Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Triple Shock Strikes the Global Economy

By Eric Le Boucher, Le Monde. Posted March 20, 2008.


The American growth model will have to change.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Eric Le Boucher

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

You've entered the kingdom of uncertainties. Oil? How high will it go? The dollar? How far will it drop? The financial crisis? When will it end? Recession? In the United States? In France? From week to week, the prognosis for each of these questions eludes us. A dark crisis mechanism is at work that seems impossible to arrest.

We're suffering the blows of a great triple shock, the scope and the consequences of which are still difficult to measure, but which we know will profoundly refashion the global system.

The first shock is the world's shift from the West to the East. The unique American engine is exhausted, China, Asia are taking over. The second shock is a consequence of the first: Chinese thirst for raw materials has caused prices to explode and provoked a return of inflation -- dead for 30 years -- to the forefront of concern. The third shock is the financial crisis which persists, expands and leads to the end of (too-) easy credit.

There is no equivalent for the first shock unless it be the passage of supremacy from Europe to America during the First World War. The second is like the so-called "oil" shock of the 1970s. For the final shock, comparison oscillates among the Great Depression of the 1930s and the more limited crises of the 19th century and those more recent crises of the 1980s. The three shocks together have, in any case, an unprecedented scope: boom, boom, boom, they come at once and act in concert.

The Federal Reserve is blamed for having been the source of the evils of easy money. The "wizard" Alan Greenspan, adulated only yesterday, decided on interest rates too low to encourage growth, but that inflated asset bubbles instead. American households were able to go into debt cheaply and consume more and more. Imports grew in a straight line; the trade deficit deepened; the dollar began to weaken.

The United States has other, enviable, "fundamentals": productivity gains, a high-tech sector, immigration ... but its debt-fueled growth model spiraled out of control with respect to real estate. The house was barely purchased before it gained in value, which allowed it to be refinanced and borrowing to be increased. Lending organizations invented subprimes to convince households without the means that they, too, could become property-owners under this system. Up until the day when, after an increase of 80 percent between 2000 and 2006, prices stagnated, forcing those households into bankruptcy.

The subprime crisis is one of excessive indebtedness. The American growth model will have to change: the return to savings will atrophy consumption; the dollar's fall could allow exports to take up a part of the slack. How? To what extent? It's too early to know.

In any case, the American deficit has its complement: the Asian surplus. China became the United States's workshop, then, as it accumulated monetary reserves, its creditor. The size of developing economies has grown vertiginously: they account for 50 percent of global GNP (in purchasing power parity). The "dragon" swallows half of global pork production, ditto for cement, a third of steel production. Its oil consumption will triple between now and 2030. Hence the surge in energy, metal and food prices.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: consumption, global economy, lending crisis

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Let's put this shock stuff to rest shall we?
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 20, 2008 11:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First off, the assumption that demand for oil will only increase is just pathetically absurd. Even a few years ago, demand for oil wasn't so high so it is possible to cut down on demand.

Examples?

Ok, let's look at those "free" trade scams that get passed by both parties. If we didn't have to "free" trade everything we wouldn't be over-importing and thereby cutting down on oil usage.

Here's another one. In most major cities, the price of public transportation is OBSCENELY HIGH and yet the quality is all fucked up especially on the metro rail stations in Washington and NYC as well as most of the major cities. And besides traffic caused by very poor traffic light timing and inefficient SUVs and pickup trucks, most buses, school or public, are usually empty and yet stop in all the wrong places thereby causing everyone's cars to use up more gas. I'd be happy to take a bus myself if there was a stop remotely close to my workplace but thanks to "capitalism", it ain't gonna happen.

And what about the RIGGING the markets to keep artificial junk food crap artifically "cheap" while keeping fresh produce OBSCENELY HIGH? It's takes more petroleum to manufacture and produce meat and junk food let alone transporting them compared to fresh produce where the only significant cost is the transportation cost. And don't forget that solar energy was used to grow most of our foods before the artificial junk food manufacturing ruin everything. Maybe peak oil will make it easier for the natural foods to unrig the artifically low price for artificial junk market.

Finally, what about those alternatives? Before oil, there was the steam engine and hemp would have made it to cars but Big Oil won and the engines were redesigned to use petroleum.

Don't worry. We'll one day be rewarded for conserving rather than be taxed and punished once the oil depletion catches up with all of us. And then we'll finally put those alternative energy ideas to use and hopefully stop allowing the market to be RIGGED.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

" the process of giving birth is always agonizing."
Posted by: gazooks on Mar 20, 2008 12:23 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As is often the precursor to death.

Cheerful note, I know, but these "informative" pseudo/econo/I dunno articles aren't often worth their weight in pixels.

To wit:

"We are experiencing the end of a 30-year downward trend in commodity prices. Does that mean the resurgence of the specter of inflation? Probably not, even if it is too soon to be entirely reassured. In the immediate future, these elevated prices are going to corrode purchasing power, slowing both consumption and growth."

1."We are experiencing the end of a 30-year downward trend in commodity prices"

Really! Or more on the mark would be that by a common measure, the CRB index, has spiked upward for the past 5 years.

This isn't the end of anything, we're half a decade into a commodities Bull market.

2."Does that mean the resurgence of the specter of inflation? Probably not, even if it is too soon to be entirely reassured"

Geez, duh! In the same time frame as above, the US $, as measured by the US Dollar Index, has declined from 120. to 71. earlier this week against a "basket" of international currencies, and as measured in gold, the universal measure of currency inflation, from $270. to over $1000.

So, not probably no, but absolutely yes!! I don't know what kind of assurances the expert author needs, or what references he needs to make to establish certainty of a trend, but half a decade ought to do it.

3."In the immediate future, these elevated prices are going to corrode purchasing power, slowing both consumption and growth."

Not to be smug, but this should be posted in Boy's Life, not Alternet. Even so, as he discounts inflation, a commodities bull market, he then concludes with acknowledging the effects of what's been denied. Brilliant!

We're in trouble friends because of a breakdown in monetary discipline, political mismanagement and malfeasance. The decline in value in the dollar is no natural occurrence, but the result of a failed experiment in economic and monetary theory exacerbated by official corruption and mismanagement.

Accountability and an open political discussion on our rapidly failing house of cards is URGENTLY necessary, and MUST be included in the Presidential candidates dialog.

Our economic future depends on ti.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Triple Shock : Financial Bubbles
Posted by: mmckinl on Mar 20, 2008 2:52 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Real Estate, Debt and Derivatives ...

We all have felt the real estate bubble. Houses will go down in price an average of 20-30% from their peak, some say more.

While housing is part of the debt bubble, it is only one part. There also bubbles in auto loans, commercial paper, LBO loans, credit card debt, commercial real estate and other sectors. The entirety of all this debt has been securitized and the good mixed with the bad in such a way as to not be able to distinguish betweeen them. As the economy falls all these opaque pieces of debt become even more dangerous to hold. The banks are panicked and withdrawing credit causing the credit bubble to burst rather than deflate.

Then there are those things called derivatives. Simply put derivatives are bets or wagers. Simple you say, someone wins someone loses. It is not so simple when the loser has no ability to pay the wager and the winner made other bets that he has lost counting on most of his bets to be good. The winner of the original bet now cannot pay his losses because of the non payment and the circle of people unable to make good on their bets grows and grows. According to goverment figures there are literally trillions of dolllars in bets. There are more dollars in bets than the sum total of all our assets put together. The reported figure for derivatives outstanding worlwide is now over 500 TRILLLION! Should just a fraction of these bets go bad, say 3% or 15 trilllion, it would overrun our economy which is only at roughly 14 trilllion. It doen't end there, the derivative market itself is unregulated and each derivative may have different contract terms creating a powder keg of unknown and unknowable (until they are exercised) risk many times the size of the whole world economy. In other words ; financial armagedddon.

Welcome to the unregulated world of Alan Greenspan and the privately owned and operated Federal Reserve.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Days of Cheap Oil Are Gone for Good
Posted by: sofla100 on Mar 20, 2008 3:34 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because of global demand, oil could surge to $150 a barrel:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/
news?pid=20601012&sid=adTrIStEuO9M&refer=commodities

The USA has about 18 times the number of cars as China, so if China starts narrowing this gap, as they have announced they intend to do, we are looking at sustained increases of at least 5% in global oil demand each year from China. So-called "free trade," has caused the industries of China and India to explode with massive increases in oil and resource consumption. Consequently, USA conservation may help a little, but it is dubious it will make that much of a difference. China is building freeways and gas stations galore and has entered into major deals with companies like Exxon for gas stations across China. Of course, a global economic downturn will reduce the oil demand somewhat, but the days of cheap oil seem gone for good. As for the oil companies, they will simply continue to exploit the increasing demand to raise prices even further and further.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is What We Need to Be Talking About!
Posted by: Spyder on Mar 20, 2008 8:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love this article. Americans are all in this together, and so is the rest of the world. We need to dump the SUV madness in the dumpster, where it belongs. We need to rebuild our infrastructure, including freeways. We need to conserve fuel. We need to develop new technologies. We need to increase fuel economy rules. We need to encourage conservation worldwide, but we also need to lead by example. Demand increases prices! Duh!

My Ten Point Plan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Mar 20, 2008 11:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The common denominator is overpopulation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Terrorist Posted by: leerhok
Would a debtors' strike administer the coup de grace?
Posted by: smendler on Mar 21, 2008 5:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The System is reeling. I wonder if it's vulnerable enough at this moment that it could be toppled by the right kind of action....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A few observations
Posted by: Trazom on Mar 21, 2008 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been following this spectacle for the past 9 months or so now, intrigued when the markets initially seized last August and the Fed had to step in to get credit/debt flowing again.

Everyone keeps talking about the next speculative bubble to burst. First it was tech in the 90's, then housing, now structured finance, and quite possibly soon auto loans, credit cards, and a host of others. What is the final bubble to burst, one that may signal the end?

I would say that it is the dollar itself. It has been living under a bubble for quite some time now, and is finally showing signs of strain of being the currency of the world's largest debtor nation. When this deflates (I mean really deflates), then we will know the end is upon us.

I recently heard an economist say that we will know when we are in deep sh** when both the dollar and short term bond rates fall precipitously in sink. I wonder how far off we really are. Probably farther now after recent actions by the Fed, but that just guarantees the fall will be even worse than before.

When the dollar tanks, oil at $150/barrel will seem like a dream.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hold on to your asses........
Posted by: steven w on Mar 21, 2008 7:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are in for some hard times. Meanwhile, i predict we will be seeing alot of corporations moving to Dubai in the year to come.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What exports? Our manufacturing sector....
Posted by: Failsafe on Mar 21, 2008 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The dollar's fall could allow exports to take up a part of the slack. How?"
How, indeed, when a significant part of the United States manufacturing sector has been exported to Asian countries to maximize profits in a "deregulated" (i.e., lawless) region of the world.

Perhaps the writer does not notice the difficulty of finding products made within the United States.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Le Monde?
Posted by: g50 on Mar 21, 2008 10:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You kidding me? I'm not going to take my analysis on the economy from a French pop publication. No offense, lovely country, beautiful language, vibrant culture, but nobody does the economy like America and there is nothing that will change. This whole talk is obscenely neurotic, truthfully unhinged, and likely a motivated effort to elect Barack to the presidency in November. Which honestly is all right, as far as an agenda goes - but don't take it too seriously. The US economy is probably not even in recession, and if it slides into recession, will do so barely, and for one quarter only.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LOL! Good one. Posted by: joeunix
Which President?
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Mar 21, 2008 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Which President oversaw this unprecedented out-of-control method whereby non-existent wealth was generated?

George W. Bush.

I do believe this man has been an abject failure at everything he has ever touched.

But... all hail the Republican MBA method of economic growth. All hail the Economic Gods: the Republicans. All hail borrow, borrow, borrow. All hail lowering taxes until gov't is broken. All hail the Republican Party, which stood by and watched it all spiral into total decay.

All hail the Swiss franc, now worth more than the US dollar for the first time in history. Thanks, Republicans!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The War-Finance Connection
Posted by: shinseiji on Mar 21, 2008 11:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(An aside: It is views such as those of 'g50' above that are reason why the USA is on a toboggan ride to hell, and the g50's of America don't even know it. Alas, the American left is infected with the same blind religious faith in an "eternal" status quo, while the Beltway and Wall Street insiders, who know the status quo game is up, loot and steal everything in sight, robbing America's g50's blind).

When mentioning the role of the Federal Reserve in manufacturing the present financial disaster, Le Boucher fails to note that the unusually long duration of ultra-low Fed Funds rates was due to the need to finance the Iraq & Afghanistan wars. The Fed also received vital assistance in what was a vast expansion of the monetary base in that period from the Bank of Japan, which engaged in the purchase of unusually large quantities of US Treasuries at the same time.

Hence Greenspans' initial moves to reinflate the bubble after the dotcom crash and then again after the temporary financial dislocations at 9/11 found even further extension in the 2002-2003 run up to the Iraq invasion. The result has been the effective bankruptcy of the USA, whether Americans care to see this or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US Finance is bankrupt - still have doubts?
Posted by: shinseiji on Mar 21, 2008 1:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Market analyst, Mark Gongloff, sheds a bit of light on the real condition of the big financials in his article ""Crunch Proves A Test of Faith For Street Strong"":

"All of the brokerage houses are highly leveraged, with a high ratio of assets to shareholders' equity, a sign they have used debt heavily to build up positions in hope of greater returns. Morgan Stanley, which will report Wednesday, had a leverage ratio of 32.6-to-1 at the end of last year, nearly as high as Bear's 32.8-to-1. Lehman was leveraged 30.7-to-1, and Merrill Lynch 27.8-to-1. And the would-be rock, Goldman? It was leveraged 26.2-to-1.""(""Crunch Proves A Test of Faith For Street Strong", WSJ)

Remember, Carlyle Capital was leveraged 32 to 1 ($22 billion equity) and went ""poof"" in a matter of days when it couldn't scrape together a measly $400 million for a margin call. How vulnerable are these other maxed-out players now that the credit bubble has popped and the whole system is quickly unwinding?

Not very safe, at all. As Gongloff points out:

"Based in part on numbers reported at the end of Bear's fourth quarter, estimated that Bear Stearns had $35 billion in liquid assets and borrowing capacity, enough to operate for 20 months. Turns out it had enough for three days.""

http://counterpunch.com/whitney03202008.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More for you in denial 'muricuns
Posted by: shinseiji on Mar 21, 2008 1:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today's deepening financial and economic crisis cannot be alleviated without addressing a number of problems that the public does not really want to hear about. Even to cite them raises a wall of cognitive dissonance. No kidding!

http://counterpunch.com/hudson03152008.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oxheadone
Posted by: oxheadone on Mar 21, 2008 3:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
US policies in the last 25 years are basically the causes of its current problems. The cold war set up a very dangerous world. Just as the destruction of the Ottoman empire led to a turbulent mid-east and the end of the Austro-Hungarian empire destabilized the Balkans, the means of the defeat of the Soviet empire really openned Pandora's box. At this critical time in history the US governmment is taken over by a radical reactionary group seeking to reverse all the New Deal policies that saved capitalism from self-destructing in the 1930s. The old isolationist position was replaced by a swagering wild west view of how a great world power should act. Corporate power was now buying the government because of the need for huge sums of money to control the media, especially TV. Huge profits and a great increase in multi-multi-millionaires grew on the virtual freezing of real wages. Consumption was maintained by making debt cheaper and encouraging a tech boom (busted 2001), a housing boom (busted 2007-), and a complex debt structure to offer yield, which is now threatening the whole financial system. In the face of big balance of payments deficits and a rising federal budget deficit (not helped by tax cuts for the haves). the US enbarked on expensive foreign adventures, largely further destabilizing much of the world and increasing enemies of the US. All this is not an act of God. The US has been behaving unbelievably stupidly for the last 25 years and the bills are coming in. It will not be easy to repair our problems and we have alienated many of the sources of help. I am sorry, but - at this time in the calendar when spring and hope are in the air - there does not appear to be much recognition of what repairs are needed nor the general public support for action.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Economics is Crap
Posted by: pangolin on Mar 23, 2008 1:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It always has been. Economics diverges from all science in that they have no way of proving their assumptions. They just assume the moon is made of green cheese and proceed to sell stocks in the cheese import business. Then they publish magazines discussing the various shades and flavors of the green cheese from different regions of the moon.

Only an economist can look at a farmers feild that is losing soil and polluting the river downstream and call that state of affairs "profitable" and "good for the economy." So what the fishery downstream is destroyed and the field will turn to sand in ten years for now that field makes more cash than it takes to farm this years crop.

The entire world is like that farmers field. We are shittting in the well and selling poison kool-aid to make the shit-water taste like something that people can drink. So what it's a slow poison and by the time everybody notices they are dying a few people will be much richer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]