "mainstream" Democrats and (of course) Republicans refused to bend to public will.

There's no way that the corporate media/political infracture will allow this nation to extract itself from Iraq..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 4,000 or 55,000 dead.... Posted by: woodford54
» THIS oughta shut Olbermann up Posted by: democracynowiniraq
» do you understand......? Posted by: foreverhope
Such a Huge Sacrifice, For What?
Posted by: edgar_michel on Mar 24, 2008 12:34 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason this is so tragic is because U.S. soldiers weren't defending this nation against a hostile enemy, they were engaged in taking a country for its oil. This was not about 9/11, although 9/11 was the fait accompli for getting Congress to approve this war, it was about oil and about how to acquire access to oil without having to pay a dictator who also happened to be seen as a threat to Saudi Arabia and The United Arab Emirates, kind of a double investment in oil dividends. It was also about how to transfer American public funds into the accounts of private persons who took part in executing the war and the mock reconstruction of the destroyed country.

This was the biggest heist in history precipitated by a carefully planned attacked on U.S. soil in order to invoke an emotional response that was indispensible for making this war possible. The result was the devastated lives of those who were used as pawns on the battlefield and the hundreds of thousands of those who were killed in that country that was taken for its oil.

But we in America don't really care. We like driving our cars and if a million Iraqi's have to go, then we will call them terrorists, dismiss them and take their oil. Along the way we will invent any excuse necessary that might be required to insure that we get what we want, and we want the oil to keep flowing into our cars, the global climate be damned, even if we have to sacrifice 2,993 of our own.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Such a Huge Sacrifice, For What? Posted by: edgar_michel
» Maybe this will help you understand Posted by: democracynowiniraq
Some of Us DO Care!
Posted by: woodford54 on Mar 24, 2008 1:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But we feel helpless. We write letters, we write blogs, we protest, we write letter to Congress People and Senators, we write letters to the Editor of our local newspapers, we join groups for peace, and where has it all taken us. Many of us in the "baby boomer" category are just plain tired of NOT being heard, or should I say, not being listened to and after all our efforts, our writing, our travel, our expenses, our prayers....NOTHING! One does tend to get weary. But that does not mean I don't care and I'm sure there are thousands out there just like me. In fact, it makes me angry when people say their number one issue in the upcoming presidential election is the economy. What about our children dying in Iraq? What happened to that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I know. Posted by: Joshua Holland
» I know, too Posted by: fluffmuffinmom
» Thank You! Posted by: woodford54
» Bless him Posted by: fluffmuffinmom
» RE: I know. Posted by: edgar_michel
4,000 sacrificed to stupidty and lies..a wasted Division..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Mar 24, 2008 3:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a sad unfortunate disgraceful milestone, that all these young lives have been sacrificed to the arrogance and stupidity of Bush and the Neo-Cons, and yet not one member of the Bush family has served in either Iraq or Afghanistan or for the most part any of the off-spring of the other Neo-Con war mongers and profiteers who have done such harm to our nations reputation and standing in the world..

The fact that 13,000 have been seriously wound is for me also an important statistic and when you add these together we have lost an entire Division in Iraq..!

When we were about to enter the Iraq war General Sansaki said we had 10 Divisions doing the work of 12 so we were undermanned now we've lost perhaps over a full Division in Iraq and for what for what gin what have we gained in Iraq, what benefit comes to us being there..

Even if you argue any benefit the negatives for me and most American outweigh it..

I have seen no real gain nothing gained from this entire debacle of Iraq..except for those war profiteers who like Cheney don't want it to ever end no victory no loss just keep it goin to keep the money flowin..a real cash cow for our fascist corrupt corporations..and the Vice President of course who stock is up 3,700%..or more..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nobody Really Cares About The Troops And Here's Why
Posted by: gandhi on Mar 24, 2008 4:35 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For all the media hype about "supporting the troops" nobody really cares about them. And why should they?

These guys signed up to kill other people. Signing up for the military is one step away from suicide. But at least suicides only take one life, and it's a life that for which they alone are responsible. Anyone who signs up to kill others on order, without question, is abdicating the very essence of their humanity. Why should we care what happens to these people later in life, as long as they do not become a danger to us?

Anyway, the hard truth is that the US public don't really "support the troops" at all. What they support is the abstanct notion which that term embraces. They support the insane vision of Teh USA as God's Chosen Land. They support the glorious vision of a righteous military fist that smashes down all enemies, safeguarding their own precious Lifestyles. They support the comfort level which the almighty US Military Machine provides them. They support the glorified schoolbook histories of war which let them pretend (for example) that native Americans were not slaughtered like dogs, and US millionaires did not finance the rise of Nazi Germany, and 9/11 was not the ultimate realisation of a decade's hard work by the Washington D.C. neoconservatives.

Remember Jack Nicholson shouting "You can't handle the truth"? He was right. The US public supports the troops only insofar as that support enables them to keep their eyes closed to what is really being done with their taxes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What if the exit were so simple?
Posted by: PaulK on Mar 24, 2008 4:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What if America was already the bloodbath that we were hoping to prevent?

What if the American occupiers left on January 19, 2009, Bush's final act to deny President Obama the privilege of doing it "right", and there was residual fighting by warring clans, and the UN negotiated a fragile peace between various warring clans? Then the clans sold a little oil, and maybe half of the three million refugees returned home and started rebuilding. And the veil of "terrorist nation" fell, and the world saw Iraq as just another war-weary nation.

The first trillion bought Saddam Hussein in a can. The last two trillion didn't buy anything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: But That Was The Plan! Posted by: edgar_michel
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Mar 24, 2008 6:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans don't have to continue to die in Iraq.

Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What event started the "War on Terror?"
Posted by: Adler Berriman Seal on Mar 24, 2008 6:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What event started the War on Terror? The best, perhaps the only way to restore sanity to US foreign policy is to gain a clear understanding of the terrorist attack of 9/11/01.

Why do these so-called "Progressives" and "Liberals" who pride themselves in being compassionate and rational, bemoan the horrors of this war while simultaneously refusing to rationally address the foundational event behind all of this horror?

Find out who Dominik Suter is and what his company Urban Moving Systems Inc. was up to on 9/11/01.

After doing that, have a look at the Connection between Ronald S. Lauder and World Trade Center

BIG CLUE: Lauder is intimately connected to MOSSAD!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about the Number of: Two
Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters on Mar 24, 2008 9:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sergeant First Class Smith
Cpl. Jason L. Dunham
One Soldier and One Marine who both with the up most valor gave there lives for this country while carrying out there duties with in there respected units. As a former Marine myself going through training we would learn about the Marines before us that has sacrifice themselves diving on a grenade in order to save there fellow comrades. Even in the friendly confides of Parris Island, SC you would think you would find yourself in such a situation such as Corporal Dunham did on On April 14, 2004, in Iraq near the Syrian border. Corporal Dunham used his helmet and his body to smother an exploding Mills Bomb let loose by a raging insurgent whom Dunham and two other Marines tried to subdue.
Thinking to myself, he was taught from the same Marines that I learn of the heroics from other Marines in such conflicts as Vietnam, Korea and World War II. Its amazing to be apart of a group that you know someone that would take the ultimate sacrifice so that you can go home.
Sergeant First Class Paul Ray Smith was someone you would want leading into combat or down a dark alley. A career solider on his forth deployment to a combat zone and a 2nd time into Iraq as his unit was one of the 1st to penetrate Iraq in the beginning of the invasion. The firefight that ensued in the the Karbala Gap were Sergeant 1st Class Smith valor was tested while withstanding incoming insurgent artillery fire in a ambush that would save about 100 lives however tragically take his own. Sgt 1st Class Smith unwilling knew what it would take for the men in his unit to get out alive when he got behind the The .50-Cal Machine Gun to suppressing the insurgence however succumb to the ultimate sacrifice.
These two Patriots will not be remember as statistics. The 3998 that has also fallen in the Iraq theater of the Global War on Terrorism are also not a statistics. Not only these people are someone loved one however they are also patriotic Americans. For or against the way America chose to handle this great conflict of our time. These people should not die in vain.
There will others that will join the brave in the fallen in the days to come however war is Hell however if you want peace so the next generation dose not have to return well we are only faced with the fact that the time is now.
The number: Two is little known in this conflict in Iraq if the Medial of Honor recipients. The highest honor that is bestowed to the heroic beyond valor. The 3998 that are apart of this number are also bestowed the honor that they should not be marked in vain. There honor must be defended and the only way is victory.
"fear is better met with vigilance"
Jibreel K. Riley

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How about the Number of: Two Posted by: drsivana99