Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Hypocrisy of BET's Bob Johnson's Obama Smears

By Davey D, Davey D's Hip-Hop Corner. Posted January 24, 2008.


Bob Johnson should leave politics to someone else.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Women's Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Egyptian Marine: Soldiers Often 'Racialize' the Enemy to Cope With Stress
Aaron Glantz

More stories by Davey D

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Former BET president and founder Bob Johnson is an asshole and hypocrite. Lemme not pull punches, be politically correct, beat around the bush or try to impress high-brow readers who feel I should be less crass and gentler with my words so I can appeal to their sensibilities. It's 2008 and unfortunately being nice and proper doesn't quite get the message across, especially when it comes to Bob Johnson and his recent disparaging remarks about presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama.

For those who don't know what I'm talking about, I'm referring to Johnson getting onstage to introduce Sen. Hillary Clinton at a rally and expressing outrage about Obama's past. He said, "Barack Obama was doing something in the neighborhood. I won't say what he was doing, but he said it in his book."

It was a cheap shot -- referencing Obama's drug use when he was a young man. This was an activity that Obama freely admitted to in his memoirs Dreams From My Father, and on some level I can see it being fair game, but coming from a guy like Johnson, that's like former President Bill Clinton giving marital advice to Halle Berry's former husband and admitted sex addict Eric Bonet. I heard Johnson make these remarks, and I was like, "Negro, go back into your cave; please sit down and leave the politics to someone else."

I keep asking myself: Where does Johnson get off slamming Obama about the wrongs of drug use when he piloted one of the largest media institutions (BET) that provided a worldwide platform that for the most part glorified and legitimized the lifestyles of those who not only used drugs but also sold them? In all the years we've known of billionaire Bob Johnson, we have not seen him get on any stage and diss former drug dealers like Jay-Z, 50 Cent, Rick Ross or any number of artists whose videos he would routinely play coupled with sit-down interviews conducted by fawning hosts who never, ever challenged these artists for resurrecting a "criminal" lifestyle they supposedly left behind in both their songs and videos.

The Bob Johnson we know has never gone out of his way to publicly smash on artists who like Mary J Blige or Fergie, who admitted to using drugs in the past and have since gotten their lives together and moved onward and upward. If anything, the former head of BET could be seen publicly praising them while courting them to appear at his award shows or Spring Bling concerts.

Johnson certainly never came out swinging on admitted drug abusing artists like Whitney Houston, Bobby Brown, Flava Flav or DMX, who all had reality shows either on BET or one of the other stations within the Viacom network where he had influence as a VP.

One would think a guy of Johnson's new found "high moral character" would've been smashing on drug use and drug peddling a long time ago. Could you imagine what sort of shock waves would've been sent around the world if Johnson, even as a retired media mogul, had spoken out and said, "No, Bobby! No, Whitney! We won't give them a reality show until those two get themselves healed and free of drugs"? Can you imagine if he insisted the DMX show Soul of a Man was centered around him getting over cocaine addiction?

Imagine the shock waves if Johnson said, "Hell no, Jigga. We ain't supporting your album American Gangster cause you highlighting the sordid lifestyle of heroin dealers like Frank Lucas, and we are against that type of behavior? Could you imagine if Johnson found his nuts when at the helm of BET and shut down any and all videos from artists who had "dirty pasts" that they were trying to exploit?

Sadly the Bob Johnson we know has seemingly had no problem in making billions from highlighting the drug-dealing, drug-using lifestyle. Adding to this disappointment is the fact that this proud African-American billionaire did things like remove programming that would make us question and shun such questionable behavior. It was on Johnson's watch that BET got rid of great award-winning shows like Teen Summit. It was on Johnson's watch that we saw incredible commentators like Tavis Smiley and Ed Gordon disappear. It was on Johnson's watch we saw the BET nightly news shrink and then become nonexistent. These shows were shut down in spite of the objections ranging from scholars like Dr. Cornel West to the eight major black fraternities and sororities to, more recently, church groups leading the "Enough Is Enough" campaign. It was on Johnson's watch that many in the community were up in arms protesting BET when they had that Step-N-Fetcher-like cartoon called "Cita's World." Y'all remember that one, right?

As I'm penning this article, I'm vividly recalling Johnson arrogantly responding to critics on a widely televised "town hall" where he was confronted for firing Tavis Smiley. Johnson said that "BET" stands for "black entertainment," that he is in business to entertain the masses, and that he was not obligated to provide news programming. Who knows, maybe Johnson was trying to be "entertaining" when he made his divisive remarks about Obama.

How is it that Johnson found the courage to stand up against Obama but was mealy mouthed against the artists with questionable pasts that he highlighted on his network that in turn became the face and MIS-perception of all African-Americans to the rest of the world? Many of us who are not celebrities and have traveled overseas know the pain we've endured of having to explain to fascinated yet misguided individuals in far-off lands that we are nothing like the characters depicted in the videos shown on BET? I know I've had my share of conversations where I had to put things in proper context in places ranging from Barcelona to Scotland to Beirut, where BET specifically was cited as the referencing point.

Instead, of being a champion for our people who could use his resources and influence to change widely held, worldwide misperceptions and stereotypes of us, he opted to become something more foul then any drug dealer. He became a propagandist of the worse kind. Instead of hustlin' crack, Johnson hustled black pathologies, distorted images and misinformation under the banner of black culture, which has resulted in many believing we are part and parcel to the unchallenged buffoonery he allowed to be highlighted. Instead of celebrating Obama for overcoming the odds, including the scorch of drugs, to possibly become the next president of the United States, this "negro," Bob Johnson, wants to act like a lapdog for Hillary Clinton and bash on him, all while being a media drug peddler of sorts who is in a big way responsible for normalizing drug culture.

And please don't get me wrong. I am in no way saying Obama is not above criticism. I have lots of critiques that I can launch at him. For the record, I am not the biggest Obama fan. He gives great speeches and has lots of charisma. There's no denying the energy he brings to mainstream political discussion, but from where I sit, his politics don't go quite go far enough. I want Obama to be the type of politician to have been on the ground -- front and center -- leading the masses when we went to protest in Jena. Instead, all I got was a press release.

I want Obama to have been the politician who is bold and assertive and uncompromising to the point that he would speak out on behalf of the SF8 or the Puerto Rican activists who are being jammed up by the Feds. I want Obama to be the type of guy who is smashing hard on police brutality and this current wave of gentrification. But when I argue with my fellow colleagues like writers Adisa Banjoko or Eric K Arnold, our spirited debates center around Obama's position on issues.

Even the big debate between rap stars Rhymefest (Obama supporter) and Lupe Fiasco (Hillary supporter) has centered around the politics of the candidates. Nobody is browbeating Obama for having used drugs in the past. The Obama we know and see today is clean, smart and razor-sharp, and we don't see him coddling and being a big enabler to drug culture the way that billionaire Bob Johnson has been over all those years. He made his billions by pimping drug culture on his network to the fullest.

The biggest challenge that Johnson creates for African-Americans is that, because he has made some significant economic accomplishments as the head of a multibillion-dollar conglomerate, he has led many of us into believing that he has built upon past freedom struggles waged by the likes of Dr. Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, the Black Panthers and others.

The sad irony to all this is that if King and X were still alive waging battles against oppression, they would probably be excluded from the day-to-day banter of BET. We barely see or hear about these past leaders on the station today. What was the last in-depth discussion you saw or heard on BET under Johnson's reign about King beyond his "I Have a Dream" speech? What's the last insightful story you saw on Malcolm X?

If you listened to Dr. King's thoughts on media, then you know one thing: that BET and the foolishness it put out in the name of our people would've been in stark opposition to where King stood in terms of using media as a tool to uplift and inform the community. Like I said, Martin and Malcolm would never be on BET, aside from a few documentary clips and sound bites, if they were around today. If you don't believe me and think this is far-fetched, let's take a short trip down memory lane.

Those of us who are old enough to recall when BET first came out, it held a lot of promise and became a source of pride. It promised to fill the void and become a much-needed answer to MTV, which started out refusing to air videos from black artists. Eventually Michael Jackson, Run DMC and later Yo MTV Raps knocked down some of those doors, but BET started off promising to be our uncompromised mouthpiece.

I recall in the late '80s, as the cable industry expanded, BET was not included on many of the cable systems, and there were spirited campaigns to get them on. It was young 20-something-year-old activists who were then part of what I would call the Public Enemy/ Afrocentric generation that took to heart some of the promises made by Bob Johnson, who at that time called upon people to stand up for BET and demand it be included as a cable channel. BET's exclusion from local cable systems was seen as yet another example of how prevalent racism was in this country. Many of us were coming out of the tailspin of the crack era, and as hip hop's golden age kicked in, many eagerly sought to fight the power. Getting BET on cable was one such fight.

Here in the Bay Area, it was rap activists like artist Chill E.B. who worked tirelessly organizing letter-writing campaigns and call-ins to get BET on cable systems outside of Oakland, in neighboring cities like Concord, Fremont and other areas. I recall doing radio shows and even having someone from BET (it may have even been Johnson himself; I'll have to check my tape archives) come on the air to talk about the importance of all of us pulling together to help insure that BET got a fair shot. I recall giving out phone numbers to the offending cable outlets and encouraging listeners to stand up for BET. Years later, many of the activists who spearheaded the fight to get BET on for the masses can't get on BET themselves to share and inform viewers of ongoing struggles in our community. For example, I know Chill EB, who is a war vet and has spoken out against the war and has even done songs and videos about the topic, never has been invited to sit on the 106 & Park couch.

It's ironic that Obama, who at 40-something would've been part of that Public Enemy/ Afrocentric generation that initially rallied for causes like getting BET on cable systems, now finds himself being criticized by a guy like Bob Johnson. How quickly they turn. But I guess we shouldn't be surprised -- sheisty people rarely change their stripes. My boy and fellow writer, Jelani Cobb, raised an important question in his recent article on this topic for the Washington Post, which was, what were the Clintons thinking when they got Johnson to stomp for them? She might as well gotten Rupert Murdoch or Bill O'Reilly to stomp for her. That's like me running for office and getting a Gestapo-like guy like Rudy Giuliani to stomp on my behalf; it's not a good look and brings into question Sen. Clinton's clear lapse in judgment. All she had to do was look at the number of protests launched against BET in the past few years for their degrading images of women. That should've been a clear enough message. In other words, if Hillary thinks so little of black people that she went and dug up a cat likes Bob Johnson, then I'm gonna have to close the book on her and bounce the other way and roll with Obama.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: clinton, obama, bet, bob johnson

Davey D is a hip-hop historian, journalist, DJ and community activist.

http://www.daveyd.com/

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
An apology is not enough? How about 30 lashes?
Posted by: Sojourner on Jan 24, 2008 12:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From NBC's Tom Lea and Mark Murray:
Four days after he made an unmistakable allusion to Obama's teenage drug use and even referred to him as Sidney Poitier, Clinton supporter Bob Johnson apologized to Obama for those remarks.

"I'm writing to apologize to you and your family personally for the un-called-for comments I made at a recent Clinton event," Johnson said in a statement. "In my zeal to support Senator Clinton, I made some very inappropriate remarks for which I am truly sorry. I hope that you will accept this apology. Good luck on the campaign trail."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Boycott Posted by: ScottP
» RE: Boycott BET & MTV Posted by: Shalimarali
Maybe he should endorse Obama?
Posted by: macmcd on Jan 24, 2008 4:36 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have the feeling that for those who support Obama nothing less than endorsing Obama is acceptable. I disagree with the drug-use suggestion; however, I doubt that the GOP is going to pull any punches in the general election so it seems that whatever can be used against any candidate should be aired now so the candidate can be "toughened-up." OTOH, Hillary has already had everything anyone can possibly make up used against her and President Clinton so they are more able to withstand the heat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have never cared...
Posted by: PJAW on Jan 24, 2008 6:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what color or gender the President of the United States is and I still don't. I won't vote against anyone based on such superficial nonsense, nor will I vote for them for those same reasons. Our election process is a pathetic sham of personalities, media buzz and electorate prejudices. It makes the work of maintaining a democracy much harder than it needs or ought to be.

As far as "drug use" is concerned, let 'em all take a piss test, just like the poor bastards that are trying to make a living driving a cab or cleaning classrooms. Why is it that the most menial laborers can be screened for drugs, but Presidential candidates get a free pass? Guess it just goes to show how important they really think it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I have never cared... Posted by: sterlingdave54
Here's to you, Davey D...
Posted by: Gungneir on Jan 24, 2008 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For whatever it's worth coming from a Tennessee white boy who appreciates straight talk from ANYBODY in our truth-challenged era, my hat's off to you, Davey D. Keep on fighting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bob's "smears" are the LEAST of the Obama campaign's worries
Posted by: xbj on Jan 24, 2008 9:54 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last night, on the Jeff Rense internet radio show, for a full hour he interviewed a man named Larry Sinclair who claims he met Obama while bar hopping in a rented limo in Chicago in '99, during which Obama procured cocaine for Sinclair and crack cocaine for himself, and after Sinclair did a few lines and while Obama smoked crack, Sinclair performed oral sex upon Obama. He claims his reason for coming forward is to get Obama to be straight about his recent drug use, that it was not during his youth but during his adult years while in public office. The video that Sinclair posted on uTube can be accessed by clicking on this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVeFVtcdSYY.

After this night on the town, according to Sinclair, a day or two later Obama showed up unannounced at Sinclair's hotel room with more drugs, requesting another oral encounter which Sinclair states he provided.

Sinclair has agreed to take a polygraph test if Senator Obama will do the same, and was quite forthcoming about his own drug use and history of involvement in other illegal matters pertaining to drugs.

It is only a matter of time before this scandal hits the major media, and from there it will be either quickly debunked, proven factual, or be allowed to "go away" because of the major New World Order power players behind the Obama campaign.

I'm only reporting it because it exists. People can judge for themselves the man's veracity.

As for what I believe after hearing the interview? I believe there is no other greater possible proof that Obama has always been a GOP Judas Goat, set up to lure the Democrats to slaughter against ANY GOP candidate, AFTER winning the Democratic nomination through every possible dirty trick Karl Rove and the GOP and Obama's REAL backers are capable of.

And I'm not the only person who believes this either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The self-cannibalization of Africa’s children
Posted by: iwarere on Jan 24, 2008 11:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The self-cannibalization of Africa’s children here is heartbreaking, albeit socio-historically documentable. Barrack Obama has been criticized for not knowing the African American experience as well as the Clintons (Andy Young), for having a white mother, for having been born to an African, Islamic father, for having had a failure of judgment, etc. Yet when a US president found new uses for the cigar, had major indiscretions, and failures of decency in the White House, African Americans for the most part remained among his staunchest supporters.

No candidate’s ethnicity, gender, condition of birth or spiritual practice should be a marker for or against his/her fitness to service, yet we illumine the degree to which we have inculcated self-derision and toxic shame when we rush to slam the man publicly in ways we have not done to others. We ride with the Klan… or walk behind them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Willie Lynch
Posted by: desidid on Jan 24, 2008 12:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill Clinton the supposed 1st Black president, is guilty of falling under the spell of the Willie Lynch Doctrine. That doctrine was introduced to White slave holders by Mr. Lynch, a caribbean slave holder. The centerpiece of the doctrine was to create turmoil through false divisions. I think Andrew Young and John Lewis are pathetic because they have tried to market Bill Clinton as a Black man (no one has ever said Hillary is a Black woman though). In true Willie Lynch fashion they have created a false division of Blacks who support Obama (who is obviously Black) and Clinton (the White man who passes for Black in the company of Blacks). This is a great example of the use of false divisions created by Willie Lynch. After all one of his positions was to drive a wedge between slaves based on skin color. Elevating the lighter Blacks above the darker ones. He would be proud that even with years of education and the experience of Jim Crow his doctrine is alive and well in those Blacks who claim to be leaders of Blacks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Call him out!
Posted by: de aqui on Jan 24, 2008 1:29 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great job in calling out another minstrel show maker who has no shame in making millions by selling out his people. I am so tired and disgusted with the whole gangster/thug mentality being peddled by rich, corporate marketing hacks who wouldn't live anywhere near a hood themselves but keep selling that self-destructive, negative bullshit as if it is the "real" black culture. It's a modern minstrel show and the misogyny, materialism and
violence they keep pushing is an ugly carticature of black culture that serves the racist dominant ideology in this country.
While no doubt some of it is genuine and artistic, it does not reflect the reality of many black peoples lives and it is soul killing and mindnumbing and reinforces the worst of human behavior under a phoney guise of "keeping it real".

People of color need to reclaim our own culture and stop letting cynical (mostly) white MTV and BET corporate hacks get rich by selling us an ugly and distorted view of ourselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» bamboozeled. Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Obama Is Our Best Hope
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Jan 24, 2008 6:13 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bob Johnson isn't the Clintons' lapdog, he's their attack dog. Obama's past drug use is no different than most of his (and my) generation's, no different from Bill Clinton's, and much milder than Bush's.

I find in Obama a conciliatory, inspiring leader. Yes, sometimes I'd rather he was a bit edgier on issues that concern me deeply, but I know he's right to try to build bridges and not walls. Although partisan bickering is normal to democracy, the Bill Clinton and GW Bush years have been horrific, and Hillary is probably more divisive than either of them. Her election, if McCain doesn't beat her (to my mind a very real possibility, given her high negatives), would usher in another four years of bickering, gridlock, hardball, realpolitik and polarization. That isn't what we need at a time when we face an unprecedented combination of military, foreign policy, economic, social and environmental catastrophes.

We need someone who, like FDR or Churchill, can bring people together to face the crises, and I believe Obama can do that. Hillary's hawkishness and chumminess with the corporate elites are also worrisome. My desire to see more women in high office notwithstanding, I cannot support her. Furthermore, she poses as a feminist while unabashedly running not as Hillary Rodham Clinton, but as Mrs. Bill Clinton. Too many women seem willing to overlook her record and evasiveness to support her based on her gender. I'd love to see a woman president, but not this woman.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama Is Our Best Hope Posted by: desidid
Thebigkate
Posted by: Thebigkate on Jan 24, 2008 8:54 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Re Bob Johnson:

A narcissistic psychopath is a narcissistic psychopath, is a narcissistic psychopath, etc. etc. He and The Big Dog make a fine pair! Poor Hillary. She deserves better! I think she is bright, experienced and able--but her terminal codependence in tolerating impossible, nasty men really turns me off!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OBAMA = Vision, Hope, Integrity
Posted by: pana on Jan 25, 2008 1:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is my choice for President. He is bright, honest, sees the complexities of situations and is not a "sound bite." I for one am proud of Obama for his many accomplishments and good deeds. Yes, like many of us, Obama struggled with identity issues during his youth and younger days. Obama is an inspiration. He is a real person, not some fabricated personality.

Obama is our hope.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Non-issue
Posted by: the_guttersnipe on Jan 25, 2008 3:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So what?

When someone is running for the Presidency of the United States EVERYTHING is on the table. It's all fair game.

I also don't think that it is especially hypocritical to question Obama's past and not a musicians. We have vastly different requirements for each position. It strains credulity to view a musician and Presidential candidate in analogous terms.

I couldn't care less if some rapper sold drugs in the past, but I wouldn't vote for a drug dealing President!

How can the two even be compared???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You're so OFF-BASE / RE: Non-issue Posted by: goldstategirl
» RE: You're so OFF-BASE / RE: Non-issue Posted by: the_guttersnipe
Bob's ex-wife supports Obama -
Posted by: goldstategirl on Jan 25, 2008 7:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ironically funny...that Sheila Johnson supports Barack.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Johnson Pimping for Hillary
Posted by: teenyboone on Jan 26, 2008 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I loved your comments, however long, I got it. I got it, before you said it! I just get it! John Lewis, Charles Rangel and Johnson, should ALL be taken out to the woodshed and be given an old fashioned, a$$-whipping, as they say, where I come from! Mr. Obama has the Audacity of Hope and those "uncle-toms", who I USED to have respect for, can kiss me, you know where! I am a 63 year old wife, mother and grandmother, who "lived" the rights struggle, in racist New Orleans, of the "Katrina" and Jena 6 racism, at its' best. I moved to upsouth NJ, in 1970, but what did I know? Used to brag on my hometown, but never again! I admire young people, like Kanye West and Michael Eric Dyson and saw Obama speak here, when he campaigned for Corzine, only to have Corzine, "pimp" for Hillary! What? If my vote counts on 2/5, Super Tuesday, I'm pulling the lever or pressing the button, for Brother Obama! I STILL, have a Dream!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why? Aplogize
Posted by: niliadis on Jan 27, 2008 5:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why if Johnson felt Hillary would make a better president why not express it. Fredom of speech...Didn't Obama say himslef he was doing drugs in his younger days and now Oh my God we need to keep quiet. Why??? This is rediculous! If someone dares mentions the "H" middle name Oh my god accused of Criminal Racist..If that is the given name by his parents why are we all making such a big deal? Something wrong here!
If Hillary had done drugs believe me no one would think nothing if she was crucified or insist on Oh my god we must keep it quiet..Why is it because she is a woman and its ok to abuse or say lies and manipulte every word she says? If you think I am playing the gender card all I can say TYPICAL!!! I think those that critize Johnson are all playing the Race card, in which I might say Obama surely jumped on that Racial Band Wagon and got 81% of the Black vote in SC and not its becasue every single person of the 81% thought he had all the expereience necessary to be president. I admire Johnson for standing and saying what ever he believes in!!! Is this not we In America believe in??? be free to think and say what we believe in..Or is someone around here is hypicritical..Can't have it both ways!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Miss the point much?
Posted by: de aqui on Jan 29, 2008 1:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The issue is not whether or not Obama did drugs or not or whether that is a legitmate concern in the presidential campaign.
The issue is the hypocrisy of someone who has used their own corporate media (BET) to GLORIFY drug use, now trying to have the moral upper hand and discredit someone(Obama) who has been open about their past drug use.
I think this guy has no credibility in calling Obama a druggie (or implying it through innuendo) after he's made millions pimping the "drug/thug" culture on his tv station.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement