Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Romney Runs His Campaign Like Bush Runs His Presidency

By Bob Moser, TheNation.com. Posted January 16, 2008.


Here's what Romney's Michigan win means for Democrats.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Bob Moser

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

In his surpassingly disingenuous campaign for president, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney has borne only the most superficial resemblance to his dad, George, the late and former governor of Michigan -- much the same chiseled, coldly handsome visage, but starkly different political trajectories. Even if he didn't actually march with Martin Luther King, George Romney was the kind of old-style Republican who strongly backed civil rights, became an opponent of Vietnam, and got axed as Nixon's HUD Secretary for pushing to integrate the suburbs.

Maybe Mitt, like George W. Bush, has a daddy thing -- he's run his campaign, much as Bush has run his presidency, as though the only thing he had to learn from his father were negative lessons. George W. thought his father didn't push hard enough on Iraq and didn't get mean enough to win re-election and was bonkers to raise taxes, and by God, he didn't make those mistakes. Mitt saw his father tarred as a weirdo when he sought the 1968 nomination and -- at a time when he was the favorite for the nomination -- famously told a TV station, "When I came back from Viet Nam [in November 1965], I'd just had the greatest brainwashing that anybody can get," and that he no longer supported the war.

Mitt's campaign has run in the opposite direction: hard right. But until Michigan, his archconservative makeover -- from the fellow who promised to out-gay Teddy Kennedy to the terror-warrior growling about doubling the size of Guantánamo -- hadn't been convincing enough to help him carry a primary. But Romney managed to convert his familiar name into a victory tonight that (at least temporarily) saved his candidacy -- and plunged the already muddled GOP race into a kind of beautiful chaos.

Beautiful, that is, for Democrats.

The oddest thing about Romney's win is that it came in a state in economic crisis -- a place that you'd have expected to overwhelmingly reject a man who made millions as a downsizing consultant. You'd also have expected former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, who pushed his economic populism here harder than his Christian Dominionism, to fare better. But there is no explaining Republican voters this year. Not even to themselves.

Huckabee's "Christian Leader" campaign in Iowa, while it worked for the unusually conservative evangelical Republicans there, undoubtedly made most of the independents and evangelical Democrats who might have listened to his economic message in Michigan tune him out for good. And when he starts talking out of the other side of his mouth -- like John Edwards holding forth on "the Two Americas" -- as he did in Michigan, Huckabee clearly confuses a lot of evangelical Republicans as well. He's echoing what many of them have told pollsters for years -- that they're a lot less conservative on economic issues than on the moral wedges -- but it's still a drastically new message, and thus a bit suspicious-sounding. Huckabee's more pragmatic problem in Michigan, of course, was that he couldn't match Romney's months of organizing and advertising, or John McCain's familiarity with the folk he wooed successfully in 2000.

For whatever bizarre alchemy of reasons, Romney passed his do-or-die test in Michigan. On Saturday in South Carolina, Huckabee will be on the hot spot -- he's holding on to a slim lead over McCain there, with Romney not far behind. McCain needed the Michigan win to boost his South Carolina prospects, but Huckabee's once-rocketing campaign has stalled there as everywhere--and Romney has been running a strong third in the polls. If Huckabee gets his must-win in South Carolina, it will set up a critical four-way battle in Florida on January 29. Rudy Giuliani desperately needs the state to position himself for Tsunami Tuesday on February 5, but he's tied in the polls with McCain, with Romney and Huckabee in striking distance.

Democrats might have blown off Michigan, but they're certainly getting some goodies from the state. Romney's win makes it all the more likely that the Republicans' indecision will stretch well beyond February 5 -- all the way to the national convention. It will make terrific theater. And it will ensure that the ultimate Republican nominee -- whoever in the world it might be -- enters the fall campaign with a divided and perplexed party behind him.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: republican national coonv, presidential primary, michigan, mitt romney, romney

Bob Moser is a contributing writer at The Nation, and is the editorial director of The Nation Institute's Investigative Fund.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Corrections
Posted by: number6 on Jan 16, 2008 11:08 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, your article is incorrect to state that Romney has made his millions as a downsizing agent. His company, Bain Capital, is actually an investment firm and they specialize in taking small companies and expanding them to a more national or global reach. True, they may get rid of a few inefficiencies here and there, but that does not necessarilly involve personnel changes - other than the fact that the Board of Governors of each company Bain takes over usually changes to include Bain people. Companies such as Staples and The Sports Authority were just small, barely lingering companies when Bain Capital took over the reigns of management. Now they are very large national firms - expanded under the direction of Mitt's company. It is no wonder to me why Mitt was selected in Michigan for that very reason. You overgeneralize, and incorrectly so, to assume that because he created a venture capital firm - he must have specialized in downsizing firms. This is a misconstruction of reality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Working Class Posted by: gellero
» RE: Working Class Posted by: leoforward
» RE: Corrections Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Corrections Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Corrections Posted by: leoforward
» And More and More Corrections Posted by: Longdream
» More Corrections Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Corrections Posted by: Doubtom
» RE: Corrections Posted by: Longdream
Romney is freakier than Huckabee, by far.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jan 16, 2008 12:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, Romney's got the Michael Jackson look - it's like he's been airbrushed into the frame. Giuliani just looks like a Mafia Don's whipping boy, but Romney - wow.

Here's a nice quote from Romney:

"For a nation like ours to be great and to thrive, that our Constitution was written for people of faith, and religion is a very extraordinary element and very necessary foundation for our nation. I believe that’s the case."

Note, from the link, that

Article XI of the United State Constitution explicitly bars a "religious test" to hold office:

"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

Romney is another Cheney clone. Cheney came out of Halliburton, Romney comes out of Wall Street - same deal, same fascist-communist alliance, same anti-democracy agenda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Huckabee Whinery.
Posted by: Funuvit on Jan 16, 2008 1:05 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want to know if it is possible for Mike Huckabee to form any two sentences without verbally man-bitch backhand slapping his arch-enemy Mitt Romney. Is anyone else just plain sick of hearing him whine about his empty pockets while he panders to the downtrodden and adds to the victimization complex of a certain demographic. A ray of hope and empowerment is what would encourage the suffering of the middle class, not commiseration. Mitt Romney is putting his own money where his mouth is and what the hell is wrong with that. He is successful and knows how to help others to be successful. His money should speak positively of him and not negatively as Huckabee keeps trying to do. What determines your level of personal commitment to serve Huck? Romney's money is not an indicator of his success, it is how he earned it. He is known for taking failing ventures and organizations and turning them completely around. Just one example: With the chaos that the 2002 Olympics was in, he stopped the finger-pointing and just rolled up his sleeves and solved it. Riddled with debt and scandal and just months from 9/11, he pulled off the most successful Olympic games ever. The event was running $379 million short of its revenue benchmarks. The Games were also damaged by allegations of bribery involving top officials, including then Salt Lake Olympic Committee. Romney was hired as the new president and CEO of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee. Romney revamped the organization's leadership and policies, reduced budgets and boosted fundraising. He also worked to ensure the safety of the Games following 9/11 by coordinating a $300 million security budget. Despite the initial fiscal shortfall, the Games ended up clearing a profit of $100 million, not counting the $224.5 million in security costs contributed by outside sources. Romney contributed $1 million to the Olympics, and donated the $825,000 salary he earned as CEO to charity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Huckabee Whinery. Posted by: drmflorida
» A Dilemma? Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Huckabee Whinery. Posted by: Ambercat
VOCA, now
Posted by: HeKnew on Jan 16, 2008 8:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watch out when Romney starts talking about how Connecticut is developing a nuclear arsenal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did crossover Dems help Romney win?
Posted by: kww355 on Jan 17, 2008 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can't believe this author didn't take that into account. The only "choice" on the Dem ticket was Hillary.

The others had withdrawn in protest due to the DNC's high-handed stripping of Michigan's Dem. delegates because they'd agreed to let the state change the date of its' primary election.

The Repubs did it to us in 1972 by crossing over to vote for George Wallace & again in 1988, voting for Jesse Jackson. We just repaid the "favor".

I'm not convinced that enough Repubs voted for Romney to put him over the top-"favorite son" or not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As a Michiganian...
Posted by: mountainmama on Jan 17, 2008 8:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
who lived during George Romney's governorship, I have been saying this all along about Mitt. He is nothing like his father other then in looks. George Romney was a terrific man who did much good for MIchigan, and one of the few Republicans I can say anything good about! What is it with the offspring of great men...they so often are so opposite and obnoxious? The same goes for Billy Graham and his offspring.

Thank you for writing this piece to show how old George Romney a better then his son.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Romney and the three other Stooges
Posted by: xvictor on Jan 17, 2008 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Romney, McCain, Huckabee, and Ghouliani are just a bunch of Repug losers embarassing our country with their loser presence.

RON PAUL is the clear, intelligent exception, however. Our country can only benefit from his demonstrated leadership. Btw, he edged out Ghouliania TWICE in the primaries thus far. There may be hope!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MI primary crossover voters
Posted by: kabac55 on Jan 17, 2008 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps many MI Democrats did cross party lines to vote in the recent Republican primary. And while some may find that distasteful, it is understandable in the context of politics. This is a primary election. So in 2000, I crossed party lines to vote for John McCain and more importantly against G.W. Bush.

This year I waivered between voting against Mitt Romney and not voting because I was told by the media that the Democratic primary was Hilliary or uncommitted. My rationale for the first was to throw support to someone who if elected wasn't as bad as G. W. Bush. After I found out that Hilliary was not entirely alone on the ballot, I voted for Dennis Kucinich--not because he's likely to get the nomination but I can admire someone who wants to create a U.S. Department of Peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They just don't get it, do they?
Posted by: willymack on Jan 17, 2008 7:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After fifteen years of reaganomics, seven of which are the chimp's, some people, including the knuckleheads calling themselves rethug candidates STILL think it's a good idea. Well, I guess they're right; it's good for the ultra-rich scumbags and those kissing their asses, but it SUCKS for the rest of us. It's appaling to think they may just make this race close enough to rig it yet again, due to the Homer Simpson vote.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]