Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Barack Obama's Momentum Grows

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted February 20, 2008.


Obama wins in Wisconsin, drawing voters from Clinton's base.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Steven Rosenfeld

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

What will Hillary Clinton do now? That is the question coming out of Tuesday's big win in Wisconsin for Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., where exit polls found he drew voters from the very ranks that supported Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., in prior primary and caucus states: women, white men, middle-aged voters and union households.

With 97 percent of precincts reporting, representing more than a million voters, Obama had 57 percent compared to 41 percent for Clinton. More notable than that solid margin of victory, which came after both candidates campaigned hard in Wisconsin, was the increasingly broad support that Obama appears to be generating.

According to exit polls, Obama won: all age groups under 65; white voters under age 60; all education levels; all income levels; all regions of the state -- rural, suburban and urban; and among Democrats, Republicans and Independents. Obama also won among voters who picked a candidate in the past week and among union members and union households, the exit poll data said. And he tied Clinton among women.

Wisconsin was the ninth contest Obama has won in a row. The exit polling also showed his support has been growing in key segments of the electorate since 2008's first primaries and caucuses. In New Hampshire, for example, Obama won 38 percent of the vote among white men. In Wisconsin, he won 62 percent. In New Hampshire, he won a third of voters aged 50 to 60, while in Wisconsin he won more than half that group. And among people earning $30,000 to $50,000 a year, Obama also went from winning a third of those voters in New Hampshire to more than half in Wisconsin.

While pollsters and pundits may quibble over comparisons between these states, what is unmistakable is Wisconsin has confirmed the new dynamics of the Democratic contest. Obama is indeed the front runner, gaining not just more delegates than Clinton but also attracting a growing cross-section of the party's base. In short, it appears that Democrats -- and Independents -- are coalescing around his candidacy.

According to CNN, Obama now has 1,294 delegates, compared to 1,234 delegates for Clinton. In Wisconsin, 92 delegates were at stake. Hawaii also held a Democratic caucus on Tuesday, which Obama overwhelmingly won with 76 percent of the vote compared to 24 percent for Clinton. Twenty-nine delegates are at stake in that contest, whose results were announced early Wednesday. The next primaries are on March 4, when four states, including Texas and Ohio, vote.

Candidates comment

"We just heard we won tonight in Wisconsin," Obama said, speaking at a rally in Houston, Texas, where after thanking Wisconsin voters, he turned his attention to the state with the largest block of delegates left in the Democratic nominating contest. "But we know this, Houston, the change we seek is still months and miles away, and we need the good people of Texas to help us get there."

"Understand this Houston, as wonderful as this gathering is," he continued, "what we are trying to do here is not easy, and it will not happen overnight. It is going to take more than big rallies. It will require more than rousing speeches. It will also require more than policy papers and positions and websites. It is going to require something more, because the problems that we face in America today is not the lack of good ideas, it is that Washington has become a place where good ideas go to die."

Clinton, meanwhile, was in Youngstown, Ohio, where she did not mention the Wisconsin results in her rally.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: obama, clinton, wisconsin, presidential primary, election08, hillary

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and co-author of "What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election," with Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman (The New Press, 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Feb 20, 2008 12:07 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The enemy of my enemy is my friend...

But I'd never let him borrow my car.

Direct Primaries!

Direct Elections!

Direct Democracy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TEXAS
Posted by: foreverhope on Feb 20, 2008 3:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GREAT NEWS!

Early votes in Harris County TX, Bushes home city of Houston, 12,000 people have cast a vote ALREADY, 9,400 ARE NEW DEMS.

Last year's primary election in Harris County only 1300 people voted.

Even better, Harris County is tradionally republican!

OBAMA '08

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TEXAS
Posted by: foreverhope on Feb 20, 2008 3:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GREAT NEWS!

Early votes in Harris County TX, Bushes home city of Houston, 12,000 people have cast a vote ALREADY, 9,400 ARE NEW DEMS.

Last year's primary election in Harris County only 1300 people voted.

Even better, Harris County is tradionally republican!

OBAMA '08

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Beyond the primaries
Posted by: robchapman on Feb 20, 2008 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It may be premature, but I suggest that it is time to look beyond the Democratic Primaries and to begin the process of winning the General Election against Republican John McCain in November.

The Republican National Committee (RNC) web-site recently displayed a monopoly money type bill with Obama's picture on it.

The message from the GOP is that Obama is inexperienced and will raise taxes to onerous levels and mismanage the economy.

The GOP suggest in various ways that voters "cost out" the magnitude of universal health insurance, the continuation of a robust social security system, Green Collar job development, the improvement of our educational and any other proposals offered by the Democrats.

The Republicans state that the cost of these initiatives will bust the budget, distort the economy and set America into an uncontrollable inflationary spiral.

It may be more fun to harrass the Clinonistas and mock out Hillary Clinton as her ship slowly sinks, but how productive is it?

It is vital that Democrats use this time to accentuate the positive aspects of their message.

Democrats must continuer to portray the initiatives in Universal Health Care, Robust Social Security, Green Collar job development and Improved Education and our other proposals as investments in America's future which will increase our prosperity and well being of all our citizens.

Clearly the primary voters are responding positively to the Democratic message and are participating in a 2 to 1 majority over the Republicans.

But the GOP have already begun focussing their attention on the general election campaign.

Are the Democrats going to squander the palpable advantages that our candidates have built up through intra-party bickering and haggling over insubstantial issues.

Each voter is entitled to cast his or her vote according the dictates of conscience, interest and judgement. Hopefully, voters will make these decisions based on their perceptions of who will make the better President for America and for their respective communities.

Shame on the commentators and the pundits for all their gossip and scandalizing over the trivial horse race stories.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't Worry, Posted by: Andie927
Barak Obama- Commander-in-Chief
Posted by: robchapman on Feb 20, 2008 5:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain has already begun the GOP drum beat of criticism of Obama as naive, untested, unready and inexperienced.

Think for a moment about the sources of potential energy and creativity that an Obama Administration will unleash.

Obama:

* community orgainizer,

* constitutional law professor,

* successful legislator with a knack for building bipartisan coalitions,

* immensely gifted political leader who came from nowhere and won the nomination of the world's oldest, largest and most successful political party.

The difference between McCain and Obama are stark.

The difference between McCain and Obama are overwhelmingly in OBAMA's favor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

good article
Posted by: davescott on Feb 20, 2008 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This was useful. I've criticized altnernet writers for uneven coverage of the Dems, but I find nothing objectionable here. Facts are facts: Clinton is up against the ropes. A Quinnapac poll showed her with a double-digit lead in Ohio, but that will obviously tighten after Wisconsin's results.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"What will Hillary Clinton do now?"
Posted by: zooeyhall on Feb 20, 2008 6:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh, I'm sure she got a whole list of things to keep her occupied:

1) serve a little time on the WalMart board of directors

2) some $50,000 speeches to the medical and drug industry

3) putting in a plug now and then for the Iraq war

4) Speaking to the Chamber of Commerce or the National Association of Manufacturers about the wonders of Globalization and NAFTA

5) Keeping an eye on Bill, and stopping him from copping a feel of that pretty young aide whenever he has a chance.

anyone else care to add their ideas to Hillary's "to do" list in case she has to chuck the opportunity to become pres?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There's lots of trouble in Hillaryland
Posted by: keefus55 on Feb 20, 2008 6:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Increasingly, there is no joy in "Hillaryland"…and with just cause.

It would appear that the "wheels started coming off the Clinton bus" even before she lost the Iowa caucuses and barely eeked out a virtual tie with Mr. Obama in New Hampshire.

That's because her negative approval ratings have always been high…upwards of 50 percent. My hunch is that most Democrats saw no other "electable" candidate in the field, so they (grudgingly) were resigned to Hillary's nomination and had fingers crossed that she could beat whomever the Republicans coughed up to run against her.

It's also become increasingly evident that Mrs. Clinton's campaign was never intended to be a 50 state campaign. She truly believed she'd have the nomination all sewn up by Super Tuesday. For, why else would she have blown through some $130 Million in campaign funds (while staying in plush accommodations along the way in the earlier contests) only to now be forced into borrowing money from herself just to keep her campaign bus filled with gas?

What's more, when she was forced to re-assure potential voters just before the Potomac primaries that there would be "no new scandals" caused by her philandering husband and former President, that comment did absolutely nothing but force Democrats into thinking, "Do we REALLY want a known source of "bimbo eruptions" and other assorted embarrassing scandals (a.k.a "Whitewater") once again living in the White House for the Republicans to ruthlessly attack?"

In addition, the proportional nature of the Democratic primary rules (vice the Republican's predominantly "winner take all" approach) has also favored Mr. Obama, and he is clearly using those rules to his advantage. The longer it takes to wrap up the Democratic nomination, the more popular he seems to become.

As a result, the Democratic campaign for President has now turned into a classic "tortoise and hair" race, with Mr. Obama obviously content to plod along...garnering small numbers of delegates here and there from the (mostly smaller) states Mrs. Clinton felt were well beneath her dignity to even campaign in.

The fact that Mr. Obama HAS elected to campaign in these smaller states has since fired up traditionally "sleepy" electorates that have most often been ignored by other candidates...including Mrs. Clinton. The enthusiasm (and votes) coming out of these smaller states are now yielding delegate counts that are, collectively, starting to add up into "real numbers". And they are all favoring Mr. Obama.

There is no doubt that President and Mrs. Clinton's arrogant (and now clearly mistaken) belief in the inevitability of Mrs. Clinton's "coronation" as President have helped lead to her downfall. Both she and her husband clearly over-estimated her (and his) lingering popularity with Democrats. And, judging from the hypothetical match-ups between Mrs. Clinton and Mr. McCain, they also overestimated her popularity with the rest of the country as well.

Now that mainstream Democrats have gotten a really good look at her (and yet another one at him) "up close and personal-like", many of the lingering fears and long-suppressed feelings of disapproval among many Democrats for BOTH of the Clintons are now coming to the fore, particularly now that many of those same Democrats firmly believe they have an electable alternative.

All of which leads me to the inevitable conclusion that the REAL problem with Mrs. Clinton is not so much her campaign or her campaign managers…. it's just her.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DON'T WORRY
Posted by: Andie927 on Feb 20, 2008 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Be Happy! Just keep Dreaming, and listening to all the Rhetoric!! Doesn't it sound pretty, Hope, and Change! Stay asleep now.

DON'T LOOK AT THE ISSUES!!Now, now, follow the left hand, don't look at the right hand!

The Republican's are going to LET Obama win!! Then when he fails, (like Duval in Mass.) they get to put Jeb Bush in the White House in 2012!

Why do YOU think so many Republicans are voting for Obama? He's PRO-Wall Street, Pro-Corporate self-regulation, PRO-Bush's Private Retirement Accounts! & the icing on the cake, PRO-Nuclear Power, and Big Coal!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Answer, NOT Hillary Posted by: Andie927
move on dot
Posted by: solrev on Feb 20, 2008 8:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“In short, it appears that Democrats -- and Independents -- are coalescing around his candidacy.”
This is why Texas is the key for Obama. In Texas independents need not apply to vote in the democratic primary. Obama must turn the female and Latino vote in Texas to beat Clinton. If this happens the old demon party masters, will have to abandon one of theirs, and Clinton will withdraw to save her remaining war chest for another day. If Obama can not pull the win in Texas, the demon party masters may push him to make a deal. I hope Obama hangs tuff because Clinton can not win without the Obama independents and newbees. It is time to dump the stump speeches and move on to the next vote that counts the electoral vote.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For the first time I feel bad for Hillary
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus on Feb 20, 2008 8:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the poor thing put up with Bill's shenanigans just so she would have a chance at winning the White House.

Obama is no better though. He is already pulling a Clintonian triangulation by talking about his admiration for Reagan, and bitching about the excesses of 60's and 70's.
Further Obama appears to be appealing to the white voters with his 'tough love' speeches to black audiences.

Either way, there won't be any progressive change with Obama/Hillary in the White House.

McCain will simply continue the neocon policy of Bush admin.

In the end, the only reason to vote for either Obama or Hillary is that we might have a chance of putting one or more center/center-left justices on the SC bench.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The big question
Posted by: beckidahl on Feb 20, 2008 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The big question is:

If the situation were reversed and Obama had just lost 10 straight primaries, would the media even be interviewing Obama campaign spokespeople every hour and carrying his NON-concession speech on major cable news? I seriously doubt it. He would have been counted out and declared dead long before Wisconsin.
Think about it!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Disenfranchised Again
Posted by: jim_altman on Feb 20, 2008 8:19 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tomorrow's headlines were written weeks, even months ago. Somewhere along the line, journalism stopped being about reporting what is and became a game of shaping what would happen next. Credible fiction is floated as opinion yesterday to spin what might happen tomorrow and where there seems the slightest congruence is followed with self-effacing claims of prescience and omniscience. Mr. Rosenfield and company have been crafting this narrative for Obama for months. Maybe it will succeed. Candidates of substance were edited out of the story months ago. It's harder to inflate people who've actually said things and done things, but much easier to burst their bubbles. On the right side of the spectrum, the keyboards are smoking as right leaning journalists spin a narrative about the heroic, straight-talking Senator from Arizona. Left-wing fiction and right-wing fiction: choose between them. Four years ago, it was fictional Bush versus fictional Kerry versus the crank who killed the Corvair, fictional Nader. Is Obama the reincarnation of JFK (minus Marilyn)? Can he walk across my swimming pool? Or, is he just a holographic projection of frustrated liberalism? Is John McCain the real-deal, straight-talker who'll clean up the mess inside the beltway? Or, is he the last of the Keating Five, up for sale to the highest bidder, who dumped his wife for a wealthy beauty queen? Fact versus fiction? Hype versus substance? For the last eight years journalists have cranked up the ether and we've suffered two four year hangovers in the aftermath. Rational thought? Reasonable choice? What's that? Smell those fumes?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

YAAAAAHOOOOOOO!!! THANK YOU HAWAII & WISCONSIN!!
Posted by: foreverhope on Feb 20, 2008 8:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
YEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!

I just figured out what it is about Obama! you want to know what the 'magic' is?

This man is brilliant and shines in so many ways, yes he is charismatic, no doubt, but why?

He has a BURNING DESIRE, a FIRE IN HIS BELLY! That is why his message for change is SO POWERFUL.

THAT is WHY his message is compelling and that is why people across the country are responding and pouring into convention centers across this country just to hear him.

WE, this country, want change just as badly as Barack wants change and he is putting it into words for all of us.

It is really just that simple, and he won't be able to do it alone. We need to sweep as many dem seats into Congress and the Senate as we can, this momentum and enthusiasim is REAL powerful stuff!

YES WE CAN, AND WE MUST, TAKE BACK THIS COUNTRY!

GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OBAMA!

This just keeps getting better and better and better and better, I am loving it!

You know, for skeptics of this amazing grassroots movement, so many endlessly complain that the biggest problem with our democratic process is not enough people pay attention, get involved or even vote, ESPECIALLY YOUNG PEOPLE.

Barack is is the one turning that around, and also SOMEHOW helping this country come together in the first REAL way progressives have EVER seen.

Please at least give Obama credit for the energy and momentum he is bringing to our democratic process. This is pretty amazing stuff by anyone's standards and it WILL work in our favor. OF COURSE WE MUST HOLD OBAMA RESPONSIBLE once elected but we will have to be there helping him get it done too.

We NEED to get behind this SPLENDID democratic candidate A.S.A.P.

Look, if Hillary were not a Clinton, not the ex First Lady, do you believe this would really be happening? At this point any respectable or responsible challenger would see the writing on the wall and gracefull congratulate Barack and bow out, EVEN ENDORSE HIM! LET THE DEMS GET ON WITH THE GENERAL.

Can anyone ignore or minimize all these wonderful excited new voters EAGER to participate? or throw all this energy away? Talk about cutting off a nose to spite the face.

At the VERY LEAST give Obama the credit ANYONE ELSE SHOULD receive for inspiring SO MANY NEW VOTERS AND YOUNG VOTERS INTO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS.

TEN WINS IN A ROW, GO OBAMA!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hawaii
Posted by: aonghus36 on Feb 20, 2008 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't remember Hawaii being mentioned in the article, although I am certain they had their primaries, too. I think it is rather discriminatory. Am I mistaken, did I overlook
the mention of Hawaii?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hawaii Posted by: keefus55
» RE: Hawaii Posted by: willymack
scary Internet search
Posted by: zooeyhall on Feb 20, 2008 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read today that the words "assasinate Obama" have become the most-searched words on Google the past week.

This country is so fu*ked-up that I truly fear another Bobby Kennedy thing or even a Chile 9-11-73. I have personally heard from the rabid-right crowd examples of the fury that the mere possiblity of Obama's election arouses in certain people. Some angry young white male, schooled in guns and Bill O'Reilley, filled with Wacko Jesus philosophy and enraged at anything that is even slightly Muslim--can such a possibility be dismissed outright?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: scary Internet search Posted by: willymack
» RE: scary Internet search Posted by: aebartle
» NSA or CIA? Posted by: sofla100
Come together!
Posted by: Hovey on Feb 20, 2008 10:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have no doubt when the chips have all been taken by Obama or Clinton democrats will passionately back the winner in the general election. Lets not confuse who we want in the primary for what we want for the country. After Bush was appointed in 2000 and possibly stole the 2004 election. We liberals want one thing, This disasterous reign of the Republican party out of office. McCain has voted for just about every change Bush has asked for the last 7 years and more of the same is the last thing this country needs. The democrats could put up a Cat named fluffy for President and a Cow named Bell for VP and they would get my vote before McCain. The endless war, the mountains of debt, failed foreign and domestic policies of the Republican Party must be stopped.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Come together! Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: Come together! Posted by: willymack
Liberals, Like It or Not, We Have to Support Obama Over War Machine McCain
Posted by: sofla100 on Feb 20, 2008 2:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Liberals need to quit always going with an "either-or" proposition when it come to political candidates. In other words, we have to be pragmatic. Edwards and Kuicnich are gone and we are most likely to have a McCain versus Obama election. Now, I know that Obama is going to be pro-corporate and pro-moneyed elite in many ways. His universal health care will be a "give-away" to the insurance industry, but McCain will have no program at all. Obama's proposed military and intelligence budgets will probably total $500 billion or so, but McCain's will top $700 billion easily. Obama will engage in some increased domestic spending, for things like education, Medicare and the decrepit public infrastructure, but McCain will only try to slash domestic spending, made all the more necessary as he beefes up defense. Finally, Obama is going to negotiate with countries like Iran and Russia. With McCain, it's a good possibility that he will just send in the nukes if they don't do things "his way." Bottom line, Obama is a corporation, sure, but not a very big one. McCain, he is the Microsoft or Exxon Mobil of corporations. And, they, along with America's richest, will be the only ones getting tax breaks in his administration anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Al Sharpton for VP
Posted by: Jersey Devil on Feb 20, 2008 4:38 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He has experience running a national campaign. He is a great speaker, and he will lock in the rest of the Black and Hispanic vote. It is time for Al! Barak and Al for 2008 how could we better demonstrate the need for serious change in the US?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Game. Set. Match.
Posted by: Denver Dem on Feb 20, 2008 4:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary nice job not conceding defeat in Wisconsin and instead just ignoring your loss altogether. That's the kind of responsibility and humility we need to see in a president.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America for Obama; all for one, to what end?
Posted by: liz2007 on Feb 20, 2008 9:47 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mrs. Obama so well explained that she is proud of America now, only because the country is in love with Obama. One wonders what happens if Obama becomes the president, and things get tough. What if Obama gets impeached like Clinton? Would the Obamas then naturally hate America?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama is only part of the change equation
Posted by: Kym525 on Feb 21, 2008 2:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rest of us are the other part.

Obama cannot run this country alone and unlike Bush, isn't interested in doing so. Activism and volunteering shouldn't come to an end if he gets into the White House (or even if he doesn't).

The Obama campaign has shown that people still matter and that armed with the FACTS, rather than spin, we are more than capable of choosing the candidate who understands the issues that effect ALL Americans. That's one reason I think he doesn't spend a lot of time talking himself up. If you want to know his stand on an issue, go to his website and do the homework necessary. Everything you need to know is there and it's all attributed. When was the last time any politician was that open with their record?

Obama treats his constituency like intelligent and thoughtful people who have been separated too long by right-wing distortions and lies. He wants us to be active in changing the tenor of politics and not to sit on our butts complaining. I for one am ready.

By the way, leave Michelle Obama alone!!! Unless you were in her head, you cannot possibly know what she meant by her statement. However, having just watched a History Channel documentary on black soldiers in WWII, seven of whom were never awarded the Medal of Honor until 1991 (five awarded posthumously), I can totally understand where she might have been coming from. What a grave injustice. Complain about THAT, why don't you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hillary's "Firewalls" in Ohio and Texas Are Already Crumbling!
Posted by: SkeeterVT1 on Feb 23, 2008 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary Clinton is counting on Latino voters in Texas and blue-collar voters in Ohio to provide her with "firewalls" to stop Barack Obama's 11-state winning streak.

But according to new polls in both states, Clinton's "firewalls" are already crumbling.

More major labor unions are backing Obama -- which could have a big effect on how blue-collar voters cast their ballots in the Buckeye State.

Texas is the worst state in the Union in terms of Latino voter turnout -- primarily because up to 30 percent of Latinos in Texas are non-citizen immigrants who cannot vote and Texas is Tom DeLay's home state. How can you possibly forget DeLay's voter-suppression tactics against Latinos in the late '90s and early '00s that resulted in the GOP takeover of both the Lone Star State's congressional delegation and its state legislature?

Then, there's the role of independents -- who clearly favor Obama.

Among independents, Obama is leading Clinton by 14 percentage points in Ohio and by 13 in Texas, according to a Washington Post-ABC News telephone poll taken Feb. 16-20.

And the settling of the GOP race in John McCain's favor is an enticement for self-styled "Obamicans" -- Obama-leaning moderate Republicans -- to come out for the Democratic election that still matters.

Moreover, both states let people vote early. Obama, fresh from his Wisconsin victory on Tuesday, didn't wait for the dust to settle before exhorting Texans to vote right away. "I don't want you to wait until March 4," he said. Clinton, with a head start in campaigning in Texas, also appealed for an early lock on votes.

In the 22 contested Democratic primaries so far, independents made up 22 percent of the vote and they supported Obama by an overwhelming margin of 64 percent to 33 percent. Crossover Republicans, a far smaller percentage in the Democratic primaries, backed him 55-33.

Yet Obama has even the party's left flank covered: a 52-44 advantage over the New York senator among those who consider themselves very liberal.

Pennsylvania on April 22 offers the biggest remaining delegate prize in a primary limited to Democrats — 158. Even there, Clinton and Obama are opening a pitched competition to bring many of the state's nearly 1 million independents into the party in time to vote, an opportunity now accorded about 4 million Democrats.

Bottom line: Clinton isn't going to win Texas -- and has only a 50-50 chance at best of winning Ohio. And without either state in the Clinton column, Obama's march to the Democratic nomination will be unstoppable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama's advisor
Posted by: steveselverston on Feb 23, 2008 8:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has anybody else heard the concerns regarding Obama's foreign policy advisor, Zbigniew Brezinski?

steve selverston

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New Obama Endorsement
Posted by: Ruth_Calabria on Mar 2, 2008 8:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Evolutionary Party endorses Barack Obama as the next president of the United States.
This is the most important election America will ever have, possibly the last if Barack Obama is not elected.

The Evolutionary Party derives its politics from an equation for evolution that has been in the textbooks for the last eighty years. A mathematical elaboration of it supported by data ranging from chemical kinetics to the evening news indicates that our “war on terror” is slowly but surely escalating to World War III, a truly terrifying thought. For that reason we support Barack Obama, the only real anti-war candidate.

The value of our unusual mathematical political analysis lies in its being able to differentiate between the skunks and the citizens. The media people are skunks. If they don’t watch what they say and do, they don’t last long. The ones who make the cut spout the American ideology in one form or another. These include the full spectrum of television and movie actors, including the politicians and the newscasters...

...And doesn’t it make you wonder about the guy’s wife? Does any sane female over the age of 22 really think Hillary felt bad about Bill and Monica? Behind all the media hype that protects those who help control the little people, you have to wonder:

A.) Is Hillary is lesbian, a married one, not that unusual in modern America. If Hillary was mad about anything with Monica, it was that she didn’t get a shot at her too. Watch one of Hillary’s lovers surface soon to clarify her tastes as to penile object.

B.) The smiling Clintons are so phony and so slimy underneath that one would not be surprised to find that the inarguably unconfident and possibly mildly retarded Chelsea Clinton was the product of her pervert parents abusing her when she was four years old, the age she seems to be stuck in. Certainly there is as much truth in this outrageous conjecture as the Clintons being good people because they go to church on Sunday. No, what the Clintons are is not good, but likable. Likable is a banana split. You just like how it tastes. You don’t need a reason. The Clintons are an imitation banana split, very likeable, like artificial sweetener that causes cancer eight years down the line.

You can trust what a Clinton says like you can trust what a Bush says. That whole family, George I, George II, Lady Barbara and Lady Laura, are all great actors too. And isn’t it interesting that the Bush daughters, Jenna and what’s her name, are as unconfident and inept as Chelsea. Makes you wonder if Bush uses a cigar too. But on Lady Laura, the Virgin Mary of conservatives?

True, this skit by the one writer’s guild writer who didn’t get rehired is a bit insane. But there are a lot of people around today that are actually insane, not the least of whom are the conservatives, all of which are unbalanced emotionally because of their castration in childhood from the pains of physical punishment and strict obedience. They are inherently defective however much their endless charades from Senate podiums and on Fox News try to hide it. And dangerous when they have weapons in their grasp.

If you want the war and the police state to end, vote for Barack Obama. Not for Hillary, who is so self-serving and devious that you wouldn’t be surprised if she teamed up with Huckabee as VP on a national reconciliation ticket. Or some such curve ball the moneyed class would use to block Obama from getting in and ending our descent into irreversible totalitarianism and worldwide war. Hopefully Obama will not be removed by assassination.

Who are we to say such dark things? We are the Evolutionary Party at www.matrix-evolutions.com.
Dr. and Mrs. Peter V. Calabria

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]