Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Are U.S. Policies Killing Women?

By Michele Kort, Ms. Magazine. Posted January 22, 2008.


In a word, yes. And what's Bush doing about it? These days, making it worse.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Michele Kort

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Even as we commemorate the landmark 35th anniversary of Roe v. Wade this year, U.S. reproductive-health policies are having an inordinately negative effect outside of our borders. They're causing women to die or be maimed. Harsh words, but true.

For the past 24 years, except during the Clinton presidency, U.S. administrations have maintained a global gag rule against providing counseling or referrals for abortions at U.S.-funded clinics in developing nations. It's a rule that only thwarts safe abortions, while reducing the already limited availability of other family-planning services. The global gag rule has also led to a pullback in overseas delivery of contraceptives, according to recent testimony by Rep. Nita M. Lowey (D-N.Y.) before the House Foreign Affairs Committee: "U.S. shipments of contraceptives have ceased to 20 developing nations in Africa, Asia and the Middle East. In some areas, the largest distribution centers for contraceptives have experienced decreased access for over 50 percent of the women they serve."

Women's health and rights activists in the U.S. have spent the past two decades fighting against such actions, and advocating on behalf of global reproductive health issues. But progress has come slowly. While maternal mortality has been declining at 1 percent annually, it needs to decline by 5.5 percent a year in order to be three-quarters reduced by 2015 (one of the United Nation's Millenium Development Goals). Sounds like a lot -- but it would require just about $6.1 billion more in annual funding -- the price of three weeks of the Iraq war -- to achieve that goal. Without that commitment, more than 500,000 women will still die annually from childbirth and its complications, with an estimated 70,000 of those deaths due to unsafe abortions.

Take, for example, the situation of women in Kenya, where abortion remains illegal unless the pregnant woman's life is in danger (a loophole some compassionate doctors interpret liberally, as they know that desperate women will risk their lives to abort anyway). An estimated 250,000 to 320,000 abortions are carried out in the country each year, with unsafe procedures causing a shocking toll: Globally, 13 percent of maternal deaths result from abortion-related complications, but in Kenya it's as high as 40 percent.

In public hospitals such as Kenyatta National in Nairobi, about 20,000 Kenyan women are treated each year for abortion-related complications. Nearly two-thirds of the beds in the notorious gynecological section -- Ward 1D -- are occupied by those patients, who suffer everything from excessive bleeding to injured organs to sepsis. Those sufferers include women such as Wangui (not her real name), who drank a boiled concoction made from trees and took several doses of an anti-malaria drug in order to abort because her impoverished household couldn't support a fifth child. She ended up in Ward 1D because she required an urgent blood transfusion to save her life.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: abortion, reproductive health, family planning, contraceptives, roe v wade, ms magazine, global gag rule

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Rape Epidemic In Africa, & US Women Denied Reproductive Health Care
Posted by: cherylholmes on Jan 22, 2008 4:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw a program on PBS a few weeks ago that perhaps some of you also saw. There is an epidemic of rape in Africa that no government is addressing. Rape carries a nasty stigma...the men are even raping the children. They do it for the humiliation and control of the women. It isn't only the soldiers doing it either. These women are so traumatized by the rapes, beatings and high pregnancy rates from being raped, they are performng their own abortions on themselves to rid their bodies of this evil spawn. They showed the overcrowded hospitals and explained women often die waiting for treatment. I don't recall the actual numbers of women, but I was truly shocked. The human rights violations are unconscienable. And no one gives a damn. These women are like the poor women in this country, invisible. Governments will not help them, the same way our government won't help us.

Our government disapproves of birth control. Insurance companies no longer cover birth control In fact, they hardly cover a pap smear either and certainly not every year. I believe most US insurance companies only allow a mammogram every 5 years now. Abortion? Not unless you are wealthy and can pay for it yourself. So, if you are a menopausal woman and you have sex, you may get as pregnant as your teenage daughter may be. Imagine that, your grandma having a baby..and both ages of women are at very high risk for birth defects and complications. Both women are likely unable to financially care for a normal child much less one with birth defects.

The only thing the US wants is for you to give birth. They are pro birth, not pro life. If they were pro life they wouldn't be slaughtering millions of people all over this planet. No one would be without healthcare, food, shelter and the necessities of life.

It is utterly ignorant and stupid for men to tell us what we can or can't do with our bodies, then take away any funding so we have to "obey" them like they own us. I get so sick and tired of men dictating to women and controlling our ever decreasing reproductive health care. They obviously hate women to do this to us, force us to be pregnant and give birth, while they run around screwing every young woman they see, then leave us for another woman to raise all the kids they made us have in the first place, alone and financially destitue.They force their children to live in poverty by not paying child support and by denying them access to food, clothing, shelter, healthcare by cutting them off any social programs that might help them. And they preach Abstinance yet they are out screwing everything.This concept is total bullshit, AND expect women to drop their drawers at the drop of a hat? What idiots..

Ladies, let's give them all the abstinance they can shove up their asses. Keep your clothes on and tell them to go see "rosie." This is birth control you morons, the only bc you will let us have...so you ain't gettin' any either...Oh, I forgot, most Republican males are closeted gays...Darn I thought we had that solved...c

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» not quite... Posted by: dover23
» Paragraph 3 Posted by: kepstein7777
Humanity and religion
Posted by: audiodef on Jan 22, 2008 6:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"And what can women in the U.S. do to help their Kenyan sisters?"

Whoa! Back up that truck, buddy. This falls under the "and then they came for me" category. It is not purely a "women's" issue. This is a human issue. As a man, this makes me as mad as any female activist. So the question really is, what can anyone do?

"Sisterhood is a global mission."

An issue like this one transcends gender in terms of solidarity, especially in a world still dominated by one sex over the other. In fact, it's especially important that the dominating sex take steps to balance sexual equality, as it serves the enlightenment of both that sex and the entire species.

It's extremely disturbing that the US has a policy of discouraging birth control, not only abroad, but here as well. I think it has a lot to do with the right-wing Christian extremists in this country who have hijacked Christianity, a religion of peace and love in its creed, for their own political/power purposes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Humanity and religion Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Humanity and religion Posted by: peacefullaim
bush admin. kills women
Posted by: mtnprivy on Jan 22, 2008 6:15 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not know enough about the african and other politics to comment on bush's policies. I think his legacy is generally pretty bad. I do agree that it is sad how "pro-life" camps are full of pro military-complex war machine hawks who meddle around the world. Many of the world's troubles are not(not all of them) caused by our government, but we often make them worse.
It does not follow, however, that killing unborn babies is the solution. If you are so respectful toward women, then why can't you admit that women carry ANOTHER LIFE inside them, when they are pregnant.It is just plain skewed to act like that OTHER LIFE is just a "part of your body" like an appendix is. This is the ultimate disrespect for the uniqueness of women. Over half of those "fetuses" that are aborted are women, you know. Who can stand up and say "I wish I had been aborted"?
Unfortunately there are very few consistent people out there who are really pro-life and anti-war. The mennonites are one group, and the hispanics often are too, but who you gonna vote for when the pro-abortion people have taken over the democrat party?
Then there is the fact of global warming, which threatens all life on the planet. On a relative scale, human life matters little if we are gonna kill ourselves and the planet too. Let's quite being selfish here, and learn to think about the experience of others too. If abortion is our solution to any problem, then we are pretty shallow thinkers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: bush admin. kills women Posted by: xennonette
» RE: bush admin. kills women Posted by: wireup
» RE: bush admin. kills women Posted by: TheLimit
» RE: bush admin. kills women Posted by: TheLimit
» RE: bush admin. kills women Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: bush admin. kills women Posted by: mtnprivy
Guttmacher Report
Posted by: Religious_Institute on Jan 22, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Last week, the Guttmacher Institute released a report that abortion rates were at their lowest level since 1974 -- but they couldn't explain if that's because abortion is increasingly difficult to obtain or because unplanned pregnancies have decreased or because...

In my experience over the past 35 years walking with women who are facing unplanned pregnancies, first as a friend, then as a counselor, and now as a minster, the reasons that women choose to have abortions or choose to carry pregnancies to term are as individual as the individual woman. Another recent Guttmacher report found that more than half of women choosing abortion already have children and don't feel they can take care of another baby.

But, what I know, deep in my core, is that women do not make these decisions lightly, whatever the outcome. And that today, I am as committed to assuring women's right to safe, legal, and accessible abortion services as I was back in 1973. I just wish I didn't have to be.

Rev. Debra Haffner
http://www.debrahaffner.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pro Life?
Posted by: Southern Gal on Jan 22, 2008 7:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We know that there is a growing population on earth and in industrialized countries people are living longer. The earth's ability to sustain this population growth is decreasing as our resources are decreasing. I don't understand why the religious nutcases running this administration limit birth control to other countries, particularly poor impoverished nations. That is like adding fuel to the global population fire. By their support of pre-emptive war and the slaughter of innocent people it is clear that pro life does not apply to anyone other than unborn fetuses. I guess that those who have commented on Alternet that the powers that be want more bodies to wage the wars are on to something.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And on the other hand, TRIPS kills far more people.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jan 22, 2008 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
TRIPS is short for "Trade-Related aspects of Intellectual Property Rights".

It is a product of the World Trade Organization, and was implemented in 1995.

It keeps life-saving AIDS/HIV drugs out of the hands of millions of people so that pharmaceutical corporations can maintain their high profit margins (never mind that most of the drugs initially come out of publicly funded universities).

For some background, see

Africans Find U.S. Put Catch-22 In Deal For Cheap AIDS Drugs, Greg Palast, 2000

"TRIP-ing, Argentina and Africa — it all fits together. The story begins with this un-fun fact: one in four people in Black Africa are going to die of AIDS unless medicine arrives now. Luckily, Brazil, India, and most aggressively Argentina, can make the drugs dirt cheap and ship them to the dying. But U.S., British and Swiss pharmaceuticals giants howled about the proposed cross-shipments. The U.S. trade cops, led by Vice-President Al Gore, backed by Big Pharma, halted the life-saving plan — Nelson Mandela’s pleas, Nobel Prize and flowered shirts notwithstanding."

But, you might say, this is needed to protect the massive investments of time and money by Big Pharma which create those drugs! Not so.

"Maybe I’m not being fair. After all, TRIPS seeks to protect and compensate manufacturers for their risky investments and inventiveness in creating medicines like AZT, Glaxo-Wellcome’s anti-AIDS drug.

Glaxo was inventive, all right, but not in discovering AZT. A professor Jerome Horowitz synthesized the drug in 1964, under a grant from the U.S. government’s National Institutes of Health (NIH). A Glaxo unit bought the formula to use on pet cats.

In 1984, an NIH lab discovered the HIV virus. The government lab urgently asked drug makers to send samples of every anti-retrovirus drug on their shelves. NIH spent millions inventing a method to test these compounds. When the tests showed AZT killed the virus, the government asked Glaxo, as the compound’s owner, to conduct lab tests.

Glaxo refused. You can’t blame them. HIV could contaminate labs, even kill researchers. So the NIH’s Dr. Hiroaki Mitsuya, combining brilliance, bravery and loads of public cash, performed the difficult proofs on live virus. In February 1985, NIH told Glaxo the good news and asked the company to conduct human trials..."


This policy of putting the interests of Big Pharma first has been amplified under the Bush regime: Global AIDS Coordinator Tobias Defends U.S. Policy Not To Use Generic Fixed-Dose Combination Antiretroviral Drugs, 2004

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"King" george
Posted by: willymack on Jan 22, 2008 9:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is a King Midas in reverse. Everything he touches turns into fertilizer, caca, doo-doo, well, you get the picture.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wangari Maathai on abortion
Posted by: vasumurti on Jan 22, 2008 10:21 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Abortion is wrong" says Nobel Peace Prize Winner Wangari Maathai, who suggests reinstating a law making fathers financially responsible for children conceived

Kenyan Nobel peace prize winner, Wangari Maathai, said "abortion is wrong," in a conversation with Norway's Dagen newspaper reporter Jostein Sandsmark in 2004. Professor Maathai is Kenya's deputy minister of the environment.

"But I am trying to avoid condemning the victim," she said, referring to the pregnant mother who seeks an abortion. She sees both mother and child as casualties: "Both are victims. There is no reason why anybody who has been conceived, shouldn't be given the opportunity to be born and to live a happy life. The fact that a life like that is terminated, is wrong," said Maathai.

"When we allow abortion, we are punishing the women -- who must abort their children because their men have run away -- and we are punishing the children whose life is terminated," she continued. "But it is because we are not willing to put the men where they should be, and that is taking up the responsibility."

"I want us to step back a little bit and say: Why is this woman and this child threatened? Why is this woman threatening to terminate this life? What do we need to do as a society? What are we not doing right now as a society? A part of that answer lies in this House," Maathai said, pointing at the Kenyan Parliament building.

While abortion is still illegal in Kenya, Maathai suggests going further -- that the 1960s law making fathers financially responsible for any children they conceive be reinstated.

"That law was removed by men in this Parliament," she emphasized. "Now I think we are too lenient on men. We have almost given them a license to father children and not worry about them. That is part of the reason why women abort, because they do not want to be burdened with children whose fathers do not want to become responsible."

Maathai was awarded the Nobel prize for her involvement in fighting for the environment, human rights and women's rights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wangari Maathai on abortion Posted by: abbadon2007
» Two points... Posted by: mjabele
» RE: Two points... Posted by: morticia
» RE: Two points... Posted by: abbadon2007
» RE: Two points... Posted by: mjabele
Abortion & Human Overpopulation
Posted by: Jeff Hoffman on Jan 22, 2008 2:25 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only is abortion the right of every woman to do what she sees fit regarding her own body -- a fetus, as opposed to a baby, is a part of a woman's body, NOT an independent form of life! -- but disallowing abortions not only harms women who want them, it creates more overpopulation, which is the biggest problem on the planet.

And lest we forget, abortion, while somewhat legal in the U.S., is not available to a large number of women here either, because the anti-abortion criminals have intimidated doctors and clinics, which have in turn refused to provide abortion services in most counties of the U.S.

And lest anyone thinks I'm only talking about overpopulation of non-whites, EVERYPLACE on Earth is overpopulated by humans, including the U.S. There are too many people of every type and color; this is not a racial or social issue, but is an ecological one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thanks, Jeff!!!! Posted by: morticia
ultrasound and autism
Posted by: o on Jan 22, 2008 2:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.realsavvymoms.com /preconception/article. php?category2=3 & article=222

is this information being kept from mothers? when my son was born in 1985 autism hit 1 in 10,000 now it strikes 1 in 166. the ultrasound heats up water and pings 100 dcb sounds at the fetus. even though all three of my children were ultrasounded and only one is autistic it could be that the timing is crucial; the others got lucky. since there is no real need to do sonograms i dont understand the continuation of the practice much less the boutique ultrasound shops. jaymee hewitt

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ultrasound and autism Posted by: TheLimit
» RE: ultrasound and autism Posted by: urthsong
Not only missing zygotes
Posted by: Andrew_S on Jan 22, 2008 3:02 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I see we have the grey cell challenged consumer elite contributing to the article thread. Ranging from the seething phalicless male orientated harridans to the pro gaien effeminized males. We must not neglect the standard fare of benile arguments. Have any of you studied commercial human husbandry or even looked at Rummels site titled 'Power kills'. Your experiences appear to be relative which proves the point, look a little higher my dear sheeple, and think abstraction. We live in a very tenuous and precipitous vertical market, but it is nice to see people thinking badly. As for our outspoken femmes, very predictable, then again what better tool could your controllers need, than the psychotic. Monetize me !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of course the policies are killing women, they are killing the planet.
Posted by: greentime on Jan 22, 2008 6:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An emotionally bankrupt Bush administration and it's Democrat counterparts are too busy raping the planet to even care. They do not think of us as a nation of citizens in a global setting.
They do not think of us at all.

They do seem to think more of men, at least as cannon fodder, than they do of women.

The planet is reeling from their corruption, the economy is sinking like a stone, they have proven over and over that they have no idea that the age of oil is not only over, it is failed and dangerous. They only seek to expand the ways they can dominate or destroy every other culture as they force us to consume what profits them and no one else.

In a time of certain overpopulation, they send their sick and destructive reproduction policies to every corner of this sacred planet. They show NO respect for women.

This is not about birth control, but it is about control. The failure is that we have lost control of our so-called government. The entire world is in peril.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Note on Personal Experience in Aggresive Feminism
Posted by: abbadon2007 on Jan 22, 2008 7:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are times when a cause needs to be voiced aggressively, depending on the conditions, the intended audience, and the desired response. Feminism is a cause which often warrants this treatment, but not always.

I responded to a comment to note agreement with the often unheard argument: "laws enforcing a man's responsibility are justified and might help reduce the demand for abortions."

And, really, to say that the argument doesn't go far enough, and to reflect fairness, needs to address equal accountability for ALL of the costs, immediate and lasting, of pregnancy. it's kind of a neat argument. you don't hear it very often. and it is logical to draw from an article which lodges the complaint that the vast majority of the legislature is composed of men who refuse to advance legislation protecting women.

The quick response was to assume and falsely label me against all the things I didn't mention. Birth control - I use it all the time. Believer in life at conception - I'm not even a little bit. Proponent of the right of uncontrolled unlimited procreation - couldn't be farther from the truth.

Case in point, the rapidity with which some of these people come to conclusions about others invovled in the dialogue is unfortunate, and probably alienates a significant number of potential allies. It's nothing to change my opinion about what's right - a woman's right to complete control over her own body. But I wish I could promote that goal without having to assoicate with people who are so judgemental.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GreginOz
Posted by: GreginOz on Jan 22, 2008 9:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the Religion, stoopid...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: GreginOz Posted by: TheLimit
» RE: GreginOz Posted by: urthsong