Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Capitalism in an Apocalyptic Mood

By Walden Bello, Foreign Policy in Focus. Posted February 25, 2008.


Yes, global capitalism may be resilient. But it looks like its options are increasingly limited.
Advertisement

Skyrocketing oil prices, a falling dollar, and collapsing financial markets are the key ingredients in an economic brew that could end up in more than just an ordinary recession. The falling dollar and rising oil prices have been rattling the global economy for sometime. But it is the dramatic implosion of financial markets that is driving the financial elite to panic.

And panic there is. Even as it characterized Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke's deep cuts amounting to a 1.25 points off the prime rate in late January as a sign of panic, the Economist admitted that "there is no doubt that this is a frightening moment." The losses stemming from bad securities tied up with defaulted mortgage loans by "subprime" borrowers are now estimated to be in the range of about $400 billion. But as the Financial Times warned, "the big question is what else is out there" at a time that the global financial system "is wide open to a catastrophic failure." In the last few weeks, for instance, several Swiss, Japanese, and Korean banks have owned up to billions of dollars in subprime-related losses. The globalization of finance was, from the beginning, the cutting edge of the globalization process, and it was always an illusion to think that the subprime crisis could be confined to U.S. financial institutions, as some analysts had thought.

Some key movers and shakers sounded less panicky than resigned to some sort of apocalypse. At the global elite's annual week-long party at Davos in late January, George Soros sounded positively necrological, declaring to one and all that the world was witnessing "the end of an era." World Economic Forum host Klaus Schwab spoke of capitalism getting its just desserts, saying, "We have to pay for the sins of the past." He told the press, "It's not that the pendulum is now swinging back to Marxist socialism, but people are asking themselves, 'What are the boundaries of the capitalist system?' They think the market may not always be the best mechanism for providing solutions."

Ruined Reputations and Policy Failures

While some appear to have lost their nerve, others have seen the financial collapse diminish their stature.

As chairman of President Bush's Council of Economic Advisers in 2005, Ben Bernanke attributed the rise in U.S. housing prices to "strong economic fundamentals" instead of speculative activity. So is it any wonder why, as Federal Reserve chairman, he failed to anticipate the housing market's collapse stemming from the subprime mortgage crisis? His predecessor, Alan Greenspan, however, has suffered a bigger hit, moving from iconic status to villain in the eyes of some. They blame the bubble on his aggressively cutting the prime rate to get the United States out of recession in 2003 and restraining it at low levels for over a year. Others say he ignored warnings about aggressive and unscrupulous mortgage originators enticing "subprime" borrowers with mortgage deals they could never afford.

The scrutiny of Greenspan's record and the failure of Bernanke's rate cuts so far to reignite bank lending has raised serious doubts about the effectiveness of monetary policy in warding off a recession that is now seen as all but inevitable. Nor will fiscal policy or putting money into the hands of consumers do the trick, according to some weighty voices. The $156 billion stimulus package recently approved by the White House and Congress consists largely of tax rebates, and most of these, according to New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, will go to those who don't really need them. The tendency will thus be to save rather than spend the rebates in a period of uncertainty, defeating their purpose of stimulating the economy. The specter that now haunts the U.S. economy is Japan's experience of virtually zero annual growth and deflation despite a succession of stimulus packages after Tokyo's great housing bubble deflated in the late 1980s.

The Inevitable Bubble

Even with the finger-pointing in progress, many analysts remind us that if anything, the housing crisis should have been expected all along. The only question was when it would break. As progressive economist Dean Baker of the Center for Economic Policy Research noted in an analysis several years ago, "Like the stock bubble, the housing bubble will burst. Eventually, it must. When it does, the economy will be thrown into a severe recession, and tens of millions of homeowners, who never imagined that house prices could fall, likely will face serious hardship."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: capitalism

Walden Bello is president of the Freedom from Debt Coalition, a senior analyst at Focus on the Global South, and a columnist for Foreign Policy In Focus (www.fpif.org).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Burn baby, burn!
Posted by: Bobsays on Feb 25, 2008 12:55 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Loosey, goosey baby-boomy capitalism must incinerate itself and should be left alone to incinerate itself.

I shall explain: what we are seeing is not the refutation of capitalism, but the self-destruction of a non-conservative form of capitalism that has warped good concepts that once were integral to capitalism.

These true capitalist values are such: being solvent is king, build and create real wealth through hard work and enterprise, not through debt and lies, a person's character DOES matter, and should count when doing business deals, sobriety and honesty should be rewarded; profligacy and deceit punished.

The baby boomer form of capitalism, forged in the counter culture and its selfish generation, has refuted every one of those precepts. And that is what we are seeing blowing up before our eyes. It is making the dull company men of the 50s and early 60s look like gods in comparison to the charlatans who stalk Wallstreet these days.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Burn baby, burn! Posted by: rock
The Economy Can Only Expand with More Debt
Posted by: mmckinl on Feb 25, 2008 2:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The underlying problem throughout all of this analysis is that the role of debt based fractional banking is ignored. The simple truth about the world's banking system is that without ever more debt the whole international banking system comes crashing down. Since all money is created by debt, and since this debt carries interest, then each day more money must be present to service the previous debt. And what creates this extra money ? : More Debt ! So the world is in a geometric debt progression just to keep moving forward.

Japan is the prime example of a country that can't create enough debt. The Japanese population is stagnant and soon baby boomers will be retiring. With no population increase and boomers saving for retirement there is no net debt production, hence the economy stalls as money can't be created. Japan has the luxury of a trade surplus to mitigate some of these effects.

What we are seeing now is the predictable end of another debt spiral brought about the bursting of yet another bubble. The problem is not the speculation, but the debt that enables the speculation. When this debt becomes illiquid or uncollectable the money supply cascades at the same rate as the leverage used in the monetary system. If these bad debts are one off exposures the system adjusts, but in a systemic crisis the whole house of cards comes down and with it the lifebloood of the economy : money.

The whole world needs to initiate a credit based banking system whereby governments create their money based on the full faith and credit of the economy of the government and set standards for the level of interest charged based on the productivity of the use of the capital. The government could fully self fund and banks would have to compete for private savings for deposits. Interest rates would be higher but predisposed for productive rather than consumptive use. One of the prime contributors to our current malaise is that capital now flows into instruments of consumptive financial use causing the rapacious destruction of the environment and the virtual enslavement of the workforce through debt obligation.

Debt based fractional banking was enshrined by the Western Europeans to monetize their colonial empires through debt obligation. It is still being used in that way today by way of the neoliberal economic models that chain developing countries to ever more debt that is codified by the WTO , their courts, and enforced by the international banking cartel. To monetize this debt the developed world has even turned in on itself through the privatization of water agencies, subway tunnels, sewage systems and roads in the developed countries themselves !

The current problems exist, not because of capitalism, but because of who creates our money, the banks, who seek consumptive return, and the use of debt based fractional banking that can only prosper through the monetization of the environment and existing real improvements to create ever more debt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nah
Posted by: g50 on Feb 25, 2008 2:31 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We might get a small recession. But we'll be fine. There is simply too much invested in the globalist economy.

The economy is built on perception, it is built on force, it is built on the international security system and the many allied nations from the Pacific rim to North America to the European Union.

Appropriate actions will be taken by policymakers, consumerism is not going anywhere, and nobody will be pulling against the grain.

Yes, it demands constant growth. But in a world where there are billions living on just a few dollars a day, there is plenty of room for growth.

Obituaries are premature. Skeptics are in a frenzy - as always. Perhaps there will be a slight and short downturn. And maybe even prior to the boost of the Obama presidency for this global system, the markets will decide to shed a little bit more of their junk in anticipation of the O-boom-a years.

But all of that will be as much a blip as Japan in the early 90s, the slight shakes at the beginning of this decade. There are just too many people with too much at stake to give up now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nah Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» other wild cards Posted by: toddcory
» RE: other wild cards Posted by: g50
» RE: Nah Posted by: g50
» RE: Nah Posted by: dmmaze6
» Resources, Anyone? Posted by: justAnEgg
What is the alternative?
Posted by: Swedish liberal on Feb 25, 2008 2:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Naomi Klein as well as this columnist is predicting doom and gloom for the capitalist system.

And of course it will not happen. Capitalism may be a flawed economic system byt the only one that is practically functional. All other economic models such as marxist socialism, mercantilism etc have been proven to be non functional. Marxist soclialism has proven to be incompatible with Human Rights. To convert to a socialist society you must suspend Human Rights as can be seen in Venezuela.

Capitalism has flaws such as it does not automaically redistribute wealth but if it is combine with democracy it does. I means that the model used in the Western World; North America and Western Europe, EU, is the preferred model.

Winston Churchill has said it perfectly:

It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.

and it can be said of capitalism as well:

It has been said that capitalism is the worst form of economic system except all the others that have been tried.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What is the alternative? Posted by: blondesprite
» RE: What is the alternative? Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» RE: What is the alternative? Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: What is the alternative? Posted by: Swedish liberal
» RE: What is the alternative? Posted by: mclemens
» RE: What is the alternative? Posted by: mbianco
» RE: What is the alternative? Posted by: Swedish liberal
capitalist greed is fear-based: unjustified enrichment will always make the wealthy fear
Posted by: Suzon on Feb 25, 2008 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for their survival. Most of the very rich have done nothing to earn their obscene wealth. They once used murderous violence almost exclusively but about 300 years ago, the Norman-English learned that they could use law for criminal purposes. The Bush dynasty is part of the US-based remnant. Having achieved wealth through lying, cheating, stealing and murder, their common nightmare must be heads on pikes.

It was perhaps an unconscious imperative for them to rachet up their pillaging about 30 years ago. What happened then to make this happen? That was about when banks destroyed the family farm and created agribusiness and the selling of sub-prime mortgages is a more recent manifestation.

They use fear to manipulate us but they themselves are fear-driven. If your wealth is based upon criminal acts, you'd be very stupid not to be afraid of retribution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Banketeering
Posted by: siamdave on Feb 25, 2008 4:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
- the article is good, but one would think Walden would know better about the Churchill quote - democracy actually is a good form of government, the problem is, as Gandhi noted, it has never actually been tried. Capitalism is bad, but there are worse. But we need to go to better places. And first we need to understand some basics about what is happening with the money, which is, with capitalists and capitalism, the root indeed of all the evil. And the banks are the head of the hydra. It's laid out pretty clearly here - Banketeering - how the banks have been stealing trillions from you, and the tap is still running

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oxheadone
Posted by: oxheadone on Feb 25, 2008 4:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can the insanely stupid actions of one man, especially if he is president of the US, destroy the world economic system beyond repair? Obviously, responsible regulation and honest sensible evaluation of US interests would have prevented the housing bubble from creating a crisis in financial confidence and kept us out of Iraq. It also is somewhat unique to fear a US caused world wide recession when we have a large budget deficit. However, there are solutions if we use our imagination and have the political will to act. First, the US war against the Muslim world (which is how they see it)has to be stopped. In fact, the west's engagement with the Muslim world has to be reduced to insignificance so that Muslims do not have to face our culture which they find insulting to their values. This leads to the second part of the solution. The US and other countries have to eliminate dependence on Middle East oil. It should be relatively easy to use some of the money that goes to develop and use the high class weapon systems we are so proud of, to develop substitutes for oil. A sort of 'Marshall Plan', including a strong domestic effort in the US, could restimulate the US and world economies. A little inflation would also help to reduce the debt burdens. There must be smart and brave people out there will even better ideas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Are you kidding? Posted by: Cathyc
Homeowners?
Posted by: Cathyc on Feb 25, 2008 5:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"tens of millions of homeowners, who never imagined that house prices could fall, likely will face serious hardship."

The vast majority of people don't actually own their homes, the banks do! And if these "homeowners" fail to pay their "rent" on time, the real owners turf them out onto the street.

Like the old song goes... "I owe my soul to the company store"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

otto
Posted by: otto on Feb 25, 2008 6:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hopefully, we are all being forced to learn the lesson that we are citizens of the world and not just of our own country or individual interests. The world is ours to share, not to possess or manipulate...and the common good has to take precedence over our "private goods". Global warming and nuclear war keep reminding us that we are ALL survivors (hopefully) in the same lifeboat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The rich elite just don't care
Posted by: ghoster on Feb 25, 2008 9:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I had a few million or billion it wouldn't matter to me what happened I would still be on top of the food chain, what they don't like is that they are no longer allowed to play the "game" that is their hobby or avocation. But they have plenty of lucre to survive what might happen, wealth does insulate you from the vagaries of the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

not the market, not the government...
Posted by: smendler on Feb 25, 2008 10:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The point is not whether the market runs things or whether the government runs things. The point is in the interplay between the two (along with the needs of the public and the physical environment). If properly balanced, the government keeps the market's excesses in check, and the market keeps the government from becoming too powerful. What we have seen in the last generation is the deliberate sabotaging of this balance, if indeed it ever existed. And hey, guess what - when a dynamically equilibristic system becomes unbalanced, it crashes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The true value of money
Posted by: audiodef on Feb 25, 2008 10:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blah, blah, blah (just the topic, not the obviously good writing).

George Soros sounded positively necrological, declaring to one and all that the world was witnessing "the end of an era."

We are. People are starting to witness firsthand the true value of money: nothing. I hope this means that humanity will start getting priorities straight and work towards a society that is based on things that are REAL - not money. When you build complicated structures out of soap bubbles, it's all going to collapse and leave nothing of substance behind. So this is not "apocalyptic", but rather the logical (and expected) result of modern society's obsession with a false god. I would like to say we might learn a lesson, but history not only has things to teach us, it also tells us that people are slow learners and quickly forget what they've learned.

But I still hold out hope and want to give each and every one of my fellow humans the benefit of the doubt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Round and round we go.
Posted by: Coleman on Feb 25, 2008 11:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Capitalism itself lives in a perpetual present; the human past seems to be a senseless accumulation of unsuccessful human efforts and intentions; yet the future of technology inspires blind and unshakable faith." - Frederic Jameson

What's with all the neoliberal cheerleaders posting here? If I wanted to read Thomas Friedman I would have bought his book on Amazon. One optimistic poster even claims that there are no limits to economic growth, that the "economy is more than [stuff], it's ideas". And then something about the human race venturing into space after we use up Earth and leave it sizzling and lifeless. Sorry if I can't get with the program, but I don't know if I'll be able to afford that SpaceBus ticket to...where exactly?

And what about the favorite conversation-stopper of cheerleaders: "There Is No Alternative" or "What's your alternative?" Don't be afraid of this despairing attitude. Even if I don't know how to build a car that doesn't use internal combustion, is it improper and dangerous for me to suggest that there ought to be a car that doesn't use internal combustion? Maybe if enough people who thought that this ought to be the case got together and worked on it, they'd figure it out.

And shame on the author for suggesting something "new" in this financial crisis. These things occur with much regularity. It's long been the case that the "real" economy - the one that feeds, clothes, houses and educates people - isn't such a profitable place to be. So instead we've got to pour investment into consumer gadgets, false needs, high tech weaponry/surveillance, and the ever-expanding entertainment/marketing sector. And what about all those complicated debt securities whose blatant function is to transfer wealth to the top as every money manager takes his million dollar cut? Lets just call it what it is: unsustainable waste.

Back to basics.
1) The current crisis is not a market distortion that will be smoothed out, these bubbles burst many times every generation. There's usually a massive government bailout to keep the funny money where it's at. This isn't some brave new world, this is the "perpetual present" of capitalism.
2) Real wages are declining even as we fill our houses with gadgets. Plasma screens get cheaper, quality food gets more expensive, sometimes prohibitively so if you live paycheck to paycheck like most people. How's that for market distortion?
3) There are limits to real growth. The natural world is instructive here. Every ecosystem is in decline as the search for profit exploits every possible resource. The cheerleaders tell us not to worry because we'll soon have renewable/recyclable everything. That's the "blind and unshakable faith in technology" bit from the Jameson quote. In response, ask them to name one case where industrial growth has proven sustainable. One!

How long do we live in this perpetual present before we transcend it? The answer is forever if we never even believe that it is possible to have an economy where we cooperate to sustain each other instead of competing over scraps to boost the wealth of society's elites. Most of us live in anxiety with a handful of broken promises, banking on a techno-fix that hasn't come and isn't coming. Most of us can sooner imagine a global apocalypse that some relatively mild shifts in the economy. Why is that?

The great re-regulation of our economy will happen, but the extent and, more importantly, the aim of that control is an open question, a political one. Tell your friends.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ound and round we go. Posted by: Kelpie
Generational Dynamics
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Feb 25, 2008 12:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As soon as the last generation that remembers a big bubble/recession is out of power, a new crew of arrogant, ignorant fools takes over and repeats the entire cycle. Boomers aren't culturally selfish and self-indulgent, as one other poster has suggested; they just don't have any personal experience of how runaway debt and financial irresponsibility can destroy individuals and societies. Their parents and grandparents had a horror of debt, but who listens to those boring old stories about bread lines and mass foreclosures?

Unfortunately, human beings don't seem willing or able to learn from the experiences of others. Otherwise, reading accounts of the stock market bubble of the 20s and the Great Depression of the 30s would have prevented the current debacle.

Look for another big war to come our way soon (within a decade), since the generation that remembers WWII is dying off too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Agressive Rate Declines Are Not Exclusive Reasons of the Mortgage Debacle
Posted by: bettina9292 on Feb 25, 2008 1:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a one time CPA and pior Financial analyst and and short lived mortgage originator. There are some other reasons for this Subprime Mess.
In the Mortgage lending business, capacity and collateral are major tenants. Excellent credit individuals who desired to purchase 100% of their homes -were approved in far more numbers than persons who had mediocre fico scores and could not prove their incomes. This allowed these persons to afford much, much more home in square footage and fancier upscale abodes beyond the reasonable. For these deals everyone got something more with the increased speculation. The investors charged a premium rate from the git go called when a 1st lien for 80 or 90 or 95% was created and charged exponential rates for the 2nd lien of 20-5%. We are not not talking variable option arm rates that reset after 6 or 3 years.
The key risk issue here is being 100% in debt or close to it. The investors loved it. The banks or just sometimes (investors) charged points in the back to the mortgage broker for getting the highest interest rate possible and the front man charge a point or two on the front for the fee for doing business. Ad these things all up and there has to be a huge payout in the end. Remember a point or two on a compounded interest on a 400000.00 note is HUGE!!!
Now collateral. Not all appraisers are crooks. In fact, Most banks that are still around have black listed ones who don't pass muster. They are independently licensed and have pretty strenuous standards for reviews. If a bank didn't like an appraisal-they request a field review (a 2nd appraiser)Except for investment properties(where rental income is considered), home values are taken from prior comparative and recent sales. There is no accounting for any future market fluctuations and not much room for error and never an average price taken from 5 years on (for instance).
Now if you were to analyze a home like you would a stock there would be better risk analysis! But this would not serve the greediest at the top of this investment scheme. The get quick equity and hedge fund managers were speculating on those double digit 2nd mortgages of interest rates in the 10%-20%--where did you find that except in stock market bubbles!!When values started to stagnate, the easy money disappeared too. Let us make sure that the subprime mess- is a real mess because financial investors and banks are in the business of making big profits on mortgages. The pain is because they aren't making AS MUCH money so they are moving on to other marks...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Capitalism" DOES NOT EXIST but FASCISM is alive & kicking (you)
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Feb 25, 2008 3:03 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I’ll keep this short. This article is (at best) more smokescreen and cheap hokum.

Capitalism (coined by Marx) requires free, open markets in ideas and trade to exist. Ergo we do not have capitalism. Period. Full stop.

(Communism literally financed by “capitalist” robber barons was another fraud that never existed)

Fascism as the merger of corporate-state power with corporations in command surely does exist and rigs virtually everything from a Washington-MSM-"education" axis down to city governments.

Once you understand this and bogus institutions like an unconstitutional, privately gamed "Federal Reserve" Corporation that's not federal and never had reserves – the reality of a de facto Fascist system sham becomes quite clear.

Hence we get phony wars (“war on terror”- “war on drugs”) along with serial boom-bust bubbles fed into derivatives, subprime crime, stock market swindles, etc, etc. All schemes to enrich a de facto parasite ruling class and all on the public nickel.

Get a clue, folks. Round 3 coming up…

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It will be simple.
Posted by: thekidde on Feb 25, 2008 4:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Eat the rich.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A revolution is overdue
Posted by: lukitas on Feb 25, 2008 5:33 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A lot of money is going up in smoke, At about the same time that our major energetic resource is going up in smoke. And as we are choking the planet from the second smoke, money is disappearing, (Poof! gone) and the economy chokes.
While the fat cats have been working disaster capitalism since Ronnie and Maggie, the sheep have been led to the slaughter, and it is gonna hurt us sheep hard, and long.
A revolution is overdue. In the old sense: deposing the current leadership. And a bit of redistribution of wealth will be beneficial, even if the new load of leaders are just as big an ass as the old ones.
Humans like to take things when nobody is watching. This is what happened here: some few, some happy few, became very adept at sucking money out of all of our pockets. Finding ways of making it invisible. Debt, Interest, CDO, investment in debt, etc.
Now thieves need to be punished, and their ill-gotten gains should be rendered unto their victims. And we need to be watching. We need a financial system where money cannot be made out of thin air, and where people can make a decent living. We need a system that makes watching financial transactions easy, because somebody who is watched does not commit crimes. A cop on the corner keeps four streets safe.
Maybe the standard for money should be work-hours: you work 1 hour, you get 1 money. Everything costs the amount of work needed to make it (plus postage ;).
I know this is a pipe dream, but a revolution is overdue. I'll be interested to watch the proceedings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The alternative is a SOCIAL ECONOMY
Posted by: RV on Feb 25, 2008 8:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. I adhere to the social economy principles of Sismondi, Polanyi, H. Daly, Marc Lutz, etc. meaning the economy must be subsumed to the interests of society;

2. This implies a hybrid economy: individuals can be the best that they can be, but they have responsibilities to the community/nation. This translates into Amitai Etzioni's communitarianism and the good society concept;

3. I am a follower of Thads Bentulan aka Streetstrategist's (formerly of Businessworld) Hypwerwage Theory . It proposes that the minimum wage of lowest worker, the household helper in a developing country, should be at least $500/mo. with corresponding adjustments for other workers/staff. This is a redistribution of wealth from GOV'T (deductible as payroll taxes) and from the elite. However, businessmen should see long-term growth from significant consumer spending...

4. There are many examples. Check out Gawad Kalinga on how communities can be revived. In their case, nearly 1,500 of them...

The solution is not economics per se, but culture, ethics, and spirituality influencing the economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'd prefer evidence over religionism.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Feb 25, 2008 11:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Meh. I dream the dream...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just watch it...
Posted by: wdednam2002 on Feb 29, 2008 2:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CRASH and BURN. It's been doing a lot of the 'Crashing', and now finally, the time's come for the 'Burning'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not all that fast now.
Posted by: talkville on Feb 29, 2008 3:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The capitalist mode of production is indeed resilient, and the fact that even a lot of believers in high places are a bit nervous isn't quite as much a concern for those more discerning and 'long-view' interests who reside in the heart of the ideology.

There is mereley a profound trans-formation occurring at the moment, and the outlines of a new capitalist order (differing only in image) are beginning to be seen.

1. Generational transfer of wealth to the younger. Inheritance of property and wealth is a big issue.

2. The form is now not so much the Factory (that's been moved to the 3rd world mostly) to the "information' and 'knowledge' base -- from producers to consumers.

3. The formation of new alliances larger than the particular State (notice the tighter rapport amongst the English-speaking countries -- especially seen in the cultural sphere now). New elites modeled on Gentry, Aristocracy, Nobility, Monarchy-- 'Princes', 'Princesses', 'Courtly-ness' galore. Federalism is a neat trick and can always elevate and in-corporate more expanded sub-units -- into Space if necessary!

4. A new proletarian expansion. Those humans formerly employed in factories and corporations increasingly thrown out into surviving by their own means of production (new field-workers!) such as pc's, laptops, cell-phones, etc while Capitalists retain the means of the means of production (the telecoms, the electric companies, the water companies) the 'Platform' they call it upon which the field-workers must rely to produce their own crops (internet businesses, blogs, etc). So owner-ship of the means of the means of production is the newer form of Capitalism. More expanded and global, perhaps, but Capitalism just the same. This is why the Bushes and the sophisticated owners of the worlds productive capacities are merely staying silent, smiling knowingly and watching the hoopla go on. The metaphysicians and religionists of all stripes are positively Ecstatic with developments. Anti-humanism is back in the saddle again with the slight inter-lude after its vanquishment in the 19th century. Plato's inventions of pure spirit and the Good as Such are once again ascendant.

The options of Capitalism are positively rosy; those of the vastly expanding pool of the multitudes of humanity? Not so much. The same 400 year old forms remain the same; it's only that they're being drained and re-filled with newer content of ever decreasing quality. Orange juice producers know it as Re-Constitution. It's still a matter of convincing everyone that the promised is within reach but still ever-so far from grasping. THAT promise may have not panned out, but just listen to this one....

Hither-to all groupings of society that have attained to the label "Civilization" have been based upon the servitude and slavery of the majority of humanity. But humans develop and are developing. Here, indeed, is the crucial area where the metaphysicians and the capitalists are really sweating about options. More and more they are needing the Military, the Police and Surveillance to keep the System profitable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]