Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

America Betrayed: Will Progressives Take the Fall?

By Joe Brewer and Scott Parkinson, AlterNet. Posted February 1, 2008.


We cannot allow the right to shift blame for disasters they created.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Joe Brewer Scott Parkinson

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The story of Iraq will be told as a story of betrayal. But which version of that story prevails -- who is cast as the betrayer -- will have profound and lasting consequences for the future of our country.

As we enter this crucial election year, progressives need to be wary that our greatest strength, our longstanding opposition to the debacle in Iraq, could become our greatest weakness. A trap has been set to clamp down on progressives when the apparent progress from the "surge" inevitably unravels into a new round of intense violence.

Are we going to sit idly by while right-wing millionaires and billionaires fund campaigns like Freedom's Watch, with its plans to spend $250 million this year to smear progressive leaders as betrayers? We need to set the terms of the debate before the barrage of deceptions issue forth. At this critical time in our nation's history, the consequences of inaction and complacency could not be more dire.

The truth is that we have been betrayed by an extremist right-wing ideology that currently goes by the name "conservative." Its well-funded message machine lulled the public into a false confidence that led to the most devastating abuse of our military for private gain in this country's history. Contrary to the arguments of many critics, this is not simply a botched policy or misguided approach.

An exceptional story

A trap has been set for progressives, and it comes in the form of a story. The betrayal has been made possible by the conservative take on the Myth of American Exceptionalism. This belief that we are the Great Nation, whose military endeavors always side with the Good, has set in motion a vicious cycle. It is the belief that our country is inherently good and our military strength is unrivaled. Consistency requires that our "enemy" must be evil and is always the lesser foe. Failure is impossible in a fair contest. If we lose, it must be a failure from within. We must have been betrayed.

Kevin Baker, in a Harper's article published in 2006, distilled this tale of betrayal into a political formula used by conservatives:

  • Advocate some momentarily popular but reckless policy.
  • Deny culpability when that policy is exposed as disastrous (and remain steadfast even when it becomes unpopular).
  • Blame the disaster on internal enemies who hate America.
  • Repeat, always making sure to increase the number of internal enemies.

(The betrayal story is also discussed on Alternet and in the Atlantic Monthly.)

The stage has been set for laying the blame on us. In the runup to the escalation, these phrases were repeated far and wide by unknowing journalists:

  • "defeatist"
  • "cut-and-run"
  • "embolden the enemy"
  • "not supporting the troops"
  • "break the will of the American people"
  • "lack of resolve"
  • "demoralizing the troops"
  • "the party of appeasement"

Often innocently quoted from interviews with conservatives, these phrases reinforce associations in people's brains between peace activists and the disaster in Iraq.

The debate has been framed against us. Our brains have been conditioned through repetitive accusations that opponents of the Iraq occupation are "emboldening the enemy" with their "defeatism" until the only thing that makes sense is the betrayal of America by war-hating peace mongers.

Talk about a twisted role reversal.

Tell a different story

Conservatives have spread a virus, incubating their ideas in our brains with the hope that they would replicate across the country. They have planted seeds of conservative thought to be born by a media that doesn't realize it is complicit in propagating the Betrayal Myth. Our responsibility as citizens is to get the truth out there ahead of the next round of lies. We can take away its capacity to influence our thinking by becoming sensitized to the hidden meaning of these words.

Presenting the facts without changing the story will not be enough. Flesh-and-blood human beings just don't all reason to rational conclusions. We have to pre-empt the trap by revealing the true betrayal of America -- the deceptive conservative agenda and its anti-democratic goals.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bush, propaganda, troop escalation, troop surge, betrayal, framing, conservatives, iraq

Joe Brewer is a cognitive scientist and fellow at the Rockridge Institute. Scott Parkinson is a guest fellow at the Rockridge Institute.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Agreed. Don't let them get away with it.
Posted by: factbased on Feb 1, 2008 12:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some of their blame tactics really are transparently silly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» But what about our leaders? Posted by: sanddollar
» RE: But what about our leaders? Posted by: factbased
» RE: But what about our leaders? Posted by: sanddollar
» The curious part Posted by: sanddollar
» RE: The curious part Posted by: Lauren
» RE: But what about our leaders? Posted by: Longdream
Please don't treat me like I treat you!
Posted by: carbon-based on Feb 1, 2008 2:50 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
""re we going to sit idly by while right-wing millionaires and billionaires fund campaigns like Freedom's Watch, with its plans to spend $250 million this year to smear progressive leaders as betrayers?""

Can anyone say General"Betrayus" Petraeus and Moveon .Org???? Maybe Progressive deserve their own treatment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why don't YOU.... Posted by: boydranchitos
» RE: Why don't YOU.... Posted by: carbon-based
» Oh... Posted by: carbon-based
» And the answer is.... Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: brunowe
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: brunowe
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: factbased
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: carbon-based
» The surge worked???!!! Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: kroenung58
» Snapping at the bait Posted by: factbased
» RE: Snapping at the bait Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Me-- Posted by: Longdream
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: kroenung58
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: factbased
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: BCcovers
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: And the answer is.... Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Oh... Posted by: Timba
» RE: You have willfully become a tool Posted by: carbon-based
» Who's the TOOL? Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Who's the TOOL? Posted by: factbased
It's AlterNet's Fault
Posted by: Tom Degan on Feb 1, 2008 3:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is something that I've been saying for years. When the trillion dollar shithammer finally hits the fan (and it's already happening) the right wing spin machine is going to go into overdrive. My question has always been: Will the American people be dumb enough to fall for it? I'm afraid that the answer to that question is: Yeah....Maybe not all of them but enough of them to make a serious difference.

We're faultering in Iraq because anti-American entities like AlterNet, Moveon.org, the Huffington Post, Keith Olbermann and David Corn are demoralizing the troops. That is the message that is being sent and, sadly, a lot of Americans are swallowing it hook, line and sinker.

The heartening thing is the fact that at least most people are starting to catch on to what a criminal fraud has been committed against them. That's why it is so important that the Democrats win this thing. Four more years of Republican "rule" (and that's the only thing you can call it) will destroy this county. That's assuming that it's not already broken beyond all repair.

Shame on you, AlterNet....

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
And Then There Were Two

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's AlterNet's Fault Posted by: Sissy
» RE: It's AlterNet's Fault Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: carbon based Posted by: thealltheone
» RE: carbon based Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: carbon based Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: carbon based Posted by: carbon-based
» tooooooo funny! Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: tooooooo funny! Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: carbon based Posted by: Longdream
» RE: carbon based Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: horseshit-based Posted by: Longdream
» RE: horseshit-based Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: horseshit-based Posted by: Longdream
» RE: horseshit-based Posted by: Longdream
» RE: It's AlterNet's Fault Posted by: Longdream
» RE: It's AlterNet's Fault Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: It's AlterNet's Fault Posted by: Longdream
» RE: It's AlterNet's Fault Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Fun Fact Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Fun Fact Posted by: scheherezade
» RE: It's AlterNet's Fault Posted by: Lauren
» Is that facetious? Posted by: factbased
» RE: Is that facetious? Posted by: gazooks
» RE: Is that facetious? Posted by: ConnecttheDots
» RE: Is that facetious? Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Is that facetious? Posted by: factbased
» RE: It's AlterNet's Fault Posted by: TheLimit
BIGGER LIE = "left" at DC Innocent on Bogus "War on Terror"
Posted by: LookOut on Feb 1, 2008 3:34 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As shown by their voting records – MSM and corporate funded "frontrunners" Hillary and Obama were top enablers for funding the insane genocide at Iraq War Inc on the public nickel.

This cannot be overstated: the American political process is a theatrical sham built to dupe the gullible, programmed and confused. As FDR said, real power has resided with corporate monopoly money power “since the days of Andrew Jackson”.

That bad Fascist theatre was on clear display at the “State of Union” address by way of Congressional clapping seals that pretend to stand for Americans in their support of bogus, endless “war on terror” when they actually represent monopolist corporate crime.

Such was the case from well before the GOP "neocon" front posed at taking over a Washington / MSM monkey in the wake of 9/11 cover-up.



“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
President FDR (on de facto Fascist rule in a letter to corporate con man “Colonel” Edward M. House, founder of the Council on Foreign Relations and political fixer for the ruling class. House also handled President Wilson. 11/21/ l933)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

good article, but
Posted by: ceare on Feb 1, 2008 3:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is exactly the narrative the Right-Wingers have put forth, but there's one blind spot in the article, namely the comment: "They have planted seeds of conservative thought to be born by a media that doesn't realize it is complicit in propagating the Betrayal Myth."

To the contrary, the right-wing corporate media understands fully their complicity in the Betrayal Myth; in fact, they will hype it relentlessly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That is only half of the problem
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Feb 1, 2008 3:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The economy is on the absolute brink - and whoever has the job of saving it is gonna be just as unpopular as Carter was when he saved the US economy from Nixon's irresponsibility.

The dollar was collapsing (sound familiar?) oil prices had more than quintupled (hmmmm - what a coincidence) and record deficits had been run for years (Nixon claimed to have been the only president to balance the budget since Truman. In fact, he simply pushed expenditures back to the previous year and ahead to the next for one year - running the largest deficits in history in both years.)

Carter had to raise interest rates to 18% and cut the deficit drastically to save the country from runaway inflation - for which he was reviled for a generation.

The dollar is sinking like a stone again - and the Bushies are cutting interest rates - as effective as dousing a fire with gasoline.

If you hit a dying man with a massive dose of speed, he may jump out of his deathbed and do a jig. Attempts to reignite the housing bubble by slashing interest rates with the dollar already crashing is like that amphetamine dosed man - whatever happens ain't gonna be pretty.

And guess who they're gonna blame? they are hoping like hell they can keep the whole mess from completely blowing up on their watch - but God help the next guy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Almost correct Posted by: brunowe
» RE: That is only half of the problem Posted by: peacefullaim
"Right-Wing" Media = Fool's Myth – It's ONE WING Corporate MSM
Posted by: LookOut on Feb 1, 2008 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And it continues to fly the country into a deadly blind man's bluff.

Who sold the War when every blogger worth his salt knew it was phony going in? The NY Times and most "liberal" so-called "news" sources were at the forefront of a mono-channel deception campaign to sell the nation down the river.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Feb 1, 2008 4:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Under the current system, not a single participant in the Bush conspiracy is going to be punished and the same pattern of lawlessness is going to happen over and over and over again.

A Vote of Confidence Amendment will enable the American voting public to dismiss and hold over for criminal prosecution any elected official who fails in their obligation to serve the people of the United States.

VOCA, now

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Main argument
Posted by: saltoafronteira on Feb 1, 2008 5:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because of bush's policies you are now owned by the chinese and the arabs.
Who betrayed that country? milton friedman, Reagan, Bush Father, Clinton, Bush son and all those who preached for free market religion.
Look where it led you: wars impossible to gain, over dependency on oil, productive activites exported to the third world and the rest of the economy sold out to foreign powers.
The problem with that argument is that there is no argument possible against manipulation.
Conclusion: the only way is the use of force against force. Don't expect your ennemies to attack you and make you going into the defensive. The problem with progressive people is that they always let the bullys put them in the defensive. Attack them, attack them now, and with all your might
submerge them with high treason law suits,
go to the field
inflame the victims before the enemy inflames them.
Fight for the people's art.
Use the same subliminar techniques they use.
Remember germany in the 1930's
dont let the new nazis do what they did then.
if necessary, USE FORCE !
Damn it, are you men or are you sheep ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Main argument Posted by: using
» here come the marxists Posted by: ark
» RE: here come the marxists Posted by: saltoafronteira
mick3
Posted by: mick3 on Feb 1, 2008 5:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We must never forget that there was no enemy in Iraq until we went in and pillaged it. Iraq was a weak nation, kept that way by cruel sanctions that resulted in at least 500,000 unnecessary infant deaths and by Bill Clinton's monthly bombing, despite no declaration of war. Guess he did it because he could.

As Walt Kelly so presciently put it: We are the enemy, and we have destroyed a nation and its people because of the madness of the neocons, all supported by the rest of the Republicans, by the way.

We have waged 50 wars on weaker nations in order to control their resources or undermine their budding democracies.

Talk about rogue states!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Inaccurate re the sanctions. Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Inaccurate re the sanctions. Posted by: militaryhater
» RE: Sanctions are weapons of war. Posted by: nightgaunt
» No. You are dissembling. Posted by: piggy
» No, you are Posted by: brunowe
» No, you are Posted by: brunowe
As long as the Democrats keep playing go-along-getalong with the GOP vote after vote, it's LOSE-LOSE
Posted by: maxpayne on Feb 1, 2008 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Progressives would be better off joining a third party (Green) or at least forming one of their own.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TRUE
Posted by: jjdoggie on Feb 1, 2008 7:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A wonderful analysis of "the problem" -- concise, well-documented. Thank you for showing us, as citizens, what we must do, and how we must attack, rather than defend, the truth.
Never forget that a democracy is never a democracy, without the active participation of its citizens. PSST! ..... DO SOMETHING!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: TRUE Posted by: using
» RE: TRUE Posted by: using
Good advice, but...
Posted by: Shenonymous on Feb 1, 2008 7:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The advice is exceptional in that you don’t get such advice from news analysts, cognitive scientists, and Rockridge Institute fellows very often. I agree that getting the language right is only part of the solution and that more importantly is getting the message out, that there needs to be a plan to counter the “swift boaters,” and that action needs to be taken before they do. It is the proverbial “we” that is mystifying. Synergizing anything is like taking a bath in a tub of jello. What netroots? What grass roots? Independent media? Who are we kidding, when is the last time they ever reframed a debate? Whatever progressive organizations there are seem only to spin wheels. I am not trying on purpose to be dismal or pessimistic, but we the people have been pissing into the wind for so long that it doesn’t even get up to the wind anymore. I would be ecstatic to be part of getting out the truth, but a whole lot more of creative thinking has to go on. For instance, people, I have noticed, people in general are totally seduced by glamour and glitz, and gore, not only Al Gore. To get the message of truth out to the masses, if they indeed are ready for the truth, and will act on what they find out, which this latter point is the big point, will require glamour, glitz, and gore. Who will step up to the plate? Journalists? Actors, Musicians, artists, any politician? I won’t hold my breath. But nevertheless I will do my part as it presents itself and if I find any group that I can join I will.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good advice, but... Posted by: using
» RE: Good advice, but... Posted by: Lauren
I hope we progressives can be
Posted by: steven w on Feb 1, 2008 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
successful in combating this propoganda, but something else has to happen in our favor too. Just like Edwards and Kucinich, we are being ignored by the MSM. I'm wondering and hoping that all these fat-cat war profiteers start screwing each other and get into a battle with each other.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Empire OR Republic
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Feb 1, 2008 7:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can't have both. Unfortunately, politicians are reluctant to use the phrase "American Empire", no matter how accurate it has become.

Politicians try and preserve the illusion of a domestic republic, and try and present "foreign policy" as something for the experts to handle. Domestic political contests are supposed to be about "domestic issues" - race, gender, moral behavior, perhaps health care and retirement benefits - that kind of thing.

This theme has been a largely enforced during the "Presidential debates" by the speaking monkeys of the corporate press. No discussions of Iraq and oil, but plenty of discussions about religion, race and gender. Don't kid yourself - that's deliberate.

The fact is that we are currently running a global military-economic empire, backed up by fleets of aircraft carriers, satellite monitoring systems, ruthless economic agreements, and massive military bases all over the world - all intended to keep the U.S. in the dominant imperial position, and to make sure that the oil, the cash and other resources keep flowing in the proper directions.

That is a theme that nobody in the corporate press wants to discuss. Sometimes you will see a discussion of the potential rise of other imperial agendas, mainly focused on Chinese and Russian energy interests, but that's about it. You will never see bilateral "free trade" agreements described as imperial agreements between the empire and its vassals, but that's the real situation.

Thus, we need to be careful when we describe "failure in Iraq" - on one hand, it was and is the (partial) failure of an imperial ambition - to establish a permanent U.S. military presence in a "U.S.-friendly and oil-rich country" in the Middle East. That didn't turn out so well - and so, it was a failure of the imperial agenda.

However, the real failure was a failure of democracy in the United States, followed by a war of aggression fought for the benefit of Wall Street and the International Oil Corporations. Bush stole the 2000 election, and emboldened by that theft, he and his cronies instituted a program of massive fraud and theft, all aimed at lining their own profits by any means available. When things started going sour in Iraq, they tried to rescue it by running torture and terror programs that indiscriminately targeted the Iraqi people.

The Republican and neoconservative and media architects of this invasion and occupation are all war criminals, in one way or the other -their roles included collusion, cooperation, and giving direction.

For example, the very real crimes of fradulent government contracting havn't been addressed - whether it's the Iraq reconstruction and the shady giveaways to Halliburton, KBR and Bechtel, the New Orleans reconstruction, the Homeland Security spying contracts, the "Project Bioshield" ripoffs (have some Tamiflu! $7 billion to Donald Rumsfeld's old company, Gilead... another billion to Battelle Memorial Biowarfare Institute) - etc.

Empires always have involved a lot of fraud and profiteering by those in power - and the American Empire is no different. It's just a theme that is banned from public discussion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mpire OR Republic Posted by: using
Who loves America?
Posted by: fearless flower on Feb 1, 2008 8:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Neoconservatists with their doomsday style foreign policy have hijacked this country and stolen it from decent patriotic citizens in both parties. Republicans and Democrats alike remain largely unaware of the Wolfowitz Doctrine that has caused America to become a global aggressor against the core beliefs of most Americans: "Thou shalt not steal" and "Thou shalt not kill." The Neocons have set conservative republicans and democrats against progressives by accusing them of "hating" America. As a former republican-turned-progressive I say to that: "I love this country. Now give it back!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who loves America? Posted by: thealltheone
» RE: Who loves America? Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Who loves America? Posted by: VickyinSD
» RE: Who loves America? Which one? Posted by: nightgaunt
» RE: Who loves America? Posted by: using
The defense should be the offense, Impeach Bush. Their Propaganda machine, the movies!
Posted by: common intelligence on Feb 1, 2008 8:48 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's good that someone, Scott Thill here, has seen the picture. It's too bad it's this late that anyone should be waking up.

It seems all to well planned though. Everything this nation is doing is damage control. At no time has, what is obviously a pending doom, has anyone been able to get this massege across and invoked a preventative measure, before the fact. Now it's all about Who to blame.

It's not that no one hasn't been warning and telling everyone, all during the whole Bush regime from Reagan, that this pirate was setting in motion a series actions that would unravel the very fabric that was America.

During the '50s they used intriguing Sci-fiction to inject the red scare. Movies like the "Crawling Eye", were imposing ideas in the subconciousness of Americans that the "Reds" were everywhere watching and waiting to take over America.

The same tactics are being used today from "300" to the new "CLoverfield", to "I am Legend". The story is the same, "We have to stick together to save America, the world". This , the movies, is their most porwerful propaganda, ( not to speak of the constant distraction and redirect tactics used in most every fulfrontal rhetorical assault.

I still find it curious how the extreme right likes to propound that it is the "left" progressives that are in control of Hollywood. Do people actually buy that?

The whole of the mainstream news and programing is controlled by THEM. I mean the powers that be (the CIAS and MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX that control the direction the future that has been mapped out for us.

It's not a myth. I know the masses don't think,/i> about it, but we must realize that these so called "Think Tanks" like the Rand Corp. don't just think about the next year or next administrations game plan and how it will adress the issues at hand. But they plot What needs to be done in order to keep moving humanity toward the destiny that They have ominpotently decided it needs to go.

It appears the "right to self determination" is the myth. We have to make up our own story in order to wiggle our own way through their
future world. We will have to literally fight in order to overcome the masses ignorant compliance with these unseen forces that dictate every move we make.

We, whom are awake, must always take the offensive, because the moron that the conservative masses have followed so blindly have destoyed that very country they where (seemingly) hoping to save.

America lost the war with Japan (What kind of car are you driving?)

Americas has lost the war with the Ghosts of al quida/ Teleban, etc (just look at where the Iraq war has burried this nation already.)

America is loosing another undeclared war with China, economically it's ruined our national economy. ( My god, quit bying their junk!)

So why should we be in denial? Because Bush has been allowed to keep us(well, the masses) in this state off mind. Everything that is destoying us has been put in place by BUSH.

If Impeachment and Truth of 911 are not addressed, fasce the music.
We're done!

What doesn't the congress understand? IMPEACH BUSH

Side bar: Where does Bush get the money to hand out free checks to all Americans? (Just a little food for thought.)
Buy more Red Chinese junk with Red Chinese moneyeveryone! It's good for the economy? Mean while, your house is still in foreclosure and China owns it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

like vampires infecting others with the desease of greed
Posted by: Don Garb on Feb 1, 2008 10:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the last million years, psychopaths have been born among the human population. For most of that time, their bad behavior was rewarded with death, meted out at the hands of posses of ordinary people, rising up out of the routine of their daily lives.

That was up until the last hundred years, when the humans stopped controlling the psychopath population, and their numbers rose steadily. Now they control business and government, because those institutions filtered them, and refined their evil techniques.

The rich psychos infect others with the insanity of their greed. That's how they get free trade agreements signed, and how they open up other countries to be ravaged by their own indigenous wealthy psychos. Look at how the Bolivian government sold the rights to all water, even rain water, to Bechtel. Which was sent packing when the people rose up and rioted.

The media too has been infected, that's why we need new ways of getting the message out. The backlash against the psychopaths and their world destroying games will not be news. The planet will not be repaired by the inhumans who have poisoned it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hurray for bold arguing Democrats
Posted by: militaryhater on Feb 1, 2008 10:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have to say, love 'em or hate 'em, I like the fighting spirit of both Obama and Hillary. We progressives wanted our Democrats to have 'balls' and when they finally stand up and fight, we think it is terrible. Either we want a tough candidate willing to fight for what they believe in or a wimp.

I choose the fighters....McCain and Romney...LOOK OUT! The progressives have arrived!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Since day one...
Posted by: VickyinSD on Feb 1, 2008 11:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when the administration blamed Iraq for 9/11, and announced the invasion of Iraq, I have been telling some of my brainwashed family and friends who actually believed the bullshit espoused by the "Liars on the Hill", that it was all just one big lie, put in place in order to get control of Iraq's oil.

And I've argued the fact that Al-Qaeda was never even in Iraq until we invaded, and that Sadam and Bin Laden weren't even on the same page... and all I heard back was Republicant rhetoric.

I've been called "naive", "stupid", "ignorant" and accused of "aiding the terrorists" and "not supporting our troops". Unfortunately, most of those who held those attitudes still hold the administration's lies to be truths... talk about naive!

I don't understand how, with all the evidence that has surfaced since the invasion began, these people can still believe the disinformation that led us to the point we're at now... stuck in a country where the people hate us, the government is in shambles, real terrorists are gathering support of many of the populous, killing our troops as well as innocent civilians, and our government is wasting billions and billions on a "war" for oil. Can they really believe all the hype after all the bullshit?

What part of the mind is responsible for the ability to discern truth from lies, and what gives some of us the ability to see the truth from day one, regardless of the media's continual spread of disinformation?

I just don't get it!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It takes effort, or it's... Posted by: VickyinSD
I would add one more point
Posted by: Red Clover on Feb 1, 2008 11:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We won "the war." The war part of the Iraq conflict was the destruction of the Iraqi military, occupation of the country by our military, and perhaps up to the capture of Saddam in December 2003. That is about the limit of what any military can be properly used for.

Everything after that is non-military. That we used our military in a failed attempt to create a new civil society post-Saddam is not the fault of our troops. They did their job as asked. Their civilian leaders did not hold themselves to the same standard.

Now the goal of an Iraqi civil society that delivers a measure of stability and good government to its people is in the hands of Iraqis, not ours. We can no more impose our will on them any more than Chinese invaders could impose their will on us.

We won the war. The Iraqis are not going to be like Germans who valued an American occupation to protect them from the Soviets no matter what kind of threat we try to make Iran out to be. Bring the troops home.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ms.
Posted by: using on Feb 1, 2008 11:57 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article. The problem I am having difficulty digesting is: even if we educate the American people to the truth -- and they stay educated while we move on to educate others and they do not get confused when they become willfully, and often unawaredly but consistently indoctrinated with the other point of view -- what will that accomplish? And how?