Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Can't Sleep? Cell Phone Radiation Could Ruin Your Bedtime

By Geoffrey Lean, The Independent. Posted January 23, 2008.


Phone makers' own scientists discover that bedtime use can lead to headaches, confusion and depression.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Egyptian Marine: Soldiers Often 'Racialize' the Enemy to Cope With Stress
Aaron Glantz

More stories by Geoffrey Lean

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Radiation from mobile phones delays and reduces sleep, and causes headaches and confusion, according to a new study.

The research, sponsored by the mobile phone companies themselves, shows that using the handsets before bed causes people to take longer to reach the deeper stages of sleep and to spend less time in them, interfering with the body's ability to repair damage suffered during the day.

The findings are especially alarming for children and teenagers, most of whom -- surveys suggest -- use their phones late at night and who especially need sleep. Their failure to get enough can lead to mood and personality changes, ADHD-like symptoms, depression, lack of concentration and poor academic performance.

The study -- carried out by scientists from the blue-chip Karolinska Institute and Uppsala University in Sweden and from Wayne State University in Michigan, USA -- is thought to be the most comprehensive of its kind.

Published by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium and funded by the Mobile Manufacturers Forum, representing the main handset companies, it has caused serious concern among top sleep experts, one of whom said that there was now "more than sufficient evidence" to show that the radiation "affects deep sleep".

The scientists studied 35 men and 36 women aged between 18 and 45. Some were exposed to radiation that exactly mimicked what is received when using mobile phones; others were placed in precisely the same conditions, but given only "sham" exposure, receiving no radiation at all.

The people who had received the radiation took longer to enter the first of the deeper stages of sleep, and spent less time in the deepest one. The scientists concluded: "The study indicates that during laboratory exposure to 884 MHz wireless signals components of sleep believed to be important for recovery from daily wear and tear are adversely affected."

The embarrassed Mobile Manufacturers Forum played down the results, insisting -- at apparent variance with this published conclusion -- that its "results were inconclusive" and that "the researchers did not claim that exposure caused sleep disturbance".

But Professor Bengt Arnetz, who led the study, says: "We did find an effect from mobile phones from exposure scenarios that were realistic. This suggests that they have measurable effects on the brain."

He believes that the radiation may activate the brain's stress system, "making people more alert and more focused, and decreasing their ability to wind down and fall asleep".

About half of the people studied believed themselves to be "electrosensitive", reporting symptoms such as headaches and impaired cognitive function from mobile phone use. But they proved to be unable to tell if they had been exposed to the radiation in the test.

This strengthens the conclusion of the study, as it disposes of any suggestion that knowledge of exposure influenced sleeping patterns. Even more significantly, it throws into doubt the relevance of studies the industry relies on to maintain that the radiation has no measurable effects.

A series of them -- most notably a recent highly publicised study at Essex University -- have similarly found that people claiming to be electrosensitive could not distinguish when the radiation was turned on in laboratory conditions, suggesting that they were not affected.

Critics have attacked the studies' methodology, but the new findings deal them a serious blow. For they show that the radiation did have an effect, even though people could not tell when they were exposed.

It also complements other recent research. A massive study, following 1,656 Belgian teenagers for a year, found most of them used their phones after going to bed. It concluded that those who did this once a week were more than three times -- and those who used them more often more than five times -- as likely to be "very tired".

Dr Chris Idzikowski, the director of the Edinburgh Sleep Centre, says: "There is now more than sufficient evidence, from a large number of reputable investigators who are finding that mobile phone exposure an hour before sleep adversely affects deep sleep."

Dr William Kohler of the Florida Sleep Institute added: "Anything that disrupts the integrity of your sleep will potentially have adverse consequences in functioning during the day, such as grouchiness, difficulty concentrating, and in children hyperactivity and behaviour problems."

David Schick, the chief executive of Exradia, which manufactures protective devices against the radiation, called on ministers to conduct "a formal public inquiry" into the effects of mobile phones.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: cell phones, radiation, sleep

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
there may be royal permission for University of Essex research to be faulty
Posted by: Suzon on Jan 23, 2008 3:53 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The university's charter may contain a declaration that "non-recital" (concealment) and "mis-recital" (deception) are to be disregarded by ministers and judges.

I am not implying anything about Essex or the research mentioned in this article, but I am stating that a number of royal charters granted to universities encourge wrongdoing by pre-excusing it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» peer review Posted by: launcher
I Haven't Yet...
Posted by: Wacre on Jan 23, 2008 6:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
purchased a cell phone, primarily because I don't quite see the need for them. Too many people have them, chattering about things that appear (on the surface at any rate) of very little consequence.

I know that this because many people, when they purchase a cell phone, seem to lose any sense of discretion that may have existed prior, so I am almost as privy to their conversations as the people having them are.

Tbs, I may get one (particularly if the iPhone Nano becomes a reality) but I will probably never see them as a necessity. This sense is enhanced since it appears that they (the cell phone makers) have not worked out all the kinks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I Haven't Yet... Posted by: aonghus36
What?
Posted by: kungfoofighterx on Jan 23, 2008 8:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nevermind the small sample size, it is interesting that mysterious parts of the brain could be activated by radio freqs. I wonder how this relates to people who have the "phantom phone" syndrome. Where they feel the phone on their person even though it is in a drawer or something. Its like people who still feel their legs after they are amputated. I wonder if this radiation would effect people who have never had cell phones? Interesting. Stress responses can be learned. Anyone out there know the cellular mechanism (nice pun) of reception for 900mhz? Who knew my glia have antennae. Soon we will be able to dial someones brain directly. No need for a silly phone. hahahahha

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» haha yourself Posted by: Ignatz deFyre
Cell phone use
Posted by: willymack on Jan 23, 2008 11:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read somewhere that people in Iceland have more per capita cell phone use than anywhere else. Maybe a study could be conducted there as it'd be much easier what the low population and small land area. I use my cell phone only at work, and only when I'm called; I seldom initiate a call. That's because I don't really like talking to others on the phone. I'd much rather talk to them in person. Besides that, I'm CHEAP and don't like the idea of supporting what I consider a dirty business. I know several people who have cell phones to use only in an emergency and limit their use to 911 calls. Not a bad idea.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

900 MHz cordless phones
Posted by: suprmark on Jan 23, 2008 11:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For 18 years the public has been using frequencies around this range in cordless phones, so I am somewhat surprised that this is the first comprehensive study done on the effects of wireless phone use on sleep patterns. It seems as if this is something the military would be interested in studying more though, if it hasn't already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Divine retribution
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jan 23, 2008 3:41 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's divine retribution for all the annoying, pretentious yapping in public places and in cars. May they all suffer eternal insomnia and watch late-night infomercials until they gouge their eyes out.

As for children and teenagers, what are they doing with phones? I didn't get one until I was 35, and only because I married into it. And please don't give me the soccer mom excuse; none of us had cell phones as kids, yet our parents knew where we were, and we survived.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Safe Wireless?
Posted by: A. Servant on Jan 25, 2008 10:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To learn more about the potential dangers of wireless communication technologies and what to do about it, see George Carlo's website at: http://www.safewireless.org/

I. Increase your body’s resistance to EMR damage: Maximize your health

II. Minimize your EMR exposure: Decrease hazardous risks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement