Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

John McCain, the GOP Nominee? Bring Him On!

By Joshua Holland, AlterNet. Posted February 4, 2008.


Once you crack the media myths surrounding him, it's unlikely voters are going to go for an angry, unstable, hypocritical warmonger.
Advertisement

According to the latest Washington Post poll, there's been a dramatic shift towards John McCain following his victory in the Florida GOP primary, and he now leads Mitt Romney by 24 points nationwide. With a number of winner-take all primaries on the Republican side, he has a very good shot at wrapping up the nomination on February 5. It looks like conservatives -- with a few raving-mad, mouth-breathing exceptions -- have gone through denial, anger, bargaining and depression and come finally to accept their insubordinate nominee. Modern conservatives are the philosophical heirs of the monarchists of a previous era; despite months of grumbling, most will, ultimately, rally around the king come November.

McCain is also the candidate most Democrats and progressives have feared facing in the general election. According to RealClearPolitics' rolling average of head-to-head polls, McCain would beat Clinton today by a slim margin of just under 2 percent and would edge out Obama by a razor-thin half-point. Eight months out -- and months before the first debate between the nominees -- these data mean little, but they are causing some concern on the left.

McCain is, however, an extremely weak candidate. The senator's been showing his age throughout the primaries, and there is still a long and exhausting slog ahead. His wooden delivery of stump speeches -- sometimes offered while staring at his notes -- and some incidents in which he's appeared "confused" -- he referred to Vladimir Putin as the president of Germany -- are vulnerabilities for a 71 year-old candidate. Most people still haven't had a chance to see and hear from these candidates at length this cycle, and while we all decry the fact that people often make political decisions based on the candidates' mannerisms or appearances rather than on the issues, in a race against a cranky, old-looking and somewhat out-of-it McCain, the War of Appearances is likely to be won handily by either of the potential Dem nominees.

The affable and avuncular image McCain's worked so hard to cultivate may also be difficult to maintain as voters focus more attention on the candidate. As Sidney Blumenthal wrote for Salon:

McCain's political colleagues … know another side of the action hero -- a volatile man with a hair-trigger temper, who shouted at Sen. Ted Kennedy on the Senate floor to "shut up," called his fellow Republican senators "shithead," "fucking jerk," "asshole," and joked in 1998 at a Republican fundraiser about the teenage daughter of President Clinton, "Do you know why Chelsea Clinton is so ugly? Because Janet Reno is her father." [In 2006], McCain suddenly rushed up to a friend of mine, a prominent Washington attorney, at a social event, and threatened to beat him up because he represented a client McCain happened to dislike, and then, just as suddenly, profusely and tearfully apologized.

And McCain's problems run far deeper than his irascibility and some gaffes on the stump. His real challenge is that his popularity -- his viability -- rests almost entirely on two narratives that have absolutely no connection with reality: his reputation as a straight-talking "maverick" and a moderate, and his "brave" support for Bush's troop escalation, a policy that's led to the widely-embraced but wholly false idea that "the surge is working."

These narratives have only gone unchallenged thanks to a compliant press; the commercial media are McCain's most dedicated constituents, and he's spent a career fostering that country-before-party image, even while walking in lock-step with Republicans on all but a few over-reported issues.

This means that Democrats are not so much running against McCain, the candidate, as McCain, the myth. The Republican Party will be a serious obstacle for the Democratic nominee, but ultimately election 2008 will be as much a battle to overturn the conventional wisdom as it will be a fight with the senator from Arizona. It should be a source of some encouragement then that the progressive movement, with its blogs, social-networking space and alternative media outlets, is far better prepared to fight and win that kind of battle than it has been at any other time in recent memory.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: election08, iraq, mccain, clinton, obama, media

Joshua Holland is an AlterNet staff writer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
One Could Say the Same of Hillary, etc...
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Feb 4, 2008 1:37 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"angry, unstable, hypocritical warmonger"

Hmm. I’m certainly no fan of bonkers McCaine but…

Now that Kucinich has withdrawn, that phrase just about describes every candidate for the oval office but for eccentric Ron Paul on the bizarre right and Mike Gravel on the odd left all but forgotten at the MSM carny show.

What Gravel says about Wall Street hatched Dem candidates is not forgotten, however:

http://therealnews.com/web/index.php?thisdataswitch
=0&thisid=777&thisview=item

Before I get peppered sprayed by comments suggesting a Dem could never be "angry, unstable, hypocritical warmonger", please be mindful that Hillary and Obama support endless faux “war on terror” for “peace” that has already cost up to a million lives.

If that kind of stand isn’t a neon sign of instability and hypocritical warmongering, then the words are meaningless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Gravel? Gravel?!? Posted by: dustinblythe
» RE: Gravel? Gravel?!? Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» RE: Gravel? Gravel?!? Posted by: Joshua Holland
We will not vote for McCain
Posted by: Blink on Feb 4, 2008 3:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It looks like conservatives -- with a few raving-mad, mouth-breathing exceptions -- have gone through denial, anger, bargaining and depression and come finally to accept their insubordinate nominee. Modern conservatives are the philosophical heirs of the monarchists of a previous era; despite months of grumbling, most will, ultimately, rally around the king come November.

Not true. A lot of us "raving-mad, mouth-breathing exceptions" will not rally around McCain. We will never vote for him. We will withhold our vote, caste a protest third-party vote, or will, in a few cases (including my own), vote for Hillary. These are powerful weapons as our vote could otherwise be solidly counted on. We are more than a few, and I assure you, we have well thought-out positions despite your characterization of our being "raving-mad mouth-breathers." One of those well thought-out positions is our opposition to foreigh interventionism, except in cases where national interest is directly affected.

McCain will just bring on more neoCon foreign interventionism, if not outright war. He'll make Bush look like a piker. Funny that you would suggest that it is the reasonable conservatives who will grumble but nevertheless rally around a likely war-monger such as McCain (as though that's the reasonable and admirable thing to do) but disparage as "raving mad mouth-breathers" those conservatives who oppose him. It shows how little the average Leftist really knows or understands conservatives, or really cares to know or understand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: reasonable conservatives Posted by: bitsfick
» Where are you getting that? Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: So let me get this straight... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: So let me get this straight... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: So let me get this straight... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: So let me get this straight... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» Out of curiosity... Posted by: Blink
» RE: Out of curiosity... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: We will not vote for McCain Posted by: Joshua Holland
» McCain has NOT BETRAYED POWs Posted by: Ripcord
» RE: McCain has NOT BETRAYED POWs Posted by: poppop_schell
» No Posted by: Ripcord
» RE: No Posted by: poppop_schell
» Simple question LtCol: Posted by: Dboy
» speak for yourself Dboy Posted by: Ripcord
» RE: We will not vote for McCain Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
» Correct. Ron Paul believes in myths. Posted by: ReallyBearish
» you need to remove your blinkers Posted by: rancespergl
» RE: you need to remove your blinkers Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: what garbage Posted by: davidg
Bring Him On? Josh, You've Got To Be Kidding Me!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Feb 4, 2008 3:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would seem to me that Joshua Holland (great writer though he undoubtedly is) is making the mistake of overestimating the intellegence of the American people. Seven years ago, during the 2000 primary season, the Republican voters had the opportunity to send John McCain to the White House and rejected him for a corrupt, hideous, incompetant, half-witted piece of shit named George W. Bush.

Believe me, the prospect of a McCain administration does not - in any way, shape or form - fill me with hope. But I think we can all agree that this country would be in a lot better shape today had a President McCain taken the oath of office on January 20, 2001. instead, we got stuck woth the oaf of office (Clever, huh?)

Do you think for one minute that "middle America" will choose Hillary Clinton over John McCain? Think again, campers. The part of FDR seems to have forgotten this teeny weeny, inconveniant truth: The American people can't stand her! The are almost as sick to death of the Clintons as they are of the Bushes. For the who-knows-how-manyth time, the Democrats are about to display their positive genius for taking a bottle of fine, twelve-year-old scotch and turning it into donkey piss.

Memo to the Dems:
Do you want to know why I left your joke of a party almost a decade ago? You people are just dumb enough to give the nomination to Hillary Clinton!

Prove me wrong, Democrats! I'm beggin' ya, prove me wrong!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
BARACK OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hillary Posted by: bitsfick
» RE: John McCain wears Posted by: surfreality
» For foreverhope Posted by: Tom Degan
» TAKE Him On? YES WE CAN! Posted by: foreverhope
Two words, Keating Five
Posted by: Sushi on Feb 4, 2008 4:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone notice in Wikipedia that John McCain's photo went missing for weeks in the Keating Five article? Someone keeps pulling it down.

Anyone notice how the mainstream media will dwell for years on Clinton's Whitewater controversy, but the collapse of the Savings and Loans collapse gets swept under the rug? Nothing to see here, folks... move along and cast your vote on our new, improved images. You are getting sleeeeepy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Two words, Keating Five Posted by: desidid
Americans...use the photo!
Posted by: Knowmad on Feb 4, 2008 4:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One possible, and fun, way to sway voters from supporting this sad little man - both Dems AND Gopers - is to take EVERY opportunity to show the photo of him with bush. You know, the one where he's bear-hugging, maybe even humping, the stupid chimp, while bush looks off in the distance as if mccain's totally irrelevant, waving superciliously to the crowd like some demented Napoleon wannabe.

It's a perfect way to use the power of a visual to demonstrate mccain's blatant hypocrisy and obvious lack of character and judgement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Edwards supporters seem to be moving to Obama
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Feb 4, 2008 5:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After watching Michelle Obama at a rally, I will be supporting Obama. To know that this fine strong and articulate woman will be standing beside Obama really gives me hope. Through her eyes I saw another side of Obama and liked what I saw. I think John Edwards would be perfect for Vice President, but Attorney General would give him a more powerful position. They say Obama does not have the experiece so give him a really experienced running mate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Council on Foreign Relations Posted by: poppop_schell
Thank you for speaking truth to power
Posted by: halweiner on Feb 4, 2008 5:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really love the McCainMyth that being a prisoner of war makes you a military expert. In the old days it just made you a loser who was captured. By the way, did you see the obit of the Brit who died at age 92 last week who escaped time and time again from a prison camp, only to be recaptured? Let's hear it from Sen. McCain about his efforts to do so, which efforts, by the way are REQUIRED by the military.

Meanwhile, Hillary sits on the Senate Armed Services Committee, is privy to all of the real info on Iraq/Afghanistan/Pakistan/Texas axes of evil, and gets no credit because she wears a skirt. Maybe she should trade it for a kilt and a dirk. Braveheart lives!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» CFR? Posted by: Sparks56
» RE: CFR? Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: CFR? Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» RE: CFR? Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: CFR? Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: CFR? Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: CFR? Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: CFR? Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: CFR? Posted by: Joshua Holland
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
» You naughty freekin boy! Posted by: yale
» RE: CFR? Posted by: happyhermit
» Thanks for your sacrifice Posted by: Ripcord
» I agree Posted by: Ripcord
» common accusations Posted by: Ripcord
» RE: common accusations Posted by: poppop_schell
» fight with compassion Posted by: Ripcord
Laches
Posted by: Laches on Feb 4, 2008 5:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't be too sure about Ronnie McCain, our next warrior, being defeated by the voters. The vacuous crowd across the Country that is mesmerized by the mendaciousness and deceit of right wing squawk radio and especially by Fox News, the boombox for the White House Gang, will likely run off to the polls, waving their flags, and send off to Congress more of their lunatic right winger stooges to represent them and send to the White House still another puppet to do the bidding of the neocon plutocrats controlling the munitions, oil and drug industries. After all, it was this crowd that burdened us with Bush II, proving that the Southern Strategy is alive and well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Laches Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: taking back the country Posted by: EdinIowa
The Surrender is Working
Posted by: Joshua Holland on Feb 4, 2008 6:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CS Monitor:

"We are an independent state; no police or army is allowed to come in," proclaims Khalid Jamal al-Qaisi, deputy leader of the US military-backed and predominantly Sunni Arab militia in charge of security in the old Baghdad neighborhood of Al-Fadhil.

"Qaisi says his men could have prevented Friday's bombings. He says the attacks only bolster his conviction that Iraq's security forces, both Army and police, are infiltrated by militias and insurgents and riddled with sectarian biases. He says his men do not recognize the authority of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and won't join the security forces under such conditions. Some neighborhood guards, called Concerned Local Citizens are slated to join the Army and police.

"The bird bazaar in Baghdad Jadida is across the highway from the main market, which is ringed with large blast walls separated by openings where members of the Mahdi Army, the militia of Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, search all entrants. The militia has emerged as the dominant force in the now mainly Shiite neighborhood.

"The national police, assailed in the past for being infiltrated by Shiite militias, mans an observation tower and a checkpoint nearby.

"Back at Al-Fadhil, Qaisi is saluted with great deference by residents and shopkeepers. Graffiti praises Saddam Hussein and calls the guards "heroes and lions."

"Qaisi proudly recounts how his men repelled government and US forces over the years. He blames the brutality toward Shiites in Al-Fadhil as well as their forced displacement on three Al Qaeda linked militants who, he said, have since been killed or arrested.

"The Americans asked to be our friends because we were the winners," he says, adding that the agreement he has with US forces precludes Iraqi forces from entering. No government forces can be seen. Qaisi's guards check every vehicle and person entering Kifah Street."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tie McCain to the war
Posted by: surfreality on Feb 4, 2008 6:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even though there is a perception that the surge is an American success, the war in Iraq is massively unpopular. Folks are fed up.
Even if you cede the idea that the surge is "working" in Iraq it is still a strategic blunder in terms of the over all war on terror; Afghanistan and Pakistan are disintegrating. The Taliban and Al Qaeda control more real estate now than they did in 2002. We took our eyes off the ball in Afghanistan to build a gas station in Iraq. The surge is but another piece of that failed strategy. Bush and the republican congress have snatched an Afghan victory out of the jaws of defeat and McCain is an avid supporter of that failed process. Result? Civil wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and an imploding Pakistan.
Had we secured Afghanistan and invested in it's infrastructure and economy, Bhutto may very well still be alive and Osama dead. Unfortunately, Bush and Cheney felt that a gas station was way more important. Evidently, so McCain feels the same way. Tie him to this failed strategy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tie McCain to the war Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Tie McCain to the war Posted by: surfreality
» RE: Tie McCain to the war Posted by: foreverhope
A Pathetic Man
Posted by: ronheri on Feb 4, 2008 6:16 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. McCain, despite his war record in the debacle of Vietnam would be a disaster. Constant wars? Sponsered the amnesty bill for illegal immagrints. Admits he's not up on Economics. You've got to be kidding me. Of all these Council on Foreign Relations darlings (all of them that are left on both sides); he and Hillary would be my last picks. If Ron Paul is not available, I will not vote.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» HAHAHA!!!! Posted by: Moira61
» Who's laughing now? Posted by: data23
» RE: A Pathetic Man Posted by: Bibsi
time for some message discipline - right on!
Posted by: counterpoint on Feb 4, 2008 6:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Christopher Lydon, an intelligent radio host on Boston's NPR station WBUR, used to prompt his overly eloquent guests:
"Give me the bumper sticker!"
I'm grateful that the tactic of creating memorable tags that bring some nasty reality into focus is actively pursued. The Rockridge Institute can have a major impact here. But it really does require message discipline as only the constant repetition of a few key points (let's call them 'truthful defamations') will have a chance to stick.
Let's have a focus group tested, prioritized list and make sure that those tags are included in every single letter to the editor, interview, talk show segment, op-ed, and commercial. If The Big Lie can work through endless repetition, so can the plain truth on McCain, the man.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

time for some message discipline - right on!
Posted by: counterpoint on Feb 4, 2008 6:32 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Christopher Lydon, an intelligent radio host on Boston's NPR station WBUR, used to prompt his overly eloquent guests:
"Give me the bumper sticker!"
I'm grateful that the tactic of creating memorable tags that bring some nasty reality into focus is actively pursued. The Rockridge Institute can have a major impact here. But it really does require message discipline as only the constant repetition of a few key points (let's call them 'truthful defamations') will have a chance to stick.
Let's have a focus group tested, prioritized list and make sure that those tags are included in every single letter to the editor, interview, talk show segment, op-ed, and commercial. If The Big Lie can work through endless repetition, so can the plain truth on McCain, the man.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Publicly separating themselves
Posted by: lamar on Feb 4, 2008 6:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The country emphatically rejected the neocon politics of god+war (Coulter, Savage, Hannity, et al). John McCain is more moderate in some areas, but he is still a true GOPer. If he is going to have any chance, he can't smell like Coulter and Savage because America has resoundingly rejected their brand of conservatism. The neocons have to publicly reject McCain before middle America can accept him. It's a dog and pony show.

Nobody on the neocon right will ever vote for Hillary for any reason ever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You're kidding, right? Posted by: Cooltruth
This is assuming the election isn't simply fixed by Diebold
Posted by: Jasonix on Feb 4, 2008 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's unlikely that either Romney or McCain could pull off a victory, since both are hated by the Religious Right. Romney's a Moron, and McCain is a liberal Protestant (Episcopalian) who characterized the Religious Right as "agents of intolerance" and passed a campaign finance reform law that the anti-abortion movement considers to be a handicap to its cause. In truth, I think McCain is just an opportunist who thought that being less-conservative was the way to go in 2000, but who now will gladly toe the Repug party line to get the support of the money men. But the Repugs have painted themselves into a corner; they've tarred McCain as a traitor, so if they back him, they'll lose credibility. It's unlikely that McCain will bring out the hordes of evangelical Christians that the Repugs rely upon.

The most important thing is making sure that the election isn't rigged.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ALL DEMOCRATS SHOULD PRAY THAT MCCAIN IS THE....
Posted by: poppop_schell on Feb 4, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GOP nominee. With him at th head of the GOP ticket, not only will the Democrats have the Presidency but will have make pickups in the House and Senate. IMO, Mc Cain will dstroy the GOP in 2008.

Now that said, there may be a bokered convention. IF Ron Paul gets the nomination, the Democrats will lose the Whitehouse and in 2010, the Senate and House will return to power but with strict Constitutionalists in control.

ronpaul2008.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fantasy Island Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Fantasy Island Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Ron Paul Posted by: Dboy
» Not more of this crap. Posted by: yellow
» RE: Not more of this crap. Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: Not more of this crap. Posted by: yellow
» RE: support only qualified candidates Posted by: poppop_schell
» RE: on Paul Posted by: Bibsi
Nonney
Posted by: nonney on Feb 4, 2008 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Mccain wins the domination, he will win the presidency, for obviously we are not picking our presidents. Again, it is florida that was the deciding ground; gee, go figure. The powers that be are picking this man as he wants the war, the draft,and the policies of the present administration, and so he will be the next president, unless America wakes up to how we are being given the biggest 'blow job' ever. Nato just approved that nuclear strikes may be initiated against any countries that 'pose a nuclear threat'.......so, welcome a war against Iran, the use of nukes, and the draft of our kids, which is one of John Mccains biggest desires. He has said so many times. War profiteering is the major reason we are in this mess, and watch who is picked for vice-president, for they will be taking over Mccains role rather quickly. I do not think the ruling class, the 'have and have mores' as Bush put it, will allow Mccain to remain president for long......they are merely using him as a doorway. He is not a bad man, but is a tool for the ones who are governing , and not just in America. Prepare, for the draft, nuclear war, economic crash, and wow, who needs more negatives than that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Feb 4, 2008 7:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The GOP controls about 90% of everything that's important in Washington DC right now and you think they're going to let a little thing like democracy trip them up?

Be expecting an October Surprise of biblical dimensions.

Government of the people, by the people and for the people.

Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain will not win, even against Hillary
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Feb 4, 2008 7:47 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been predicting Hillary vs McCain for almost 2 years now. Just google Hillarain vs McCainary. I can tell you that McCain has dug himself a hole too deep, even for the pliant over-entertained masses. Between his rants against nation building, and the "bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran" song, its just too much to overcome. Not to mention he admits he doesnt know anything about the economy. The economy has only just begun to become the big factor of '08, and by the end of '08 you can be assured that it will be and even larger factor. Too bad people are still not realizing that Hillary dont know anything about the economy either! "Hillary and Bill will turn the economy around like they did last time!"

Also, enough people are dumb enough to think that Hillary is going to end the war and give them healthcare. HA! Good luck with that too!

McCain makes a total flip-flopping mockery of himself. And its all on youtube! Ironically, thanks to ron paul supporters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "Flip-Flop" way over-used Posted by: Ripcord
» RE: "Flip-Flop" way over-used Posted by: poppop_schell