Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

We're Losing Another Winnable War: The Fight Against Childhood Cancer

By Deirdre Imus, Huffington Post. Posted February 16, 2008.


If the mantra for the 2008 election is "change," then let's hope this includes a change in attitude and polices concerning childhood cancer.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Deirdre Imus

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Friday was International Childhood Cancer Day, a day designated to raise awareness about childhood cancer. It is also a day when we reflect on the advances made and what steps need to be taken to eradicate this dreaded disease. Unfortunately, like other chronic diseases, there is not much to celebrate. This is because we have a fundamentally flawed philosophy about how to combat cancer that can be summed up in two words ... irresponsible and reactionary.

In 1971, President Richard Nixon declared a "war on cancer" and enacted the National Cancer Act. In spite of billions of dollars invested annually in scientific research over the past 36 years, cancer cures have failed to emerge.

Cancer statistics are on the rise and following the same trend we see with other children's chronic diseases and developmental disorders. More than 7.6 million people worldwide die each year from cancer, 600,000 in the United States. This is equal to 20,000 deaths a day globally. Every year another 1.5 million people are diagnosed with cancer in the U.S.

Each school day 46 kids are diagnosed with cancer. According to the most recently recorded data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cancer remains the leading cause of death among U.S. children ages 1 to 19 years, second only to accidents (2004). Approximately 13,425 children in this age group are diagnosed annually with pediatric cancer and about 2,250 children will die each year from the disease. While the prevalence of childhood cancer increased by 27.1 percent between 1975 and 2002, the death rates declined for leukemias by 3.0% and all other cancers combined by 1.3% per year, from1990 to 2004. We are doing a better at prolonging life, but not preventing the disease.

Tobacco smoke, including second hand smoke, is clearly one of the causes of several forms of cancer. According to the American Lung Association, ninety percent of all smokers begin before the age of 21. Currently, 28.4%, more than a quarter of all high school students, smoke cigarettes or cigars nationwide. It is estimated that approximately 6.4 million children using tobacco products, will eventually die prematurely from a smoking-related disease based on calculations by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. But non-smoking cancers are also occurring at proportionately higher rates. Since 1975, acute lymphocytic leukemia has increased 68.7%, brain and nervous system cancers in children is up 56.5%, and testicular cancer is up 66% in adolescents.

What is causing this disturbing increase in pediatric cancer and why are we losing what numerous scientists suggest is a winnable war on cancer?

Like many other chronic children's diseases, science tells us that toxic chemicals used in our everyday environment are playing a significant role in the rise of childhood cancer. According to the International Agency for Research in Cancer, " ... 80-90 per cent of human cancer is determined environmentally and thus theoretically avoidable."

Since World War II our environment has changed dramatically. The uncontrolled, development of untested, unregulated industrial chemicals has contaminated the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the food we eat. Even children's clothing can contain flame retardant chemicals that become just one more unnecessary toxic exposure that our children could do without.

Other carcinogenic chemicals found in our every day environment includes; arsenic used in wooden playground equipment and decking material, pesticides, ployaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) a pollutant from burning gasoline, polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PBCD/F) a by-product of PVC production, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), a Teflon chemical, identified as a human carcinogen by the Environmental Protection Agency.

As early as 1987 research published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute found children exposed to pesticides in their own homes were three to six times more likely to develop leukemia. Additional studies suggest possible links between parental exposures to pesticides and other carcinogenic chemicals increases the risk of kidney and brain cancer in children.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: childhood cancer, health, war on cancer, cancer prevention

Deirdre Imus is Founder and President of the Deirdre Imus Environmental Center for Pediatric Oncology, and Co-founder, Co-Director of Imus Ranch, a working cattle ranch for kids with cancer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
THC/Cannabinoids kill cancer cells and more!
Posted by: garry minor on Feb 19, 2008 6:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 2000, Dr. Manuel Guzman of Complutense University of Madrid Spain rediscovered that THC and cannabinoids, the active components of cannabis, inhibit tumor growth in laboratory animals but preserve normal cells. They do so by modulating key cell-signaling pathways, thereby inducing direct growth arrest and death of tumor cells, as well as inhibiting the growth of blood vessels that supply the tumor.
According to Dr. Ethan Russo a neurologist and authority on medical cannabis cancer occurs because cells become immortalized; they fail to heed normal signals to turn off growth. A normal function of remodeling in the body requires cells to die on cue. This is called apoptosis, or programmed cell death. That process fails to work in tumors. THC promotes it's reappearance so that gliomas, leukemias, melanomas and other cell types will in fact heed the signals, stop dividing and die.
In 2007 Dr. Len Horovitz, a pulmonary specialist at Lennox Hill Hospital in New York City discovered the same results, that THC cuts cancer growth in half and impedes it's ability to spread.
In 2006 at the Memorial University of Newfoundland, Neuropsychiatrist Xia Zhang and a team of researchers discovered that THC and cannabinoids, unlike heroin, cocaine, alcohol, nicotene, and other drugs, actually promotes the growth of brain cells. They believe these new cells help to improve memory, fight depression and mood disorders. Cannabinoids are also proven to prevent Alzheimers disease.
All mammals, fish, birds, and reptiles have cannabinoid receptors throughout their body that work independent of those that control the heart and lungs. This is why in the entire history of mankind not one death can be attributed to it. It cannot kill you.
Pollutants in our environment are a major cause for concern. Anything made from oil, coal, timber, or cotton can be made ecologically friendly with cannabis hemp. It easily surpasses corn, kenaf, or sugar cane for ethanol production. All paper, plastics, packaging, paints, varnishes, fuels, lubricants, textiles, plywood, insulations, many cosmetics, and health foods can be made with it. Over 25,000 Earth friendly products.
It's seed is the single most nutritious thing you can eat! Our Government actually stockpiles it as a strategic food source under Executive order #12919, yet deny it to us today.
Canvas is Dutch for Cannabis. For thousands of years all ships sails and most clothing were of cannabis fibers which are the longest and strongest in nature.
Henry Ford built and fueled a car primarily with hemp. The cellulose plastic panels ten times stronger than steel. Synthetic plastics were developed using cellulose technology. Neither he or Diesel intended to run their engines with petroleum.
One acre of hemp equals four of timber for pulp and you harvest it every year, tree's take a lifetime. It grows without most fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides to foul the soil and water, in climates and conditions other crops will not grow. Almost everywhere from the Equator to the Arctic Circle.
The really sad thing is that our Government first discovered the anti-tumoral effects of THC in 1974 at the University of Virginia while trying to prove cannabis suppressed the immune system. Instead they discovered it destroyed brain and breast cancers and a virus induced leukemia. They have censored the results ever since, the same way that they have censored the many uses of industrial hemp. Money and profits are more important than the lives of the people.
The needless pain and suffering of millions upon millions of people never had to be!
Hemp industrialization will create millions of Earth friendly jobs from the farm to the laboratory. It will begin a redistribution of wealth and create social harmony. With it we can provide food, fuel, shelter, medicine, pleasure, spirituality, and unity for every human being on this planet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Ignored Pesticide Threat
Posted by: vissermel on Feb 20, 2008 1:01 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A quarter century ago we banned PCBs and the environmentally damaging and cancer causing persistent pesticides. Now, recent studies of non-Hodgkins Lymphoma, Type II diabetes and other diseases show strong correlations between the disease and pesticides such as chlordane in patients blood. Researchers are surprised because we banned these chemicals.

International scientists have found that “banned” pesticides are still in tens of thousands of ton per year use in the developing world. They circle the globe and deposit out in our waters. Our clear summer air contains hundreds of millions of molecules of foreign pesticides per breathful. Inuit women of the far north ingest 15 times a tolerable daily intake of chlordane, toxaphene, and PCBs. Killer whales that consume mammal pups while hunting in the Arctic no longer reproduce. Alaska has an extremely high cancer rate and we wonder why.

The Stockholm Agreement of 2001 was signed by more than a hundred countries that agreed to voluntarily ban the chemicals we banned in the 70s and 80s, but they have no resources or will to comply.

Meanwhile, foreign use of toxaphene has contaminated Lake Superior to the point that a reasonable sized trout has a toxaphene level ten times that required to classify dirt as hazardous waste. Health agencies in Ontario and the states surrounding the Great Lakes have responded to this threat by no longer listing toxaphene in their Fish Consumption Guidelines. This is no way to protect health. Hiding problems will not solve them.

Yes, we need a change.

Melvin J. Visser
Author: Cold, Clear, and Deadly: Unraveling a Toxic Legacy. Michigan State University Press

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iatrogenics; Long overdue attention
Posted by: herbal on Feb 20, 2008 2:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dierdre Imus does well, although it is impossible shed adequate light on such a scandal in such short space.

First, forgive her title. The very definition of war is that it's unwinnable; she can't possibly be comparing the cancer war with Iraq.

First a word that deserves household use is: Iatrogenic. This is simply physician induced disease and death. Virtually every medical college in the USA has required courses in iatrogenic medicine. (It is certainly pertinent to insurance issues.)

Many others have pioneered this field of medical malfeasance and environmental disease. The Michael Pollan 'In Defense of Food' book review by Roychoudhri in today's Alternet contains information on the chemical chain in foods.

Link here:
http://centerforinvestigativereporting.org/projects/exposed

Samuel Epstein, MD has been doing decades of
tireless work to debunk the American Cancer Society and what he calls "the cancer industry". He is famous for pointing out that over 95% of anti-cancer research is dedicated to increasingly expensive treatment and a miniscule amount for prevention.
RE; breast x-rays can be iatrogenic.

Link here:
http://www.breastcancerchoices.org/epstein.html

http://www.preventcancer.com/about/epstein.htm

I am an organic farmer, a grower of alternative medicinal plants, herbs. The chemical industry and its watch dog cum lap dog, FDA has torpedoed the herbal rennaissance of the 1990's with media fanfare charges of unknown safety and efficacy. But alas, they live in a glass house. According to the FDA own statistics, there are more than 100,000 deaths per year of iatrogenic deaths in US hospitals, alone, due to misprescribed drugs. How does that compare to world wide deaths attributed to old fashioned palliative pytomedicines? About 100,000 to one!

Efficacy first should be measured by non-mortality. Second by need; for example, breast implants' safety and efficacy by comparison in a need:cost:benefit analysis. Efficacy? It is evident quickly under examination that herbal medicine, even assuming they are inert and placebo, can prevent iatrogenic disease like cancer. When is doing nothing better? The analogy is the mamogram vs hand examination.

Sister Rosalie Bertells, MD, a research epidemiologist, first exposed the dangers of low level radiation by examining x-ray exposed patients. Then, the iatrogenic nature of x-rays was not known. She documented it. X-ray dosage has been reduced but usage is markedly up. Mammograms are now less promoted for women over 40 with no genetic predisposition. But as Epstein points out, mammograms are causing more cancer than preventing it.

So, new iatrogenic fans, lets think a moment about the total net toxicity and safety of the entire repertiore of patent drug company 'medicines'. Has there been any systematic survey of the known toxicity, interactions and the practice of compensating for these by the medical industry in modern times?

We must recognize that drug companies write their own clinical findings and then provide their own reviews of their methodologies and findings, double blind though they may be, to the FDA. Then they write their own articles in the PDR for the physician's information. Why? From Reagan years on, the FDA lacks the funding to do its appointed job itself. It lacks the budgetary means; by design. As the hens guard the fox house, the War on Cancer is not 'winnable'.

Corporatism or national (corporate) socialism is a root cause of evil sufficient unto the day thereof. Health, welfare, and the pursuit of happiness is all tied to the same political environment and a positive systemic revolution must be established in order to seriously address these human environmental problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Lon Harmon Ball Posted by: herbal