Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Stop Bush's Stimulus Package; It's a Give-Away to the Wealthiest

By AlterNet Staff, AlterNet. Posted January 23, 2008.


Take action: Tell Congress to help ordinary Americans, not just the same fat cats who got us into this mess.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by AlterNet Staff

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

AFL-CIO's 5 Keys to a Stimulus Plan to Help Working Families
By Mike Hall
AFL-CIO blog


Unemployment is climbing. The stock market is dropping. The housing boom is bust. Corporate earnings are tanking. The nation's economy is in the worst shape it's been in years. Maybe even headed toward recession. Working families are worried.

[Last week] the Bush administration proposed a growth package of as much as $150 billion, which insiders familiar with the details say may include $800 tax rebates for individuals and $1,600 for households, along with business incentives. Although it is 'encouraging' that President Bush recognizes the need to act quickly to stimulate the economy, Bush focuses too much emphasis on tax cuts-both business and personal, according to AFL-CIO President John Sweeney. Bush's plan does not address crucial problems facing working families or target tax benefits to those families who need them the most and will spend them the fastest.

In a letter (PDF) to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D- Nev.) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Sweeney wrote:

In particular, we are concerned that the President's income tax cut proposal would not be sufficiently stimulative because it fails to target lower-income and middle-income households who, as the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) wrote last week, are likely to spend a larger share of any tax benefit they receive.
Today, the AFL-CIO outlined several proposals to develop a short-term stimulus package that 'offers the biggest bang for the buck' and began to address the underlying causes of today's economic anxiety.

In addition, with many state tax codes linked directly to federal tax rates, Sweeney warns the business tax cuts could lead to a reduction in state revenues, resulting in economically depressing budget cuts and tax increases by state governments.

Noting that compromise will be needed to quickly enact a stimulus package, Sweeney urges Reid and Pelosi to 'insist on legislative measures' that will deliver the biggest boost to the economy and protect state and local budgets.

The five points the leaders are urged to include are:

  • Extension of unemployment benefits.

  • Increased food stamp benefits.

  • Tax rebates targeted to middle-income and lower- income taxpayers.

  • Fiscal relief for state and local governments to avoid the economically depressing effect of tax increases and budget cuts.

  • Acceleration of ready-to-go public investment in school renovations and bridge repair.


For the long term, Congress also must address the deep and serious underlying causes of today's economic woes. Says Sweeney:
While it is appropriate for Congress to focus on measures that have an immediate economic impact as it crafts a short-term stimulus package, this is no excuse to put our heads in the sand and do nothing about the underlying longer-term problems afflicting our economy.
Wage stagnation is at the heart of the economic problems facing today's ordinary working families.
Wage stagnation, which began in the 1970s, has led to longer working hours, higher consumer debt, and increasing reliance on home equities. But today home values are plummeting, home foreclosures are on the rise, consumer debt is reaching unsustainable levels, and prices for energy, health care, and education are soaring out of reach for many working families.
Sweeney's letter points to several solutions to solving the wage stagnation, including:

  • Ensuring transparency and effective regulation of our housing and financial markets.

  • Reactivating the historically successful fiscal and monetary policies that place a higher priority on full employment.

  • Fixing our flawed trade policies.

  • Investing in the high-paying green jobs of the future.

  • Fixing our broken labor laws so that workers who want to form a union can bargain with their employers for better wages and benefits.

  • Ensuring affordable health care and retirement security.


*****


MoveOn Calls on Congress to Stop Bush’s Skewed Stimulus Plan
By Noah, Eli, Wes, Justin, and the MoveOn.org Political Action Team


Congress and the President are racing to pass a stimulus package. Here's the problem:

The President's plan—tax breaks for corporations and rebate checks for the well-off—isn't just morally wrong. It's based on discredited "trickle down" theories and it won't work.

But there's tremendous pressure on Democrats to accept the President's priorities just to get something passed. Negotiations are happening right now, and Congress needs to hear from you right away!

We need to demand a progressive stimulus package—one that puts money into the hands of people who are feeling the squeeze (who, incidentally, will spend it fastest). One that funds public infrastructure projects that will create new jobs, make our economy more competitive, and reduce our dependence on oil. One that will actually solve the problem.

Can you sign our petition to Congress? Click here to add your name.

The petition reads: "Congress must quickly pass a stimulus package that helps those who need it the most and will spend it the fastest. And it should include public investments that will create jobs and move us toward a 21st century, clean energy economy."

A leading economist at NYU says "We're facing the risk of a systemic financial crisis." The mortgage, credit card, and auto loan industries are all in trouble. The stock market is tanking as we speak. On top of all that, we're hemorrhaging $2 billion a week in Iraq.

The "Iraq Recession" is here.

Yet Bush's proposal is just another kind of trickle-down economics. His plan gives little or no help to people who make less than $40,000 a year, and families of four making less than $24,950 would get nothing—even though those are the very folks who would spend a little extra cash in their pockets.
According to a top economic think tank, the Republican plan would do nothing to help about 65 million Americans. "This approach fails on two counts. It omits or partly omits those who need the help. And it omits the tens of millions of people who are living paycheck to paycheck and who would be most likely to quickly spend every dollar they can get."

Bush's own Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testified before Congress that "putting money into the hands of households and firms that would spend it in the near term" would be more effective than other short-term fixes or tax rebates for the wealthy.

We need to get help into the hands of those who need it. That means making sure tax rebates go to working people, not millionaires, extending unemployment benefits, sending money to the states so they don't have to cut back programs for average people, and fully funding energy assistance programs for the low-income families struggling to heat their homes as oil prices rise.

And, with skyrocketing oil prices driving the recession, we need public infrastructure investments that create jobs in the short-term, and move us toward a 21st century, clean energy economy in the long-term. We should invest in energy efficiency, mass transit, and a Clean Energy Corps, putting hundreds of thousands of people to work rebuilding our economy.

And of course, we need to end the war that has already cost us $1 trillion.

This economic stimulus package will cost about $150 billion. Just think what we could do if all that money was invested in big, smart, sustainable ways. Or we could just try the same old, failed, trickle-down economics.

Congress is moving fast, and will make a decision as early as this week about what the plan will include. Click here to add your name to our emergency petition.

*****


Bush’s Stimulus Plan Misses the Target
By Faiz Shakir, Amanda Terkel, Satyam Khanna, Matt Corley, and Ali Frick
The Progress Report


This past weekend, as most Americans celebrated the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., markets all across the world were experiencing precipitous declines. The fears of a recession "roiled markets from Mumbai to Frankfurt on Monday, puncturing the hopes of many investors that Europe and Asia would be able to sidestep an American downturn." Witnessing the global markets free fall, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke took a sudden and surprising action yesterday morning, announcing the single deepest cut in the Fed's main interest-rate target in more than two decades. "The unexpected decision came after a rare, hastily called policy meeting by videoconference on Monday evening, and it reduced the Fed's benchmark overnight lending rate by three-quarters of a percentage point, to 3.5 percent." U.S. News reports that, in private, Bernanke is expressing fear that the United States is falling into a recession that "will be much worse than he has admitted to publicly." Last Friday, President Bush announced a $145 billion economic stimulus package meant to reassure the "health of the broader economy."

The dramatic downturn in global markets over the weekend, however, sent an umistakable message that investors lacked confidence in the President's "grasp of the depth of the problem." Center for American Progress Senior Fellow Christian Weller writes that Bush's proposal "is not targeted enough to get the biggest bang for the buck from the sizeable spending increase he proposed, and it does not include an answer to the threat of sharply lower house prices."

THE ECONOMY'S WEAK UNDERPINNINGS:

Meeting with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) yesterday, Bush said that the current economy is "inherently strong" and simply needs a "boost." Ed Lazear, Bush's Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, added, "The structure of the American economy is sound."  In fact, such happy talk overlooks the fundamental weaknesses of the U.S. economy -- a weak labor market, large budget deficits, massive trade deficits, low productivity growth, and a nationwide decline on house prices. The Philadelphia Fed reported yesterday that the economies shrunk in 23 states -- including Ohio, Missouri, and Arizona -- last month and was stagnant in seven others. For years, the Bush administration has been ignoring these structural deficiencies and masking them with record amounts of debt.

HOW WE GOT HERE:

Since the beginning of the current business cycle in early 2001, family incomes in the United States have not risen, yet the costs for important consumer items such as housing, health care, transportation, energy, and food all climbed at often breathtaking speeds. To afford these necessities, families buried themselves in deeper and deeper debt relative to their income -- "at a rate more than four times faster than that in the 1990s." Partly due to the Bush administration's laissez-faire, deregulatory approach to the markets, lenders preyed off low-interest rates and offered risky loans, financing them by borrowing heavily overseas. As a result, a vicious cycle of debt has resulted from the meltdown in the housing market, and the burgeoning crisis has enveloped foreign investors and markets.

HOW WE GET OUT:

Bush's plan to get America out of its economic doldrums is to offer tax rebates and business tax cuts, a package that fully or partially excludes an estimated 65 million taxpayers who would be the most likely to spend the money to help our ailing economy. Business lobbies are already trying to add targeted tax cuts to the stimulus package.

But tax rebates alone are not good enough. What is needed instead is some display of economic competence from the Bush administration and conservatives in Congress. The Center for American Progress Action Fund has crafted a proposed stimulus package with a number of components targeted on spurring demand, including measures such as expanding unemployment insurance, increasing food stamp benefits, and dealing with rising energy costs. But above all, the plan notes, no stimulus plan is complete without solving the housing crisis: "Nothing policymakers could do in 2008 would be more important to the economic prospects of American families and the national economy than actions to stem the decline of home values." As part of this effort, "Congress should create a refinancing vehicle for creditworthy homeowners who cannot refinance because they owe more than the house is worth." House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) has indicated his desire to "expand availability of federally insured mortgages for subprime borrowers as part of the economic-stimulus plan being negotiated
with the White House." Moreover, beyond a temporary stimulus, a long-term plan is needed. The Center for American Progress has put forward a plan for the next administration to transform America's economy through clearn energy, innovation, and opportunity.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: economy, recession, stimulus package

Mike Hall is a regular contributor to the AFL-CIO blog.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The MoveOn petition links are broken - they don't link to anything
Posted by: PaulC on Jan 23, 2008 8:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Am I the only one unable to respond?

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not good
Posted by: PaulC on Jan 23, 2008 9:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Paul Krugman has said that the majority of the "growth" in the economy over the past decade or so has been due to a very high rate of increase in "worker productivity". But this has not been caused so much by better training of workers or better methodologies as the simple fact that families are working harder and longer hours simply to stay afloat. This is because since 1990 adjusted wages have "fallen" while take home pay has remained stagnant only because of longer hours or both heads of the household heading off to work (leaving the kids to fend for themselves, presumably). Quite a stark contrast to the wealthy rolling in loot, is it not? (Since 1967 the top 5 percent saw incomes rise 5 times faster than everyone else - the number of billionaires doubles every couple of years or so).

But my point is that now, with unemployment rising and good jobs gone off to Communist China, with families already overextended to the limit, what is left to sustain the high rate of "growth" of "worker productivity" that has been driving the economy, now that the latter is stumbliing? Is giving the rich more money, the same people already rolling in so much loot that they are dumping it into overseas accounts because they know that the dollar isn't worth the paper it is printed on, going to get average Americans to work even longer hours? Maybe get the kids jobs as well, since both mom and dad are already holding down two or three jobs apiece because they are shit jobs at WalMart or Burger King that don't pay the bills? Maybe junior can drop out of college to get his brains blown out in Iraq?

I don't see it happening for this economy anymore - because it has been a sham all along, lifted on the backs of slave labor that is now tapped out, overworked, underpayed, "negative" average savings, stuck with maxed-out credit card debt at 29.9 percent interest rates, losing their homes, no health insurance, and so on. So much for the American Dream!

And this repeats a cycle, does it not, of economic mayhem every time a right wing free market nutjob gets his sweaty palms on the economy - "any" economy, be it the US or the many developing nation economies ruined by the IMF over the past 25 years.

I want to know if these greedy bastards will now own up to the utter devastation they have wrecked upon this nation.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not good Posted by: Xynyx
congress should pass emergency legislation to prevent the repossession of
Posted by: Suzon on Jan 24, 2008 4:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the individual/family primary residence. This would calm the troubled waters, perhaps even more than universal health care (though we need that as well).

It's not that this is a radical new idea, but one that Americans have previously enjoyed. So why isn't anyone calling for it to be restored?

Oh, could it be that banks profit from any transaction, even the most cruel?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Exactly Posted by: asilsfable
Would you expect anything different from Bush? Dems are no better!
Posted by: yale on Jan 24, 2008 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the name of national security to the health and welfare of the American people, the Dems had the power of congress to remove Bush/Cheney, and they did nothing. By watching them and listening to them we can only assume they are promising to be just as draining to our infastructure as the current mob. Once again Americans are being swindled on a huge scale. We are no longer a democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Competence? From the Bush Administration?
Posted by: weslen1 on Jan 24, 2008 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think so. You're not going to get any kind of competence from people with no knowledge of the jobs they are holding who only GOT those jobs for helping Bush cover up some crime or other for the past 7 years and who knows how many before. In most cases people were put into jobs to destroy the agencies they were given the jobs in. Witness the FDA, FEMA, etc. 'Nuff said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The best we can do is
Posted by: steven w on Jan 24, 2008 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to get involved with the Progressive Democrat movements- PDA, MoveOn, and others. We have alot of work to do in the primaries weeding out corporate Democrats, Bush Democrats and generally those out of touch with our reality. Get involved, take action, but let the results be up to God. I am not at all religious, but if there EVER was a time to pray for our country, it is NOW.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Come on, there is no "god" in charge of anything.
Posted by: thekidde on Jan 24, 2008 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need to do this ourselves even if it means taking it to the streets with another revolution - EAT THE RICH.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Badly needed repairs
Posted by: zepher on Jan 24, 2008 9:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sensible thing to do would be to straighten out the banks that have duped so many people. Put a cap on interest rates, stabilize the housing market and do commonsense repair to the damage irresponsibility has caused. Pelosi and Reid are cyphers, they do not represent we the people. Congress needs to get to work on taking care of my country instead of pandering to the dying empire of neo-conservatism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I would add ...
Posted by: monkeywrench on Jan 24, 2008 9:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... to the AFL-CIO's intelligent list of measures an indefinite freeze on ARM mortgage interest rates, help for homowners bilked by criminal mortgage practices, and aggressive prosecution of companies engaged in those practices.

But, does anyone think that Harry "Neville Chamberlain" Reid and Nancy "panty-waist" Pelosi will even back the AFL-CIO list as written? Word has it that Nancy has already taken extending unemployment benefits "off the table" – which indicates that she and her pencil-neck second in Congress are already primed to give little Goergie everything he wants to turn his "smoke-and-mirrors" "stimulus" package into a joke for ordinary citizens. (The only thing I haven't heard yet concerning this package is any mention of eating cake....)

Face it: Bush is a criminal, but he is being aided and abettted by cowards in Congress. This latest "stimulus" package, with the usual givaways to business, is yet another indication that our government has abandoned us, and yet continues to betray us as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The stimulus package is worse than originally proposed
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Jan 24, 2008 10:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This morning more news came out about the so called stimulus package. As usual it is top heavy with goodies for the well off and business. Dems have abandoned the little guy and middle class again. Doesn't anyone see that the rich have gotten all the goodies for years because they use it for business expansion and more jobs? Right! If that were true, we would not be in a recession. This is insanity. Our leaders just keep doing the same thing over and over.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deb
Posted by: debmcd on Jan 24, 2008 1:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, lets give some more to the corporations. There have been eight years of tax cuts and tax breaks for the rich corporations and the only thing it's done is ruined the economy. Why does the president think giving them even more will help now if it hasn't worked for the past eight years. Time to try something else. Exxon and Haliburton don't need another damn tax break they need to pay their fair share.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Elijah
Posted by: Elijah on Jan 24, 2008 2:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This whole mess is the fault of Bush and Greenspan,....Bush had Greenie lower interest rates to 1% and this fed the housing bubble and practically forced people to speculate on houses..this way too low rate has fed inflation to 20 to 35 %..the m3 is growing at 35% so this is your real inflation rate..just ask average folks what they paid for milk last year and now..$2 then and $4 now..the Fed is lying to us about inflation just like bush did on the war...2nd world america here we come thanks to bush and his buddies stealing our wealth..we were a 46 trillion economy...now we have lost 60% of the dollars value..or to put it correctly WE HAVE LOST 23 TRILLION IN WEALTH...and you wonder why americans don't feel good!!! GREEDY IDIOTS RUNNING THE SHOW!!!...Elijah

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

abuelo
Posted by: abuelo1 on Jan 24, 2008 2:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
are you about the "little or no rebate to anyone under $40K or family of 4 under $24,950"? that does not match anything else I've read. and it would be suicide in November for Democrats to go along with that now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Jan 24, 2008 7:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Commenter Paul is right on. You reap what you sow. They stole everything out from under the American consumer and encouraged him to go into debt with rampant mindless consumerism at the helm and the promise (lie) of great riches if they bought the great trickle down mantra.

Well the truth is out and it's not pretty. No bandaid on a hemorrage is going to fix this. Only progressive taxes and retroactive taxes on those who built $50 million mansions on the backs of the American worker - will work. We should plow this money into affordable housing, which was deliberately ignored so this mercenary regime could get more people into debt buying McMansions which weren't built for them or their incomes.

The whole thing is ridiculous. But what's really scary is that Americans didn't see what was being done to them by the corporatocracy 4 years ago. It took this long? Put down your drugged Starbucks and your overpriced i-Pod and get a grip and get mad, voters. Vote for the most progressive candidate and let's get some fiscal fairness and sanity installed again - before this economic Katrina breaks our backs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A list of specific things to be done
Posted by: asilsfable on Jan 28, 2008 2:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Danny Schecter had it right; debt is a big deal. People need to pay more attention to the nickle and diming of America.

1) No penalty rates for credit cards--No 32% interest on credit cards because someone paid some other bill late. Also, no over limit fees--no transactions should be allowed to go through if they will go over the card holder's contracted limit. An 18% national cap should be implemented immediately.

2) No extra fees for mortgage companies--no tacked on fees for being in foreclosure or forbearance. No exorbitant late fees.

3) An immediate moratorium on all foreclosures for 120 days--enough time (and some incentive) for lenders to work with borrowers to get a refinanced interest rate that is affordable.

4) NO FICO loans and a window to refinance into government secured low fixed rates for borrowers with less than stellar credit--credit scoring rules are shackles for low FICO borrowers-lowered rates would allow many to stay in their homes. No FICO loans would allow criteria to be based on ability to pay.

5) Parameters on credit scoring--once someone has dipped into sub-prime territory they're swimming in shark infested waters. Credit scoring often keeps people locked into bad rates even though they've been responsible bill payers after a bad period. Lending alternatives to loans based on FICO scores should be established.

6) Outlawing pre-payment penalties on a federal level--this should never have existed!

7) Extend unemployment insurance AND TANF benefits for at least 6 months--a tight job market is an inevitable by-product of the mortgage crisis--stop the clock for needy families and the unemployed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement