Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Congressional Steroid Spectacle a Major League Waste of Taxpayer Money

By Dave Zirin, The Nation. Posted February 14, 2008.


Roger Clemens's face-off with Congress has moved the guardians of our democracy beyond absurdity.
mr.clemens

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Dave Zirin

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Representative Tom Lantos, Democrat of California, died this week at the age of 80. We remember Lantos for many things, but he's top of mind today as the man who gazed at the very first of these idiotic steroid hearings in 2005, and called it for what it was: "a theater of the absurd." Roger Clemens's face-off with Congress Wednesday officially moved the guardians of our democracy far beyond the absurd.

Before we discuss one word of the tax-funded idiocy on display Wednesday at Representative Henry Waxman's House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, let's concede that there are only about 1,500 ways we can think of off the top of our heads that the committee's time could be better spent. They could be asking why the Bush Administration is so keen on bugging our phones, why it grants no-bid contracts to Dick Cheney's pals or why they're underfunding the Veterans Administration. Hell, they could be holding hearings on how it is Bush got that weird black eye a few years back. Anything but this.

Virginia Republican Representative Tom Davis -- the guy with the pumpkin-colored hair -- defended the idea of steroid hearings last month, saying, "This is one of the few things in a partisan, polarized town that the Republicans and Democrats are on the same page. It isn't on the budget or Iraq. But you've got to start somewhere."

Yet the anabolic circus was an absolute parade of partisanship. The positions of lawmakers on the dais seemed as hardened as those testifying. Clemens, under oath, declared that he had never taken steroids or human growth hormones. His ex-trainer, Brian McNamee, a former cop, swears he did. So one person was lying, one was telling the truth, yet both presented to the camera fidgety faces of squirmy deceit. And we ask again, who cares? If steroid use is against the law, these people should be in court. Why are members of Congress focused on testimony as to whether abscesses on someone's buttocks could lead to a better earned-run average?

But the partisan lineup of majority Democrats going after Clemens and Republicans after McNamee made for bizarre political theater. While Democrats were calling Clemens a liar, Republicans like Chris Shays were shouting that McNamee was, of all things, trading in controlled substances. "You deal drugs!" the Congressman said. Yes, Chris. That's usually who testifies in drug cases.

Clemens is a Republican with long-standing ties to the Bush family. During his testimony, Rocket Roger invoked some strange words of encouragement -- "Stay high and keep my head up" -- that the syntactically challenged George Herbert Walker Bush once gave him. Not the best choice of words at a hearing about drugs.

And the Bush patronage is likely to continue, even if Clemens eventually is charged with perjury as a result of his testimony. McNamee's lawyer Richard Emery today predicted a pardon from Bush the Younger: "It would be the easiest thing in the world for George W. Bush, given the corrupt proclivities of his administration to say Roger Clemens is an American hero, Roger Clemens helped children," Emery told the Associated Press. "It's my belief they have some reason to believe they can get a pardon."

Clemens is also reportedly close to his former boss, Houston Astros owner Drayton McClane, who has given hundreds of thousands of dollars to various Republican candidates, and to Rangers owner Tom Hicks, the former chair of the Giuliani for President campaign.

Another priceless moment was when Clemens was taken to task on his assertion that he hadn't used steroids, only B-12. Representative Bruce Braley asked him if he had an approved medical reason for taking B-12, if he had been diagnosed with anemia, senile dementia or Alzheimer's, or whether he was a vegetarian or a vegan. The word "vegan" threw Clemens for a big loop. "I don't know what that is," Clemens replied. "I'm sorry."

Having already blamed his wife for getting injected with B-12 to buff up for her appearance in the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue, Clemens tossed responsibility on dear old mom. "My mother in 1988 suggested I take B-12," Clemens said. "I always assumed it was a good thing, not a bad thing."

Sounds like what a lot of people thought when the Democrats took over Congress.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: roger clemens, henry waxman, steroids

Dave Zirin is the author of "What's My Name Fool? Sports and Resistance in the United States." Read more of his work at Edgeofsports.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Agreed!!
Posted by: talkville on Feb 15, 2008 2:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of all the hearings that could be launched in all areas of malfeasance, the very last would be hearings about the activities of personalities and their ethics in advancing flagging careers in sports and entertainment.

Tax money and equally significant attention have, once again, been diverted and channeled away toward more 'safe' and 'innocuous' purposes. Lots of money and lots of attention desperately needed for such issues as Iraq, economic piracies and such things. Next thing you know, the Congressional hearing rooms will be hired out for broadway and theater productions of all kinds!! The ball we gotta keep an eye out on is a lot uglier than a baseball, granted; but it's a heck of a lot more important to all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Daphna
Posted by: Daph on Feb 20, 2008 2:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How can we, as taxpayers and voters, put a stop to these silly Congressional inqueries? Don't we, as a nation, have more important things to do?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I seem to recall,
Posted by: jwpa13 on Feb 21, 2008 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that our Democratic leadership (ha,ha Ms. Pelosi) didn't want to waste the time on hearing that would lead to impeachment as it would wate too much congressional time that was required for "other matters". IS THIS crap one of those "other matters"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It should be remembered
Posted by: Thucy on Feb 22, 2008 6:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that major league baseball is a multi-billion dollar industry, and deserves the same sort of scrutiny any other multi-billion dollar industry might merit, should it or particular entities within it be suspected of "fixing the competition" in some way. Specific teams, and the industry in general, have reaped tremendous financial gain through the rise of superstars such as Clemens and Bonds, with consumers shelling out record amounts to attend what fans used to believe were truly competitive games. If nothing else there is a "truth in advertising" issue here, one that quite a few people take very seriously indeed.

What troubles me is not the theatrical aspects of these hearings so much as the thought that, at the end of the day, the owners and managers of these companies (and remember, Bush used to be one of them) will pocket their profits without ever being confronted with how they fostered a workplace culture that condoned, in fact encouraged, the widespread use of these drugs in order to "enhance productivity." It seems to me the drugs that Bush & Co. oppose in our "war on drugs" are only those that provide individuals their own private pleasure, or in the case of cancer and other patients some relief from nausea or pain, as opposed to chemicals that boast corporate profits, even if they might compromise an individual's health.

Viewed in this light, I don't see these hearings as a waste at all. I just wish they'd get down to the more important issues at play.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It should be remembered Posted by: astron0t
government oversight of baseball.
Posted by: whealeydj on Feb 23, 2008 6:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I sure wish there was twice as much government oversight of military contractors and half as much coverage of sports peccadilloes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm glad someone finally pointed this out
Posted by: astron0t on Feb 26, 2008 12:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for writing this article. I was beginning to think I was the only person crazy enough to think that it's totally ridiculous that millions of taxpayer dollars have been spent on something that doesn't affect the people of this country; minus the peace of mind knowing that millionaires can make the hall of fame and all is well in the known universe.

The US's obssession with media frenzies only exaggerates that we as a society either:

A. don't have anything better to do with our lives
B. don't have a meaning and/or purpose other than to squander valuable resources
C. don't want to face reality
D. all of the above.

What bothers me even more is that we have governmental officials who are supposedly intelligent enough to make decisions affecting millions of people, but can't prioritize poverty, pollution, and poor health (to name a few things) over the interests of corporate America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]