Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Unspeakable Path to Balanced Budgets

By Paul Buchheit, AlterNet. Posted March 22, 2008.


Shhhhh ... It's politically incorrect to talk about raising corporate taxes.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

In Special Coverage

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Jim Hightower, Raising Hell
Jonathan Rowe

Democracy and Elections:
Are Feds Trying to Aid Republican Candidate's Election?
Tim Kalich

DrugReporter:
A Cultural History of the Magic Mushroom
Lux

Election 2008:
The Real Elitist: Video of McCain's Collection of Mansions Reveal He's Not Your Average Joe
Steven Greenhouse

Environment:
Republicans Have Handed Democrats a Winning Election Issue
David Morris

ForeignPolicy:
Blocking a Gazan's Path to an Education
Fidaa Abed

Health and Wellness:
The Misshapen Mind: How the Brain's Haphazard Evolution Left Us with Self-Destructive Instincts
Sasha Abramsky

Hurricane Katrina:
From the Bayou to Baghdad: Mission Not Accomplished
Amy Goodman

Immigration:
Medical Neglect in Immigrant Prisons Reveals America at Its Worst
Kyle Hussein de Beausset

Media and Technology:
What's Going on with the Media's Ballooning Coverage of Celebrity Babies?
Meredith Blake

Movie Mix:
Protest over Use of the Word 'Retard' in Stiller's 'Tropic Thunder' Misses the Target
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Obama Should Pick Hillary
Lanny Davis

Rights and Liberties:
Stop the Execution: Jeff Wood Faces Death Tomorrow for a Murder He Didn't Commit
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
Catching the Wrong John: When Are the Media Going to Talk about John McCain's Infidelity?
Drew Westen

War on Iraq:
How Many More Iraqis Can You Throw Behind Bars Without Trial?
Fatih Abdulsalam

Water:
What If Your Tap Water Is Not Safe To Drink?
Elizabeth Royte

More stories by Paul Buchheit

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 

Over most of the country we hear the same refrain: tax revenues are shrinking, budget cuts will be needed, and the public will have to pay a little more. A recent US News and World Report article concludes that at least 20 states (and 35 to 40 by 2009) are facing budget shortfalls. The only options, according to the article, are to raise taxes or cut spending.

A good example is Chicago, where an increase in the Cook County sales tax awarded the city the dubious distinction of the highest sales tax in the nation, at 10.25 percent. There seemed to be few alternatives to this further regressive tax on average Americans. In May 2007, Illinois Governor Blagojevich tried to increase business taxes, but his efforts were shot down without a single supporting vote from the Illinois House.

The sense is that we shouldn't tax the corporate 'lifeblood' of America. A rudimentary analysis shows that indeed we do not tax big business, but not for lack of trying. A 2007 Business Week review revealed that many of our largest corporations are paying an extremely low percentage of federal income taxes. In the five-year period from 2002 to 2006, CMS Energy, Chesapeake Energy, and Boeing paid an average tax of less than 1 percent, and well-known firms such as Amazon, Yahoo, Broadcom, Southwest Airlines, and eBay paid an average tax of less than 4 percent. The reasons are varied and notable. Boeing has taken advantage of now discontinued tax breaks for selling outside the country. Broadcom was one of many companies that produced and sold billions of dollars worth of goods in tax-favorable countries such as Singapore. Tax-avoidance winner CMS Energy wrote off a great amount of bad investments, but added, through CFO Thomas Webb, "We will get back to paying taxes again, and we look forward to that day."

By combining the low-tax figures with the annual Fortune 500 rankings of revenue-producing firms, the extent of the tax loss to the American people can be gauged. If the top 86 tax-avoiding companies had paid as much tax in 2006 (26 percent) as the average S&P 500 company, a tax return to the public of $221 billion would have been realized. This amount of money would have covered the ENTIRE 2008 federal budget for Education, Health and Human Services, and Homeland Security. (Calculations here.)

The consensus among Americans, thanks to years of supply-side assurances, is that business taxes slow the economy, eliminate jobs, and drive the corporations to other states or countries. It's often noted that the U.S. already has one of the highest corporate tax rates among OECD countries. But according to the Brookings Institution, and as suggested by the calculations above, the U.S. is actually the fourth lowest among OECD countries in the collection of corporate taxes as a percentage of GDP.

The threat to shut down and move out of the country is also highly questionable. Between 2002 and 2006 the S&P 500 realized 18 consecutive quarters of double-digit revenue growth. The average salary for CEOs of large U.S. firms in all industries was $11.6 million in 2005, with some oil company and military defense executives making much more, up to almost $100 million a year. US productivity has continued to surge in the 2000s, while worker compensation has remained largely stagnant.

When social security taxes, sales taxes, transportation fees, and utility costs are included, the typical American wage earner pays about a 40 percent overall tax. American wage earners should think about the big companies with the little tax bills the next time their local school budget is cut.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: corporate taxes, budget

Paul Buchheit is a professor with the Chicago City Colleges, co-founder of Global Initiative Chicago (GIChicago.org), and the founder of fightingpoverty.org. He is the editor and main contributor to the forthcoming book "American Wars: Illusions and Realities" (Clarity Press).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Great Article ... take the next step ... Tariffs ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Mar 22, 2008 9:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Implementing tariffs would accomplish much in dispelling talk of moving overseas. Other countries are manipulating their currencies, dumping product and subsidizing production. Rather than quibble with these countries we need only implement tariffs.

Tariffs would accomplish three things. Not only keep jobs here but actually bring some back. Reduce our unsustainable trade deficit and raise money to offset our budget deficit.

Would prices go up? Of course, but they will go up anyway if our dollar keeps plunging. So it's either pay now and get jobs and tax revenue or pay later having lost the jobs and having no new revenue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Help for Cities and States ? Business too ?
Posted by: mmckinl on Mar 22, 2008 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Medicare for everyone ...

An instant easy way to stabilize budgets while covering everyone in America ... Right now we are wasting at least 6% of our GDP on unnecessary medical expenses.

Of course states would have to be reigned in with penalties should they use this windfall for pay raises or other political gamesmanship. We need to prohibit states from paying corporations to move in ... this is a no win bargaining chip for America.

How to pay for it? As the article says, raise taxes to a fair level on corporations, but, give them protection in the form of import tariffs.

A national strategy with tariffs would leave corporations where they are, states on a level playing field while everyone is insured.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Kill the Creature from Jekyll Island
Posted by: Adler Berriman Seal on Mar 22, 2008 2:13 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only way to put the US (including the economy) is to kill the creature from Jekyll Island.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tax the damned corporations
Posted by: pangolin on Mar 23, 2008 12:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back in the dark ages of the Carter years the schools had a relative surplus of money, only one worker could support most households and college was affordable for almost everybody.

Oh, and they taxed corporations and the wealthy.

When Raygun was elected suddenly homeless people (they had to INVENT a word) appeared on the streets of the US, unions were broken, schools were defunded, and two-parent families became two working-parents just to make ends meet. College became something the upper-middle class could afford and everyone else had to take out loans. And the corporations and the wealthy had their taxes cut drasticatlly.

I say that we increase the tax revenues on corporations and any corporation that moves offshore forfeits all of its assets to the state that held it's corporate charter. US citzens that form offshore corporations to hide earnings forfiet all of their assets if such an action is proven in court.

Corporations are supposed to be given charters for the common good not merely to increase the comfort of the wealthy and afflict the rest of the citizenry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Mar 23, 2008 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have been listening for far too long to the supply siders as they decry every form of taxation in the name of "growth". However, there are many forms of "growth" that exist in society, and not just economic growth should be used as a benchmark. We need to foster growth in wages, in affordable housing, in the care of infrastructure, in healthcare, and in social practices which enrich ordinary working families. In order to do this important work (which really pays Wall Street back, although they would never admit it - because a healthy, less stressed, well housed populace does feed the economy quite well by consuming)...taxes need to be enacted fairly.

Corporations have been the recipients of nanny state welfare for years - but the benefits of this have not flowed into the pockets of ordinary working Americans except in some cases where you have fair and decent corporations. Thus I think we should be raising taxes and not listening to the general sophistry that Wall Street promotes (especially now we should be turning a deaf ear as you can see quite well the sorry results of such indefensible economic policies as have been promoted over the last few decades). The lowering of corporate taxes did overly enrich CEOs but no one else as wages were flatlined due to their obsession with profits. So the constitutents (wage workers) who needed the most benefits from lowered corporate taxes did not realize them for the most part.

In addition to revisiting corporate taxes, I think we should retroactively tax CEOs - and raise the personal income tax rate for them in addition to raising the rate on stock options and so on (and doing away with the indefensible write offs they enjoy such as use of jets, personal accountants, and so on). This would be redress for the damage done to this economy by their financial chicanery. Then we should use that money to correct the gross injustices that have been done in the name of profits over the years - i.e., build affordable housing, remake the healthcare system, invest in infrastructure, and revamp the educational system so that the first things we start teaching our young citizens are about financial sophistry in government policies, deception in the media, manipulative advertising and manipulation in political ads, religious manipulation, and heuristic voting. Lastly the importance of civic duties and activism should be taught. A corporation's civic duties should include being fair and we should revamp our tax system, the Wall Street system and capitalism in general so that everyone, not just CEOs, can reap the rewards of their labors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's still about 200 billion to fix America
Posted by: dajson on Mar 24, 2008 9:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've watched this over the last 3 Presidencies and it seems consistent that the difference between a prosperous America, and an America on the precipice of recession is about 200 billion dollars that moves between the Pentagon and domestic spending. Clinton moved about that much to domestic spending and it seemed like the good times would never end as surpluses of tax dollars were projected to just keep piling up sure to save a projected Social Security shortfall. Then Bush came along and way more than 200 billion moved from the domestic to the Pentagon, and the bad times have been a threat ever since. Don't tell me we can't trim 200 billion dollars off of a bloated wasteful Pentagon budget, and still keep flushing money down the Iraq toilet. I think we can save this country and let the rich keep their stupid Bush tax cuts, but let's take away their influence on our government that they no longer pay for in taxes. I say we could legalize pot, throw a generous excise tax on it, and bomb all the countries we want, or create a prosperous America that leads the world by example. I'm going to smoke it every day anyway, and then we could just tell the rich to shut the F#$@k up since they don't pay taxes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]