Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Gutted by Money Men, Chicago Newspapers Circle the Drain

By Martha Rosenberg, AlterNet. Posted February 20, 2008.


Buyouts, incompetent leadership, and a lack of reader support have all but destroyed Chicago's newspaper industry.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Martha Rosenberg

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

In Mike Royko's town, it's been a while since you boarded a bus or train at rush hour and met the "newsprint curtain." In its day, the wall of newspapers spread-eagled in front of intent readers was such an institution that poet Allen Ginsberg satirized it by poking a hole in his paper and peering through.

Nor do most Chicagoans wake up anymore to the Chicago Tribune or Chicago Sun-Times with their cornflakes. Or end the day with the Chicago Daily News and a martini in their easy chair. (Who remembers easy chairs? Martinis?)

With its tail between its legs, the Tribune Company, which owns the Chicago Tribune, the Los Angeles Times, other newspapers, WGN television and the Chicago Cubs, went private after a $8.2 billion buyout engineered by local real estate tycoon Sam Zell.

Bedeviled by a $1 billion tax bill from buying the Times Mirror and the Los Angeles Times in 2000 -- it was a taxable sale rather than a restructuring says the IRS -- the Tribune Company is now owned by an S-corp ESOP employee stock ownership plan which makes "selling for parts" difficult in the near future since it pays no corporate taxes.

Not that anyone's happy. This month the Los Angeles Times lost its third editor since the sale, James O'Shea, a Tribune Company lifer. It has also lost publisher Jeffrey Johnson and two editorial page editors since the Tribune takeover.

And why was outgoing Tribune Chairman and Chief Officer Dennis FitzSimons rewarded a $17.7 million dollar severance package, many are asking? Not just $10.7 million but $4 million to cover his tax liabilities from the $10.7 million? What would he get if he left the paper profitable -- his own island?

Things are even worse at the Chicago Sun-Times, where Conrad Black and F. David Radler siphoned off millions in phony non-compete agreements that they paid to themselves as officers of the parent company Hollinger International Inc., now Sun-Times Media Group, whose celebrity board featured Henry Kissinger, Richard Perle and former Illinois Gov. James Thompson. The pair are prison bound unless their appeals succeed.

In a perverse twist, the Chicago Sun-Times actually had to pay $17.4 million of Black's legal fees -- thank you Director & Officers insurance! -- on top of losing $60 million of its shareholders' money.

This month, Chicago's "other" newspaper terminated 17 reporters, editors and newsroom staff members after merging its suburban Daily Southtown and Star papers, shutting down three weeklies, and farming out newspaper delivery to the Chicago Tribune, failed to total the $50 million it is seeking to trim from its operating budget.

Even the Chicago Reader, considered the granddaddy of free weeklies, is now struggling after three decades of seeming imperviousness to the vicissitudes of the newspaper business.

In July the four-section quarter fold paper, known for its long format articles, was purchased by Florida based Creative Loafing. The Chicago Reader promptly became a standard flat tabloid with one page articles that no longer jump and only half the number of pages as before.

Asked about the shrinking size and staff -- four top reporters were let go -- Editor Alison True and Publisher Mike Crystal both replied that the pub had no choice.

Two free monthlies that were formerly newsprint, Today's Chicago Woman and Conscious Choice, an environmental magazine, have survived by adopting a glossy look, generic content, and reducing local focus and staff.

And while the Chicago Tribune's five-year-old tabloid daily, Red Eye, passed out free at city "el" train stops, has found a readership, the publication had to dumb down content to two paragraph stories and celebrity "cellulite news" to do so.

Even Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism is caving.

Dean John Lavine announced he's considering adding " ... and Integrative Marketing" to the school's name -- to a chorus of angry J-school students who will probably get jobs in ... integrative marketing.

Of course everyone knows that the reason newspapers are circling the drain is the exodus of readers, advertisers and attention spans to the Internet.

But there's also the greed monster Wall Street has created, wherein a single digit profit margin is no longer enough reason to get out of bed in the morning.

And there's a third reason.

When you board a Chicago bus or train at rush hour today, you see 30 cell phones held up to faces -- not 30 newspapers.

Even if you're a lone wolf carrying a Chicago Tribune or Sun-Times, just try to read it.

"Can you hear me now????" ... "So I go to him ... " ... "And he's all ... " ... "And she's like ... "

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: newspapers, wall street, buy-outs, conglomerates, cut backs

Martha Rosenberg is a staff cartoonist at the Evanston Roundtable.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Many business execs now operate like criminals
Posted by: Moonray on Feb 20, 2008 2:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Newspapers in the form of dead trees are about as relevant as buggy whips nowadays. But it's sad to see those grand old dames being raped and looted by professional "executives" whose real expertise is lining their own pockets.

Even the legal activities of top executives in many industries border on wholesale thievery. Everyone knows the horror stories. Why does our government allow it? Hell, our government even encourages it with many tax breaks. Golden parachutes add up to a "golden shower" on the lower-level employees who work so hard to make those businesses successful, but those who should protect the workers instead sit idly by and collect large campaign contributions from the wheeler-dealer creeps.

Someday future generations will look back at our America and shake their heads in amusement and disgust. We allow widespread criminal activity and call it "business as usual."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Everybody's talkin'
Posted by: ibolyap on Feb 20, 2008 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read newspapers on the internet now. I print the larger articles because I'm still not totally comfortable reading the monitor. In my city we have two free dailies that have mcnews and the transit system is littered with them as a result. I rarely see young people reading. They all have ipods stuck in their ears or they're on their cells having inane conversations. I wear earplugs when I go outside to mute the intrusive sounds of the city these days.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: verybody's talkin' Posted by: donl51
Growing old with newspapers
Posted by: BST on Feb 20, 2008 8:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was 2, I'd scamper across the newsroom of a Holyoke, Mass. newspaper during visits with my mother to leap into the lap of one of the editors, my grandfather Joe.

He died one day in that newsroom of a heart attack, and the presses were halted while the priest and hearse arrived. I have the article that was written. It's on yellowed paper.

I am now my grandfather's age and, after having spent my own lifetime in newspapers, feel that I'm losing a family member every time a paper newspaper falters or folds.

But how do I acquire my news, news junkie that I still am, at 64? On the Web.

I'll bet my grandfather would do the same.

People who crave news will seek out the best delivery system. The Web is what keeps news junkies up to date. Newspapers inform us a day later of what we knew the afternoon before.

Life changes and that's it. I think many of the young people with cell phones and IPods are very much interested in what's going on. Their ways of accumulating information are just foreign to old-timers.

The Web is a more equalitarian system, also. The world can debate and comment and not wait for the authoritative voice of an editorial writer musing over coffee at some paper.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Growing old with newspapers
Posted by: BST on Feb 20, 2008 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was 2, I'd scamper across the newsroom of a Holyoke, Mass. newspaper during visits with my mother to leap into the lap of one of the editors, my grandfather Joe.

He died one day in that newsroom of a heart attack, and the presses were halted while the priest and hearse arrived. I have the article that was written. It's on yellowed paper.

I am now my grandfather's age and, after having spent my own lifetime in newspapers, feel that I'm losing a family member every time a paper newspaper falters or folds.

But how do I acquire my news, news junkie that I still am, at 64? On the Web.

I'll bet my grandfather would do the same.

People who crave news will seek out the best delivery system. The Web is what keeps news junkies up to date. Newspapers inform us a day later of what we knew the afternoon before.

Life changes and that's it. I think many of the young people with cell phones and IPods are very much interested in what's going on. Their ways of accumulating information are just foreign to old-timers.

The Web is a more egalitarian system, also. The world can debate and comment and not wait for the authoritative voice of an editorial writer musing over coffee at some paper.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Sad Legacy
Posted by: ebishirl on Feb 20, 2008 8:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chicago was once the pre-eminent newspaper town, and Royko was god. His column was the first thing I read every morning, first at the Sun Times, later (after "The Alien, aka Rupert Murdoch, bought the Sun Times and turned it into a rag, prompting Royko ... and myself .. to jump ship) at the Chicago Tribune.

For anyone seeking a taste of "real" journalism, I suggest picking up any one of Royko's many books, each one a gem: "Boss," "Sez Who? Sez Me," "I May be Wrong, But I Doubt It" and "One More Time: The Best of Mike Royko." The guy was the penultimate, no-nonsense journalist, and funny as hell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sad Day for my city
Posted by: Jerry on Feb 20, 2008 9:56 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been out of Chicago for 10 years, but it is still "my city" (and Barak Obama, the next President of the US of A, is still "my senator") I am saddened that the greeat and not so great newspapers have fallen to corporate greed. Mike Royko must be seething. I hope there will be a return to classic journalism. We need the "Fourth Estate". Too bad it has been bought. The country suffers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to say good night
Posted by: jebpgh on Feb 20, 2008 10:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My grandfather was the reigning sports columnist at the Chicago Sun-Times for many years. He covered the Dempsey/Tunney fight and when he retired, Joe Lewis (who's autobiography he penned for the Big Little Books) was at the dinner along with just about anybody who was anybody - from Ray Meyers to Abe Saperstein to Roger Hornsby (and if you know who those people are you are really old). Some years later, I got a job tearing wire from the machines in the Sun-Times/CDN newsroom. I worked my way to the City Desk for the CDN and had beers with Royko at the Billy Goat after shifts. I worked the Midnight to 9 shift at 11th and State for City News. They were tough times and great times. Chicago without newspapers is like New York without taxis. I feel the passing of an era - from Ben Hecht to my grandpa to Mike Royko - and Chicago will never be quite the same. Makes you want to throw your cell phone into the lake. Good story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sad Sad Sad
Posted by: kegbot1 on Feb 20, 2008 2:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I went down with The Cleveland Press in 1982 and have worked for five daily newspapers.

Now I own a small bookstore in my hometown and I am resigned to never working for print journalism again. It's sad because it was my first love. I'd wait in the snow back in the 70s for the afternoon Press to be delivered and then I'd devour it from cover to cover.

And now I feel like some kind of alien in my own society.

Newspapers have been either horribly dumbed down or turned into partisan rag sheets by their owners. In any case, I realized when I left my last paper in 2005 that it just wasn't a fun business any more. There was no spark, no fire, no real passion left in newsrooms any more. Just gloom and doom and endless, endless meetings. No one got excited about anything any more.

Sure I love the Internet and I think its a great thing for public information. But there was just something about having a newspaper to start the morning with (and now we have The Plain Dealer in Cleveland, a morning daily disappointment) or end the day with.

Most people are also 'too busy' to read anymore anyway and are lost to television.

The thing is, if newspapers go totally Internet, will enough people be willing to pay for them online to make them viable? My guess is no.

I do however, believe there is still room for small weekly community newspapers and I'm happy to say my hometown is served well by two of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now the papers next the networks.
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave on Feb 20, 2008 4:35 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We regular folks have lost faith in the paper and network news. Too many times we see the left leaning press spin stories. We see the advances and the good deeds done in Iraq ignored and replaced with the daily casualty report. We see constant one sided Bush bashing in the editorial pages. Never do we see the conservitive shown in a good light. Most of the USA are traditionalists and the constant hate America first banter has turned them off to the papers and network news. For example; Mary Mapes, longtime television news producer and reporter who worked for CBS for fifteen years who produced the story that got Dan Rather fired. Dan Rather was salivating to put that false story on the air. How far will these people go to trash our President and our country? Accepting falsified documents so badly forged? People started losing faith in paper and network news. Thank God Fox is here to set the record straight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I like newspapers...
Posted by: Blade on Feb 20, 2008 9:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can read more stories quicker in paper form. Can't "save" them immediately, or "google" for more info, but for a breakfast or lunch partner, newspapers have been my friend for years. Who cares if it's half a day old, so what? Sad to hear about "The Reader", so sad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]