Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Barack in Butte, Montana: Defying Conventional Wisdom About Race and Politics

By Laura Flanders, TheNation.com. Posted January 30, 2008.


If Barack Obama's South Carolina victory was a really "black" thing, how can you explain his popularity in Butte, Montana?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

In Special Coverage

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Jim Hightower, Raising Hell
Jonathan Rowe

Democracy and Elections:
Are Feds Trying to Aid Republican Candidate's Election?
Tim Kalich

DrugReporter:
A Cultural History of the Magic Mushroom
Lux

Election 2008:
The Real Elitist: Video of McCain's Collection of Mansions Reveal He's Not Your Average Joe
Steven Greenhouse

Environment:
Republicans Have Handed Democrats a Winning Election Issue
David Morris

ForeignPolicy:
Blocking a Gazan's Path to an Education
Fidaa Abed

Health and Wellness:
The Misshapen Mind: How the Brain's Haphazard Evolution Left Us with Self-Destructive Instincts
Sasha Abramsky

Hurricane Katrina:
From the Bayou to Baghdad: Mission Not Accomplished
Amy Goodman

Immigration:
Medical Neglect in Immigrant Prisons Reveals America at Its Worst
Kyle Hussein de Beausset

Media and Technology:
What's Going on with the Media's Ballooning Coverage of Celebrity Babies?
Meredith Blake

Movie Mix:
Protest over Use of the Word 'Retard' in Stiller's 'Tropic Thunder' Misses the Target
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Obama Should Pick Hillary
Lanny Davis

Rights and Liberties:
Stop the Execution: Jeff Wood Faces Death Tomorrow for a Murder He Didn't Commit
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
Catching the Wrong John: When Are the Media Going to Talk about John McCain's Infidelity?
Drew Westen

War on Iraq:
How Many More Iraqis Can You Throw Behind Bars Without Trial?
Fatih Abdulsalam

Water:
What If Your Tap Water Is Not Safe To Drink?
Elizabeth Royte

More stories by Laura Flanders

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

If Barack Obama's South Carolina win was a "black" thing, it's awfully strange how it's going down in Butte. US towns don't come much whiter or more hope-resistant than this battered old Montana mining town. And yet organizers here resonate with his call, not because they think he'll change things here, but because they believe the movement he's inspiring will help them do that work.

It was mid-morning Sunday when I finally flipped open my laptop to watch Obama's South Carolina victory speech. The only other soul in the faded foyer of the once-grand Finlen Hotel was Debbie, the receptionist. Obama's words drew blue-eyed Debbie over. What do you think? I asked. Looking at the crowd, her smile revealed more than a few missing teeth. "That looks like everybody," she said. "That's good."

The Finlen is a lonely place; a 1920s relic perched on a snow-swept slope between stone-cold, closed Victorian banks and bars and the country's biggest toxic Super Fund site. Butte was once the copper capital of the world (and the most unionized town in the US) but the swag and smut of the 1880s is long gone and Butte's as broken now as the bones of its best-known 20th century export -- Evel Knievel. And even he is dead.

The exuberant crowd behind the stylish Senator Saturday was Southern, sunny, multi-racial and all revved up. The backdrop to his words in Butte was very different. Obama's pledges of "change" and "purpose" and "belief" echoed, airy, into this wintry, white, whupped, western town. This place aches for solid stuff like union jobs and productive work and there was precious little promise of either in Obama's speech.

So can Obama's magic move Butte? Before the morning was over, I was able to ask the question to a group of local activists. The Montana Human Rights Network was holding its annual"Progressive Leadership Institute" in the Finlen this weekend and two dozen local organizers gathered around to hear the speech in between workshops on running effective campaigns and running for local office.

"It's not that he would change anything in Butte," said Alan Peura, a City Commissioner in Helena. "But he's building momentum that we can use to make that change ourselves."

Although John Edwards was by my survey probably the group's favorite candidate, Obama roused them, not by his policy promises, but by opening he presents for their work.

"At the very least, we'll have four years of movement-building from the Presidential bully pulpit, which is the polar opposite from what we've had," chimed in Jason Wiener, a Missoula city councilman.

Obama's wrong on fuel, said Patricia Dowd. He supports liquid coal, a fossil-fuel-burning non-alternative that Dowd, an environmentalist, is against. "But I love the fact that he always thanks his organizers first. He values what we do and that makes it easier for us to do our work.''

"I don't trust all this talk about bi-partisanship," said retired MT Congressman, Pat Williams, one of the longest-serving progressives ever to sit in the US House. "Compromise can be just another word for collusion." On the other hand, even Williams sees movement potential at the party level if Obama were to be the candidate. Williams served in Congress under Clinton in the early 1990s. He saw how the Clinton magic worked - for Clinton only. "We lost the Governors, the House, the Senate."

Ken Toole, one of the founders of the Network and a student of the Right remembers how the Right came to power. Gaining the White House wasn't the last it was the first stage of that process. "The best thing Obama could be is our Reagan," said Toole. "Reagan didn't deliver a whole lot in terms of policies, but he shifted the country's direction." Even from Butte, it's clear to organizers: Obama's not the savior: we are. He opens a door. We push.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: barack obama, election 2008, montana

Laura Flanders is author of Bushwomen: Tales of a Cynical Species.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The answer is simple, really...
Posted by: Allstar Cookie on Jan 30, 2008 5:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...people across this country are more concerned about the economy....health care, not the color of skin.

I'm a Republican, and depending on what happens in the primaries, I may be voting for Obama. The few people I know that are conservative may also be voting for him. Our local and mostly Republican talk radio hosts......praise Obama.

Liberals and Progressives have to get over the idea that being a Republican equates to being a bigot.
Pisses me off.

Democrats continually bring the issue of race up....keep talking about walls of division.....because it creates a voting block.

Sure...pockets of racism...bigotry still exist today.....and unfortunately will be around for years to come....but with each passing generation it gets better.

The other thing that's appealing about Obama, is that he doesn't have too much of Washington in his blood.

A black man as President........I think the country is ready for that.....Hillary on the other hand..........she's condescending....phony....and has ice in her veins.
She's pure politics.



Allstar Cookie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The answer is simple, really... Posted by: militaryhater
wvm
Posted by: rinpochet on Jan 30, 2008 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It makes perfect sense! He started off as a community organizer which is about giving people the tools they need to make change. As President, he can get to do it on a national level.


Hillary's speeches are all about "what I can do for you" while Obama's are "what WE can do together for the country". It's a strong message of empowerment that resonates and will result in a strong movement by the American people to rise from their apathy and take back their country.


I have also been in community organizing and it's magic when you see the community grow strong and take over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: wvm Posted by: Herb3705
» RE: Talks Cheap, Posted by: Andie927
ms.
Posted by: using on Jan 30, 2008 6:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They have it right -- Edwards would be the man that could change the direction of this country. His plan is to untangle the stranglehold that greed has on our government so that they, the local leaders, can help make change happen. They also have Obama right. He is inspirational speaker -- however, no matter how many words of praise he throws to the hard working organizers in the throws of wanting to get elected, and no matter how inspirational his words are, he will not be "our Reagan" simply because -- Reagan was puppeteering for the very forces of change that caused our economic downward spiraling. In other words, he was not bucking the powerful forces. He was leading us in the direction they were pointing. It is hard to believe that the people of Butte can conclude that colluding with the unleased distructive forces of greed can open the door for union and community leaders to make productive change. If they want positive change, they should flex their musceles and push their energies behind Edwards, the candidate that openly offers us a clear plan for change. If the beams of power can be balanced, we can all work for productive change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ms. Posted by: JVG
» RE: ms. Posted by: using
Just Stop Already!
Posted by: DebDeb on Jan 30, 2008 7:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh my god. Please stop talking about race and the political contest. Do you know who seems to care? The media. That's it. No one I know ever talks about race where Obama is concerned. Not one person. NO ONE CARES...except the media who need something to write about. So just stop. Please. Just. Stop. For the love of god. Stop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just Stop Already! Posted by: willymack
Very interesting report.
Posted by: Sojourner on Jan 30, 2008 8:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Comparing Obama to JFK or Reagan goes nowhere with me. But the fact that folks in the grassroots like him is an eye-opener. That helps me to articulate my choices.

Do I want someone who knows the office of the president better than anyone since Al Gore? If so, then I support HRC. No one knows that job better than the Clintons, and they'd use it.

Do I want someone who can stir the people to get to work, to light a candle in their darkness? If so then I support BHO who might do as well as outsider Jimmy Carter did.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ooh, I know why they're excited. Posted by: heathehren
» exactly Posted by: EKSwitaj
» RE: He's NO Carter Posted by: Andie927
It's never really been about race.
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jan 30, 2008 8:55 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone generally believes race is the definer in politics. It's not. It's how well you do what you're told. Everyone who has ever made an impact in politics or had a long career,has done so behind following orders. Those who don't have short terms or get wacked,either by bullets or scandel,the result is the same,your career is done.
Sorry to point out Mr. Obama is no better. He was a social organizer,for the poor. That's a good thing,but for him it was just a stepping stone in getting noticed by the big dogs. He proved he was a sell-out when he willing moved from where he was to Illinios to be the democratic challenger in an area that was fed up with their republican guy in DC and there were no democrats there to challenge him.
Think about what that really means.Think about who orchestrated the move for Mr. Obama and why there was no local democrat that would have filled the bill. Obviously the local democrat was someone that did'nt exactly 'toe the mark'. So they got someone who would. Sell-out. Now the Illinois Miracle Man has the Chapaquidic Submariner backing him. Think about that. The major Sell-out being backed up by one of the most wealthy and corrupted families in the Country!??!! The patriarch of the Kennedy's was no Saint. He'd deal with anyone that could get him what he wanted. So is Mr. Obama.
Don't get me wrong I support NONE of the candidates. There may be a lot of them but you're still only getting a choice of two. There are other's running. Have you heard of them? No!! That's one example of tyranny American style. The other is a governance that tilts it's laws,support and policy making towards the wealthy industrial/financial complex.The candidates running now represent centralized wealth,centralized power and NOT The People. Follow the money. Watch who does the best 'Corporate Dance' and you'll see who is really going to be 'Puppet Master of the Presidency'. Lately it's been big oil. We can only hope that someone out there who's not been bought is willing to stand up for The People and will cut off the strings attached to the DC pipeline.
Draft Jeffrey7 for Prez
www.youtube.com/RevJeffrey7

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Butt Montana marketing article
Posted by: logansafi on Jan 30, 2008 9:53 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Butte and Obama have nothing to do with each other, and putting such a piece of marketing for BO on line is as bad as watching a commercial on TV for soap or meds. It is the equivalent of Fox News if they put some nonsense about RP candidate Huckabee being IN with the IN CROWD in the Bronx.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama with Bush
Posted by: militaryhater on Jan 30, 2008 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama will follow Bush's lead in deciding whether to bring troops home. As he said to Edwards in the last debate, he has to see if Bush starts bringing troops home before he even decides to do so...so, when Obama, if, he becomes President, will be waiting for Bush's nod to do anything. The man wants the title but will not actually run the country. Just like Bush, he will hire lots of 'experts' to do the thinking for him. Typical.

Oh, it is nice to see on the news that the Slum lord he helped out in Chicago, helped him get his house in a 'shaddy' deal. No surprise coming from a liar which is what Obama really is. Once again, the American people don't really listen to what candidates say but are sold down the river with catchy 'change' phrases and uplifting speech filled with nothing. So nothing is what Americans will get ...more of the same and Bush's policies continued.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama with Bush Posted by: willymack
» RE: Obama with Bush Posted by: aebartle
» RE: Obama with Bush Posted by: militaryhater
» RE: Obama with Bush Posted by: MindyB
We Democrats are so stupid
Posted by: g50 on Jan 30, 2008 2:03 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are going to lose this election because we can never get our act together. I'm not sucking it up and voting for the candidate either. At this point, I vote for Barack, or I vote for the Republican to defeat Hillary. I used to like the Clintons - but now, I realize they are bad people, they are bad for democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm no fan of Hillary's but...
Posted by: TagsNOLA on Jan 30, 2008 2:56 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... They're rolling Bill & her under the bus because not because she's being racially divisive, that's just a cover story, but because she had the temerity to mention a moratorium on home foreclosures. (Shades of FDR!) The movers and shakers in the Demoquat party, have decided that Hillary and Bill have got to go. They'll build up Obama only until they're sure that Hillary's been taken out. Then all the dirt on Obama that everyone in Cook County, IL already knows about will get outed nation wide. As one waggish friend of mine quipped, "The only real difference between Obama and Giulliani as that Giulliani works for the New York mob and Obama works for the Chicago mob." Obama's blather about change is bogus. He's put the word out that, if he's elected, Pelosi and Reed will stay right where they are, NO CHANGES! But Obama *won't* be elected. Once Hillary is out of the way, he'll get rolled under the bus right along with her. I'm betting that there's at least a 50/50 chance that Blumberg gets the Democratic party nom, unless people wake up and put a stop to it. But it won't be easy, not when Felix Rohatyn and George Schultz, the political "Dons" of their respective parties are moving the pulleys and wires to get what they want, Fascism in America.
- TagsNOLA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He's An Attorney
Posted by: hole11 on Jan 30, 2008 6:13 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Doesn't matter if he's black a woman or gay. It isn't going to change anything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: He's An Attorney Posted by: using
Obama and Montana
Posted by: macdon1 on Jan 31, 2008 11:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What do they have in common? Zero tolerance for BS. The American people are tired of having politicians pee down their backs and try to tell them it's rain. Race isn't the issue here. The issue is the future of our country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bridger
Posted by: Bridger on Feb 28, 2008 12:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Butte is "Montana's Whore" of cities, with Anaconda only slightly behind.
If Barack has good and honest people on his team, the team will reject those in Butte/Anaconda for what they are, corrupt welfare cities.
Butte holds high the federally funded MSE Technologies, corrupt from top to bottom. Almost every politician in Montana has attached themself to this federally funded welfare funded company which admitted to fraud in 2000 Montana Justice Department. In 2003-4 Montana couldn't help but give MSE special awards and recognition.
Anaconda trails only slightly, with it's AWARE company, also publicly funded monstrosity which now claims to be the largest employer of Montana.
Both companies have achieved their goals, and riches on the backs of hard working, taxpaying citizens. Aware only accepts Medicare/Welfare.
Denny Rehbert (R.), Max Baucus (D.), Brian Schweitzer (D.), Conrad Burns (R.) have all fought over who brought in the most earmarks and pork for the companies.
AWARE just sends bills for "patient care" to the hard working, tax paying citizens, by way of the corrupt approval of politicians.

So, one might ask why Barack might be popular in Butte? Anything that sends the tax dollars to the corrupt Butte Mafia would be welcomed.

Politicians who align themselves with these two welfare subsidized companies, should be ashamed. But, the two are now sizeable monsters, and the politicians can't help but get a piece of the pie...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]