Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Candidates Plunder the Pews in Their Altar Call for Votes

By Rob Boston, Church & State Magazine. Posted February 18, 2008.


Presidential candidates are professing their faith as the "Jesus Factor" continues to reverberate in politics.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Rob Boston

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

    Although no one realized it at the time, a defining moment of modern American politics occurred on Dec. 13, 1999.

    Six Republican hopefuls met for a debate that evening at the Des Moines Civic Center. During the event, moderator John Bachman of WHO-TV asked each candidate to name his favorite political philosopher.

    George W. Bush, then governor of Texas, took some observers aback when he replied, "Christ, because he changed my heart." Asked to say more, Bush responded, "When you turn your heart and your life over to Christ, when you accept Christ as the savior, it changes your heart. It changes your life. And that's what happened to me."

    Several of Bush's GOP opponents were quick to add that they, too, respect and revere Jesus.

    At the time, Bush's answer raised a few eyebrows and was discussed in the media for a few days. More than one commentator thought his identification of Jesus as a political philosopher was odd, but soon the media moved on.

    The answer, however, turned out to have legs. It came to be viewed as a signal by Bush to many evangelical Christian voters, a way of saying "I'm one of you." They went on to back Bush heavily and stuck by him during the disputed election of 2000. Some analysts say evangelicals were pivotal to his reelection in 2004.

    Since then, the "Jesus Factor" has continued to reverberate in politics. Republican presidential aspirants have been eager to tap into what is perceived to be a rich vein of votes.

    At the same time, some advisers began telling Democratic candidates to be more open in discussing their faith, in the hope that they might sway some of these voters. Although Democratic hopeful John F. Kerry never seemed to warm to this advice in 2004, this year candidates such as Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama are taking it to heart. The result is even more religious talk on the stump.

    Consider these recent developments:

  • Obama, addressing a huge rally in Columbia, S.C., Dec. 9, opened by saying, "Giving all praise and honor to God" then quoted Psalm 118: "Look at the day the Lord has made!"
  • Addressing voters in Iowa shortly before Christmas, former president Bill Clinton cited the Book of Romans, saying the Bible instructs people to "be good citizens as well as good followers of the Lord." Hillary Clinton took to the podium and quoted the same biblical passage as Obama: "This is the day the Lord has made."
  • U.S. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) stated his belief that America is a Christian nation, telling Beliefnet.com last year, "I just have to say in all candor that since this nation was founded primarily on Christian principles, personally, I prefer someone [as president] who has a grounding in my faith."
  • Some candidates are even parsing doctrines related to Jesus. In one highly publicized flap, former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee questioned Mormon doctrine, asking, "Don't Mormons believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers?" (Huckabee, a Southern Baptist preacher, later apologized to Romney.)

    American campaigns, which have always had more religion in them than electoral contests in other Western democracies, now frequently sound like Bible-quoting contests.

    When the media gets involved, it becomes an inquisition. During this primary season, candidates have been quizzed on how often they attend religious services, whether they believe the Bible is literally true, what sins they've committed and other faith-centric questions. They've been asked if they believe in evolution and prodded to name a favorite Bible verse.

    At times, the emphasis on religion has pushed other issues into the background -- issues that many Americans tell pollsters are their top concerns, such as the state of the economy, the sub-prime loan crisis, health care and the war in Iraq.

    The rhetoric, although probably stirring to some believers, may mask more than it reveals. It runs the risk of becoming simply a rhetorical flourish. Obama and Huckabee quote the same Bible, after all, yet their stands on issues -- especially contentious social issues -- are poles apart.

    Obama quotes scripture, but it took the Huckabee upsurge to really boost the profile of Jesus on the campaign trail. Relegated to second-tier status just a few months ago, Huckabee's startling rise has been attributed to voters in the Religious Right, a movement many media pundits had consigned to the political graveyard.

    It appears the Religious Right isn't dead yet. The day after the Iowa caucuses, James C. Dobson, chairman of Focus on the Family, jubilantly cited Huckabee's victory as a clear sign that the evangelical movement remains vital.


    Digg!

    See more stories tagged with: election 2008, church and state

    Rob Boston is associate editor for Church and State magazine.

    Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


    Advertisement

     

    Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
    Comments closed.
    The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
    View:
    And while you at it. . .
    Posted by: Prairie Waif on Feb 18, 2008 3:35 AM   
    Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    I honestly believe that any candidate that gives a speech in a house of worship/attached building/religious school should cause that entity to lose it's tax exempt status.

    The idea of campaigning through "delivering the sermon" as a guest speaker, is extremely transparent and an obvious violation of the tax exempt status that these institutions have been granted.

    This should hold throughout the duration of the campaign season, however long that is, as it changes each year.

    Also, could you PLEASE REFRAIN from asking God Bless America?

    God blesses his people, not land masses.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    » RE: And while you at it. . . Posted by: aislinnluv
    » RE: And while you at it. . . Posted by: aislinnluv
    In case you are wondering
    Posted by: walldodger1969 on Feb 18, 2008 4:30 AM   
    Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    politicians aren't dumb,..really...One survey said folks would rather vote for a "GAY" ,a "woman", or a "black" before they would vote for an " atheist".

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    sad, isn't it?
    Posted by: aislinnluv on Feb 18, 2008 4:43 AM   
    Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    to believe that anyone who doesn't fall for the Big Fairytale ("my invisible friend is better than your invisible friend") has no values or evil values is the acme of absurdity. besides, just because someone does not espouse a belief in "god", it does not automatically follow that he has no spiritual beliefs at all - only that he doesn't subscribe to your particular interpretation of things. the legacy of the puritans in this country is religious intolerance, which does not apply only to the tolerance of other religious beliefs, but the tolerance of and acceptance of no religious beliefs at all. open your minds, people.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Jesus called Politicians FOXES
    Posted by: wawa on Feb 18, 2008 5:00 AM   
    Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    Meaning they only care about themselves.

    2,000 years ago The Cross had NO symbolic religious meaning. When Jesus said: "Pick up your cross and follow me,"

    He was issuing a POLITICAL statement, for the main roads in Jerusalem were lined with crucified agitators, rebels, dissidents and any others who disturbed the status quo of the Roman Occupying Forces.


    The term 'Christian' was not even coined until the days of Paul, about 3 decades after Jesus walked the earth a man.


    Jesus was NEVER a Christian, but he was a social justice, radical revolutionary Palestinian devout Jewish road warrior who rose up and challenged the job security of the Temple authorities by teaching the people they did NOT need to pay the priests for ritual baths or sacrificing livestock to be OK with God; for God already LOVED them just as they were:

    Sinners, poor, diseased, outcasts, widows, orphans, refugees and prisoners all living under Roman Military Occupation.



    What got Jesus crucified was disturbing the status quo of the Roman Occupying Forces of his time, by teaching the subversive concept that Caesar only had power because God allowed it and that God preferred the humble sinner, the poor, diseased, outcasts, widows, orphans, refugees and prisoners all living under Roman Occupation above the elite and arrogant.



    The early followers and lovers of Jesus were called members of THE WAY-being THE WAY he taught one should be; Nonviolent, a Peacemaker and one who did the will of the Father and the Hebrew prophets before him all reminded the stiff necked people:


    "What does God require? He has told you o'man! Be just, be merciful, and walk humbly with your Lord." -Micah 6:8




    Jesus remained NONVIOLENT and forgiving even while being mocked, whipped and nailed to a cross and he promised that it is the Peacemakers who are the children of God, not the peace-talkers.

    e
    http://www.wearewideawake.org/

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    » Hello E! Posted by: garry minor
    » Hello again...! Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal
    Politics gives you religion
    Posted by: carbon-based on Feb 18, 2008 5:24 AM   
    Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    This was an excellent article -Regardless of what many think, McCain saw it correctly, this is a Christian nation.. That said, I believe that many do not want religion to enter into politics. I for one!

    As for the increased focus on religion, one thing not mentioned is that we are in what amounts to a religious war with Islam. Obama had to be more concerned with religion than anyone else.. after all , so much has circulated about his Muslim father and his upbringing. No way a person even smelling of Muslim would make it near a Presidential nomination.

    Another is that increased backlash in recent years against Christians and visible signs of holidays etc. All this together increases fears of a slow dismantling of the Christian faith to many.

    On the other side is Bush's pronouncement of his faith and perceived influence of his faith on his policies.

    Religion is as hot a topic in this year than in any other. I can only hope that Obama, McCain or Clinton are just talking to get the votes and will revert to their normal perception after one of them are elected.

    I pray we will never see a religious symbol on top of the whitehouse

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Honesty the Best Policy?
    Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Feb 18, 2008 5:26 AM   
    Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    It seems to me that many, if not most, voters will see through a phony claim by a politician to great piety. Some will find the piety itself offensive and others will be offended by the falseness of it. Offending voters is not a good tactic for a politician, so if I were a political adviser, my advice would be to keep claims honest.

    However, this does not mean that an appeal to devoted Christians is impossible, just that it needs to be framed differently. A fundamentally secular politician can still have Christian values, and in fact progressive politicians generally do. The fact is that progressive values are much the same as Christian values and progressive politicians would do well to point this out.

    In his book, Conservatives Without Conscience, John Dean pointed out that the phrase conservative Christian has an oxymoronic quality to it. This too would be worth pointing out.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Matthew 6: Politicians' exemption
    Posted by: kepstein7777 on Feb 18, 2008 5:39 AM   
    Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    "Thou mayeth pray loudly in public, trumpet thy good deeds, babble confusing words like pagans, etc., so long as ye be running for public office. Amen."

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    » Hello...Christianity was founded... Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal
    seperation of church and state...
    Posted by: ellie on Feb 18, 2008 5:47 AM   
    Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    should STILL be the requirement in this country... never have read the bible, don't belong to any denomination, no church going here, and run fast away from people who quote or allude to a book of many re-writes over the years based in folklore, yes do mean the bible... and non profits begging money, yes, so called churches, for 'religious gains'... no, we are not atheists either but closer to agnostics... yes we have raised our kids along these lines and all feel the same now that the youngest is old enough to vote...

    now that every potential presidential candidate can't tell the difference between the separation of church and state, we in our house are so disgusted with all the available candidates, none of us have plans for supporting, much less voting for any of the above...

    let's get back to the constitution and bill of rights people, not a book of fairy tales...

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    » I completely agree Posted by: LeeAnnG
    Religion and taxes
    Posted by: freshlemon on Feb 18, 2008 7:31 AM   
    Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    It is time to strip tax exemption from religious groups that actively participate as a political organization.

    If churches want to continue to be tax exempt, they should be able to prove that they are actively involved in humanitarian activities such as: feeding and housing the poor, caring for the sick, protecting the elderly and disabled,and helping members resolve personal issues that interfere with their peace and happiness.

    I have attended many Christian churches in my 65 years, and have found none that I would consider to be doing the work of Christ. They manage to talk the talk, but have a hard time doing the walk. Building funds, investments, employees and social events get most of the attention. Many churches split into other churches because their members get into spats with each other and can't get along to worship under one roof.

    Do we really want religious groups running our government? Organized religion has been one of the most destructive and divisive forces in history. The self-righteous zealots who claim to know the "real" truth are intent on forcing their views on others or on condemning anyone who disagrees with their interpretation of the "real" truth.

    Churches need to be doing some soul-searching, some history studies and paying taxes.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    » RE: eligion and taxes Posted by: fork
    I will NEVER vote for a person of faith.
    Posted by: mbruton on Feb 18, 2008 7:56 AM   
    Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    In 14 states you CANNOT hold public office unless you are a "person of faith". Saying you are an atheist is an automatic disqualifier.

    People who want to honor god by erecting ten commandments monuments (graven images) on public land are obviously insane.

    Forcing god (yeah, that's right - little g) down the throats of children is child abuse.

    Not all Christians are bad people but why would I vote for somebody who's brain is paralyzed by faith when reason is what's called for.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    The only disciple interested in politics was Judas
    Posted by: jgdewey on Feb 18, 2008 8:35 AM   
    Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    As Al Gore said, politicians masquarading as ministers, being more judas than Christ was. and when and if a candidate starts behaving like a Christian instead of mouthing off that they are one (think Jimmy carter) I'll have some respect for them.
    Jesus was very very clear. MY KINGDOM IS NOT OF THIS WORLD... He lives inside us,when each of us awakens the Chirst within us we won't need politicians as savoirs, the world will be harmomious. It doesn't start outside it starts inside. That is what christianity is really about and the born agains are really missing the boat on this one. I think like John Denver in the movie OH GOD, George Burns as God would simply tell them to all shut up.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Bush said Jesus, becouse he couldn't name a single philosopher!
    Posted by: exhibit on Feb 18, 2008 9:45 AM   
    Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    While we can not exclude possibility that the question was a set-up, I bet you that unprepared Bush could not name a single philosopher, leave alone say anything about their ideas. This is clearly above intellectual capacity (if this expression is even applicable here) of this moron.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    The power of bad ideas
    Posted by: willymack on Feb 18, 2008 9:49 AM   
    Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    When I was attending jr. high school, I became friends with Kenny, who was considered to be the smartest kid in the school. I learned early on that it's a damn sight more interesting and educational to associate with people smarter than me. Kenny thought I was cool because I could easily climb a rope and do a lot of chinups. I also kept the bullies away from him. I asked him one day what it was like to be so smart. He told me that was a stupid question because I already knew the answer to it. Of course,this caused me to THINK, and in the process discovered that he didn't consider himself smart as much as he considered the bulk of humanity as STUPID, or unwilling to think for themselves. Just think of the persistence of religious twaddle in the light of scientific discoveries effectively negating it, or the poisonous aftermath of the Civil War, and our irrational prejudices against people of another color or ethenicity as well as gender. Until we put these encumberences aside those with evil intent will strive to bend us to their will.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    "God" is in the White House
    Posted by: QQOblivion on Feb 18, 2008 10:27 AM   
    Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    Right after the 2004 election "victory" for President Bush, I heard on the TV a devout Christian, probably a leader of some religious/political organization, say that "God is in the White House".
    Well, if so, did GOD start wars based on lies? Did God torture innocent people? Did God lift habeas corpus? Does God spy on his own people? (Well, yes to that last one...)
    Maybe so. And if so, then GOD is not worth worshipping EVEN IF God is real. Pledging allegiance to God IS like pledging allegiance to George Bush in some ways. Both God and President Bush demand human sacrifices. Both demand that we "have no Gods but" They. Both demand utter and blind surrender to their ideals. Both have a pretty high opinion of themselves. And both will never let us all forget just how pitifully puny we, Their subjects, are in Their eyes.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    » RE: "God" is in the White House Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal
    I would still vote for Pat Paulsen
    Posted by: popsicle67 on Feb 18, 2008 7:51 PM   
    Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    Even though I was barely cognizant of the people yacking away on TV at the time, I though he made more sense than all of the boring people who were
    taking up my cartoon time simply because he said what he wanted (and no, I didn't get the joke) then I didn't see him again all week. The perfect politician.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Beatitudes
    Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Feb 18, 2008 10:55 PM   
    Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    The feckless Democrats have allowed Bushshit, et al to play the Jesus card while they stand mute. Once, just once, I would like to see one of them get in his face and kick his ass with Jesus' Sermon on the Mount. Weigh those inspiring words against "compassionate conservatism" or anything uttered by the evangelical nitwits and the jig is up. But, I suppose that is "off the table" as well.

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Not all who cry out "Lord, Lord" will enter the Kingdom of Heaven-or the Oval Office!
    Posted by: Woodpecker on Feb 19, 2008 2:45 AM   
    Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    Speaking as a practising Roman Catholic, this tendency to turn Our Lord into what former Governor Mario Cuomo termed "a celestial party chairman" gives me what our continental cousins call "the willies"!
    When we absolutize the relative( the things of secular party politics), we risk relativizing the absolute( the things of God) as then_Cardinal Cathal Daly pithily put it during the Troubles in NI!
    Fortunately thinking evangelical leaders are waking up to the risks of becoming a paid subsidiary of the GOP (God's Own Party)!

    Terry

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Ron Paul didn't use religion.
    Posted by: Livemike on Feb 19, 2008 5:03 PM   
    Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    And he's at least as religious as any candidate. In fact he was disturbed by another candidate using a cross-like image in his ads. So what does it say about the other candidates that they are prepared to pander to religion and the most religious candidate isn't?

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

    Sad thing is...
    Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Feb 20, 2008 1:15 PM   
    Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
    ...there is not ONE speck of evidence for a god of any kind.

    There is not one speck of evidence for the miracle producing Jesus. Yes, there were hundreds of people named Jesus during the "miraculous" ones existence, but the stories in the Bible are just that...stories...like the stories about Zeus.

    So I guess the main point here is this country is doomed because of its seemingly insatiable thirst for Invisible friends that have NO basis in fact.

    "History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes." ~Thomas Jefferson to Alexander von Humboldt

    "Of all the systems of religion that ever were invented, there is none more derogatory to the Almighty, more unedifying to man, more repugnant to reason, and more contradictory to itself than this thing called Christianity."
    ~Thomas Paine

    [« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]