Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Super Tuesday’s Voting Glitches

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted February 6, 2008.


Barriers to voting emerge in Georgia and Los Angeles. Other states experience electronic machine snafus, poll worker confusion.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Hard to Believe: 73 U.S. Kids Sentenced to Life Without Parole at 14 or Younger, and All Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by Steven Rosenfeld

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Super Tuesday was not just a referendum on presidential candidates. It was a test of the nation's ever-evolving voting systems and there were glitches reported coast-to-coast, with the most serious possibly being in Georgia, where a new voter ID requirement and electronic check-in process delayed voting in dozens of locations and prompted some people to leave.

"I think this is the most significant election administration story of the day," said David Becker, director of People for the American Way's Democracy campaign, which runs a nationwide voter hotline on election days. "We knew this would happen with voter ID. There were long lines, bottlenecks at the check-in table, voting machines not in use."

The Atlanta Journal Constitution's website recorded hundreds of voter experiences. While many said the state's new electronic poll books, which list voters' names, and its photo ID requirement was not a problem, dozens of people said otherwise.

One such comment said, "Long, long lines, with three women who did not appear to know how to work machines, working on the only three machines provided to the precinct, while hundreds of voters stood in line waiting to vote; waited for more than an hour to cast my vote, which took less than 30 seconds!"

Another said, "The dozen or so voting booths sat empty most of the time while a long line of people waited 45 minutes or more just to pass through "station 2." In the past, paper printouts were used to look up voter records, and this was much much faster. The precinct workers said they won't get any additional computers for November, so it's doubtful I'll wait through what will surely be an even longer line in the general election. What a shame."

Matt Corrothers, director of media relations for Georgia Secretary of State Karen Handel, said his state had a very positive experience voting on Super Tuesday, saying, "Waiting in line at a polling place is not indicative of a problem with the process."

County election officials, not the secretary of state, provide the check-in terminals used, he said. In the near-future, Carrothers said Handel would meet with county officials to encourage early and absentee voting, and to buy more "check-in terminals." He rejected any claim that the state's new voter ID law was to blame.

"Any lines that may have formed in a few precincts throughout Georgia was the function of excitement at a historic turnout," Carrothers said.

Another locale with serious election administration problems possibly affecting large numbers of voters was Los Angeles, where some poll workers were not aware that voters who declined to state their party on voter registration forms could ask for Democratic or American Independent Party ballots. At 4:30 p.m. on Tuesday, California Secretary of State Debra Bowen sent out a release asking the news media to remind these voters of their voter rights. "The secretary of state's voter hotline has received several dozen calls from DTS (decline to state party preference) voters around the state reporting some county poll workers have not been fully aware of DTS voter rights," the release said.

More worrisome to election integrity activists, however, was the ballot layout used in Los Angeles County. If independent voters cast a Democratic ballot, they had to fill in an additional circle on a paper ballot, above the presidential choice, for their vote to count. The Courage Campaign, a California-focused group that seeks to encourage progressive grass-roots leadership, has asked county election officials to count the Democratic primary ballots by precinct to ensure that all votes are counted.

"I can tell you we have about 800,000 DTS voters in Los Angeles County," said Rick Jacobs, Courage Campaign founder and chair. "So potentially hundreds of thousands of votes are at stake ... This is a voter rights issues. If people don't think their vote counts, they won't continue to vote."

Jacobs said it was possible that a careful count could shuffle a few of the Democratic delegates awarded based on results in congressional districts.

In New Mexico, a potential election challenge might be brewing. In that state, where Clinton won by 210-vote margin with 98 percent of precincts reporting, apparently four ballot boxes representing the remaining 2 percent of the vote were taken home by Democratic Party officials overnight, according to Heath Haussamen, an Albuquerque Tribune political columnist and blogger. Other party officials took possession of the ballots on Wednesday.

The open question is whether there was any vote count fraud. But because caucuses are private, party-regulated affairs -- as opposed to primaries which are run by states -- litigation prospects are limited. Still, the Obama campaign was reportedly sending lawyers to investigate.

In other states, the problems fell into two categories: electronic voting machine snafus and poll worker errors.

In Illinois, one of four states to hold a Green Party primary, at least a dozen precincts in the greater Chicago area did not know there was a Green Party primary, said Illinois party spokesman Patrick Kelly. "The ballots were there, sitting in the back, in boxes under the table, still in boxes," he said. "People couldn't get a ballot at their polling place."

In New York City, there were reports that registered voters names were not on voter rolls in a perhaps a dozen precincts. In Phoenix, Ariz., there were long lines when election officials did not anticipate as high a turnout, according to local media reports. Voters were given provisional ballots, which have to be verified before being added to totals.

Perhaps the nation's most high-profile electronic voting machine failure occurred in New Jersey, when Gov. John Corzine, a Democrat, was delayed from voting for 45 minutes when a touch-screen electronic machine would not work. In that state, there also were isolated reports of voters selecting one candidate while the computer screen highlighted another choice.

While no election is trouble-free, there were some success stories, most notably the transition in California -- with the exception of Los Angeles, which has its own voting system -- from paperless touch-screen systems to paper ballots that are scanned and counted by computers.

California Secretary of State Debra Bowen was criticized for instituting the change last year, but apart from counting delays, there appeared to be no major problems. Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner also has told election officials in her state to switch to paper ballots that are counted by scanners. The Ohio primary will be held March 4.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: election 2008, super tuesday, voting problems

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and co-author of What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election, with Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman (The New Press, 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
But...
Posted by: chomsky on Feb 7, 2008 12:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anybody who expects fair and honest elections is... naive!
If elections were fair and honest, they would have no chances to win.
As you say in the US: "Whatever it takes" and "The end justify the means"
Do you still believe in the Democracy fairy-tale...?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

California Problems
Posted by: EJ on Feb 7, 2008 5:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a resident of a small town in Southern California (not Los Angeles, obviously), but I and a number of others ran into trouble. First off, there were people who went to vote and whose names were not listed (yes, these were registered voters). Then, some moron(s) decided to change the voter registration of some people without their permission. I am a registered independent, and yet someone had changed my registration to Democrat (I'm just glad it wasn't Republican--that would really have pissed me off). The excuse for this given by the Registrar of Voters was that there was a press of new registrations as the election approached, thus causing some people to be registered in a way they hadn't intended, and that some people didn't check a box for party when they filled out a new voter registration form upon changing residences.

Here is what I have to say about their excuses: Bullshit!

I have been a registered independent (not American Independent, just independent) since 2005, and have been at the same residence since 1976.

Here is a link to an article about the problem from the Press-Enterprise, the regional newspaper for my area:

Voters claim party registrations wrongly switched

Oh, and please note that some Democrats were switched to being Republicans, but not, apparently, the other way around (and this paper would have been all over it if they had--the Press-Enterprise is very conservative).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Counties own US
Posted by: lc on Feb 7, 2008 7:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He who counts the votes owns US. The major population centers are in single counties that can be manipulated by corrupt,local boards and key people in choice positions that can manipulate and control everything. The county election boards and main people have been around for years. The key ones are bought and paid for. Only fear of getting caught limits them. Considering how few get caught and what little punishment is ever meted out, I am writing this election off to the pre-determined and selected President to be: John McCain.
IM
Belteshazzar

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe Zogby was right!
Posted by: nomomorons on Feb 7, 2008 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a radical thought, but......maybe the whole thing (or a sizeable part of it) was rigged. Maybe the pollsters got it right and the results were.....unh.......managed?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kvass
Posted by: kvass on Feb 7, 2008 9:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and still the USA has the audacity to go abroad and tell other countries how to run their elections.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cali-phun with machines and poll workers
Posted by: DaBear on Feb 7, 2008 9:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . .there were some success stories, most notably the transition in California. . .from paperless touch-screen systems to paper ballots that are scanned and counted by computers.

Ventura County went from punch card to Sequoia Systems' opti-scan machines... never had DRE's except for the disabled voter machine which is DRE for obvious reasons and has a paper receipt (duh,every DRE ought to have one but somehow only our county got them).

One thing I noticed was the vote count on the front of the scanning machine at the time I voted @noon was 126. Then I looked behind the machine (we insert our own ballots into the scanner slot. weee, great fun) the receipt spool had 111 tags that read "Over-voted ballot." The poll workers couldn't tell me what that meant but when one of the older women mentioned that it might mean people messed up their ballots and those aren't counted, the line of fifty people nearly went ballistic.

I called the county registrar and they didn't know what that ticket printout meant either. (NOT good!) They did say that the machine only prints a ticket if something went wrong. (SHITE!) When I scanned mine, nothing was printed but since we're not allowed to take the printouts all the evidence is now gone (I shoulda used my cellphone camera but the resolution sucks). But if it truly meant those votes weren't counted, our polling place--which has the highest number of DTS, Greens and Dems in the east county--then 88% of the vote as of noon in our precinct was disqualified. That doesn't sound very effective, just, democratic, or fair to me.

The funnier side, or not, was that the poll workers felt free to make commentary on each voter's ballot choices or party affiliation. When we showed up and they read Green next to our name, I was called a "trouble-maker" which I thought was funny because I am, but my wife was asked didn't she really want a Democrat ballot instead. My wife politely posited that such a question was probably improper, which made the nice old lady grumble a little. Someone used to bake buttloads of cookies and stuff, no goodies this time. I'd have done it had I known. Voting should have a festive element. Crazy Nick from under the overpass used to sing outside... a killer opera voice and memory. He wasn't there this time. There was massive street construction that the city chose to begin on Stupor Tuesday... wonder if that was a coinkydink, no place to park as a result.

We did notice with some interest that when Republikaaners were announced as such or had to say what ballot they wanted, they were always crotchety about it and there were lots of clucking and mutterings in the line directed towards them. The younger voters were equally vocal in their disgust for Republikaaner voters as Republikaaners were in demanding their ballots. The poll workers clearly set the vocal tone. While some of this was humorous, I think I really prefer the old school of polling place decorum, where no commentary was provided and people in line didn't snicker... even if the Repukes fully deserved it.

Of course I just couldn't help myself when I had to inquire about the over-voted ballot printouts on the machine. That kind of trouble-making still seems appropriate. Or not...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

maccatas
Posted by: JohnTas on Feb 7, 2008 9:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Several people have suggested that Australia does it better when it comes to valid elections. I suggest you go to the site of the Australian Electoral Commission at www.aec.gov.au
to see just how careful we are. Have a look at our Scrutineers handbook to see how scrupulous one should be. Our elections don't cost an arm and a leg - there are limits and transparency.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement