comments_imageCOMMENTS: 70

A Liberal Goes Undercover to Brave America's Premiere Right-Wing Gathering

Posing as a lobbyist for the American Milk Solids Council, one lefty blogger entered the belly of the CPAC beast.
March 1, 2008  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 
So I decided to go to the 2008 Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC -- America's foremost gathering of the extreme right wing of the Republican Party. Why did I do it? For years, I'd been writing snotty articles about the reactionary right as a contributor to the blog Sadly, No! but aside from family reunions, I never spent much time with them. So, with a hotly contested presidential election in the offing and rumors of the retreat of modern neoconservativism being whispered in the corridors of punditry, I decided there was no better time than the present to worm my way into the midst of the right wing's true believers. Using the generous donations of Sadly, No! readers and other well-wishers, and posing as a lobbyist for the American Milk Solids Council, I made my way to Washington in early February and sat through every moment of CPAC 2008. Herewith, a highly abridged version of my copious notes from the belly of the beast.

*****



WEDNESDAY NIGHT. When I arrive at the hotel, two members of the Young America's Foundation -- the omnipresent youth league that superceded the hippie-punching Young Americans for Freedom -- are trying to check in using a credit card not belonging to them. Rules are for poor people, and they seem to think that if they berate the poor West African guy working the front desk, they'll get what they want eventually. They may be wrong, but damn it, no late-shift immigrant is going to tell them that. Modern Washington, the Washington of Bush and CPAC, was built to keep people like him from telling people like them what to do.

The convention will be attended, largely, by two groups of people: the mainline Republican rump of 19-percenters, who think George W. Bush is doing a Brownian heck of a job, and the radical right, who think that the problem with George is that he's not heartlessly conservative enough. To put it another way, here we have the people who look at the wreckage of the American 2000s and pronounce it a wonderful thing and the people who look at it and say, "Yeah, it's pretty awful, but if we tried, we could make it a whole lot worse."

In the elevator up to my floor, two men in golf hats (golf hats? at 8 p.m.?) talk about how high taxes will cause the rich to flee the country and stop producing if Hillary gets into office. (They're apparently laboring under the misapprehension that Americans still produce things.) This is a real threat in the world of CPAC, while things like massive healthcare shortages, an increasingly ill-educated population, dependence on dwindling natural resources and the ever-widening gap between rich and poor are the stuff of fairy tales.

I've arrived too late for the pre-CPAC Diamond Reception and too early for the expensive hookers to start roaming the halls. The soda machine costs a buck and a quarter a can, so I decide to just wait for the boy to bring my bottle of gin. Then, before the pills kick in -- I need a little help to get through this -- a moment of imperialist panic: What if there is no boy? What if there is no gin?

THURSDAY MORNING. Here's a description of Hell they never give you: a huge room full of all the people you hate most, and they're all having a wonderful time.

Yes, it's all smiles and sunshine here at CPAC: lively young ladies with skillfully applied layers of makeup are here to greet you at every turn and correct your every confusion. Hopelessly earnest collegiate nerds hand out Mitt Romney stickers and hope against hope that John McCain has some sort of campaign trail meltdown: perhaps it will occur to him that the last 30 years have all been a fever dream brought on by bad fish paste, that he is still in some VC labor camp wearing a tin can around his head, and he will savagely turn on his campaign manager with a broken bottle while at a Kiwanis breakfast.

A rail-thin brunette in the row in front of me tests my cover for the first time.

"Hi! Are these seats taken?"

"Help yourself."

"Oh, thanks, sir!" Sir. So much for getting laid. "I'm (name redacted) from the University of Small Midwestern State's Conservative Student Alliance."

"Leonard Pierce, American Milk Solids Council."

"I'm sorry? What is that?"

"It's an industry group for milk solids manufacturers. We lobby Washington lawmakers to lessen regulations on the export of milk solids. The problem is that the government blames us for the incompetence of African mothers."

"That is so unfair."

"Tell me about it."

American Conservative Union leader David Keene interrupts a panel dedicated, like most things here at CPAC, to the beatification of Ronald Reagan, to report that Vice President Cheney has arrived early. I brace myself: I am about to be a few yards away from the Worst Man in America.

Before Cheney comes on, a bunch of CPAC dignitaries are introduced. Who gets the biggest applause? Wayne LaPierre, the human bulldozer of the National Rifle Association. But the panel is a real cross-section of the American privileged class, the rich and angry from A to B.

People are clapping rhythmically -- well, as rhythmically as this crowd is ever going to get -- for Cheney. For Cheney! I keep expecting them to start chanting "WE WANT THE SHOW" like they're waiting for the Blues Brothers, the presence of whom would color up the crowd considerably. Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso introduces the fiend of the hour: "The C in CPAC should stand for Cheney!" Which "C" he means is left unrevealed.

The crowd gives Dick a standing o, and, as a gang of bull-veined dudes in front of me start chanting "FOUR MORE YEARS!" I get the sensation for the first time all day that I'm at something that could easily turn into a fascist rally. When the applause finally quells, Dick chuckles evilly. Can that be done? Is a chuckle even feasible as the delivery vector for evil? If it is, Dick Cheney is the man capable of pulling it off with finesse. I have to admit, the guy has a certain degree of charm, but it's the same kind of charm that you might find in Stalin or Dracula: the easy charisma of a man who knows he can, with a wave of his hand, have you ground into paste.

The first part of Cheney's speech is right at the wheelhouse of the CPAC crowd: lower taxes, lower taxes, lower taxes. "Lower taxes are always good for this economy," he says. Which economy is he talking about? The economy in general, or the economy of the people in this room? He gets another standing ovation for "The absence of another 9/11 is not an accident, it's an achievement." (The first 9/11, apparently, was an accident.) A laundry list of constitutional butt-wipes get standing ovations from about half of the crowd: an expansion of FISA, the torture of terror suspects, and the financial protection of any big corporation who might theoretically have allowed illegal wiretapping to take place. The telecoms, says Cheney, shouldn't be "hassled" for acting in "good faith," which usage of the phrase is unfamiliar to me. Terror, terror, terror: it's the Dick Cheney boilerplate. (Bonus homosexual innuendo, Dick Cheney edition: describing the president's term in office, he says "We've done hard things and done them well.") Weirdly enough -- or maybe not so much -- his defense of torture gets a standing ovation, but his praising of our fighting men in uniform does not. It takes a man to fight, but it takes a train to waterboard.

Defense, security, prosperity. America is a country of good: thus stated, it need not be defended or explained. It's nothing we haven't heard before, but somehow hearing it in person, in the presence of true believers, it leaves a haze in the air, a strange absence of rhetoric: It seems less like a speech that has been delivered and more like a series of directives that have been issued. Cheney leaves the building (his last appearance here as vice president, Keene notes with a lick of the lips, but not his last appearance here) to thunderous applause, having gone out with a workingman's damn and told us all that the nation will be safer and more prosperous for having had Bush as president for eight years. It is not an assurance: it is an order.

THURSDAY AFTERNOON. Mitt Romney's funeral pyre. Desk-drawer Ann Coulter manqué Laura Ingraham is introducing him, and her speech is a fiery enfilade against the RINOs who seem to think that the faceless Mormon nonentity isn't the second coming of Ronald Reagan, who I am beginning to think of as the fourth member of the Holy Trinity. She refers to the fact that "the three remaining Republican candidates for president" are all in attendance; that must cheese off Ron Paul something fierce, and a cheesed-off Ron Paul is a joy forever.

The crowd is absolutely explosive for Mitt; if the rumors are true that he's about to chicken-walk out of the race, there's going to be a lot of tears. (Although, of course, there were the callow little shits of the YAF I ran across in the Exhibit Hall who were already swapping out their Romney buttons and stickers for John McCain gear.) The true believers saw in him what they saw in Reagan, a mildly pleasant cipher of a man upon whom they could impress their most extreme beliefs: a man doing bad things and allowing you to feel good about them. His speech, delivered in that clipped I-can-only-read-five-words-at-a-time way he has, is hitting on all the cheer buttons: security, lower taxes, the "attack on faith" (not the Muslim faith, though, surely), and those sick, sick '60s, which ruined everything forever. Another big applause line for the punters comes when Romney invokes the hideous shadow of a nonexistent threat: "Simply put, we must not allow America to be held hostage by the likes of Hugo Chavez." Somewhere in a metallic cave below the streets of Caracas, Chavez shakes his armored fist and screams: "¡Maldígale, Romney! ¡Usted me ha frustrado otra vez!"

Now comes doomsday: Because I love this country, says Mitt, I entered this race, and because I love this country, I am leaving it. Unfortunately, he means the race, not the country; I was hoping he was going to move to Paris and take a run for mayor against that dirty Red queer they have now. So it's all over for the Mittster, and when I wander back down to the hall of bloggers, it's like someone has let all the hot air out of them. The stench of failure and burritos hands in the air.

THURSDAY, LATE AFTERNOON. The John McCain speech viewed from a TV monitor near Blogger's Row. I fought like hell to get in here: No soldier in a war ever suffered more to gain less. (Hey, if conservatives can compare no-smoking laws to the Holocaust, then I own this.) His introduction keeps focusing on the theme of bravery, which, ever since those golden years of oh so many hours ago before Mitt Romney dropped out, has been the primary qualification for being president. So often does he drop the word "courage" that you'd think terrorists where constantly breaking into the Oval Office and challenging the leader of the free world to a rassling match.

John McCain's not the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree, but he's surely smart enough to realize that he's among a group who wants a candidate slightly to the right of Father Coughlin. He establishes his conservative creds right away by talking about how the most important freedom of all is the freedom to be born without some vacuum-cleaner-wielding liberal getting all up in your fetusitude. He goes on to say the word "conservative" about eleventy seven billion more times, but honestly, he goes over like a lead balloon encased in a lead safe that has been thrown out of a lead airplane while someone plays Led Zeppelin III. There are exactly three times when he gets anything even remotely resembling raucous applause: (1) when he discusses lowering taxes; (2) when he disses Barack Obama; and (3) when he mentions Mitt Romney. He also apologizes constantly, saying that he knows he hasn't always been perfect and he counts on the cons in attendance to set him straight. But to this crowd, any admission of error is an admission of weakness, and every mistake is made by someone else. Anyone who still buys into McCain's reputation as a maverick should see him now, abasing himself before the rightest of the right: He may as well be wearing a "KICK ME" sign.

The overall consensus on Blogger's Row is that McCain is a dud. It's too soon, he's too dull, the Democrats are too competitive, the campaign season is too long. Even a ticket with The Great Mormon Hope is likely to be doomed unless his name is at the top. No one on Blogger's Row seems to think that, in the words of Ice Cube, today was a good day. I move along to a lecture featuring the Virgin Ben Shapiro about the next generation of Republican leadership, and despite an overall attempt at forthrightness and penetrating insight (not to mix a metaphor that would get Ben all hot and bothered), everyone better hope that the next generation gets it right, because this one fucked around and let John McCain end up at the top of the ticket.

FRIDAY MORNING. George W. Bush, when you get right down to it, is a fucker. That's why I don't like him. He's a fucker who does fucked-up things. He's a privileged little shit who doesn't give a damp hell for the opinions of the people he was elected to govern. He buys into the toxic economic theories of unreconstructed capitalism, despite never having had to earn an honest living in his life, and he supports a worldview that cuts out anyone who hasn't had his good fortune -- the worldview of a murderous plutocracy stained with swaths of luck and cruelty where first is first and second is nobody. He's stupid in the truest sense of the word: willfully ignorant and determined to surround himself with people who keep him that way, not only resistant to different ideas but actively hostile towards them. He is neurologically incapable of thinking ahead, and he consigns the consequences of his actions to the status of dreams. And he forced his country into a pointless, unnecessary, unconscionably wasteful war that will poison every aspect of American life for generations.

Worst of all, though, the son of a bitch made me get up at 2 o'clock in the morning to go to his fucking speech at CPAC.

At around 7:20 a.m., Mr. President finally takes the stage. In person, he looks a little haggard and tired: no legacy to speak of, no friends overseas (whither Pooty-Poot? a nation turns its starving eyes to you), and another boatload of corpses to go and frown at later today. He won't last as long as his old man once he's out of office: With no one to stand in the way of, with no one to infuriate, with no press hanging over his shoulder for him to mutter "fuck off" at, he'll wither away and disappear, just another burnout boomer with prostate cancer and no hobbies. The chant begins before he even hits the walkway: "FOUR MORE YEARS! FOUR MORE YEARS! FOUR MORE YEARS!" I look around for a copy of the Constitution, but no one seems to have brought one.

He starts out a little bleary, but with an oddly touching human moment, talking about his daughter's upcoming marriage. But just in case we might get the mistaken impression that he has a functioning human brain that works in a normal fashion, he goes on to say that "Dick Cheney is the greatest vice president in the history of the United States." Then again, maybe he's got some chip implanted in his incisor that makes him say that whenever Cheney's name gets mentioned, like when someone asked Frank Sinatra about Raymond Shaw. His administration "didn't seek the approval of editorialists" before deciding what to do -- take that, Matt Taibbi! -- and "we darned sure didn't seek permission from groups like Code Pink and MoveOn before taking action." Take that, mothers of dead soldiers! But what's with this "darned" shit? Even Cheney said "damn."

The war spiel comes next, because even this dumb bastard knows that no one's going to offer up any catcalls about the war. "Afghanistan will never again be a safe haven for terrorists who wish to do us harm," he claims, using a strange interpretation of "never again" which apparently means "at some point in the future," since the last I heard the heirs to the Taliban were pretty much running roughshod over the joint. He offers up a little bit that's calculated to make my blood pressure shoot up to Throbsville: he intends to sign an executive order that will force the president to explain wasteful and unaccountable spending. How fortunate that this doesn't apply to him, and the vast financial sinkhole that Iraq has become. No fear, though: "When the history of this period is written," says Mr. I Can Has Legacy? "it will show that we were right."

As of today, says the worst president in American history, "25 million Iraqis are free." A million more are beyond freedom, knowing what the dead know. At the final moment, he does what we all knew he would do: He gives John McCain the most tepid, most damaging endorsement imaginable, saying only that he hopes the crowd will support the Republican nominee for president. I'm tired and sick and burned, and I need to eat and I need to get away from all the choking self-satisfaction in the room. The whole place rises as one, roaring and chanting, calling for a repeal to the Constitution so this luckless bastard, so desperate to get the hell out of a job he never wanted to begin with and only took out of spite; and Bush stands there, holding a dripping knife -- the only tool he's ever used -- just another misbegotten Mark Antony, waiting for the cheers of the crowd to die.

The full and unexpurgated CPAC diaries of Leonard Pierce can be found here:

Chapter 1: An American God

Chapter 2: Invisible Asia

Chapter 3: You Shan't Go Home Again

Chapter 4: In a Mad Frenzy, Stinging Themselves to Eternal Death

Chapter 5: Soy un Perdidor

Chapter 6: She Don't Like, She Don't Like, She Don't Like … McCain

Chapter 7: Holding a Shard of Mirror Up to Nature's Throat

Chapter 8: Twice Presented Him a Kingly Crown

Chapter 9: Brought Me to Darkness, But Not Into Light

Chapter 10: The Sugar and the Shit

Chapter 11: Pestilence Goes for the Big Laff

Chapter 12: Show Us Your Twits

Chapter 13: Getaway

Mister Leonard Pierce is a freelance writer currently living in San Antonio, Texas. He enjoys metal, gangsta rap, crime fiction, and democratic socialism, all of which he attempts to keep hidden from his neighbors.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: bush, cheney, cpac


Comments are closed-

Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Mar 1, 2008 12:18 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The only difference I ever found between the Democratic leadership and the Republican leadership is that one of them is skinning you from the ankle up and the other, from the neck down."

Huey P. Long


Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Terrific send-up of toxic conservatism
Posted by: Moonray on Mar 1, 2008 1:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Pierce is to be congratulated for this piece, which exposes supposedly respectable Republicans for what they really are. Now we know the significance of the phrase "the blandness of evil."

Also, it's a reminder that conservatism is very dependent on maintaining various myths and fantasies within its ranks. The real religion of these folks is capitalism and their faith is peopled with all sorts of twisted values, imaginary demons and unlikely heroes (the goofy Ronald Reagan being the most prominent at the moment).

That's why conservatives are so dangerous, especially to the Internet and other democratic institutions. Their survival depends on restricting and distorting information, and the Internet is providing factual information to the world's population at a tremendous rate. More than any other factor, the Internet is fueling the "liberal" resurgence we see today in America and around the world.
As long as we can keep that information flowing, these blandly evil folks will not prevail.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's "the banality of evil" Posted by: Ignatz deFyre

Comments are closed-

Life inside the Death Star
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Mar 1, 2008 2:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very Taibbi...Or is "Mister Leonard Pierce" an alternative pen name?

Very entertaining. More articles like this, please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Great Piece!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Mar 1, 2008 5:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Individually, right wingers can be tolerable, even pleasant company. As this piece makes frighteningly clear, when they come together as a group, that group instantaneously becomes a mob.

The statement made by Mitt Romney, that Dick Cheney is "the greatest vice-president in history" is quite telling. When one considers the fact that the list includes Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and Theodore Roosevelt, it becomes a classic line in the realms of irony; sort of along the lines of, "I'm gonna restore honor and integrity to the White House". Do these silly people even have a clue?

One of the great things about the modern day ultra right movement - or whatever the fuck you want to call it - is it's deep mine of unintentional humor. For someone like me, never noted for having a very prolific pen, it's been the equivilant of striking gold in California during the 1840s.

Eureka!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
Oh, Ralph, you've done it again!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Great Piece! Posted by: Chloe2005
» RE: Great Piece! Posted by: Tom Degan
» I heard you also Posted by: itzamirakul

Comments are closed-

Entertaining yet Disturbing
Posted by: taxidriver on Mar 1, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know I shouldn't be surprised, but where are the calls for national unity as well as sacrifice? Conservatives keep talking about fighting existential wars against Terror and Islamofascism, yet in the same breath they call for lower taxes and less government. And based on this piece, "support our troops" means just paying them lip service while young conservatives cash in their stock options. What a remarkably selfish, smug, and self-righteous crowd. This way to oblivion!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: entertaining yet Disturbing Posted by: oceanwaves99999

Comments are closed-

soowee
Posted by: soowee on Mar 1, 2008 6:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Leonard Price is outstanding!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Reality
Posted by: OldRedleg on Mar 1, 2008 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If this were a MSM ragsheet, or even Saturday Night Live, I would think that this article was a great piece of satire and humor. Unfortunately, it is frighteningly real.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Reality Posted by: nha16
» RE: eality Posted by: Mr. Heathen
» Yes, it's a scary article Posted by: Blink

Comments are closed-

Hunter S. Thompson
Posted by: pdecarlo on Mar 1, 2008 8:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wants his life back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hunter S. Thompson Posted by: drsivana99
» Pretty silly Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Pretty silly Posted by: sevengen
» In the absence of HST..... Posted by: morticia
» RE: Pretty silly Posted by: Quannah

Comments are closed-

Like Going to A Nuremberg Rally
Posted by: sofla100 on Mar 1, 2008 11:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In Hitler's time, rallies were held at Nuremberg with an almost complete devotion to Hitler and "the German state." German corporations, from IG Farben to Volkswagen, stood ready to help and contribute to the cause. Before the war, military and defense contracts boosted the German economy to its highest levels since before the Weimar Republic. Today, in America, we have the Republican right, ready with its agenda to further "the American nation." American and multi-national companies stand ready with checkbooks open. The vision, "an Islamic free America (since Islam=terrorism)," on guard with government monitoring of communications and the internet. The vision includes a nation divided into two camps. The wealthy elite (1%) owning most of the countries wealth (already they own 50%) and the rest of the slobs, forced to work for the lowest wages possible. So, this is where the divide stands today. Once again, history is starting to repeat itself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Nabuddha
Posted by: Nabuddha on Mar 1, 2008 2:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The paragraph that reads:
"FRIDAY MORNING: George Bush, when you get right down to it, is a fucker....."
:should be posted on his wikipedia page. It pretty much sums up Shrub in just a few words. Very crafty writing. Kudos....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This article can't be taken seriously
Posted by: Blink on Mar 1, 2008 3:25 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is too full of seething anger and hostility to be taken seriously. Every single person he encountered is a caricature of some kind and disparaged in ad hominem fashion. The only thing missing from it is a description of the ritual performed at midnight when all of these evil conservatives don their horns and forked tails and dance around a fire with pitchforks...but I suppose Mister was back at the bar and missed that one.

I feel sorry for Mister. It can't be easy going through life with that much anger and hatred toward those who don't share your political outlook. I suspect he's a very unhappy person.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Debate ideas? Posted by: mainspark
» Burying Your Head in the Sand Posted by: sofla100
» The point Posted by: Blink
» RE: The point Posted by: sofla100
» Death to those who disagree!! Posted by: Iraan Ozono
» I feel sorry for you ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: I feel sorry for you ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» BUT, George Bush really Posted by: itzamirakul
» Debate? about fascism? Posted by: davidg

Comments are closed-

Oh, brother!
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 1, 2008 3:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a quarter. Buy a sense of humor. (Because we all know trolls were born without one!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This is an all too common report
Posted by: Libsrule on Mar 1, 2008 3:43 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While more humorous than most, I read this all too often with others who have gone undercover to see the sheer evil and to be perfectly honest, stupidity of the rightwingers who inhabit this great country.

These bland but evil people would think nothing of turning America into a fascist country and would take great pleasure, and I mean that sincerely, in torturing fellow Americans for no other reason than belonging to the "wrong" party.

They would make Stalin and Mao blush with envy at how they would turn America into the most "pure" country on Earth. Re-education camps would be strewn thoughout America and in some states so common that they would be financial base for many a rightwing community.

Constitution?

They would rewrite it just the way Hucklebee wants it to be written; IN HIS NAME. And yet they see absolutely NOTHING in common with the very enemy this country is fighting that is run by rightwing religious fanatics. They figure that since they dress better, that makes their way of turning America into the Christian Taliban version somehow much better, holier and purer.

But what makes me the most curious is just how they came to believe they are the righteous, the correct blood, the overords, those who have a God Given Right To Rule over the rest of us.

Anyone who can give Darth Cheney a standing ovation would follow evil into the deepest darkest depths of hell and be convinced they were doing God's work.

We need more reports like this.

Insightful and humorous as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Tom
Posted by: robigreg on Mar 1, 2008 4:31 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When we stop using "fuck" as a way to say something nasty about someone; or call someone like Dick Cheney a "fucker"; but reserve it instead to refer to one of humankind's more pleasurable endeavors, to be celebrated and valued instead of using it the way "dirty" is associated with sex--then, and only then, will I believe this nation has its head screwed on right about sex. Someone on the left using the word in this demeaning way tells me how far they are in their own emancipation from the right-wing's sexual hangups.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tom Posted by: Joni50
» RE: Tom Posted by: mainspark
» RE: I don't know .... Posted by: Cybershaman

Comments are closed-

In South Carolina
Posted by: desidid on Mar 1, 2008 5:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you can go to a local diner to enjoy a meal and be forced to listen to some conservative dimbulb talk about the evil liberals. I went for a quiet breakfast the other day, and was forced to eat like I was in some kind of eating contest. Some idiot decided that he was going to have a republican rally and forced everyone in the restaurant to suffer his ignorance. As the only Black person present I felt I was the only thing keeping him from going off on Obama, but every third word was liberal, and not in a good way. I certainly felt this piece though humorous, was pretty accurate in describing how hateful republicans tend to be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Brilliant!
Posted by: balderkitty on Mar 1, 2008 7:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I couldn't get enough of Pierces article and started reading some of the long chapters. Thank you, Alternet, some of the best news on-line.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The defininitive description of GWB....
Posted by: jmonday on Mar 1, 2008 7:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the absolute best, most accurate description and analyses of Bush I've ever read:
"George W. Bush, when you get right down to it, is a fucker. That's why I don't like him. He's a fucker who does fucked-up things. He's a privileged little shit who doesn't give a damp hell for the opinions of the people he was elected to govern. He buys into the toxic economic theories of unreconstructed capitalism, despite never having had to earn an honest living in his life, and he supports a worldview that cuts out anyone who hasn't had his good fortune -- the worldview of a murderous plutocracy stained with swaths of luck and cruelty where first is first and second is nobody. He's stupid in the truest sense of the word: willfully ignorant and determined to surround himself with people who keep him that way, not only resistant to different ideas but actively hostile towards them. He is neurologically incapable of thinking ahead, and he consigns the consequences of his actions to the status of dreams. And he forced his country into a pointless, unnecessary, unconscionably wasteful war that will poison every aspect of American life for generations." .......Insightful, and deep down everyone knows W is an asshole that couldn't give a smaller shit about them or their future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What's in a name?
Posted by: willymack on Mar 1, 2008 7:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was talking to a young Hispanic man in Medford, Or. today. Call him Juan. Juan told me he'd NEVER vote for a Muslim, and since Obama is a Muslim, that meant him too. I asked him why he thought Obama is a Muslim. Juan looked at me as if I were a child with a middling mind, and said: "Barack", to which I said "Yeah", then he said :"Obama", and I said Yeah" again. He said: "Don't you get it?" I said: "I guess not; tell me". He said: "They're both Muslim names", to which I said: "No, they're not; they're Keynan names, and the major language of Keyna is Swahili, a beautiful, musical language. Obama's father is a Sawhili-speaking Keynan,and his mother is American. Barack's father is a Muslim, but Barack is not". Juan asked me how I knew that. I told him he was asking the wrong question, and that he should be asking himself how it was he DIDN'T know that. If Juan is typical of young Americans, then it's no wonder the dummies at the rethug rally are so mentally deficient.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» the state of awareness... Posted by: davidg

Comments are closed-

X pat in Scotland
Posted by: davy on Mar 2, 2008 1:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is what I wish for America. This quote by Robert Burns.

" Oh would some god the giftie gie us, to see oorselves as others see us"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Great Article!! LOVED EVERY BIT OF IT.
Posted by: 1984NOW!!! on Mar 2, 2008 1:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A WHOLE AUDITORIUM OF MIND WARPED, YOUNG AND OLD REPUBLICANS WOULD MAKE YOU WANT TO BE SURE TO HAVE A BOTTLE OF SOMETHING STRONG WAITING FOR YOU SO THAT YOU COULD GET DRUNK ENOUGH TO PURGE THE SMELL AND AFFECTS OF SULFUR OUT OF YOUR SYSTEM.

THANK YOU MR. PIERCE FOR DOING THE DIRTY WORK and for being so satisfyingly funny.

THE PEOPLE ARE COMING TO TAKE BACK THEIR COUNTRY.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I'd love to go to CPAC!
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Mar 2, 2008 7:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's like watching chimps in a shitfight.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Entertaining, but not informative
Posted by: kevred on Mar 3, 2008 10:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing against the writer, his humor, or the ever-present self-referential style of writing that permeates blogs and print these days--where journalism is more personal diary than a recording of events--but...

...there's such a thick layer of interpretation of events in this piece, and so little actual documentation of events, that I feel like I didn't really learn much of anything about this event. Without many specific quotes or specific activities described, what we're mostly left with is broad, colorful, we'll-take-your-word-for-it editorialisms.

Now, I sympathize with the views of the writer, and would probably feel just the same way after being in such a repulsive setting. But honestly, it reads to me like an album review in Pitchfork, where I learn a lot more about the reviewer's mind and record collection than I do about the subject.

So, nicely done for what it is, but I still don't really know anything about this event. To each their own, but over time I find myself looking for pieces that let the craziness of what's actually happening speak for itself, rather than the author supplying too much of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Language
Posted by: BCcovers on Mar 3, 2008 12:01 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While posting on a message board can be construed as a somewhat off-the-cuff and knee-jerk commentary on a current topic; an atricle written in a magazine or webpage is not. In the former all sorts of street language abound as the debate persists. However, in the latter, the presence of such extreme and derogatory language is puzzling, unexpected, and blatantly unproffessional. When people, on the right or left, write using these words what they don't realize is that their credibility with those with opposing or varied viewpoints is severely diminished. The writers come off as immature, bitter, and intellectually defunct. Have you ever read a scientific paper or a legal brief that stated: "This motherfucking cell just wouldn't divide when bombarded with those shitty little electrons. It can therefore be concluded that the electrons did not have sufficent velocity to do so; or in short, they were pussies"
Kind of devalues what the study is saying about electrons, huh? If you want to bring people around to your way of thinking swearing and crude language usually won't do anything but highlight your own linguistic and personal deficiencies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Language Posted by: DreamFast
Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Mar 1, 2008 12:18 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The only difference I ever found between the Democratic leadership and the Republican leadership is that one of them is skinning you from the ankle up and the other, from the neck down."

Huey P. Long


Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Terrific send-up of toxic conservatism
Posted by: Moonray on Mar 1, 2008 1:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Pierce is to be congratulated for this piece, which exposes supposedly respectable Republicans for what they really are. Now we know the significance of the phrase "the blandness of evil."

Also, it's a reminder that conservatism is very dependent on maintaining various myths and fantasies within its ranks. The real religion of these folks is capitalism and their faith is peopled with all sorts of twisted values, imaginary demons and unlikely heroes (the goofy Ronald Reagan being the most prominent at the moment).

That's why conservatives are so dangerous, especially to the Internet and other democratic institutions. Their survival depends on restricting and distorting information, and the Internet is providing factual information to the world's population at a tremendous rate. More than any other factor, the Internet is fueling the "liberal" resurgence we see today in America and around the world.
As long as we can keep that information flowing, these blandly evil folks will not prevail.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's "the banality of evil" Posted by: Ignatz deFyre

Comments are closed-

Life inside the Death Star
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Mar 1, 2008 2:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very Taibbi...Or is "Mister Leonard Pierce" an alternative pen name?

Very entertaining. More articles like this, please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Great Piece!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Mar 1, 2008 5:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Individually, right wingers can be tolerable, even pleasant company. As this piece makes frighteningly clear, when they come together as a group, that group instantaneously becomes a mob.

The statement made by Mitt Romney, that Dick Cheney is "the greatest vice-president in history" is quite telling. When one considers the fact that the list includes Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and Theodore Roosevelt, it becomes a classic line in the realms of irony; sort of along the lines of, "I'm gonna restore honor and integrity to the White House". Do these silly people even have a clue?

One of the great things about the modern day ultra right movement - or whatever the fuck you want to call it - is it's deep mine of unintentional humor. For someone like me, never noted for having a very prolific pen, it's been the equivilant of striking gold in California during the 1840s.

Eureka!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
Oh, Ralph, you've done it again!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Great Piece! Posted by: Chloe2005
» RE: Great Piece! Posted by: Tom Degan
» I heard you also Posted by: itzamirakul

Comments are closed-

Entertaining yet Disturbing
Posted by: taxidriver on Mar 1, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know I shouldn't be surprised, but where are the calls for national unity as well as sacrifice? Conservatives keep talking about fighting existential wars against Terror and Islamofascism, yet in the same breath they call for lower taxes and less government. And based on this piece, "support our troops" means just paying them lip service while young conservatives cash in their stock options. What a remarkably selfish, smug, and self-righteous crowd. This way to oblivion!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: entertaining yet Disturbing Posted by: oceanwaves99999

Comments are closed-

soowee
Posted by: soowee on Mar 1, 2008 6:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Leonard Price is outstanding!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Reality
Posted by: OldRedleg on Mar 1, 2008 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If this were a MSM ragsheet, or even Saturday Night Live, I would think that this article was a great piece of satire and humor. Unfortunately, it is frighteningly real.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Reality Posted by: nha16
» RE: eality Posted by: Mr. Heathen
» Yes, it's a scary article Posted by: Blink

Comments are closed-

Hunter S. Thompson
Posted by: pdecarlo on Mar 1, 2008 8:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wants his life back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hunter S. Thompson Posted by: drsivana99
» Pretty silly Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Pretty silly Posted by: sevengen
» In the absence of HST..... Posted by: morticia
» RE: Pretty silly Posted by: Quannah

Comments are closed-

Like Going to A Nuremberg Rally
Posted by: sofla100 on Mar 1, 2008 11:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In Hitler's time, rallies were held at Nuremberg with an almost complete devotion to Hitler and "the German state." German corporations, from IG Farben to Volkswagen, stood ready to help and contribute to the cause. Before the war, military and defense contracts boosted the German economy to its highest levels since before the Weimar Republic. Today, in America, we have the Republican right, ready with its agenda to further "the American nation." American and multi-national companies stand ready with checkbooks open. The vision, "an Islamic free America (since Islam=terrorism)," on guard with government monitoring of communications and the internet. The vision includes a nation divided into two camps. The wealthy elite (1%) owning most of the countries wealth (already they own 50%) and the rest of the slobs, forced to work for the lowest wages possible. So, this is where the divide stands today. Once again, history is starting to repeat itself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Nabuddha
Posted by: Nabuddha on Mar 1, 2008 2:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The paragraph that reads:
"FRIDAY MORNING: George Bush, when you get right down to it, is a fucker....."
:should be posted on his wikipedia page. It pretty much sums up Shrub in just a few words. Very crafty writing. Kudos....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This article can't be taken seriously
Posted by: Blink on Mar 1, 2008 3:25 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is too full of seething anger and hostility to be taken seriously. Every single person he encountered is a caricature of some kind and disparaged in ad hominem fashion. The only thing missing from it is a description of the ritual performed at midnight when all of these evil conservatives don their horns and forked tails and dance around a fire with pitchforks...but I suppose Mister was back at the bar and missed that one.

I feel sorry for Mister. It can't be easy going through life with that much anger and hatred toward those who don't share your political outlook. I suspect he's a very unhappy person.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Debate ideas? Posted by: mainspark
» Burying Your Head in the Sand Posted by: sofla100
» The point Posted by: Blink
» RE: The point Posted by: sofla100
» Death to those who disagree!! Posted by: Iraan Ozono
» I feel sorry for you ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: I feel sorry for you ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» BUT, George Bush really Posted by: itzamirakul
» Debate? about fascism? Posted by: davidg

Comments are closed-

Oh, brother!
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 1, 2008 3:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a quarter. Buy a sense of humor. (Because we all know trolls were born without one!)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This is an all too common report
Posted by: Libsrule on Mar 1, 2008 3:43 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While more humorous than most, I read this all too often with others who have gone undercover to see the sheer evil and to be perfectly honest, stupidity of the rightwingers who inhabit this great country.

These bland but evil people would think nothing of turning America into a fascist country and would take great pleasure, and I mean that sincerely, in torturing fellow Americans for no other reason than belonging to the "wrong" party.

They would make Stalin and Mao blush with envy at how they would turn America into the most "pure" country on Earth. Re-education camps would be strewn thoughout America and in some states so common that they would be financial base for many a rightwing community.

Constitution?

They would rewrite it just the way Hucklebee wants it to be written; IN HIS NAME. And yet they see absolutely NOTHING in common with the very enemy this country is fighting that is run by rightwing religious fanatics. They figure that since they dress better, that makes their way of turning America into the Christian Taliban version somehow much better, holier and purer.

But what makes me the most curious is just how they came to believe they are the righteous, the correct blood, the overords, those who have a God Given Right To Rule over the rest of us.

Anyone who can give Darth Cheney a standing ovation would follow evil into the deepest darkest depths of hell and be convinced they were doing God's work.

We need more reports like this.

Insightful and humorous as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Tom
Posted by: robigreg on Mar 1, 2008 4:31 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When we stop using "fuck" as a way to say something nasty about someone; or call someone like Dick Cheney a "fucker"; but reserve it instead to refer to one of humankind's more pleasurable endeavors, to be celebrated and valued instead of using it the way "dirty" is associated with sex--then, and only then, will I believe this nation has its head screwed on right about sex. Someone on the left using the word in this demeaning way tells me how far they are in their own emancipation from the right-wing's sexual hangups.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tom Posted by: Joni50
» RE: Tom Posted by: mainspark
» RE: I don't know .... Posted by: Cybershaman

Comments are closed-

In South Carolina
Posted by: desidid on Mar 1, 2008 5:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you can go to a local diner to enjoy a meal and be forced to listen to some conservative dimbulb talk about the evil liberals. I went for a quiet breakfast the other day, and was forced to eat like I was in some kind of eating contest. Some idiot decided that he was going to have a republican rally and forced everyone in the restaurant to suffer his ignorance. As the only Black person present I felt I was the only thing keeping him from going off on Obama, but every third word was liberal, and not in a good way. I certainly felt this piece though humorous, was pretty accurate in describing how hateful republicans tend to be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Brilliant!
Posted by: balderkitty on Mar 1, 2008 7:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I couldn't get enough of Pierces article and started reading some of the long chapters. Thank you, Alternet, some of the best news on-line.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The defininitive description of GWB....
Posted by: jmonday on Mar 1, 2008 7:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the absolute best, most accurate description and analyses of Bush I've ever read:
"George W. Bush, when you get right down to it, is a fucker. That's why I don't like him. He's a fucker who does fucked-up things. He's a privileged little shit who doesn't give a damp hell for the opinions of the people he was elected to govern. He buys into the toxic economic theories of unreconstructed capitalism, despite never having had to earn an honest living in his life, and he supports a worldview that cuts out anyone who hasn't had his good fortune -- the worldview of a murderous plutocracy stained with swaths of luck and cruelty where first is first and second is nobody. He's stupid in the truest sense of the word: willfully ignorant and determined to surround himself with people who keep him that way, not only resistant to different ideas but actively hostile towards them. He is neurologically incapable of thinking ahead, and he consigns the consequences of his actions to the status of dreams. And he forced his country into a pointless, unnecessary, unconscionably wasteful war that will poison every aspect of American life for generations." .......Insightful, and deep down everyone knows W is an asshole that couldn't give a smaller shit about them or their future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What's in a name?
Posted by: willymack on Mar 1, 2008 7:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was talking to a young Hispanic man in Medford, Or. today. Call him Juan. Juan told me he'd NEVER vote for a Muslim, and since Obama is a Muslim, that meant him too. I asked him why he thought Obama is a Muslim. Juan looked at me as if I were a child with a middling mind, and said: "Barack", to which I said "Yeah", then he said :"Obama", and I said Yeah" again. He said: "Don't you get it?" I said: "I guess not; tell me". He said: "They're both Muslim names", to which I said: "No, they're not; they're Keynan names, and the major language of Keyna is Swahili, a beautiful, musical language. Obama's father is a Sawhili-speaking Keynan,and his mother is American. Barack's father is a Muslim, but Barack is not". Juan asked me how I knew that. I told him he was asking the wrong question, and that he should be asking himself how it was he DIDN'T know that. If Juan is typical of young Americans, then it's no wonder the dummies at the rethug rally are so mentally deficient.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» the state of awareness... Posted by: davidg

Comments are closed-

X pat in Scotland
Posted by: davy on Mar 2, 2008 1:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is what I wish for America. This quote by Robert Burns.

" Oh would some god the giftie gie us, to see oorselves as others see us"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Great Article!! LOVED EVERY BIT OF IT.
Posted by: 1984NOW!!! on Mar 2, 2008 1:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A WHOLE AUDITORIUM OF MIND WARPED, YOUNG AND OLD REPUBLICANS WOULD MAKE YOU WANT TO BE SURE TO HAVE A BOTTLE OF SOMETHING STRONG WAITING FOR YOU SO THAT YOU COULD GET DRUNK ENOUGH TO PURGE THE SMELL AND AFFECTS OF SULFUR OUT OF YOUR SYSTEM.

THANK YOU MR. PIERCE FOR DOING THE DIRTY WORK and for being so satisfyingly funny.

THE PEOPLE ARE COMING TO TAKE BACK THEIR COUNTRY.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

I'd love to go to CPAC!
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Mar 2, 2008 7:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's like watching chimps in a shitfight.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Entertaining, but not informative
Posted by: kevred on Mar 3, 2008 10:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing against the writer, his humor, or the ever-present self-referential style of writing that permeates blogs and print these days--where journalism is more personal diary than a recording of events--but...

...there's such a thick layer of interpretation of events in this piece, and so little actual documentation of events, that I feel like I didn't really learn much of anything about this event. Without many specific quotes or specific activities described, what we're mostly left with is broad, colorful, we'll-take-your-word-for-it editorialisms.

Now, I sympathize with the views of the writer, and would probably feel just the same way after being in such a repulsive setting. But honestly, it reads to me like an album review in Pitchfork, where I learn a lot more about the reviewer's mind and record collection than I do about the subject.

So, nicely done for what it is, but I still don't really know anything about this event. To each their own, but over time I find myself looking for pieces that let the craziness of what's actually happening speak for itself, rather than the author supplying too much of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Language
Posted by: BCcovers on Mar 3, 2008 12:01 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While posting on a message board can be construed as a somewhat off-the-cuff and knee-jerk commentary on a current topic; an atricle written in a magazine or webpage is not. In the former all sorts of street language abound as the debate persists. However, in the latter, the presence of such extreme and derogatory language is puzzling, unexpected, and blatantly unproffessional. When people, on the right or left, write using these words what they don't realize is that their credibility with those with opposing or varied viewpoints is severely diminished. The writers come off as immature, bitter, and intellectually defunct. Have you ever read a scientific paper or a legal brief that stated: "This motherfucking cell just wouldn't divide when bombarded with those shitty little electrons. It can therefore be concluded that the electrons did not have sufficent velocity to do so; or in short, they were pussies"
Kind of devalues what the study is saying about electrons, huh? If you want to bring people around to your way of thinking swearing and crude language usually won't do anything but highlight your own linguistic and personal deficiencies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Language Posted by: DreamFast
 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS