Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Creating Sustainable Cities: San Francisco and New York Are Leading the Way

By Michelle Chen, The Wip. Posted January 15, 2008.


Far from besieged forests and melting icebergs, American cities are a new front in the environmental movement.
Advertisement

Angela Greene has a tough job: she and her workcrew scale the rooftops of Richmond, California to run wires, lay racks, and bend metal piping. Yet in the end, when she unfurls a gleaming solar panel over her community, it feels easy to save the planet.

After being laid off from her former job at a printing business, Greene went through a vocational training program and then joined Solar Richmond, an organization that is bringing sustainable energy along with new jobs to the heavily black and Latino port city.

To the 47 year-old single mom, her new work as a project manager means more than a steady income. "I'm actually helping my community--showing people in the community that there are things here for us to do," Greene says. "There's good things happening here."

Those good things place Richmond at a new forefront in the environmental movement, far from the embattled rainforests and melting polar ice caps that dominate the news. Many cities have spawned "greening" initiatives to test new concepts of sustainable development, and the political momentum behind them is growing.

New York City recently launched a multi-year plan to ramp up energy efficiency, reduce pollution and cut emissions. And across California, local governments have mapped out eco-friendly development policies that complement new state legislation to control greenhouse-gas emissions.

But amid the political green rush, grassroots groups want to ensure that the plans engage marginal communities, where both people and the environment suffer systemic exploitation and neglect. From downtown Oakland to the South Bronx, activists are trying to align environmental solutions with goals of equity and inclusion.

Nwamaka Agbo with the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, a San Francisco Bay Area activist organization, says the future of the burgeoning movement around climate change hinges on how far it reaches outside the environmentalist in-crowd.

"If the top ten percent are doing everything that's hot and sexy--with the solar panels and the hybrids and biodiesel--but don't invest in these other communities that don't have as much money or don't have as pretty of a reputation," she says, "then all the efforts will be undone."

Rethinking Green

Activists are wary that the green solutions pitched by policymakers and the largely white, mainstream environmental movement may perpetuate, or even deepen, economic and racial stratification. They point to a common trajectory of other urban "development" efforts over the past generation: an infusion of business-friendly capital spurs a wave of gentrification, rents rise, and low-income households are pushed out to make way for a new privileged class.

An ironic dimension to the politics of greening is that the poor and people of color are often hit hardest by the consequences of industrial and human activity--from hurricanes to toxic brownfields.

So what happens when shutting down a smog-churning power plant cleans up the air but wipes out local jobs, or idyllic "green space" is generated by razing low-income housing?

"Very often, efforts to improve environmental quality, especially at local level, have functioned unintentionally--and sometimes intentionally--to gentrify neighborhoods and displace poor people," says Raquel Pinderhughes, a professor of urban planning at San Francisco State University.

New York City environmentalists view Mayor Michael Bloomberg's greening initiative, PlaNYC, with cautious optimism. While it includes progressive initiatives like cleaning up water systems and retrofitting buildings for energy efficiency, the plan gives little insight on how to ensure that green benefits span equitably across the city's uneven social landscape; the New York metro area leads the nation in income inequality.

"The plan is a really positive thing for New York City," says Jack Dafoe of Urban Agenda, a research and policy group focused on job development in the environmental sectors. "The question is, though, can we do something to address the fact that New York City is increasingly a city of the haves and the have-nots?"


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: new york, san francisco, environment

Michelle Chen has written for the South China Morning Post, Clamor, INTHEFRAY.COM and her own zine, cain.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Petition to sign on global warming
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Jan 15, 2008 2:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Subject: Blackout on global warming

Click here to tell top TV reporters:
"The American public deserves to know where all the candidates
stand on the climate crisis and the solutions they propose to
address it. Asking those questions is your responsibility."


Sign the petition

In the last year, the major TV networks asked the presidential
candidates 2,679 questions. Pop quiz: How many were about
global warming?

A) 514—after all, it's one of the top issues facing the country
B) 165—as many as were asked about illegal immigration
C) 3—the same number asked about UFOs

If you guessed 3, you're right: Reporters asked as many questions
about UFOs as they did about the climate crisis—the biggest
threat to our planet.

Can you sign our petition urging top TV reporters to ask the
presidential candidates about global warming? Click here to add
your name:

http://pol.moveon.org/climatequestions/


The petition to the reporters says: "The American public deserves
to know where all the candidates stand on the climate crisis and
the solutions they propose to address it. Asking those questions is
your responsibility."

Please forward this email to your friends, family, and co-workers.

The media help decide what's an "issue" in the '08 election. Unless
climate change is on the '08 election agenda, it won't be on the
next president's agenda. And the UN's top climate expert warned:
"If there's no action before 2012, that's too late. What we do in the
next two or three years will determine our future."

Climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our time.
And polls show that voters care about it. But somehow, the TV
networks never got the memo. NBC's top political reporter, Tim
Russert, didn't ask a single question about global warming last
year. Same for Sunday political show hosts on CBS and ABC.
CNN asked just 1. Incredibly, Republican-leaning Fox bested
them all with a grand total of 2.

Our friends at the League of Conservation Voters will deliver
your signature and comment directly to the TV networks at a press
conference in front of their Washington, D.C., headquarters. And
they'll use our petition signatures to prove there's public demand
for TV anchors to ask about climate change.

Sign this petition to urge TV anchors to ask about climate change.
Clicking here will add your name:

http://pol.moveon.org/climatequestions


Thank you for all you do.

–Noah, Wes, Ilyse, Justin, and the MoveOn.org Political Action
Team
Tuesday, January 15th, 2008


Sources:
1. "What Are They Waiting For?", League of Conservation Voters
http://www.whataretheywaitingfor.com/facts.html

2. "Desperate times, desperate scientists," Salon News, December
12, 2007
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/12/12/ipcc_report/

3. "Poll: Finding Their Voice as Agents of Change," Democracy
Corps, October 30, 2007
http://www.moveon.org/


MoveOn.org Political Action is entirely funded by our 3.2 million
members. We have no corporate contributors, no foundation
grants, no money from unions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Is A Sustainable City?
Posted by: Jeff Hoffman on Jan 16, 2008 12:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To say, as the title of the article does, that places like San Francisco and New York are leading the way toward creating sustainable cities is laughable. Sure, those two are doing some good things like promoting less harmful energy sources and energy efficiency, but the biggest environmental problem in those places by far is the oil consumed and burned by motor vehicles. Unfortunately, neither city is doing anything about that, and anything short of fixing that problem is tinkering around the edges.

A good start would be a large tax on private motor vehicles entering the downtown areas of the cities. The goal should be complete elimination of private motor vehicles from the entire cities, substituted for by more and better public transit, and by roads exclusively for bicycles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There is no way
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jan 16, 2008 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Simply put, such large cities simply cannot be sustainable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There is no way Posted by: JuliaZ