Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

New Yorkers Get Priced out of Grocery Stores

By Sam Pizzigati, Too Much: A Commentary on Excess and Inequality. Posted March 5, 2008.


Enormous accumulations of wealth are hitting New Yorkers where it really hurts -- at the deli counter.

In New York City, as TV's widely viewed Without a Trace series regularly reminds us, people disappear all the time. But something new, a headline revealed last week, is now disappearing in New York. Grocery stores.

Over the last six years, researchers report, the number of supermarkets in New York has shrunk by a third. Three of the city's top food chains -- D'Agostino, Gristedes, and Key Food -- "have each closed about a dozen stores since 2000."

Why are New York's supermarkets shutting down? No one needs to call in the FBI to investigate. Analysts already know the answer. New York is simply becoming too unequal -- too economically top-heavy -- to sustain the basics of modern American middle class life.

The enormous wealth now concentrated in New York has sent property prices so high that supermarkets can no longer afford to rent their urban spaces. The city's "soaring real estate values," the Washington Post notes, "are prompting property owners throughout the city to shutter grocery stores and sell to developers."

Those developers are bringing to market condos and businesses that cater to the ever-richer ranks of New York's awesomely affluent. No mystery why. These affluents have congregated in New York at levels seen nowhere else in the United States.

One telling statistic: The average weekly salary in New York County -- Manhattan -- hit $2,821 in 2007's first quarter, the equivalent of $147,000 a year. That figure over tripled, for that time period, the national average weekly take-home.

How could the average take-home be so high in New York? Credit Wall Street. In last year's first quarter, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data show, the folks gainfully employed in New York's financial sector averaged an incredible $16,918 a week, a $879,736 per-year rate -- and more than enough to drive Manhattan's overall average take-home up near $150,000.

Not surprisingly, New York County now ranks as the nation's most unequal county jurisdiction. The top fifth of Manhattan's income-earners take home over 50 times the income of Manhattan's bottom fifth. Nationally, according to U.S. Census figures for 2006, top-fifth incomes outpace bottom-fifth incomes by 15 times.

Amid all this inequality, only those at the tippy top of the income ladder can afford to live stress-free and comfortably in Manhattan. The market has priced out most everyone else. If you can't afford to shell out $1 million, you haven't been able, since 2004, to afford the average Manhattan apartment. On the city's Upper East Side, apartments with three or more bedrooms average $6.6 million.

The inevitable result?

"The super rich," observes Queens College sociologist Andrew Beveridge, "are driving out the upper middle class, let alone the middle class."

Those merely "relatively well-off," notes New York-based newspaper columnist Richard Bernstein, experience their city's intense inequality every day, most aggravatingly when they "spend hours of their time trying to park their cars on the street, because a spot in a parking garage costs $6,000 or $7,000 a year."

Meanwhile, New York mayor Michael Bloomberg, the billionaire who made his fortune selling information services to Wall Street, is working hard on solutions to the city's widening supermarket crisis. The Bloomberg administration, according to news reports, is planning "to license 1,500 street vendors to sell fruits and vegetables."

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: standard of living, wall street, income inequality, new york

Sam Pizzigati is the editor of the online weekly Too Much, and an associate fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The democrat way?
Posted by: carbon-based on Mar 5, 2008 2:54 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The super rich affect manhattan and maybe the fringe areas of Brooklyn across from Manhattan. This is a democratic strong hold which affords is an excellent opportunity to see how a major democratic society operates.

But NYC isn't the only one affected by high prices and the super rich..San Francisco, and LA are two other areas ( there are many others) where it's almost impossible to buy a house and middle class cannot live.

Why haven't these cities, who are steeped in democratic ideology, been able to provide for the middle class. Is this what we are to expect with a democratic president?. Or is it that a democratic government can have little affect on peoples ability to accumulate wealth and drive up prices!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not democratic. Capitalist. Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» RE: Not democratic. Capitalist. Posted by: carbon-based
Move
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Mar 5, 2008 3:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't understand why anyone would want to live there, including the rich. NY dwellers seem to cling to their city like a security blanket, despite the stress and the outrageous cost of living.

It seems to be an addiction. Without all the rush, the ripoff, and the chaos, they wouldn't know what to do with themselves. They think everything west of the Hudson is farmland, and all us Jersey-folk sit on the porch all day whittlin' and spittin'.

Let them think that, I suppose. If they move, they'll just drive up the cost of real estate elsewhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well said. Posted by: Artkansas
» RE: Move Posted by: Artkansas
» RE: Move Posted by: carbon-based
Why I Live Here
Posted by: Urstrly on Mar 5, 2008 3:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A friend of mine on the Upper West Side of Manhattan went to a market to buy some chicken recently, and discovered to her horror that they didn't have any that was not cooked already.

Two things contribute to the high cost of groceries: the outrageous real estate market and the fact that so many people work very long hours and don't cook. Convenience takes precedence over price, and I can't believe the closing of so many stores isn't also related to those ugly Fresh Direct trucks that will deliver groceries and prepared food that you order online.

When I moved to Manhattan in the seventies, it was crime-ridden and the grocery stores were cramped and filthy. Now we have everything you can find in the poshest suburb— for a price.

Why would I live here? 1. it's one of the few places in the US you don't need a car, 2. the medical care is as good as it gets, 3. live music and the theater, and 4. most important, the opportunity to live among incredibly smart, creative and open-minded people.

Yes, it's getting harder and harder to ignore those obnoxious people who want to turn NYC into a gated community, but I figure this upcoming recession that the Bush administration has created is going to restrain them. They certainly aren't prepared to cook a chicken.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why I Live Here Posted by: VZEQICVA
It does not matter...
Posted by: Traven on Mar 5, 2008 5:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In ten years most of the city will be under water. Unless the city can raise it's local taxes to build a pumpimg system on par and better than the ones now used in New Orleans.

Fat chance that will happen. There won't be any lower classes in the city to tax and we know the upper classes stash their wealth overseas....and can't be bothered with a fair progressive tax system.

Still think Bloomberg, Buffet, Gates and all the other billionaires et al. are the kind of leadership capable of responding to the giant and massive public works projects that will be needed by hundreds of cities let alone NY.

So much for American civilization suckers... are you angry yet?

Global warming's payback is a bitch isn't it..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I got a bridge to sell you.... Posted by: BCcovers
» RE: It does not matter... Posted by: TheNamelessCity
» RE: It does not matter... Posted by: TheNamelessCity
...and New Yorkers wonder why...
Posted by: Farasien on Mar 5, 2008 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the rest of the nation saw 9/11 as something akin to a foreign event.

NY is not as loved by the rest of the country as it seems to think.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thank God that's over ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» "foreign event"??? Posted by: grethart
» RE: "foreign event"??? Posted by: Tat106
» RE: open mouth, insert foot Posted by: chaoslegs
» RE: open mouth, insert foot Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: open mouth, insert foot Posted by: carbon-based
» it seems to me... Posted by: rafaeltoral
» RE: it seems to me... Posted by: Moore Hognutz
» akin to foreign event here also. Posted by: abbadon2007
» and Americans wonder why... Posted by: astron0t
the history of the middle class
Posted by: twoten on Mar 5, 2008 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of us who grew up in the 20th century think that the middle class always was and always will be. But it hasn't, it's a brief and temporary phenomenon. The human race for the vast majority of it's history has been made up of a few super super rich air heads, supported by a few thousand psychopathic thugs, while everyone else was desperately dirt poor.

You can thank FDR and his new deal for that anomalous blip in human history. The shadow council and their thugs the secret team have decided that the old ways were better. With their flair for the dramatic, you can expect some major distractions soon, and some even bigger repression.

It's always been a great time to move to Canada!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the history of the middle class Posted by: fringedweller
Although I agree, I have some issues....
Posted by: igoeja on Mar 5, 2008 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been griping about the GINI coefficient, an economic measure if income inequality, for several years. I am not an academic, but when I was in B-school I considered publishing, particularly the degree which economic inequality correlates with negative social outcomes. When looking at countries, the higher the inequality, the lower the educational performance and attainment, the higher the overall mortality and infant, the higher the crime and incarceration rate. Although there are many ways of interpreting this, most likely is that countries that focus on fostering the economic elites no longer care about the lives of everyone else. There seems to be a correlation between authoritarianism and such inequalities but this is only a sense. By the way, the US and Britain are the most economically unequal countries in the developed world.

That said, some minor 'corrections':

- Average income is misleading, particularly in finance, since the most highly compensated are a small proportion that throws off the mean, but to your point, finance pays much better that most other industries on average.

- Although my wife and I together earn about 200K gross, we pay a higher tax burden based on out income, as well as taxes levied by city.

- The cost of living is twice as high as middle-America, so our 120K net, is equivalent to 60K in the rest of the country.

- Considering real estate, our apartment is probably worth about 350 to 400K, but realize that we live in a 400 square foot studio, albeit it with doormen and maintenance staff.

- The major chain grocery retailers face some competition from FreshDirect, a service which delivers groceries, often of better quality and typically lower price.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Combating Inequality Posted by: igoeja
This is what happens
Posted by: DaBear on Mar 5, 2008 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is what happens when you let rich people run things. Kapitalism is their tool, is sure as hell never helped or benefited anyone else.

The time to keep the rich in power exclusively, the time to keep this failed experiment called Kapitalism in place is over. This is the 21st century. It's time to kick in the teeth of the aristocracy and their tools that keep the rest of us in chains. Short of that, nothing else will work or matter.

Petrocollapse is acomin'....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Best-kept secret in America?
Posted by: wireup on Mar 5, 2008 9:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes. New York is a GREAT city. The world is at your feet, everything you could want is there. BUT...who can afford it?

I lived on Long Island and, when I was in the middle of a divorce in 2006, I wanted to move to NYC. But I found it was impossible. Not enough money.

So, I looked for alternatives and what did I find? Every city on my A List was impossible. All too expensive.

And then I found the perfect city - the BEST KEPT SECRET IN AMERICA - Philadelphia, PA. WHAT A CITY!

I found a large 1-bedroom apartment I could afford to buy. If I didn't want to buy, there are plenty of apartments to rent at affordable rents. I got rid of my car because there is an excellent public transportation system here and I walk everywhere.

Whole Foods is here, as well as an EXCELLENT health food store downtown.

Theatre, music, culture, book stores - second to none!

And the people? Terrific - friendly, helpful. And, in shops and stores, always ready to provide excellent customer service

Philadelphia is truly the Best Kept Secret in America and I wouldn't live anywhere else!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Best-kept secret in America?
Posted by: wireup on Mar 5, 2008 9:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes. New York is a GREAT city. The world is at your feet, everything you could want is there. BUT...who can afford it?

I lived on Long Island and, when I was in the middle of a divorce in 2006, I wanted to move to NYC. But I found it was impossible. Not enough money.

So, I looked for alternatives and what did I find? Every city on my A List was impossible. All too expensive.

And then I found the perfect city - the BEST KEPT SECRET IN AMERICA - Philadelphia, PA. WHAT A CITY!

I found a large 1-bedroom apartment I could afford to buy. If I didn't want to buy, there are plenty of apartments to rent at affordable rents. I got rid of my car because there is an excellent public transportation system here and I walk everywhere.

Whole Foods is here, as well as an EXCELLENT health food store downtown.

Theatre, music, culture, book stores - second to none!

And the people? Terrific - friendly, helpful. And, in shops and stores, always ready to provide excellent customer service

Philadelphia is truly the Best Kept Secret in America and I wouldn't live anywhere else!!!!

Addendum:

Let me add that Philadelphia is also a mecca for Alternative Health!!!! You find many practitioners and excellent restaurants, including (if you are so inclined, vegetarian and vegan).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Best-kept secret in America? Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Best-kept secret in America? Posted by: TheNamelessCity
» RE: Best-kept secret in America? Posted by: TheNamelessCity
C&S Wholesale Grocers
Posted by: frantaylor on Mar 5, 2008 9:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They own the wholesale grocery business in the northeast, including the NYC area. They are vehemently anti-union and do not like going into NYC because the unions are strong there. This is another reason you can't buy groceries in NYC.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: C&S Wholesale Grocers Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: C&S Wholesale Grocers Posted by: Joshua Holland
Real Estate is not ruled by normal competitive market forces
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Mar 5, 2008 10:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The main problem with real estate is that buildings are relatively permanent.

Once they get built they by and large cannot be moved, no other piece of property is like that.

As a city gets more popular people are forced to live in ever smaller spaces with constantly increasing prices.


We need to come up with a new way of managing the real estate economy.

Economists, real estate developers, and city planners need to come together and come up with a new way.

A way that encourages building taller and taller buildings to house all of the people and businesses in the area.

A way that decreases the cost of real estate not increases it.


Our current way encourages selling to the highest bidder who then remodels the buildings and rents or sells to the rich.

This causes real estate prices to spiral ever higher when we should be trying to make them spiral ever lower.


No other product we buy with the exception of collectibles is considered an investment.

When we buy a car or a tv the value of those objects decrease the moment it is driven off the lot or taken out of the box.

We should be trying to develop a real estate economy that mirrors this phenomenon, not accept and encourage the one we have now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good riddance
Posted by: Doubtom on Mar 5, 2008 11:05 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read of Noo Yawk's problems and grin through it all. My fondest wish is for that infernal excuse for a city to implode and let Wall Street be ground zero.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good riddance Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Good riddance - Why? Posted by: wireup
» RE: Good riddance - Why? Posted by: TheNamelessCity
Although the Sheer SCALE of the Disparities Mentioned Caused My Mind to Blank...
Posted by: grumble-bum on Mar 6, 2008 7:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...(I think the quoted take-home might be something like 8 or 9 times my haul!), the very last part, about the pushcarts, really grabbed me!

I (obviously) don't reside in Manhattan, or NYC in general, but I find the idea of cart peddling fresh produce, etc., to be very appealing. Imagine being able to leave your building, run down the block, & grab most of the stuff you needed for that night's dinner! If implemented properly, you could have the equivalent of a roving Farmer's Market, spread across the city. People could get to know their local pushcart operators, what was "good" on a given day, have a friendly chat with other regulars...

Yeah, I know, I'm a silly idealist (& that maybe the author mentioned the possibility with derision in mind). But a shift in focus like this would do wonders for city-dwellers all over the country, impacting our physical, mental & social health. It would be a giant step towards weaning ourselves off the poisonous notion that we have some God-given right to shop at a central location & be guaranteed an unnaturally, artificially wide selection of foods.

Of course, I'm pretty pleased to live in a reasonably-sized "flyover" city that boasts lovely architecture, essentially friendly people, a good arts scene, a "living wage" ordinance, an improving public transit scheme (although nowhere near as user friendly as an elevated train can be), a wealth of affordable education opportunities, a solid Progressive political tradition, a diverse, overtly immigration-positive population, many fine-dining options, several Farmer's Markets, & more natural food stores than I can name right now (& I work in one of them, so that's both very impressive & a bit embarrassing).

& my studio apartment, in an historic building in possibly the nicest part of the city, costs a little over $600 a month.

So, really, New Yorkers, feel free to stay where you are ;-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You got It Right! Posted by: BCcovers