Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Democrats: 'Particide' In Six Easy Steps

By David Michael Green, AlterNet. Posted February 9, 2008.


Democrats are working overtime to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by David Michael Green

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Suppose you had a political party you were trying to get rid of. How would you do it?

Would you give it some cement shoes and toss it into the bay? Would you roll it up in a carpet and drag it into the trunk of your car in the middle of the night? Would you put out a contract on it?

If the latter sounds appealing, no need to get your hands dirty messing with any nasty mob guys from Jersey. I know some very upstanding establishment folks who've perfected a killer formula (pun intended) for particide. They're called Democrats, and they know how to get the job done right.

In fact, they've demonstrated it again for the umpteenth time just as I'm writing these words. Yesterday, that tough guy Harry Reid laid down the law for congressional Republicans thinking he wouldn't play hardball on the much-needed economic stimulus package now working its way through Congress. He told them: "Well, I think that if they think this is a bluff, wait until we have this vote and they'll find out if it's a bluff. I'm not much of a bluffer." Then, today, he completely caved into their pressure on the bill, proving - though perhaps not quite in the manner he intended - that he is in fact not much of a bluffer, after all, even if he is from Nevada. Nor, as it turns out, is he much of a negotiator either.

Yep, ladies and gentlemen, if it's particide you're after, Reid and his fellow Democrats would be happy to show you how it's done. It's pretty simple, really. There are just six easy steps that you need to follow to take out a political party that's grown a bit, shall we say, inconvenient.

First of all, make sure it does nothing. If you're looking for a good way to anger voters, here's the best. Have them send you to Congress to address a host of their urgent concerns. Let them invest their full faith in you to rescue them from all the effects of a country gone completely off the rails. Let them believe and let them hope. Then do nothing. Crush their pedestrian little dreams in your blood-soaked hands by protecting corporate interests instead. Spend two years racking up not a single notable legislative accomplishment, and then go before the voters asking for another term. They'll remember your name.

A second excellent technique is to fail to block the worst tendencies of the worst president ever, the very mission you were most entrusted with by the voters. If they hate this president's stinking war, make sure you give him the money for it every time he asks. Send all his reactionary nominees to the Supreme Court after they mock you in bullshit hearings. Yeah, go ahead. Allow a supporter of torture and Constitution-shredding to become the highest law enforcement officer in the land. Etc., etc. Get it? Sure, you can go through the motions of opposition, but at the end of the day, be sure to bungle it so badly that you leave everybody scratching their heads and wondering which party actually controls Congress. Next, while you're at it, don't do anything to make this hated president and his administration accountable for their manifold crimes of the century. Treat them as though they've got pictures of you in some airport men's room somewhere that they're threatening to release if you dare do anything remotely resembling oversight (or patriotism). Let these guys absolutely run rampant thrashing the republic in every imaginable way, while you sit on top of your congressional majority abdicating any responsibility for protecting the people who sent you there to protect them. Show the public how tough you can be by investigating the use of steroids in baseball, while lies about war and illegal phone-tapping and torture and suspension of habeas corpus go ignored. Keep your priorities straight and you're guaranteed to score points with the voters, for sure.

Of course, not only must you fail to oppose an insane kleptocratic dictator, but it's crucial that you also have absolutely no program or ideas of your own to offer. I mean, who can't never not get no excitement going about nothing? Er, something like that Anyhow, the point is that a political party without ideas is like a car without wheels. And it will go just about as far, too. If you want to get rid of your party, be sure to be about nothing whatsoever.

And yet, even while trying to be the Seinfeld of political parties, you will no doubt sometimes accidentally advance some sort of popular idea or another, despite yourself. You know, like a million monkeys at a keyboard When these inadvertently beneficial bills are immediately destroyed by the obstructionist minority party - who continually overuse and abuse parliamentary tactics you (of course) never dreamed of all those years when you were in the minority - make sure that nobody in the voting public knows about it. You could run around screaming about them continually blocking you from doing the people's business, but that would only increase public sympathy for you. And since you're trying to kill your party, you surely won't want to do that. No, like a good Democrat, you want to make sure the other guys never have to pay for their crimes.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: democrats, election08

David Michael Green is a professor of political science at Hofstra University. He is delighted to receive readers' reactions to his articles (dmg@regressiveantidote.net), but regrets that time constraints do not always allow him to respond. More of his work can be found at www.regressiveantidote.net.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I Couldn't Agree More
Posted by: NoPCZone on Feb 9, 2008 3:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Billary is the single most polarizing politician in this country, among Democrats- much less Republicans. If you want to see Crazy McCain tilt the Supreme Court to the hard NeoCon right for the rest of your life, vote to give Billary the nomination.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

7. Bypass killing the party.
Posted by: Longdream on Feb 9, 2008 6:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Spin out a little sarchasm, telling us what we already know.

Then come in for a big ending by encouraging non-thinking Clinton-haters not to vote if she's nominated (she won't win anyway, right?) and kill off the whole country.

Nice work, Hofstra, although I could have done nicely without it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I will vote for her,BUT
Posted by: Rod on Feb 9, 2008 6:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will be very unhappy about it and I expect her to loose. Edwards would have won. So would Obama. With Billary, the vote will be so close that once again the Dibold type tricks can deliver another one, for them.

If the democrats loose this one every single person in the DNC should resign. Even the receptionist. Well, maybe not the receptionist, maybe we should promote him/her, it has to be an improvement.

Rod

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can the Dems grow spines?
Posted by: chunksmediocrites on Feb 9, 2008 7:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Democratic party on the national level has shifted to the right as a result of former President Clinton's successful 'centrist' strategy. They have abandoned much of their base and offer 'peace candidates' as window dressing to avoid wholesale abandonment. They are happily helping push through neoliberal policies (more 'free trade', this time with Latin America) to show their allegiance to big business interests and campaign funding sources. The author of the op-ed is right as well in pointing out the continual inability of the Democrats and their national leadership to develop a strategy beyond, "Vote for us, because the other party is worse!"
Some have posited that the 'do-nothing and kow-tow to the Republicans' efforts that we have seen since the '06 election is simply a tactic to make sure that Republicans are still holding the Iraq bag for the 2008 election. Even if this was true, it would be ethically reprehensible and hardly representative of the campaign promises to, and sentiments of, the voting public that elected them.
Senator Clinton does represent centrist 'right-lite' political philosophy, and appears happy to court big business, HMOs and big pharma, had a fund-raiser hosted by Rupert Murdoch, and employs a union-buster in her campaign staff.
Senator Obama is ironically campaigning on former President Clinton's message of change and hope, and Obama's votes and positions are not far distant from Senator Clinton's.
Senator Reid and Speaker of the House Pelosi have caved on every promise and engineered capitulation at every turn.
The traditional base of the Democratic party, the working-class, union members, the poor, and minorities, have less and less to hold them to a party that has done little since the New Deal and Civil Rights legislation. There are two choices: retake the party or build a new party. There are already efforts to run candidates to the left of centrists in the upcoming congressional races. Some state Democratic parties have been reshaped by a new generation of progressives. If however on the national level the Democratic party continues to disgrace itself, there may not be much to save. Waiting for the Democratic party leadership to grow a spine may be an effort in futility. Time for a third (second) party coalition of labor, progressives, environmentalists, minorities, working class?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This story is a real disappointment.
Posted by: PerryBrass on Feb 11, 2008 7:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had wanted something with real substance in it; all I got was the usual cliches, queer baiting, inuendoes, and silliness. This writer has no idea how the country is now organized, working, and destroying itself. He wants a return to the Old Time religion of the Democratic party. It ain't going to happen. If you want to figure out what's going on, how the country is running and run, all you have to do is read the Business section of the NY Times every day. The last election was a referendum on Jesus: it was shameful. I just hope that this next election will not be as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good butt-kicking satire
Posted by: hagwind on Feb 11, 2008 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I chortled all the way through and now I'm back to work in a better mood, but if we're going to talk seriously, let's devote a little attention to another gloriously self-destructive entity, which is to say the U.S. left-of-center. What pulled the Republican Party rightward from the early 1970s on? What enabled a party that's essentially the preserve of the capital manipulators to win decades of support from the working people it's busy screwing? Grassroots organizing on the right, religious and otherwise. Why has the rightward slide of the Republican Party dragged the Democratic Party in the same direction? There are plenty of reasons, most of which are beyond our control, but one of them isn't: the widespread ineffectiveness and inability to get organized of the left-of-center. Not that there isn't some stellar and successful grassroots organizing going on, because there is. I'd love to see more nuts-and-bolts organizing stories on AlterNet, even if it means cutting back on some of the punditry. What I need here on the ground is reliable information about what the assholes are doing, the kind of theorizing that generates useful strategy, and reports of grassroots efforts that work. So what are we missing while everyone's obsessed with the presidential election?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]