Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Self Help: $10 Billion for What?

By Emily Wilson, AlterNet. Posted February 26, 2008.


Self-help is everywhere, but does it work? One writer immersed herself in the industry for a year to find out.
41xytnlm9ql.ou01aa240sh20
bethlisick

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Emily Wilson

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When performer, rock musician and writer Beth Lisick woke up Jan. 1, 2006, and the only New Year's resolution she could think of was learning to do the splits, she decided to aim a little higher.

Instead, she spent the year availing herself of all the advice out there to better her character, physical fitness, parenting and sex life, along with her financial, organizational and time management skills. Lisick read Chicken Soup for the Soul, by Jack Canfield, and The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, by Stephen Covey; she went to seminars with John Gray of Men Are From Mars, Women Are From Venus fame and financial superstar Suze Orman; she consulted with Oprah Winfrey's organizational advisor; learned about giving her child time-outs from a book called 1-2-3 Magic; gave Deepak Chopra (who she had previously considered 'spirituality lite") a chance, and went on a "Cruise to Lose" with fitness guru Richard Simmons.

During the year, Lisick tried to put aside her cynicism and refused to dismiss Covey for his Mormonism or Canfield for his love of golf and fast cars. Now she can always find her keys and ask for things in a direct way, and has embraced the concept of abundance instead of scarcity and negotiated a lower interest rate on her credit card.

Lisick chronicles her yearlong journey through the self-help world in her new book Helping Me Help Myself: One Skeptic, Ten Self-Help Gurus, and a Year on the Brink of the Comfort Zone. She recently shared that experience with AlterNet.

Emily Wilson: Do you think your life is better now after a year of helping yourself?

Beth Lisick: I actually do. Like I said in the book, I thought it would be funny, in a way, if nothing changed. I don't feel like I am a totally different person than I was before I started the book, but I think that if you immerse yourself in anything for a year, it's going to change you, and it definitely did change me for the better. I feel like I am more organized, and I do have a better grasp of time management and organization that I really didn't before. I started thinking about goals, and I had never had done that before in my life. And it was weird because it wasn't like I was a person who could never get anything done. I do a lot of stuff, but I just think I did so much stuff it was almost like I was spreading myself too thin. That was probably the big one. I feel like I'm more organized and more focused.

You talk about reviewing the day before you go to sleep at night, which is something Jack Canfield and Deepak Chopra do. What are some other concrete things you do now?

I'm a lot better at looking around my house and if I see something and I'm cleaning up, just saying, 'Where does that thing go?' Before, a lot of things in our house, we just didn't have a place for them, and we were always losing certain things like the digital camera, or my keys. Now when I'm cleaning up, I can say, 'Where does that thing go?' or if that thing doesn't have a home, then I have to sit there and think, 'OK, where can be a place for this thing that we just move from desk to table to couch?' So that's something I do differently. Those were my favorite things. Like the 1-2-3 Magic thing with Gus -- the things where I could see immediate benefits. I could see immediate results with that.

You say early on in Helping Me Help Myself that you are a Godophobe. A lot of these books are very focused on God or a higher power. How did you deal with that?

I think the first thing I did was I realized the Godophobe part of me was really a holdover from adolescence. It was just when people would talk about their higher power and I would be like, "Can't you figure out another way to talk about it without saying that," and then as I was reading these books, and it was just everywhere; it was impossible to escape. Then when I started thinking of those synchronicities and things I thought were cool, I was like, "Well, I've known for a very long time people substitute the word God for something bigger than me, something I can't control, something that is mysterious and out there." And then I mention in the book a big thing for me is my friends who were recovering drug addicts or alcoholics, who, for so long, were unable to do the 12 steps because they could not accept the higher power part, and it just held them back for so long, and once they decided just to surrender that and say, "OK, I don't even know what that means, I don't understand, but I can think of it as this or that," then they were able to get sober and healthy, so I think about it in that way too.

You say you were surprised by how much you liked The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People and that you have no interest in slamming Stephen Covey because he's Mormon.

Yeah, I'm over that. I mean, I don't think of myself as a journalist. I think my approach was to be like anybody else who reads the books and goes to the seminars and tries to figure out what it all means and how it all can work for them.

What am I going to do, go into some in-depth analysis of Mormonism? I felt like I don't want to be another person who has those two paragraphs that talk about all the ridiculous things about Mormonism. I feel like I've read those two paragraphs everywhere, you know, about the special underwear. It just seemed boring to me. I mean, when I read longer articles about Mormonism, I find it totally fascinating, but I didn't think anybody needed me to sum up the weird things about Mormonism. That's kind of how I decided to start at the place where we all know these self-help people are cheesy. I mean, sometimes I couldn't help myself and had to point out things that were so weird or funny, but I think the idea of writing some sort of expose of how it's all a scam is just like, "Really? In 2008? I don't think so." There are people out there who do that and are researchers or want to expose everybody for how much they make per talk and what their credentials are, but I don't think that belongs in this book.

You had a hard time with John Gray and his whole Mars/Venus thing. Why was that?

I put my prejudices right out there because I was kind of a tomboy growing up, and maybe it was just the time and place, but there was never any moment in my entire life that I felt like there was anything I couldn't do because I was a girl. So, to me, that whole idea of gender stuff is so fluid, and the blatant stereotyping drives me nuts. I just can't get behind it -- that men's chemistry is one way and women's chemistry is another. I think all of our chemistry is all over the map and, yeah, there are two sides of it that he exploits for his purposes, but I think people really like to buy into it, and they think, "Oh, I do love my chocolate. and I do love to go shopping, and I do hate it when my man goes into his man cave." It's like we want to feel like individuals, but then there's the sense of belonging to something. It just made no sense with my relationship with my husband, and it was just confusing to me. ... It was almost not fair to choose him because I had such a huge prejudice, but I felt like I was cutting him slack the whole time.

Did you feel like a lot of these self-help movements are based on the personality of the leaders?

Yeah, the personality aspect is huge with the gurus because the ideas are very old and have been around forever, and so what it is is the personality of the guru and how they are putting their message across. You can say something like, 'Do unto others,' and we've all heard it a million times, but if somebody comes along and can say it in this way that is a little bit different and has a little bit of a different twist on it, all of a sudden it seems new and exciting again. Like, I was at a bookstore recently for one of my readings, and there's a new Montel Williams self-help book, and I picked it up and I swear to God, the first thing I read is, "Drink six six- to eight-ounce glasses of water every day." So here's this piece of advice that's in every issue of every women's magazine that ever comes out every single month. So it's all about the personality. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, because some people will listen to what Montel has to say because they're a fan of his show. But that's why it's perpetuated in so many different ways with so many faces and hairdos and teeth; selling this thing is all about personality in the commercial sense. It's not about the advice, because the advice has been around forever.

You're fairly indifferent to money. You do talk about wanting a dishwasher, and visualizing getting one, but how was it for you to read about people who talk about having hundreds of thousands of dollars or aspiring to have a mansion?

Jack Canfield had a lot in his book about visualizing yourself behind the wheel of a red convertible. Even go to a dealer and sit in it, visualize yourself on those golf courses around the world or having vacation homes. That was stuff like with the Mormonism or whatever that I had to let it go. Because I think once you're at the level those people are at -- you know, in Jack Canfield's defense, he's got those things, and I'm sure he can't imagine his life without them, so he's saying to these people, 'All right, you can come along.' But, for me, it's always been such an unattractive quality in a person when they wanted a lot of material things or a lot of money. So that was a hard one for me, and I think a lot has to do with my background of being raised without any want for money. Growing up, we had everything we needed. There were things we didn't get, but we lived a very solidly middle-class life. I think part of it too is being a writer; I just thought, I'm never going to have money. So yeah, money is a huge issue for me, and I have to really edit myself to not obsess over it.

It seemed like a hard year because you and your husband were really struggling with money and then there was this relentless self-examination. What was the hardest thing about the year?

I think the hardest thing when I first started reading these books was facing up to these faults and shortcomings that I had previously overlooked. Now that I'm aware of what they are, it's hard to imagine I wasn't paying attention. And I was perfectly happy not paying attention. I'm an optimistic person -- I'm a happy person -- and so there wasn't a huge struggle I was trying to get over. The hardest part reading some of these books was realizing some things. It wasn't like, "Oh I don't have the convertible and the mansion," it was, "Oh, I don't manage my money well and, wow, I don't always do what I say I'm going to do." So it was pointing out all these things in my personality that were kind of depressing.

What was the funnest thing about it?

I think the fun part for me was knowing your life can be an experiment and that you can just decide to do something and do it. I think, generally, in our lives, you want to walk around with that feeling that it's your life and you can do whatever you want, but it was cool to put it to the test. So even in the darkest hours I was like, all right, I'm doing this thing.

I also really enjoyed the people that I met. Because, in the Bay Area, when do you ever meet a person who's never had a cappuccino in their life? And you're sitting next to them the moment they decide to have their first cappuccino. That's so great. I mean, when I was at the FranklinCovey seminar and I was talking to the woman who is an event planner for industrial laundries, I was like, "God, what kind of events do you plan?" You're given the opportunity to talk to people from all over the place, and I really liked that. I think I just have fully admitted I love people so much, and I love being around them.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: self help, beth lisick, helping me help myself

Emily Wilson is a freelance writer and teaches basic skills at City College of San Francisco.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What next? Scientology???
Posted by: strahlungsamt on Feb 26, 2008 2:08 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great! I saw this article and thought: Finally, AlterNet gets around to criticizing the Self Help industry. Boy was I disappointed. Instead I read this shill for a self-help book promoting all the other self-help books out there. What happened? Tom Cruise bought Oprah?

The SH industry has been practically doubling in size every year for the last 5 years and, like every other cult, it's all about getting your money. Thanks to SH, people are rejecting regular medicine for quackery such as Homeopathy and Ayurvedic medicine (and getting sicker and dying in the process), substituting self-esteem for real achievement (hint: the World won't respect you unless you actually DID something, not for how good you feel about yourself), leaving steady jobs to persue some get-rich-quick scheme they read about in "Rich Dad" and wasting money for books, tapes and conferences they can't afford and don't need (Never mind that nobody reads real books anymore).

SH gurus live to make money. They are the teleevangelists for the secular. They want you to become dependent on them so you get duped into buying more books, attending more conferences, buying more kits and making them more money. Consequences be damned!

I have watched many untalented people change as they join the "Almost Rich" class, thinking next week/month/year they will be rich and retiring with millions just because they think like "The Most Successful People".

Folks, put down the Self Help books and learn a real skill instead. It will do you a lot more good in the long run.

For more information: go to these links below:

What's the Harm?
Quackwatch
Rick Ross
Real Estate Guru rating
The Shadow of the Dalai Lama

Read them and weep.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh, for heaven's sake. Posted by: Beck
» Thank You... Posted by: skizum
» RE: Oh, for heaven's sake. Posted by: mullenhead
» "Televangelists for the secular" Posted by: andabottleof_rum
Self Help = Conscious Awareness
Posted by: skizum on Feb 26, 2008 3:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Self help works because it focuses one to become more conscious of one's actions, choices and decisions. These books workshops and seminars not only help focus ones attention on relevant issues of self but also one's relationship to the world around them. In essence, we seek ways to live more humanely.

Our basic mechanism for learning is repetition. If we practice something a lot we develop better skills, the more we study the more we learn, the more 'on message' rhetoric we hear the more we believe it and so on.

So, it comes to no surprise to me that by becoming consciously aware of an issue and engaging in a regular practice to solve the root causes of that issue can be a highly effective.

Most of the books I've read frame issues in topics such as finance, relationships, health and so on. This approach offers the practicality of breaking down problems into familiar 'digestible' categories that one deals with on a daily basis. This is like understanding that you have to eat in a balance from the 5 food groups. Now what about understanding the nature and effect of the nutrients in a balanced diet?

I think that there is much more work we can all do by exploring the human condition from an even more fundamental perspective of Human Nature and integrating what we learn into our general educational systems. Human nature is an inescapable reality which now influences virtually every aspect of change on planet Earth; how we relate to and impact ourselves, each other and our environment.

My approach to the subject of understanding human nature is to first assume that virtually everyone on planet Earth wants to live a humane lifestyle. The question then becomes how does one define what the elements of a humane lifestyle are? The next question is, what elements of a humane lifestyle are common to the vast majority of humans? If there are a common set of needs or experiences that exist, what are they, how can they be verified and how do we determine what a healthy balance of these elements is? Finally, how could such a such a self help knowledge base be effectively disseminated and understood by the masses of the world to the extent that it would catalyze a great shift in consciousness towards creating balanced benevolent change in the world?

I think that the answers to these questions exist, spread across various topics of social research, religion, philosophy, psychology and in the very intuitive opinions of the vast majority of humankind. My goal is to play a part in bringing all of that together in a project plan with the working title, "The Universal Humane Needs Assessment".

Unlike most self help books, this project is being set up to ask individuals to define the elements of a humane lifestyle from their own personal perspective. The data from this phase of the project will help to either prove, disprove or edit the initial objective assumptions I have made. Once, the initial list of humane elements is more solid then the real fun begins; finding intersections between these basic universal elements and other research that is out there already.

Hopefully, this approach can help us not only accept the ideas that we seek guidance from a higher power or the need for people and things to have a home, or the need for people to be healthy and so on, but also why we have these needs, how we can balance them for ourselves, within our communities and the world through the value of a commonly shared compassion.

As individuals seek the security of a more humane life, we need to realize that we are growing more dependent on each other to do so as the limits of finite resources are fast approaching.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I second the above comment Posted by: Sunfell
Let's differentiate between peer support/mutual aid and a charlatan industry
Posted by: graemebacque on Feb 26, 2008 3:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's true there is a very large component of money-grubbers and outright control freaks in the so-called 'self-help' industry but this is no reason to abandon personal autonomy or right of choice in favor of relying on 'experts' who for the most part don't know their arse from a knothole.

True peer support and mutual aid initiatives where there is no profit motive or desire for control of others can be invaluable and needs to be clearly distinguished from an industry that is driven in equal measure by money and ego.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» good point re: profit Posted by: notthatsimple
Good approach
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Feb 26, 2008 3:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She seems to be saying: Take what you can use and leave the rest. Most of these books take one or two chapters' worth of concepts and stretch them into a series of 300 page books, tapes and seminars.

There's no need to spend money on self-help books. Most are at the library. And those that aren't will end up there sooner or later. Let someone else spend the $10 billion.

Assuming you don't spend any money, I don't see the harm in reading a few, assuming you're not an addictive personality or a cult fanatic. I got a few things out of Scott Peck's books, and it was fun reading.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good approach Posted by: Sunfell
Anyhing But the Dogma of Organized Religion
Posted by: drricklippin on Feb 26, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The self help movement is a good thing generally. Anything that offers an alternative to the "mind poison" of dogmatic organized religion will probably help us.

As another poster said you do not have to invest large amounts of $ into seminars, tapes or books.

Much of what you need is on the web.

Dr. Rick Lippin

PS-Among my favorites

- Chopra
- Dyer
- Seng

ral

PPS- I am a spiritual progressive

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Narcissism will not solve our global problems
Posted by: IronNose on Feb 26, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So many people with their dreams of self-perfection and unlimited wealth, living in their narcissistic little bubbles - how depressing. This great turning inward when what is truly needed is an expansion of global consciouness, an appreciation of our interconnectedness and shared fate on this planet with a recognition of the dire problems we face and the need for common solutions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: you got it! Posted by: davidg
» RE: but how can you help others... Posted by: notthatsimple
» There is a valid need for it. Posted by: Artkansas
Self Help Survivor
Posted by: Artkansas on Feb 26, 2008 9:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've read most all of them. Few really had much effect for me.

The best is "Bunkhouse Logic" by Ben Stein. Simple, no nonsense, and yes, it was written by that Ben Stein before he became famous.

The Tao Te Ching by Lao Tsu is a classic and I also like Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind by Shunryu Suzuki

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fear
Posted by: grkjr on Feb 26, 2008 10:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most people who complain about self help seminars are simply missing the opportunity to take the next step along the path of their own growth. Fear of being taken advantage of. Fear of the unknown, of giving their power away... the list goes on and on.. But if one puts their fear aside and commits themselves to the possiblity that someone may know something that they themselves may not know, that the knowing of which, may change their lives, and they go with a open mind determined to get value (via listening), versus going into it with the intention of sharing their infinite wisdom, they will get their moneys worth and then some.. simple... also there are indeed many roads which may be followed, thus trying something on and finding it may or may not work is so different than not trying anything at all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When government cooperates with Big Business/Media/Religion to rob you,
Posted by: maxpayne on Feb 26, 2008 10:39 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the solution is not to let a motherfucker lecture you about helping yourself but to get ready to be a vigilante, guns or none. Face it, those books are total SCAMS designed to sucker punch you. Let's all turn off our televisions first and help SHUT DOWN the celebrity info-tainment media.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's wrong with self-help?
Posted by: willymack on Feb 26, 2008 10:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ok, our entrepreneurs, in their typical exuberant fashion have jumped on the bandwagon and turned a perfectly good concept into a major industry. That's the American way and doesn't diminish the fact that good advice faithfully followed, can benefit anyone desiring a beneficial change in life. Good examples of self-help are books like "It pays to improve your word power", which enrich your vocabulary and really help at job interviews, any book by Harry Lorraine, and books like "How to argue and win every time", by superlawyer Gerry Spence, teach logic, and make one a more effective communicator, better able to see through the lies of a ronald reagan or a dick cheney. All the best teacher at the school you went to can do is to cause you to THINK, and point you in the right direction; you have to teach YOURSELF, and that's what self-help is all about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lots of folks go to self-help seminars to get laid...
Posted by: lexicon on Feb 26, 2008 12:35 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know...go to the seminar, mingle with the <insert personal gender preference> hotties, and so on...

...You know the drill...people that go to self-help seminars are essentially credulous and open to "guidance", so they're the right "mindset" for a predatory <insert your gender here> looking for sex.

UNFORTUNATELY...all-too-often, "self help" REALLY DOES MEAN "self help".

...poor foolish B<insert appropriate derogatory gender epithet here>s.

lexicon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

self help = reinforcement of false consciousness, plain and simple
Posted by: efpatter on Feb 26, 2008 12:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the booming industry (part of its own corporate media industrial complex) of self help only serves to reinforce the false consciousness that isolates oppressed people from one another and prohibits them from addressing the actual material and economic conditions of their lives. e.g. "you're overweight? it's not the unhealthy food that you're confined to eating because of your neighborhood-- it's you, you're lazy, get some exercise." "you're poor? it's not the capitalist superstructure that maintains our rigid class system and prohibits upward social mobility; it's your fault, start saving." every self help book or speaker raking it in relies on our false consciousness to line their pockets. This is really, really obvious to me and most other academics around me, but for some reason it's not reflected in the other comments. I thought it would be worth it to add this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Absolutely! Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Agree 100%! nm Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» How to Prevent Social Change - I Posted by: MartianBachelor
» How to Prevent Social Change - II Posted by: MartianBachelor
As sentient beings,
Posted by: atka on Feb 26, 2008 12:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
humans have an awareness of self that, say, dogs don't, not in the same degree anyway. If you're not aware of what your problems are or don't know how to solve them (the part about the author 'sitting down and figuring where to put a thing' or something like that, it's totally ridiculous. We KNOW how to be more organized, eat healthier, lead a healthier lifestyle, etc., we are just TOO LAZY to be bothered to start doing that. And the PR/media push the image that we are all too frazzled to take the time and do things that are right. Whatever happened to taking responsibility for your actions??? Visualize yourself in a red convertible, puhleeease. As some other poster said, read a REAL book.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Self-Indulgence of The Self-Help Industry
Posted by: chlamor on Feb 26, 2008 3:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's the short version from the beautiful people:

"Since politics and economics in the traditional sense are dead, we must now embrace a new paradigm of self improvement and self-actualization. Anything that interferes with our focus on ourselves and our pursuit of creating ourselves as an actualized being is to be rejected. The way to achieve the perfect society is first to create a perfect self. Meanwhile, so long as the authorities do not interfere with our self-actualization, we must comply in all ways with that authority. This allows us perfect self-expression within perfect social conformity. Anyone who attacks our personal choices is the enemy, and anyone who attacks the social system based on personal choice is also the enemy.

Others, however, who do not share our values are not to be given personal choice, when and as we can prove that their personal choices are wrong, often with convoluted claims that their choice impacts us somehow. We support the police state and massive incarceration of people, so long as they are being harassed and imprisoned for the right reasons. Any variance from our idea as to how people should be is the right reason, by definition.

We believe that we must “be the change we wish to see,” and the change we wish to see is more people like us: polite, talented, beautiful, intelligent, calm, successful, clever, enlightened. So we merely need to be ourselves, focus on ourselves, and serve ourselves. Those who cannot or will not become like us need to back down and get out of the way.

We fully support aristocracy, capitalism, corporate domination, and consumerism, provided that they support our self-actualization and afford us the personal lifestyle choices we prefer."

Of course it is all nonsense and comports quite nicely with the narrative of capitalism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not All Bad, A Big Buck Livelihood For Some!
Posted by: sofla100 on Feb 26, 2008 4:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Self-Help Industry does have some benefits. Of course, they are mostly for the book writers and seminar sellers. One of the professionals quoted in this article charges $50,000 for an afternoon talk. Not bad for half a day's work? Especially considering he got his PhD from a mail order school. I think the industry therefore really is good for some of us psychologists, that is, if you are a good talker and can really BS up one or two points and make it sound really hot. After all, it's all been said before for the past 30 years in one form or another. Therefore, please don't completly criticize it as overdone and overblown. Many are depending on your continued interest (and "self-esteem" problems or whatever) to make next month's Lexus payment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

this is just so so very wrong on the Alternets
Posted by: DaBear on Feb 26, 2008 6:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just have to laugh (or throwup) at this piece because it's as vapid as the overprivileged person who authored the source book of the piece.

So some yuppity chick followed a couple of SH books and wow, got something out of a few of 'em. Oh, wait, I forgot, the yuppity author said she had struggles with money... *puke* my horseshit senses are tingling! Every middling and owning-classer waxes philosophic ad nauseum about their "poverty"... it's bullshit. If she had enough money to live while doing this experiment she ain't poor or working class so her "struggles" with money are as substantive as the content she's spewing out for $25.95 a copy. Goddammit, I hate rich people!

And this is an analysis or critique of the SH industry how? WTF?!

Meanwhile Countrywide and B of A are getting bailed out by an excessively-privileged congress to screw working class 'Merkins out of their overpriced condos and shacks.... why?! So the rich can stay that way on everyone else's backs like the parasites they are and Alternets gets to write more fluffernutter bullshit.

Enuff of this crap!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

priests, prophets and miscellaneous gurus
Posted by: talkville on Feb 27, 2008 3:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only 'self' or 'selves' all these formulas are serving belong to the author or authors of the books and cd's, who are comfortably able to retire at a very early age and enjoy those 'better things of living' that they promise. The beauty of the genre is that, when they don't work, you have 'no one to blame but your Self'!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line on Feb 28, 2008 4:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is wrong with trying to improve your life? It can come from many sources... A book, a person you meet on the street or from watching nature. The point is that there is nothing wrong with trying to improve your lot in life..If it comes from a book then read it... You will find them for sale at many used book stores and can also find them at libraries.. or better yet can be given as gifts from friends who have benefited from their purchase.
We ALL have issues and can ALL benefit from some improvement.... The reason most people scoff at self help etc is that they are afraid to try... and it IS very very difficult work.. but very worth it. VERY..Self help can usually reduce your fears which undermine every aspect of your life...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Say what?
Posted by: marjani on Feb 28, 2008 1:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You mean it took a whole year to figure out self-help doesn't help? I could have told you that without doing a study. People live their lives one day at a time and it's all anyone can ever do - period. Regrets or no regrets, everyone has to live in the moment and worry about consequences later. The only self-help there is is the ability to control yourself under ALL circumstances and to know when to let go when it's time to let go. That's the beginning, the middle, and the end of any and all self-help books that have ever been written.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement