Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

How Generation X Got the Shaft But Can Still Keep Everything From Sucking

By Helaine Olen, AlterNet. Posted March 22, 2008.


Gen X'ers don't deserve their slacker reputation, argues the author of X Saves the World. After all, they can boast Google and Barack Obama.
imagedb
bookcover

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Helaine Olen

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Somewhere in between the ceaseless celebrations of the Baby Boomers turning 60 and the Millennial generation discovering they were suffering from a quarter-life crisis, the cultural powers that be forgot to take note of a major milestone: Generation X began to turn 40.

Molly Ringwald, of the quintessential Gen X film The Breakfast Club, celebrated her 40th birthday earlier this year. Prozac Nation author Elizabeth Wurtzel might well be spending her days taking notes on perimenopause -- she's turning 41 in July. And if Kurt Cobain were still alive, no one would be thinking of him as an angry young man. He would be 40-plus too.

Yet Generation X, those born roughly between 1965 and 1980 (it's worth noting that demographers disagree about the group's exact parameters, preferring to use the dates 1963 to 1977), remains forever young in the public imagination, still those 20-somethings sitting around Seattle and Austin grunge bars and coffee houses exchanging ironic witticisms about life and doing not much else with their time. "Somebody seems to have forgotten Generation X," writes Jeff Gordinier, author of the just released X Saves the World: How Generation X Got the Shaft but Can Still Keep Everything From Sucking. "The stodgy old species known as the 30-something has been shuttled off like Molly Ringwald herself, to some sort of Camp Limbo for demographic lepers."

Gordinier seeks to rescue Generation X from the shadows in this rollicking book. (Hint: if you don't think Gordinier is funny, read his hilarious take-down of a Newsweek article on Boomer friendships in his introduction), He revisits Gen X highlights from childhood in the inflation-ridden 1970s through slacking during the recession of the early 1990s to the dot-com boom and bust, and what came after. He looks at the careers of folks as disparate as director Paul Thomas Anderson and Meetup founder Scott Heiferman and his partners to prove that, well, Gen X doesn't deserve its slacker reputation. They work, those 30- and 40-somethings. They really do -- when they can get work, that is. Generation X, it seems, has a nasty habit of getting bushwhacked by bad economic conditions time and time again. Yes, they've produced a few Internet millionaires, but Census Bureau figures reveal that the men of Generation X are grossing less than their fathers at the same age. And if you think you detect a tone of slight bitterness in my reportorial voice, in the interests of full disclosure I admit to a birth date that marks me as a full-fledged member of Generation X.

Yet in his attempt to shill for a group that is genuinely in need of some good public relations, Gordinier lets some less than exemplary Gen X traits slide. When it comes to solipsistic spending, for example, Generation X puts Baby Boomers to shame. What other generation can claim to have made $1,000 architecturally inspired infant strollers and $5 cups of designer coffee into necessities? Gordinier could also have devoted more page space to the women of his generation, who are now on the forefront of the work/life balance debate.

Yet Gordinier is ultimately an optimist, believing Generation X is only now coming into its own as a true force for change. He points to a growing number of 30- and 40-something social activists, arguing that the sheer number of political, international, economic and environmental disasters that have occurred over the course of George W. Bush's presidency leaves Generation X with no choice but to begin to go about the business of fixing our society. In short, he believes the group will turn into the demographic equivalent of Winston Wolf, the clean-up character played by Harvey Keitel in Pulp Fiction:

We're equipped. We're wary enough to see through delusional "movements": we're old enough to feel a connection to the past (and yet we're unsentimental enough not to get all gooey about it); we're young enough to be wired; we're snotty enough not to settle for crap; we're resourceful enough to turn crap into gold; we're quiet enough to endure our labors on the margins. Beyond that, we're all we got. Nobody else is going to do it.

Gordinier's probably got a point. But this GenXer needs to make a stop at her local coffee house before she gets to work. I hear they have a great new South American blend, and I'd like to try it out. We 40-somethings need all the energy we can get, you know?

AlterNet met recently with Gordinier in his suburban New York City town to discuss what makes Generation X distinctive, if demography is destiny and which generation can legitimately claim Barack Obama as one of its own.

Helaine Olen: Why did you write this book?


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: barack obama, generation x, x saves the world, demography

Helaine Olen has written for the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, Salon and other publications. She is an associate editor at LiteraryMama.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Every realize what the 'X' really means?
Posted by: Adler Berriman Seal on Mar 22, 2008 12:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MDMA. It was a marketing ploy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Term Generation "X" was INVENTED by author Douglas Coupland
Posted by: Prairie Waif on Mar 22, 2008 4:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture is the genesis of the terminology Generation X.

Generation X is Canadian author Douglas Coupland's first foray into the publishing world (1991) and he has been around to develop aphorisms for our generation the same as The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy has done.

Each book came out in paperback with a different colour of clouds on the top heading of the book's front. I've had blue, yellow and now pink and successive loans have not returned. Too tired are we to rise from the light beaming in our found cozy spot, it's not worth the struggle.

The introductory words on the inside cover:
"Finally . . . a frighteningly hilarious, voraciously readable salute to the generation born in the late 1950s and 1960s- a camera shy, suspiciously hushed generation known vaguely up to now as twentysomething.

Andy, Claire, and Dag, each in their twenties, have quit "pointless jobs done grudgingly to little applause" in their respective hometowns and cut themselves adrift on the California desert. In search of drastic changes that will lend meaning to their lives, they've mired themselves in the detritus of American cultural memory.

Refugees from history, the three develop an ascetic regime of story-telling, boozing, and working McJobs--"Low-pay, low-prestige, low-benefit, no-future jobs in the service industry." They create modern fables of love and death among the cosmetic surgery parlors and cocktail bars of Palm Springs, disturbingly funny tales of nuclear waste, historical overdosing and mall culture.

A dark snapshot of the trio's highly fortressed inner world quickly emerges-landscapes peppered with dead TV shows, "Elvis Moments," and semi-disposable Swedish furniture. And from these landscapes, deeper portraits emerge, those of fanatically independent individuals, pathologically ambivalent about the future and brimming with the unsatisfied longings for permanence, for love and for their own home.


The author of the article apparently hadn't done his research to learn where the terminology began, and it did begin with Coupland.

Funnily enough, Coupland was on the CBC recently discussing Gen Xer's at this point in their life cycle. He mentioned Grandparents having died or dying. He told how when his Grandmother died, they were allowed to choose anything they wanted from Grandma's house.

True to his roots, he chose a mobile that she had gotten for free with gas purchase coupons; it was a bunch of eyes of all different sizes that had an eerie effect with the slightest air current in the room. "Maybe I will catch Grandma's spirit."

Spoken like a True Gen Xer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Generation X was a Pop/Punk Band Posted by: left_libertarian
» RE: Generation X was a Pop Band Posted by: johnclark
Dying Laughing...
Posted by: grumble-bum on Mar 22, 2008 4:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Eventually, whether they'll admit it or not, the Boomers are going to die."

Absolutely priceless, & a brutally honest encapsulation of the often self-satisfied & well, oblivious, aspect of the Boomer world-view.

When the time comes, it will make for a great series of bi-monthly Newsweek/Time/Rolling Stone cover articles.

I don't agree on all of the author's points (as presented in this interview, anyway), but it certainly is past time that my generation start getting a modicum of respect. Of course, it behooves us to keep the self-congratulation to a minimum, lest we fall into the nostalgia-pit our parents sometimes live in.

There are no generational absolutes, but it does seem fair to say that mine has evinced a trend towards late-blooming (I'm in my early 30's, & just now starting to find a focus). Not that we aren't in our own way passionate, or hard-working, but in the sense that it's taken a while for us to find way to combine passion with a paycheck.

I look around at many of my peers & see that we are (like any generation of people) finally coming into our own. It's just taken a lot of wandering in proverbial deserts & battling against our own disillusionment.

Don't worry, folks. Despite ourselves, there is hope here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Late Blooming Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Dying Laughing... Posted by: MobileSucks
» Generation what? Posted by: wwittman
» RE: Dying Laughing... Posted by: joeunix
» The boomers are sellouts? Posted by: joeunix
» Yes. Posted by: MobileSucks
» RE: Yes. Posted by: gustafgrapple
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
Pondering
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Mar 22, 2008 4:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's impossible to be accurate with these articles that try to sum up generations and put them in boxes. But this one definitely got me thinking more than a lot of them. It's a fascinating topic.

It's hard to say why many Xers ended up so cynical. Boomers had the '68 and '72 elections, and the tragic deaths of many of their heroes, movements, and cultural icons, as well as the economic problems of the early '70s. They had a lot to be cynical about, yet they went on to be annoyingly naive and idealistic, thinking Reagan, materialism, and right-wing ideology would cure their blues. How's that working out, by the way?

A few minor economic downturns, scandals, and punk bands makes Xers too cynical to bother getting off the couch? I don't know...But something definitely did it to some of us, because I identify with a lot of the X sentiments described in this article and in Grunge culture. Maybe if you combine our own experience with our reflection on the Boomers' experience, it all adds up...I don't know.

For those of us who do fit the profile, I don't see that changing anytime soon, or that we're going to soften up and have more faith in changing things for the better. The depression analogy was pretty good: Were your grandparents still keeping money under the mattress 50-70 years after the Depression ended?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Nuclear Posted by: Pick
Transcript error in the interview -- A note from the interviewer
Posted by: Helaine on Mar 22, 2008 6:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is Helaine Olen, the interviewer for this piece. I need to correct an error in the transcript. Jeff said "fucking crap culture" in the first question. He did not NOT say fucking rap culture." I am trying to get this corrected as soon as possible and, hopefully, this comment will soon make no sense.

All I ask is that you don't blame the author of the book for this. You may feel free to blame the interviewer all you want.

Many apologies to all the readers of AlterNet for this fuck up.

Helaine

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama is part of Generation Jones, not GenX or Boomer
Posted by: WatchingTheParade on Mar 22, 2008 7:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is not a GenXer. Nor is he "technically" a Boomer. What does that mean anyway..."technically"? There are no technical or official definitions of generations. Generations are determined by the subjective opinions of experts, primarily social scientists.

There has been a running debate in recent months about the correct generation of Obama. Increasingly, the conclusion has been that he's part of Generation Jones--the heretofore lost generation between the Boomers and Xers. The New York Times, CBS, Newsweek Magazine, and The Wall Street Journal have all run pieces in which they argued that Obama is, in fact, a member of Generation Jones. I recently heard a panel of experts on a radio show discuss this for an hour, and they concluded as well that Obama is a GeneJoneser.

When you study his bio, his worlview, his political stances, it becomes obvious that Obama is part of this long-lost generation finally coming into its own.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My Perspective...
Posted by: dave16 on Mar 22, 2008 7:23 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please see www.discussrace.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Boomer or X'er?
Posted by: NoKidding on Mar 22, 2008 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was born in 1964. I always considered myself a Boomer, but now I may be of Gen X? I'm having an identity crisis! ;-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Boomer or X'er? Posted by: TokyoTuds
» GenJones, not Boomer or X'er Posted by: WatchingTheParade
» RE: Boomer or X'er? Posted by: DaBear
» RE: Boomer or X'er? Posted by: left_libertarian
I must be an idiot
Posted by: hotdog on Mar 22, 2008 8:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to be writing on this thread. "Baby boom" is a demographically defined event from 1946-64. So Obama is baby boom. The guy born in 64 is on the cusp. Ask an astrologer what that means.

Does "Barack Obama [have] a Gen X sensibility"? Give me a break. so does Jesus and Buddha and Robert Downey Jr!

Want to make a difference on the planet? Stop consuming, stop believing in fairy tales, and get together with some friends or neighbors and do something.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I must be an idiot Posted by: NoKidding
Espresso Bar? I was there too!
Posted by: NoKidding on Mar 22, 2008 8:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We probably crossed paths, Jeff. I used to hang out there in the alley in the mid '80s. Dean, Peter, Spencer, all old pals. No more Loch Ness Monster, just high-end boutiques. Oh well, it was fun while it lasted. I still remember the original Pooh Bah's on Fair Oaks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Generation X"; "Generation Y"; "The greatest Generation"; "Baby Boomers"
Posted by: joeunix on Mar 22, 2008 8:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Divide and conquer.

And you dummies keep falling for it, and falling for it.

It's called the "Hegelian dialectic."

Americans--sharp as marbles.

My people shame me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» :O Posted by: Scientz
» RE: O Posted by: joeunix
» RE: Nope, you miss the point (Burp `;^) Posted by: left_libertarian
» What comes after Gen Z? Posted by: joeunix
One thing about Gen-Xers....
Posted by: ankhet on Mar 22, 2008 9:48 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...they talk too much about nothing. so far - all style and no substance. Mindless lemminghood.
Nice to know that the generations that survived two world wars, a
Depression, and are now suffering the same sh*tty economic conditions as those poor poor Gen-Xers have spawned offspring that want nothing more than to see them dead.

Yes, there were 10 or 15 good years in that pile from 1912-2007, but it was just the luck of the draw for most of us to have been born into it - not complaining - grateful, feel lucky, yes. Gen-Xers for some inexplicable (look it up, it's not a brand of music player) reason - egotism? solipsism, narcissism? believe of themselves that they would have responded differently under the circumstances.

There are too many of you, and you're mere guppies. Maybeyou'll get eaten up by ther bigger fish in the tank. Stop whining. I hate food that whines.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You're right Posted by: joeunix
» You are one sick puppy Posted by: joeunix
» RE: You are one sick puppy Posted by: ankhet
» RE: You are one sick puppy Posted by: ankhet
The Robin Williams Plan
Posted by: mindtrvlr on Mar 22, 2008 3:50 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Plan!
?

Robin Williams, wearing a shirt that says 'I love New York ' in Arabic.

You gotta love Robin Williams......Even if he's nuts! Leave it to Robin Williams to come up with the perfect plan. What we need now is for our UN Ambassador to stand up and repeat this message.

Robin Williams' plan...(Hard to argue with this logic!)

'I see a lot of people yelling for peace but I have not heard of a plan for peace. So, here's one plan.'

1) 'The US will apologize to the world for our 'interference' in their affairs, past & present. You know, Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Tojo, Noriega, Milosevic, Hussein, and the rest of those 'good 'ole' boys', we will never 'interfere' again.

2) We will withdraw our troops from all over the world, starting with Germany , South Korea , the Middle East , and the Philippines . They don't want us there. We would station troops at our borders. No one allowed sneaking through holes in the fence.

3) All illegal aliens have 90 days to get their affairs together and leave We'll give them a free trip ho me. After 90 days the remainder will be gathered up and deported immediately, regardless of whom or where they are. They're illegal!!! France will welcome them.

4) All future visitors will be thoroughly checked and limited to 90 days unless given a special permit!!!! No one from a terrorist nation will be allowed in. If you don't like it there, change it yourself and don't hide here. Asylum would never be available to anyone. We don't need any more cab drivers or 7-11 cashiers.

5) No foreign 'students' ove r age 21. The older ones are the bombers. If they don't attend classes, they get a 'D' and it's back home baby.

6) The US will make a strong effort to become self-sufficient energy wise. This will include developing nonpolluting sources of energy but will require a temporary drilling of oil in the Alaskan wilderness. The caribou will have to cope for a while

7) Offer Saudi Arabia and other oil producing countries $10 a barrel for their oil. If they don't like it, we go someplace else. They can go somewhere else to sell their production. (About a week of the wells filling up the storage sites would be enough.)

8) If there is a famine or other natural catastrophe in the world, we will not 'interfere.' They can pray to Allah or whomever, for seeds, rain, cement or whatever they need. Besides most of what we give them is stolen or given to the army. The people who need it most get very little, if anything.

9) Ship the UN Headquarters to an isolated island someplace. We don't need the spies and fair weather friends here. Besides, the building would make a good homeless shelter or lockup for illegal aliens.

10) All Americans must go to charm and beauty school. That way, no one can call us 'Ugly Americans' any longer. The Language we speak is ENGLISH..learn it...or LEAVE...Now, isn't that a winner of a plan?

'The Statue of Liberty is no longer saying 'Give me your tired, your poor, your huddle d masses. ' She's got a baseball bat and she's yelling, 'you want a piece of me?' '

If you agree with the above forward it to friends...If not, and I would be amazed, DELETE it!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get Used To It!
Posted by: westomoon on Mar 22, 2008 6:01 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I loved this quote: "I was impressed by what he was doing. I was also put off by his robotic use of jargon, by his self-satisfaction, by his, like, "Yes, I'm doing something good for the world. Now I'm going to tell you all about it." As an X'er, I found it sort of distasteful."

I was born in 1948 -- make of that what you will -- and I've gotten used to the fact that everything that gets written by a self-identified Xer will contain a basic ration of unabashed whining. (The ones who don't whine also tend not to be real invested in the Gen X label.)

Rasps my nerves somethin' fierce, but I recognize that you have something to say within that slime coat of whine. If the generation after you Xers packages its thoughts in a way you find hard to take -- well, I guess they're doin' their job then, aren't they?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This article is smug and condescending (not to mention a pile of crap)
Posted by: joeunix on Mar 22, 2008 7:20 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"After all, they can boast Google and Barack Obama."

As UNIX operating systems expert (Sr. UNIX Systems Administrator, with ample Linux, Solaris, AIX, and FreeBSD experience), I can tell you that Google was developed on a UNIX-like operating system (Linux). Granted, Linux was developed by Linux Torvalds and hundreds of others who worked in collaboration with him, one must remember that Torvalds merely emulated/copied the operating system, which was originally developed by two "baby boomers", Ken Thompson and Dennis Ritchie at AT&T.

Thus, Linux would not exist today without the pioneering work of the two "Baby boomer" geniuses, Thompson and Ritchie.

By the way, I was born in 1966, so I'm a Gen-Xer, and I have the highest respect and admiration for the "baby boomers". They were pioneers in many fields and they deserve our thanks and respect. Put simply, you would have nothing without them.

Moreover, don't be so smug, my fellow Gen-Xers, because without the work of Thompson and Ritchie, you wouldn't have the internet today.

So get off you high-horse and grow up; learn to show some respect for those whose work towers over your paltry achievements.

----------
Proud Ex-Texan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sorry for the typo Posted by: joeunix
» RE: Sorry for the typo Posted by: bornxeyed
» More typos (Burp) Posted by: joeunix
» Unix not invented by boomers. Posted by: johnclark
» GNU's not Unix Posted by: johnclark
» More bunk Posted by: joeunix
Barrack Obama is Gen X
Posted by: DrSteve on Mar 22, 2008 10:23 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Strauss and Howe, who wrote some great analysis of American Generations called GenX also the 13th generation, which they tagged as born in 61 and after.This Makes Obama an Early GenXer. The 64 date is one of those endlessly cut n paste dates journalists leech off each other that was basically a date demographers pinned when the birth rates started dropping (Birth Control!!Divorce American Style!!))Culturally however those born after 60 have little in common with their older boomer sibs. Obama's overall savvy staying above the the typical political media frenzy fostered on the 24 hour news channels is pure GenX.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm Calling Bullsh*t
Posted by: NoPCZone on Mar 23, 2008 1:03 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, Baby Boomers are not all the same. Someone like myself, brn in 1961 has little in common with the Boomer born in 1945 other than the fact that our parents were probably both of the WW II generation. When the Summer of Love was going on I was playing Little League Baseball and riding my bicycle to the beach. So much for lumping us all together.

Secondly, much of what the slackers like to lay at the feet of the Baby Boomer Generation is actually a gift given to all of us by the 'Greatest Generation' that came home from WWII to a very generous GI Bill of rights and the only major economy not devastated by WW II. 30 and out was something few, if any Boomers have ever seen- retiring on full pay and benefits after 30 years on the job. The WWII generation held on to the reins of power until Bill Clinton. From Eisenhower through George HW Bush, we were ruled by WW II vets, so don't blame the boomers for what was largely decided for them.

Third, the Slackers are in the process of getting the largest generational transfer of wealth the world has ever seen. As two-income Boomers retire with smaller families, the slacker kids are going to inherit a monstrous amount of money and property.

As to the endless bashing of the Boomers, think back and look at what they did actually do in their youth. The Civil Rights Movement, the 18 Year-Old Vote, the Gay Rights Movement, the Environmental Movement, the Organic Foods Movement, the Consumer Movement, the Anti-War (Vietnam) Movement, the Women's Movement, the Anti-Nuclear Power Movement and many other things taken for granted today were powered and peopled largely by the Baby Boomers so widely derided by the Slackers.

As you type your response on your computer, thank Baby Boomers like Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, Bill Gates and others who brought the personal computer to life. Thank Boomers like Tim Berners-Lee and others who turned DARPANET into the Internet. Thank Boomers like Al Gore who pushed to have this formerly DoD property turned over to the public and extended on a universal basis.

The rep the MSM has laid at the doorstep of the post WWII generation is largely undeserved and inaccurate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Of course it's b******* Posted by: joeunix
» RE: I'm Calling Bullsh*t Posted by: left_libertarian
As a boomer,
Posted by: Ellie1 on Mar 23, 2008 6:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
who is still out there protesting, I would like to see younger people out there demanding change from our horrible government, protesting the war, demanding reform, and actually voting.

If not, I would like to see a return of the draft. That motivated my generation, and would get the passive asses of this generation out of their parent's houses, either in the street or in Iraq. Which would you prefer?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: As a boomer, Posted by: NoPCZone
» We are not passive Posted by: Ghoulman
DON'T call me a 'slacker'
Posted by: Ghoulman on Mar 23, 2008 10:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a 41 year old Gen-X veteran let me tell ya, I will smash your teeth out if you call me this name. It drives me crazy.

The term came around in the mid to late 90s, suggesting we as a generation were lazy. But who created the 'slacker' term? Anyone know??? Think about it.

The reality was that we are a generation overly educated but unable to find work other than the 'McJobs' the Yuppie Right Wing generation before us created thanks to Globalization/Free Trade. We also saw employment law deregulated to a legal equivalent of 19th century law.

In the typically cruel right wing corporate way of seeing things, it wasn't 'their' fault we couldn't get a real job, we were 'slackers'.

Pisses me right off, I can tell you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: boomers got the money Posted by: Ghoulman
Missing Time in Night Club
Posted by: DeaconJ on Mar 23, 2008 1:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ironic this article surfaces after an odd observation
my wife and I had at a trendy dance club. This DJ
started off the set with tacky 70's and early 80's and
then jumped way forward to present dance songs. Seems
the mid eighties and all of the 90's were irrelevant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama is a Baby Boomer
Posted by: clocksmith on Mar 23, 2008 3:56 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Baby Boom Years have always been recognized as 1946 through, and including, 1964. Obama was born on August 4, 1961.

So stop trying to steal him and suddenly make him part of the Gen X group. Bad enough we Boomers have to claim Baby Bush as part of our generation!

I was born in 1958 and feel that I don't have much in common with people born in, say, 1946 but that does not change the fact that I am part of this generational group. My oldest son was born in 1980 and probably has nothing in common with someone born in 1965 but they are both part of the same generation, like it or not. Please stop trying to rewrite the rules!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Obama will LOSE to either Hillary or McCain Posted by: democracynowiniraq
» RE: Obama is a Baby Boomer Posted by: DrSteve
Slacker
Posted by: johnclark on Mar 23, 2008 9:27 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Richard Linklater's first film. Big time X'er piece.

It's also really, really funny reading the boomers, too. I just love how they try to say Obama is one of them (just to bring him down). Both HRC & Edwards called him a "young man" on MLK day. When did the boomers re-define middle age 'cause I didn't get the memo?

Generation X was the first book I read about us. Just about everything by & about us up to that point was in zines (look it up, boomers).

I'll get "X Saves the World" in hardcover as soon as the paperback comes out (as we X'ers ain't got the money to pay full price).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]