Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Las Vegas Casino Caucus Showcases Blue-Collar Vote

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted January 19, 2008.


Barack Obama wins at casino as Hillary Clinton is statewide victor.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Steven Rosenfeld

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Hillary Clinton won the first round of the Nevada Caucuses, beating her nearest rival Barack Obama, with 51 percent of the voters who caucused compared to 45 percent for Obama. John Edwards finished a distant third with 4 percent of the vote, according to the Nevada Democratic Party.

Clinton's victory included a surprising 11 percent margin in Clark County, where Las Vegas is located and where Obama was backed by two of Nevada's strongest labor unions, the Culinary Workers and Service Employees. In contrast, Obama beat Clinton in many rural counties.

As the caucus results were tallied, the Obama campaign issued a press release saying he would emerge with 13 delegates from Nevada at the Democratic National Convention, compared to 12 for Clinton. That assertion was based the state party's arcane formula for awarding delegates, which varies from county to county. However, Nevada Democratic Party officials replied that conclusion was premature, as the delegates elected on Saturday first have to pass through a county and state nominating process.

Nonetheless, the nation's first western presidential contest was filled with firsts. Voter turnout was historic and unprecedented, with 120,000 voters -- including thousands who registered to vote before caucusing, according to party officials. In contrast, barely 10,000 people participated in 2004's Democratic Caucuses.

Party leaders were jubilant as the surveyed the results on Saturday afternoon at the Las Vegas Convention Center. From their perspective, the caucus energized and enlarged their party, even though there were problems reported, such as voters who were turned away from some locations and confusion over the rules at others.

"Come November, we're all Democrats," was repeatedly heard as party officials congratulated each other.

CAUCUSING AT THE CASINO

Nevada's Caucuses also included special precincts at nine Las Vegas casinos so workers there could help select delegates without losing a day's pay. The Democratic National Committee and state party created these at-large precincts specifically to engage blue-collar minority voters.

One such caucus, at the Luxor -- Las Vegas' famous pyramid-shaped hotel -- was all that party officials could hope for. As the noon start time approached, a parade of valets, maids, buffet servers, cooks, food runners, waitresses, and others dressed in uniforms from Luxor and two adjacent hotels filled a large ballroom decorated with flags and a banner declaring "MGM-Mirage Supports 2008 Caucus." The hotel's president even visited, saying caucusing was more important than getting back to work.

One-third of the attendees registered to vote before caucusing. Party officials said the combined turnout at the nine casino sites was 2,600 voters. Although that figure was less than predicted, they still said the casino caucuses were an unqualified success. "We were able to mobilize so many first-time voters," said Andres Ramirez, who oversees outreach for the Nevada state party.

At 10 minutes past noon, the Egyptian Ballroom's doors were closed and the caucus began. The room was filled with 383 voters, party officials, observers from the campaigns, and members of the media.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: nevada, election 2008, hillary clinton, barack obama

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and co-author of "What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election," with Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman (The New Press, 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Remember: the real action will start AFTER the election.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jan 19, 2008 4:07 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Essentially, the Republicans have almost zero chance of winning the Presidency, and the realignment of corporate interests with the leading Democratic candidates is more or less proof that this is the case. Edwards is a bit iffy - "potential Roosevelt" is how the corporatocracy views him, so he's being airbrushed out of the frame by Propaganda Inc. (i.e. NPR, CNN, FOX, ABC, CBS, NBC, NYT, WP, etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.)

So, what's going to happen next? The political class in the United States have thoroughly revealed themselves as corporate salad-tossers, which, while sort of depressing, is also highly amusing - public prostitution is kind of funny, isn't it?

The best response to all this is to ridicule the politicians and the corporate media - which, as Stewart & Colbert have demonstrated, is oh-so-easy to do (shooting fish in a barrel comes to mind, doesn't it?).

Really - we've got a totally corrupt electoral system. Look at the "debates" - you've got General Electric running NBC, Disney & Co. running ABC, and Someone's Got A Red Nose running CBS -when they manage to lay off the whiskey and cocaine, that is.

What next? This is just beyond belief. No debate over the Iraq war, no debate over the Las Vegas -style crapshoot banking system, no debate over why an ex-CEO of Goldman Sachs is running the U.S. Treasury (#1 contributer to the "leading candidates" Obama and Clinton), etc. etc. (Speaking of which, check out the photo of Bush, Cheney and Paulson that AFP published today... Skull & Bones? Damn if Paulson doesn't look like he's having a VERY bad day...

It's just too ridiculous for words - "Leader of the Free World?" I mean, WTF is going on here? Chimpanzees at the buffet?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

funny?
Posted by: wwittman on Jan 19, 2008 8:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's only "funny" if you think having all of our lives, and those of our children, ruined is "funny".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It was disappointing that Latinos betrayed
Posted by: cjohnson44 on Jan 20, 2008 8:37 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a fellow person of color by ignoring Barack Obama. A fellow organizer friend of mine warned that we can't count on the Latino vote for Obama because they are jealous of him and only care about Latinos - that they view Blacks as lazy and dumb. At the time, I was shocked by her assessment and refused to believe it. Now after seeing what happened in Nevada, I'm begining to wonder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Come November
Posted by: Quasar on Jan 20, 2008 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I dont think the Dems should count on all Dems voting Dem if it's Clinton and McCain in November.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I will never vote for Clinton
Posted by: Susan Kipping on Jan 20, 2008 4:37 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bilderbergers selected Bill Clinton for president in 1991 and have met with Hillary in l997. This is the New World Order we are talking about and Hillary is there all the way.

Only two classes will survive the Bilderberg plan - elites and slaves, all dissenters will parish. One good book to read is "The Bilderberg Group" by Daniel Estulin. The Bilderbergers have had their wish list filled year after year after year and it isn't pretty. I do not think this country will survive. Look at our economy, this endless war, our lying mass media, our corrupt banks and corporations. This has all been planned to a science. Then we have the CIA, FBI and Pentagon to further take us down. Our congress, senate and supreme court are working against us whether democrat of republican. We need to wake people up. The mind control is overwhelming and the electoral system is rigged. Our children depend on us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]