Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Obama's Economic Go-to Guy

By Sam Pizzigati, Too Much: A Commentary on Excess and Inequality. Posted March 12, 2008.


A self-described 'centrist' is minding Barack Obama's economic policy store.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Sam Pizzigati

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

How progressive a President could Barack Obama be? Could he be as transformational as Franklin Roosevelt, whose dozen White House years downsized America's rich and helped usher onto the global stage the first mass middle class in world history? Or will the Obama years more likely end up, as Bill Clinton's did, as a timid intermission between two plutocrat-friendly acts of conservative Republican dominance?

Austan Goolsbee, outside Obama himself, just might have more of an impact on the answer than any other individual in the Obama camp. Goolsbee, a 39-year-old University of Chicago business school prof, has emerged as Obama's top economic adviser.

With Senator Obama closing in on the Democratic nomination -- and the U.S. economy tottering on the brink of big-time trouble -- progressive analysts have begun looking Goolsbee's way. And many don't particularly like what they see.

Are these analysts seeing clearly? Or might Goolsbee, the odds-on choice to chair the Council of Economic Advisers in an Obama administration, actually nudge public policy in a decent direction?

Goolsbee's brief public policy career, at first glance, appears to offer precious little reason for progressive optimism. Goolsbee defines himself as "a centrist market economist," and everyone else seems to have locked in on that exact same characterization.

The Chicago Tribune, for instance, describes Goolsbee as a business prof "with centrist Democratic views" who's firmly "anchored in dominant market-oriented economic thought." U.S. News and World Report last month discussed how Obama "has surrounded himself with centrist economic advisers, like the frustratingly reasonable Austan Goolsbee." Business Week, also last month, labeled Goolsbee the leader of a Obama economics brain trust packed with "generally careful technocrats."

The thought of a centrist technocrat whispering sweet mainstream nothings into a President Obama's ear has already begun generating waves of angst among veteran progressive observers. American Prospect editor Robert Kuttner, for one, considers Goolsbee and his fellow centrist advisers "free-market guys who want to use markets to somehow solve social problems, which is like squaring a circle."

Much of what Goolsbee has written over recent years supplies ample fuel for such angst. Goolsbee can come across as remarkably ivory-towerish.

One example: In a 2006 New York Times column, Goolsbee marked the death of Milton Friedman, the patron saint of free-market fundamentalism, with a profile that saluted this right-wing hero for bringing "his brashness and his love of debate" to the University of Chicago. Not a word, in that column, about Chile, where Friedman acolytes -- the "Chicago boys" -- forced hyper free-marketism down the throats of a populace brutalized by the dictatorship of General Augusto Pinochet, a Friedman favorite who expressed his "love of debate" by having debaters tortured.

Last year, in another New York Times column, Goolsbee hailed subprime mortgages as a market innovation that can help people in need -- and dismissed fears that unscrupulous lenders would ever exploit this innovation "fool people into thinking they can afford homes that they cannot."

Five months later, the Times would document that very exploitation, in a report that exposed how the nation's top mortgage lender, Countrywide Financial, had been manipulating borrowers into "high-cost" loans that "made Countrywide executives among the highest paid in America."

So do we have, in Austan Goolsbee, an academic unwise in the ways of the world whose eagerness to achieve change "through market-oriented policies" will lead a President Obama down some dead-end primrose path?

Maybe not. Goolsbee may not be as excruciatingly centrist as his reputation suggests. In fact, on the central economic issue of our time -- the intense and unrelenting concentration of wealth at America's economic summit -- Goolsbee has often been downright good.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: progressive, economic centism, goolsbee, economy, obama

Sam Pizzigati edits Too Much, the online weekly on excess and inequality.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Goolsbee's ideas are Kool but he's not the guy progressives are looking for to build the New Economy
Posted by: yellow on Mar 12, 2008 11:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've always liked Obama personally but felt that ironically he is weaker on socioeconomic issues facing the nation's middle class and working poor than people like John Edwards, Denis Kucinich or even Hillary Clinton for that matter. Obama is perfect for a rich yuppie with culturally liberal proclivities. In other words, conservative syndicated writer David Brooks's "Bourgeous Bohemians" are the perfect political base for a guy like Obama. This may explain the millions he's received from Wall Street hedge funds, investment banks and other financial powerhouse supporters. He's not really the workin' man's candidate. Goolsbee is a supporter of NAFTA, tax cuts, less government spending,etc. He is not a libertarian and doesn't want to privatize Social security or cut taxes only for the upper 1% of tax payers. But he is a University of Chicago economist and they have a certain tendency toward the views of the Austrian Marginalists. Goolsbee is a free marketeer but he is sure to tailor his advice politically to the expectations of most of Obama's poorer supporters. Just don't expect a New, New Deal from the guy...He's no Keynes!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama is not a progressive
Posted by: carolcarre on Mar 14, 2008 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As has been noted before, the progressive platforms have been: 1) Edwards 2) Clinton and a distant 3) Obama.

If anyone would have listened before, they would not have pinned their hopes on the Obama Glamorama

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clinton#2 different than Clinton#1?
Posted by: mnascimento on Mar 14, 2008 2:05 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have trouble understanding how Clinton#1 did any more than warm the seat between Bush 1 and 2.

We had the high tech bubble that kept things looking prosperous on Wall Street, while manufacturers through out the country got tax breaks to move overseas. We were already in a recession when Bush 2 came to power.

Remember Perrot's warning that Clinton would only create "Mc Jobs"

Why you think the co-dependent Clinton#2 is any more than a proxy for her husband, and will differ in economic policy from the game plan of the plutocracy?

I want a change in the fundamental ideology regarding the creation and distribution of wealth. Lets get off the supply side "trickle down"
tit.

Obama was clever enough to outmaneuver the process which tripped up Edwards and Kucinich, by orgainizing from the bottom up, rather than the top down.

They were still patronizing him as a charming, articulate, Darkey when he swept by Clinton.

Start thinking in your own self interest, and save this Country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This just illustrates how important electing a really
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Mar 14, 2008 9:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
PROGRESSIVE Congress is!! No matter who is President we the people will need more than ever, a Congress to guide, push, and perhaps override a veto.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Divide and Conquer
Posted by: halg on Mar 16, 2008 2:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we broke the economy down into smaller pieces, like the communities we live in, we could resolve a lot of problems at once. Plan building homes and jobs to employ their occupants at the same time. This will elminate nearly all commuting, and keep dollars recycling locally in the community.

Goolsbee can come across as remarkably ivory-towerish. Just what America needs right now: Another myopic "visionary" who uses the buttons on a hypothetical remote control to fine tune the economy. The U.S. government has been trying to do this for years now; why don't they give it up since it doesn't work?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]