Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Brutal Chinese Crackdown on Tibet Carries Terrible Echo from the Past

By Dave Zirin, The Nation. Posted March 22, 2008.


China joins a long, proud tradition of countries carrying out brutal political crackdowns in honor of the Olympics.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The brutal crackdown by Chinese authorities against Tibetan independence protesters ahead of the opening of the Summer Olympics in Beijing August 8 carries with it a terrible echo from the past. Scores of protesters are reported dead in the capital city of Lhasa and more repression has been promised. Tibet's China-appointed Governor Champa Phuntsok said, "No country would allow those offenders or criminals to escape the arm of justice and China is no exception." A Tibetan exile group said Monday that Chinese troops were shooting down protesters "like dogs."

Even after decades of occupation, the ruthlessness of the crackdown has shocked much of the world. It happens the week after the U.S. State Department removed China from its list of the world's worst human rights offenders.

Yet the concern expressed by world leaders has seemed less for the people of Tibet than the fate of the Summer Games, with Olympic cash deemed more precious than Tibetan blood. The Olympics were supposed to be China's multibillion-dollar, super sweet sixteen. Britain's Minister for Africa, Asia and the United Nations, Mark Malloch-Brown told the BBC, "This is China's coming-out party, and they should take great care to do nothing that will wreck that."

Other countries hankering after a piece of China's thriving economy have rushed to put daylight between the crackdown in Tibet from the Olympics. The Russian foreign ministry issued a statement saying that "attempts at politicizing the holding of the 2008 Olympic Games in China are unacceptable."

While the European Union, Russia, the United States and Australia have ruled out the idea of boycotting the games, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said Tuesday that the EU should at least consider boycotting the opening ceremony if violence continues.

Whatever happens next, China's crackdown in Tibet is not happening in spite of the Beijing Olympics, but because of them. It is a bold play by China to set a tone for the remainder of the year. Since its occupation of the country in 1951, China has suppressed its Buddhist faith, despoiled the environment and made Tibetans a persecuted minority in their own country via the mass migration of millions of Han Chinese. As monks and young Tibetans took their grievances to the streets over the weekend, the government made clear it would brook no protest and tolerate no dissent.

But it's helpful to remember that in many countries, including our own, pre-Olympic repression is as much of a tradition as lighting the torch.

In 1984, Los Angeles Police Chief Daryl Gates oversaw the jailing of thousands of young black men in the infamous Olympic Gang Sweeps. The 1996 Atlanta games were supposed to demonstrate the gains of the New South, but the New South ended up looking much like the old one, as public housing was razed to make way for the construction of Olympic venues, homeless people were chased off the streets and perceived trouble-makers were arrested.

As Wendy Pedersen of the Carnegie Community Action Project recently recalled in Vancouver, BC, another city poised to crack down on crime, drugs and homelessness in preparation for the Winter Olympics in 2010, Atlanta officials "had six ordinances that made all kinds of things illegal, including lying down. Lots of people were shipped out, and lots of people were put in jail. [The Olympic Planning Committee] actually built the city jail. Activists there called it the first Olympic project completed on time."

But the worst example of Olympic repression -- and the most similar to the current moment -- came in 1968 in Mexico City, where hundreds of Mexican students and workers occupying the National University were slaughtered in the Plaza de las Tres Culturas on October 2, 1968, ten days before the start of the games. Recently declassified documents paint a picture of a massacre as cold and methodical as President Luis Echeverría's instructions.

Echeverría's aim was the same as China's: a pre-emptive strike to make sure that using the Olympic games as a platform for protest would not be on the itinerary. The irony, of course, is that while Echeverría succeeded in crushing the protest movement outside the games, on the inside U.S. athletes Tommie Smith and John Carlos raised their black-gloved fists in an expression of Black Power, cementing the 1968 games as a place defined by discontent. It's a lesson the 2008 athletes might remember. Officials may try to smother dissent on the streets of Lhasa and elsewhere in China, but in the games themselves -- from the path of the Olympic torch up Mount Everest to the opulent venues constructed in Beijing -- the risk for protest, and the opportunity, is real.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: protest, china, human rights, olympics, tibet

Dave Zirin is the author of What's My Name Fool? Sports and Resistance in the United States. Read more of his work at Edgeofsports.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Mar 22, 2008 12:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FREE AMERICA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» FREE AMERICA... Posted by: harryf200
A great article with over-arching themes
Posted by: talkville on Mar 22, 2008 4:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm glad Zirin 'levels the field' in his article. With current developments in Tibet, it is very necessary that each of us consider the activities of our own governments (ours currently engaged in the unilateral, post-invasion occupation phase of another country: Iraq) and the REAL motivations and intentions behind superficially 'humanitarian' efforts with regard to the dire conditions of Tibetans. Movement towards real liberty and real democracy is becoming more and more apparent throughout the 'global South' and the post-colonial world still today being re-colonized by political, economic and military means. The RealPolitik of the G-7 or G-8 ALWAYS will make use of situations such as those of the Tibetan people and very seldom are they motivated by the concern of the well-being of the parties involved. Oppression is global and all the oppressors remain pretty much the same. Let's beware of 'blow-back' when engaging the Olympic Games in an inter-imperialist 'game'. And let's keep solidarity with the Tibetan people in their quest along with a whole lot of others of us for justice, dignity and equity in our social and human relations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

X pat for kindness
Posted by: davy on Mar 22, 2008 10:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dave Zirin is the BEST sports writer there is. As I watch the sports I have known all my life become corrupted it parallels exactly whats going on everywhere. He has the BALLS to tell the story as it should be told. THE REAL STORY.

When kindness carries the Olympic torch I will go to the games - O, I believe it's Mr. Lama that says, kindness is the greatest of all things. I'll play for him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On the Dalai Lama, Feudalism and Slavery in China
Posted by: Purple Cheese on Mar 22, 2008 12:54 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Dalai Lama fled China in 1959 after the failure of an armed rebellion aimed at separating Tibet from China. Before 1959 the majority of Tibetan people were dominated and suppressed under a social order that consisted of a set of religious and government laws that imposed feudal serfdom. Along with the general characteristics of this feudal serfdom were many remnants of slavery. This social system was more cruel and reactionary than serfdom in Europe in the Middle Ages. The serf-owners' economic interests were protected by a political system that combined political and religious powers, ruling over the Tibetan people spiritually as well as politically. The Kashag or local government of Tibet (which in Tibetan translates to "the institute that issues orders") was composed of powerful and influential monks and aristocrats. It upheld a series of social, political and legal institutions that rigidly stratified society. The Thirteen Laws and The Sixteen Laws divided the Tibetan people into three strata and nine grades according to their family background and social status.

The monasteries, officialdom and the aristocrats owned all the arable land and pastures as well as overwhelming majority of livestock. These means of production were granted to them by the Dalai Lama. They had the right to govern and inherit the land.
Taxes and levies in Tibetan areas included land rent, stock rent, corvee (unpaid labor) and taxes. The main form of land rent was forced labor. In addition, there was a mixed form of land rent, which was paid in kind, forced labor and cash.

In Tibet under the serfdom, not only did the local regime at various levels, set up judicial institutions, but the big monasteries, manorial lords and tribal chieftains could also judge legal cases and had their own private prisons.
If the serfs stood up against the manorial lords, violated the law or could not pay rent or taxes on time, the lords would punish them according to the Thirteen Laws or others. They used such inhuman tortures as gouging out the eyes, cutting off the feet or hands, pushing the condemned person down a cliff, drowning, beheading, etc..

The wealth of the society was highly concentrated in Tibet before 1959. More than 80 percent was under the control of the manorial lords. Less than 20 percent belonged to the serfs, who accounted for 95 percent of the population. The majority of serfs lived in extreme poverty.

During the era of the Dalai Lama there were no public schools or universities. In order to gain an education a child had to join one of the Monasteries, which is why many Tibetan mothers were forced by their own clans to give up their loved ones to the Monasteries. Tibetan women and girls were considered second class citizens and had no opportunity for education. Today, all Tibetan children, both boys and girls, have equal rights to a free and compulsory public school education. Tibetan women today provide a major and essential workforce in the government of Tibet Autonomous Region.

Please consider this when deciding to support a return of the Dalai Lama to a Tibet torn away from China. Tibet was officially part of China since the 7th century. The idea of Tibetan independence was born in 1904 when Britain invaded and seized control of the region to protect its crown jewel, the colony of India. British troops murdered the Tibetan army who tried to defend themselves with primitive flintlock rifles versus the British carbine rifles and machine guns. No one in the west ever refers to this invasion, preferring to heap criticism on Chairman Mao for restoring Tibet to China in 1949.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Stretching history..... Posted by: mjabele
» RE: Stretching history..... Posted by: drjasonmd
Yep. You know it's an Olympic year
Posted by: bettyn on Mar 22, 2008 1:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when the host country starts rounding up all the malcontents and misfits. They're either put in prison, sent to the local funny farm, or otherwise exiled. Happens every four years. Unfortunately for the dingbats who ran the Atlanta Olympics, they didn't find Eric Rudolph fast enough and they didn't stop the hick preachers from showing up on every street corner. What a cluster**** that was! I wonder if the IOC will ever let the USA have another shot at this sports(and drug)fest again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Like it or not, Tibet has long been a part of China .
Posted by: skyblizzer on Mar 22, 2008 5:51 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll just bet that if the Western States decided to try for independence from the East due to religious reasons, you would have no problem with a military response from Washington.

Like it or not, Tibet has long been a part of China, and nothing is likely to change this fact. There is not enough support for independence, or it would have already happened.

Do you agree with ne? Feel free to chat with me online. I am at interracial community where i put my photos online, and many black and white singles are online

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» SPAMARAMA>>>> Posted by: jeffreytaos
Questions many Chinese would ask
Posted by: jc_online on Mar 22, 2008 10:47 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There have been a lot of tension on this issues that go well beyond reasoning. A few questions most Chinese would ask:

1. Why when someone starts to burn shops, kill other people, the government should not take them down as fast as possible? Just because they are Tibetans? Think what’s your action if you were those innocent shop owners or the wife/husbands of whoever killed by these Tibetans. How come those lives are not valuable?

2. There is a long history about Tibet. How much do you know about that?

3. Has China really been trying to repress Tibet right before Olympic for political gains? Or those people try to exploit Olympic as a weapon to hurt China?

China is obviously in a hot position and they own an explanation for their action to the international community. But at the same time, those who criticize China over this issue own one billion Chinese an answer for those questions as well.

China is a huge developing country with a host of social problems. Tibet has always been a problem, but is only one of many. The problem would have long been solved if everything else in China has been neatly taken care of and this is the only one left. The question is not whether there are problems. The question is what’s the best way to deal with them, and what are the priorities for a country of that size at that stage of development. Doing nothing after people start to burn shop --- as much as the Tibet activist would love to see --- is not an acceptable or workable solution based on any standard. The sad thing at here is many westerns falls into that trap because they know so little about China and the difficulties China face.

Every peace lover/freedom lover who care about the future of Chinese people or the further of China should try to understand why things are happening as it is. When they don't, their actions hurt much more people than they save. There are much deeper reasons rather than a simple “evil” regime: read more here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» CHIRMAN MAO MIGHT NOT APPROVE... Posted by: jeffreytaos
Rewriting of History
Posted by: mahabhusuku on Mar 23, 2008 7:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There has been an increase in revisionism of the historical relations between Tibet and China. There are a number of good authors anyone should read if they want to understand the situation. Melvyn Goldstein (very critical of Tibet's history and a socialist), Matthew Kapstein, and Tsering Shakya.

In addition, here are a number of online links that address some of the points of contest that have been thrown up by advocates of the idea that Tibet was part of China:

On the recent origin of the idea that Tibetans are a Chinese people:

Sun Yat-Sen, leader of the republican movement that toppled the last imperial dynasty of China (the Qing) in 1911, popularized the idea that there were "Five Peoples of China"--the majority Han being one and the others being the Manchus, Mongolian, Tibetan, and Hui (a term that included all Muslims in China, now divided into Uyghurs, Kazakhs, Hui, etc.).

This article even includes the tidbit that the original CCP constitution allowed for minority separation from China:

The Communists even offered the possibility of true independence for minorities. Chairman Mao frequently referred to Article 14 of the 1931 Chinese Communist Party (CCP) constitution, which "recognizes the right of self- determination" of the national minorities in China, their right to complete separation from China, and to the formation of an independent state for each minority. This commitment was not kept after the founding of the People's Republic (Gladney 1996: 60-75).

Symposium on the Tibetan issue

Chinese Dissident Wei Jingsheng's critique of the CCP version of Tibetan history:

Wei Jingsheng's letter to Deng Xiaoping in 1992

Tsering Shakya
Tsering Shakya is considered by many to be the foremost historian of modern Tibetan history.

Tibet: Does History Matter?

Google book exerpts of his text The Dragon in the Land of Snows: A History of Modern Tibet since 1947

A refutation of scholar Wang Lixiong.

Wang Lixiong: Reflections on Tibet

Tsering Shakya: Blood in the Snows (A Reply to Wang Lixiong)

This last is probably the most thorough refutation of the many talking points that critics of Tibetan independence like to throw around nowadays.

Best wishes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you
Posted by: Basenjis on Mar 23, 2008 2:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for all these links to information on Chinese-Tibet history. I will explore every one of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Correction
Posted by: calmecac5 on Mar 23, 2008 3:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Luis Echeverria was Minister of the Interior (Secretaria de Gobernacion) at the time of the massacre in the Plaze of the Three Cultures in Mexico (October 2, 1968). The President at the time was Gustavo Diaz Ordaz.
Echeverria went on to become a president (1970) who had very little respect for dissidents or human rights, but let's put the blame for this incident where it properly belongs--on both Diaz Ordaz and Echeverria.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

watch from different point of view
Posted by: lesterliu on Mar 24, 2008 10:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this is the most rated youtube video about tibet posted by a chinese. check out if you will


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9QNKB34cJo

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

duh!
Posted by: shikejian on Mar 27, 2008 1:59 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good ole China bashing Duh! article writing. This whole thing is orchestrated and it IS about the Olympics. It is about embarrassing China. It is about destabilization.

Rhetorical question: Why, with the US's brilliant, shining human rights violations were the LA and Atlanta games not worked on by the world community?

It's a Duh! moment, yet another one for the pseudo-intellectuals and those American who think they know everything when, in fact, they talk out of the Platonic Cave of ignorance.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This Tibet Gambit Is A Huge Psyop, Of Course
Posted by: blues on Mar 28, 2008 8:49 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not going to re-state the obvious here in some multi-volume dissertation. What is Tibet? Imagine Texas, except it's four miles high. With Mount Everest between it and Mexico. It's basically a vast, windy, dry, semi-desert, where you can't grow much, and you can only survive by eating critters. For centuries, it has been inhabited by a variety of tribes, some Muslim, most Tibetan Buddhists. The Tibetan Buddhists don't even agree on who the head Lama really is. For ordinary people, the place is only accessible via China. India didn't even seriously try to claim it, because they couldn't afford to cross the Himalayas to get to it.

Life was harsh there, and the small ruling monkhoods and whatnot still managed to grasp 3/4 of whatever wealth was available, but the serfs survived somehow. It was merely presumed to belong to China, because no one else could see much reason to go there. Even China ignored it. But for the last hundred years, western powers that had little real success invading (or holding) other parts of China have been sending in spies. The monks and peasants didn't know what these fake western "anthropologists" and "journalists" were about of course. But deals were made. In 1950, China's army went up the hill to establish control over the situation.

So the monks are rioting now, overturning many automobiles, and burning down buildings. Well, Chinese people have been moving in, so now, of the roughly 6 million people on the Tibetan Plateau, there are perhaps two million original Tibetans, two million Chinese newcomers, and one million western "anthropologists, etc." Since China became a thermonuclear power, with regular piloted space missions, and so on, Tibet has become strategically significant to China. And remember, there are about 700 Chinese for every inhabitant of Tibet, including the newcomers and "anthropologists." Of course, the ruling monks and tribal chiefs don't like this. However, if they had bothered to not make deals with all those western "anthropologists," they would have attracted far less attention from Beijing.

The monk riots are coordinated with the upcoming Chinese Olympic games, plus a vast, very well funded, covert western public relations psyop to influence the western perception of China. Why?

My guess is that the western gamesters are somewhat divided over how the military/deindustrial complex should proceed. There are basically two plans: Continue the new War against Islam, which is not going very well, or attack the Eastern Powers, Russia, China, India, et al. (The people who manufactured your computer.) (And who are not helping at all with the War against Islam.) Everybody wants the almighty oil, and the two (belligerent) paths to the oil are to seize the oil outright, or to push back the Eastern Powers, who are contending for it. So some western gamesters want to continue trying colonize the Islamic oil regions, as others wish to re-ignite the Cold War. The faction that is exploiting Tibet is the one that wants to re-ignite the Cold War.

If things seem to be going badly in the Islamic oil holding regions, we would wish to not even think about re-igniting the Cold War. Remember, the Russians never destroyed (the really potent part of) their nuclear arsenal. And China now has extremely advanced weapons. Such as stealth submarines that carry stealth cruise missiles. With India, they now hold perhaps 90% of the readily renewable productive systems that were once ours. (Japan is the only alternative, but it is uniquely vulnerable.)

But the global gamesters need some kind of global conflict to ensure their stranglehold on the US economy. So they have created this fake Tibetan psyop to launch their new Cold War.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» MONKS THROWING MOLOTOV COCKTAILS?? Posted by: jeffreytaos
PROPAGANDA SUCKS!
Posted by: jeffreytaos on Mar 31, 2008 5:52 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sick of you propaganda writers who work for multi-nationals that rape and pillage the earths resources, such as in Ethiopia where China has been ripping apart the forests for what little they can get for nothing to support the thriving industries that create millionaires in a so called communist country. You people don't know the first thing about communism or capitalism. You seem to know a lot about doublespeak or truthspeak, and you try to bombard the internet with lies and half truths, to keep the people guessing while denying your own people access to real information with the help of google and company. (Sorry google, but your software is culpable), in the meantime people die. If China was a communist country, nothing would happen in Tibet until the committees met together and discussed all issues. Sadly, you are not a communist country, but a post-communist dictatorship run by fascist. The real meaning of fascism is in the dollar sign, or yen for those who speak Chinese. I don't believe your lies. I believe that Tibet is a remote region which existed for a few thousand years without any need of help from China or anybody else. All that crap about slavery is just crap! The USA knows very well how to save souls and civilize savages. Spain too knows all too well how to subdue savages who don't follow the orders of he priests sanctioned by the ruling order. You can't justify those lies. The war in Iraq is wrong by many accounts, and I don't defend it with lies. Why do you defend China with lies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

David Zirin should read what western journalists saw in Tibet!
Posted by: mBayram on Apr 19, 2008 10:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of repeating CIA propaganda, one should read the Economist's journalist James Miles' transcript of his interview on CNN on what is happening in Tibet. Armed thugs stoning 10 year old boys because of his Chinese ethnicity, beating and killing Chinese on the streets etc.

How would any government respond to this? Should Tibetans be allowed to lynch unarmed, innocent Chinese civilians on the street because of their ethnic origin? Do we want a Tibet that looks like the US' South in 40's 50's? Before writing uninformed articles, Zirin should read what people write who were in Lhasa at the time! Of course, I am assuming Zirin was not there?

CNN Miles interview text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]