Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Who Will Take the Fall for the CIA Torture Tape Scandal?

By Roberto Lovato, AlterNet. Posted January 18, 2008.


The actions of three key Latino government officials may determine whether the torture tape investigation reaches the White House.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Roberto Lovato

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

As he concluded a closed-door congressional hearing into the CIA torture tape scandal, Committee Chairman Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, on Wednesday opened the country to a historic possibility: that the fate of the investigation into the destruction of the tapes will be decided by Latino government officials. Current and former Latino officials may even determine whether the investigation reaches the White House.

Reyes, the powerful chair of the House Intelligence Committee, is charged with overseeing an investigation into the latest controversy. Reyes' fellow Tejano, former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who was one of four Bush administration officials briefed on the tapes before they were destroyed, may be asked to testify in the investigation. And at the heart of the whole affair is Jose Rodriguez, the Puerto Rican native who was the CIA's former director of clandestine operations. According to the CIA officials, Rodriguez ordered the destruction of the interrogation tapes in 2005.

Rodriguez was subpoenaed to appear before a closed-door hearing of Reyes' intelligence committee on Jan. 16. But after Rodriguez's lawyer informed Reyes and the committee that his client would not testify without a grant of immunity, the congressman decided to postpone the former CIA official's appearance. Some observers believe the postponement signals a willingness on the part of Reyes to negotiate some kind of immunity deal with Rodriguez.

Developments in the case represent a new, more diverse chapter in the history of national security scandals. How these current and former Latino officials proceed -- especially Reyes and Rodriguez -- may well determine whether the investigation reaches as far as the Bush administration. President George W. Bush said last December that he could not recall hearing about the 2005 destruction of the tapes prior to a Dec. 6 briefing by CIA Director Michael Hayden, despite recent revelations that Gonzales was among the four White House lawyers debating between 2003 and 2005 whether to destroy the now infamous tapes. Some experts speculate that Rodriguez's testimony could lead to a wider investigation and that he is trying to avoid becoming a fall guy for the Bush administration.

"If everybody was against the decision, why in the world would Jose Rodriguez -- one of the most cautious men I have ever met -- have gone ahead and destroyed them?" said Vincent Cannistraro, the CIA's former head of counterterrorism during an interview with the Times of London. Cannistraro's sentiments were echoed by Larry Johnson, another former CIA official interviewed by the Times last month. "It looks increasingly as though the decision was made by the White House," said Johnson, who pointed to a likely expansion of the investigation by an eventual Rodriguez testimony. "The CIA and Jose Rodriguez look bad, but he's probably the least culpable person in the process," said Johnson. "He didn't wake up one day and decide, 'I'm going to destroy these tapes.' He checked with a lot of people and eventually he is going to get his say."

Whether or not Rodriguez does, in fact, get his say depends on his fellow Latino government official, Reyes. Unlike Gonzales, whose rise from poverty in Humble, Texas, to the heights of power and controversy became front-page news following his involvement in the Abu Ghraib scandal, Reyes is a much lesser-known Tejano. Called "Silver" by his friends and close associates, Reyes, a very conservative, pro-Pentagon Democrat and Vietnam war veteran from El Paso, rose to the top of the congressional intelligence chain after a 26½-year stint with the Border Patrol.

As the head of the congressional committee responsible for oversight of the CIA and 15 other agencies comprising the U.S. intelligence community, Reyes will play a definitive role in determining the breadth and scope of the tape controversy investigation. Derided by Fox News commentator John Gibson and other conservative pundits for being "unqualified" for the position, Reyes' past statements about Rodriguez may raise questions about his ability to objectively manage the investigation. During a Border Security Conference organized by Reyes at the University of Texas at El Paso in August, he presented an award to Rodriguez, calling him "our good friend and American hero" and speaking glowingly of his claim to fame as the man who inspired the role of Jack Bauer in 24. Rodriguez, he said, was "the genesis -- with a few liberties that Hollywood takes -- the exploits of Jose Rodriguez are documented in the series 24." Rodriguez, he added, "admitted to me that he likes fast cars. I won't tell you about the women, but I will tell you about the fast cars. He is a connoisseur of fine wine."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: torture, silvestre reyes, latinos, cia, alberto gonzales, jose rodriguez

Roberto Lovato, a frequent Nation contributor, is a New York-based writer with New America Media.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
For crying out loud....
Posted by: cordas on Jan 18, 2008 2:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cut the crap and impeach Bush... there is so much excremant about that there is no way he doesn't have at least a case to answer for.

Having a low IQ and a refusal to accept reality is no reason not to impeach him and the rest of his gang.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: For crying out loud.... Posted by: steven w
» RE: For crying out loud.... Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: For crying out loud.... Posted by: cordas
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Jan 18, 2008 2:55 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I work in your factories.
I study in your schools.
I fill your penitentiaries.
And your military too!
And I feel the future trembling,
As the word is passed around.
"If you stand up for what you do believe,
Be prepared to be shot down."

ooooo-eeeee, watcha gonna do about me?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Certainly not anyone in this Administration
Posted by: Sissy on Jan 18, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I visited the Truman Library the sign that sat on his desk when he was in the White House, and which is now in the Library "The Buck Stops Here" made me think. "When in nearly 8 years, has Bush ever really taken the blame for anything that has gone wrong in this wretched administration unless he has had to make a little nominal admission?" NEVER. But then if he castigated himself for the year after year of poor governing, he would probably throw himself off a bridge. I wish some one would have presented that little sign that Harry had to "W" in 2000, don't you? Nah, it would have disappeared shortly after and no one would have known where that wonderful piece of history went to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nobody takes a fall
Posted by: mr.ed on Jan 18, 2008 5:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jose Rodriguez won't testify without immunity, and everybody else is fingering him. He'll get up and fess up, and the deal's done. He retires, and nobody gets prosecuted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nobody takes a fall Posted by: steven w
» RE: Nobody takes a fall Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Nobody takes a fall Posted by: SENILEBIKER
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Jan 18, 2008 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are forces of chaos and anarchy
Everything they say we are we are
And we are very
Proud of ourselves...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Terrorist Posted by: redbird30328
Give us your tired and weak and don"t forget your corrupt
Posted by: grn1 on Jan 18, 2008 6:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we are experiencing is the globalization of our government. It is particularly easy for this government to become corrupt while advancing those who do not understand the constitution and don't really give a shit. That is how corruption can run rampant. In the 80's, 400,000 Russian emigrees came to the US. Russia was not sending the best and brightest, they were sending many with a criminal past, so does Cuba then add south of the border. So what do we end up with high ranking officials who run a communist, socialist, dictatorship where only their best interest is the concern. Welcome to the world of huddled masses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In case you're wondering what this about...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jan 18, 2008 8:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CIA Tapes Destroyed As Pressure Mounted, Jason Leopold, Jan 8 2008

"The CIA destroyed videotapes showing its agents subjecting high-level al-Qaeda detainees to waterboarding after the agency's inspector general issued a classified report in the spring of 2004 that concluded the interrogation methods used on the prisoners "appeared to constitute cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment, as defined by the International Convention Against Torture."

However, there is a very interesting undercurrent here:

""The officials who described the report said it discussed particular techniques used by the CIA against particular prisoners, including about three dozen terror suspects being held by the agency in secret locations around the world," The New York Times reported." They said it referred in particular to the treatment of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who is said to have organized the Sept. 11 attacks and who has been detained in a secret location by the CIA since he was captured in March 2003. Mr. Mohammed is among those believed to have been subjected to waterboarding, in which a prisoner is strapped to a board and made to believe he is drowning."

Considering that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is the mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks, why hasn't he been placed on trial in the United States?

Odd that that goes completely undiscussed in the press, isn't it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are the real Libertarians when you need them?
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 18, 2008 8:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Wall Street needs ass kissers who'll do the "big government" lie just to kiss Wall Street's ASS at the expense of the working, lower, middle class, the "libertarians" are there.

When gun toters can't control their lust for more guns and violence, the "libertarians" are there.

BUT, when we all need people who will clamp down on big government actually eroding our civil liberties to dust at the expense of having fake "security", the "libertarians" will say "FUCK YOU !" Here's a real litmus test to show them. If they really are against Big Government, let's see any of them fight to ABOLISH THE CIA. Enough already about the CIA's misdeeds. The CIA was completely flawed ever since it was created by Truman STEALTHY executive order for the sole purpose of battling the USSR. You'd think that the "conservatives" who hated Truman would abolish the CIA already !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

By the way, the CIA created Al Quaida.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 18, 2008 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That it still does its unreported backdoor funding ought to make taxpayers wonder why bother funding this terrorist agency? They're about as "good" as Hitler stealing the swastika sign originally a peace sign and misusing it for world domination.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm confused.
Posted by: lexicon on Jan 18, 2008 11:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Somehow, the whole "latino connection" thing strikes me as completely, utterly irrelevant.

The fact that three guys with latino names are involved is somehow "historic?" What's THAT all about?

Is it some kind of "come of age" indicator for the country's latino population, that they're well-represented in a Republican Bush Administration scandal? "We've made it, our guys are on the cover of Newsweek!"....is that it?

What's the real story? That this is the tip of the iceberg. When time comes for the guys in white hazmat suits from the National Archives to come to the White House, to retrieve the presidential records, They'll basically have about 1 mid-sized van's worth of records, for the entire 8 years.

Where's the rest of it? "What do you mean, the rest of it? That's ALL of it, Bush's chief of staff will reply".

lexicon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm confused. Posted by: badkitty
» Yeah, me too... Posted by: aka_bozo
The Hypocrisy Never Ceases To Amaze
Posted by: redbird30328 on Jan 18, 2008 6:18 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact is that none of the posters care a whit whether anyone was tortured, whether tapes were destroyed, or about anything else other than that this incident provides another excuse to vent frustration with their own problems on 'dubya. Even if Dennis Kucinich were elected, their lives will still be the same. This incident is a non-story with the vast majority of Americans. The CIA torturing prisoners is a news flash??!! Join the real world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CIA Officials Guilty of Treason for Violating the Bill of Rights, US Constitution
Posted by: sofla100 on Jan 18, 2008 8:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every one of the CIA torturers has violated the US Constitution. Every one of them is as big a terrorist as the terrorists they have supposedly captured. Hired lawyers who justify this are nothing more then traitors themselves, looking for loopholes and are no better than ambulance chasers. Consequently, these CIA officials should be charged with treason and charges preferred against them. The reason being violating the principles of the USA and its consitution. But, the bigger reason is that torture can now be legally practiced, by precedent, against American citizens abroad, without cause or justification. The demise of the rule of law having seriously damaged American credibility.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
He will get his immunity, most likely.
Posted by: Gaubladt on Jan 20, 2008 6:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the agent who authorized the destruction of torture evidence is given immunity. He will most likely take credit for everything that happened and leave his superiors off the hook.
I suspect that is what Oliver North did during the Contra Investigation.
It would be better if the agent were prosecuted, convicted and sentenced before being allowed to appear at a committee hearing. That way, he would be much more cooperative.
But, the conservative, pro-pentagon pro-war pro-Jack-Bauer head of the investigative committee will most like give him the immunity he wants regardless.
With that said, I think it would be better to focus on Nancy Pelosi and Jane Harmon, who may have witnessed the torture on the tape first hand. If they did, shouldn't they have gone to the 911 commission and reported what they saw? It is possible that if they had spoken up, a revival of military discipline might have ensued, and Abu Graib might never have happened. Shouldn't they be asked to testify before a congressional committee to explain why they remained silent about such a willful disrespect for the rule of law for such a long period of time? Besides, it might be good for their soul.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a latina
Posted by: de aqui on Jan 23, 2008 2:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't see the point of the whole "Three Latinos" angle. I mean the Bush administration is full of creepy old white guys who are criminals but I have yet to see their ethnicity explored in any way. I don't think the writer either saw any meaningful connection or managed to make any real connection other than that Latinos can be as crooked and screwed up as any other ethnic group. Why not use a 3 Texans angle for that matter?

Bush's craven attempts to curry favor with Latinos or screw over people of color while painting himself as an "affirmative action employer" is an old tool from the Republican playbook. It brings us vendidos (that means sell-outs for you English speakers) like Condi Rice and Alberto Gonzalez and it's not new or news.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]