Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Iraq: Less Violent But Not Less Hellish

By Dahr Jamail and Ali Al-Fadhily, IPS News. Posted January 15, 2008.


Looking around Iraq, one finds a ruined country.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Dahr Jamail Ali Al-Fadhily

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

U.S. and Iraqi officials claim that security is improving across al-Anbar province and much of Iraq. Security during the last half of 2007 was indeed better than in the period between February 2006 and mid-2007. But this has brought little solace to many Iraqis, because violence is still worse than in 2005 and early 2006.

Top Iraqi and U.S. officials and politicians have been saying that Iraq is back on its feet and that security has been established in the most volatile provinces like al-Anbar, to the west of Baghdad. Security responsibilities here will be handed over to Iraqis in March, the U.S. military says.

Violence levels are down, but attacks have not ceased. "Nine U.S. soldiers were killed in 24 hours, U.S. B-1 and F-16 bombers dropped over 40,000 pounds of special munitions on the Arab Juboor villages just south of Baghdad, and Awakening (militia paid for by the U.S.) leaders and senior police officers are being assassinated all over Iraq, yet U.S. army leaders and top officials say Iraq is safe and sound," lawyer and human rights activist Mahmood al-Dulaimy told IPS.

Dulaimy said U.S. President George W. Bush has succeeded in convincing many people in the United States that everything in Iraq is all right. "It is you media people who fool the world by transmitting false news about the situation in Iraq," Dulaimy said. "Look around you and tell me what is good here."

Looking around, one finds a ruined country. And neither occupation forces nor Iraqi government personnel seem to care about saving the little normal life that remains.

The independent U.S.-based group Just Foreign Policy says more than 1.1 million Iraqis have been killed through the occupation. According to an Oxfam International report, four million Iraqis are in need of emergency aid. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees estimates that there are more than 4.5 million Iraqis displaced from their homes.

"Is it good that we still cannot go to Baghdad to sell our crops and buy seeds and other necessary things for our farms," said young Jassim from Fallujah. "Is it good that we only plant ten percent of our land because there is not enough electricity and fuel to run our pumps?"

Many people in Fallujah say they simply want the U.S. forces to leave. "If the U.S. generals mean they will hand over security to Iraqis and leave the province, then I will salute them all," retired Iraqi army colonel Salman Ahmed told IPS in Fallujah. "But I know it is just another comedy like that played elsewhere in Iraq, where Iraqis (officials) are just ropes for American dirty laundry. We want our country back for real, not just on paper."

People in Fallujah, the second biggest city of al-Anbar province after capital Ramadi, say they are still in the grip of draconian security measures implemented and backed by the U.S. military.

"If security is so good then let them end the tragedy of our city," a member of the Fallujah City Council, speaking on condition of anonymity told IPS. "We want our freedom back and we want to leave and enter our city without this humiliation by soldiers and policemen. Fallujah is dying, and our masters (Americans) are bragging about security and prosperity."

Fifty-five-year-old mother Um Bashar came to the house where IPS was meeting with residents.

"Let them (Americans) take everything and bring me my son back," she said. "He stayed to guard the house in the November 2004 siege and the Americans captured him. Now he is missing. Some people who were released told us he was with them in the airport prison."

Iraqi people do not speak of improvement. They do not see it; they see only that these claims have become important for the U.S. elections.

(*Ali, our correspondent in Baghdad, works in close collaboration with Dahr Jamail, our U.S.-based specialist writer on Iraq who has reported extensively from Iraq and the Middle East)

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: media, unembedded, dahr jamail, iraq

Dahr Jamail is an independent journalist who reports from Iraq.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
politicalagnostic
Posted by: politicalagnostic on Jan 16, 2008 1:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is my first post, so bear with me. It is a sad commentary that the MSM has ignored the toll on the native population. More should be made of this.

In looking back at the beginning,it should have been obvious we were being led by amateurs. The BCR(Bush,Cheney,Rumsfeld)triumvarate were way out of their league. We should have known better when it was said that the result of our actions be like those of post-war Germany and Japan. Keep in mind that those countries at least had a rudimentary form of representative government at one time. Iraqi's, for better or worse, have been subjects most of their lives, usually being told what they could or couldn't do. It's no surprise that things have turned out the way they have.

Perhaps had Rumsfeld been fired for comments like "you go to war with the army you have not the army you want", or had we locked down the govt. offices and prevented the looting( these things happen in war according to Rumsfeld,i.e.s**t happens) the climate in Iraq might be more hospitable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: politicalagnostic Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: politicalagnostic Posted by: jimidee
War is hell, probably literally
Posted by: vox persona on Jan 17, 2008 1:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If God is Love (IJohn 4:8), and Christ taught peace, then war is the most antiChrist-ian activity imaginable. Especially a voluntary, counter-productive, ill-advised, ill-conceived, badly planned, counter-intuitive, 'preemptive' war based on lies, exagerrated and cherry picked intel, and brought to us by a man who probably believes the Earth to be less than 10,000 years old. Bush must have known what he was doing when he invaded Iraq. After all, doesn't his evangelical base believe in the theology of the end times? Indeed, many believe we are in the end times now, and they seem to look forward to it. And creating a virtually no-win situation in Mesopotamia (where Chapter 9 of Revelation takes place) may be just the thing to bring them on, since they're coming anyway. Think about it, to Iraqis their Armegeddon is now....their cities are in rubble, no to little electricity, walking inthe street is a life threatening activity, etc.... We (BushCo) backed ourselves into a position where if we leave the most violent and evil elements in the world would stand to gain the upper hand, and our very presence is counter-productive to the end goals.
I contend that Saddam was among the most vicious tyrants in the world, but he was our ally in the region when Reagan sent Rumsfelf to shake his hand and offer 'military help' in their war against Iran, another ally when we propped up the Shah. Can you say 'blowback'? I am reminded that we armed the Mujahadeen in their resistance to Soviet occupation, and all that brought us was the Taliban and Al Qaeda. Will we never learn? Someone should remind our Christian President 'sow what ye reap' and 'live by the sword, die by the sword' and 'Blessed are the peacemakers' (not blessed are the cheesemakers).
But no, a single man's decision diverted us from our action in Afghanistan to a personal vendetta/shady agenda in Iraq. But Bush did explain that history would show in 40 years or so that he was right How convenient....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Different lies, same theme
Posted by: Democritus on Jan 17, 2008 8:38 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First it was the lie about weapons of mass destruction. Now it's the lie about how great things are going in Iraq since the "surge." The theme remains the same: muscle our hand-picked Iraqi government into signing oil agreements, then hunker down in those billion- dollar bases so our military can protect the theft of Iraqi oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Different lies, same theme Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Different lies, same theme Posted by: BJ Barrington
Better Under Saddam?
Posted by: SparkyClinton on Jan 21, 2008 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess Alternet feels it was better under Saddam. At least then it was brown people killing brown people and brown men raping brown women. You racists make me sick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]