COMMENTS: 50
"We Should Start Eating Insects"
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
Marco Visscher: Why should we eat insects?
Arnold van Huis: While the world population is growing and our global wealth is advancing, meat consumption is rising dramatically. Currently, 70 percent of farmland is being used for meat production. If this trend continues, it will prove unsustainable. Moreover, livestock is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions, including methane and nitrous oxide. Insects have a much lower environmental burden, while their nutritional value measures up to chicken or beef.
Visscher: Don't they taste awful?
van Huis: That depends on how you prepare the dish. I'm not so wild about cakes made using crushed flies from East Africa--a couple of which I have at home -- but sautéed crickets in a warm chocolate dip make a great snack."
Visscher: Isn't it primitive to eat insects?
van Huis: It's quite normal for most of the world. In tropical countries, people don't eat caterpillars, beetle larvae, grasshoppers and termites because they don't have a choice but because they taste good. Plus insects are high in protein and have essential fatty acids and important vitamins. Which is why food programs in developing countries should increase their focus on insects. Currently, vegetable consumption is emphasized, but it's much more efficient to get nutrients from animals. Because traditional meat is often too expensive, insects could be a very good alternative.
Visscher: Isn't the psychological barrier in the West simply too great?
van Huis: The first time you bite into a grasshopper might be a little 'hard to swallow.' But there are ways to handle this. Insects can be ground industrially so they're less recognizable, just as a filet doesn't really resemble a particular animal. There are some 1,400 edible insects, which can enrich and diversify our food supply.
*****
Four Recipes for an Insect-Rich Diet
Banana Worm Bread
Compliments of Iowa State University Entomology Club
Ingredients:
- 1/2 cup shortening
- 3/4 cup sugar
- 2 bananas, mashed
- 2 cups flour
- 1 teaspoon soda
- 1 teaspoon salt
- 1/2 cup chopped nuts
- 2 eggs
- 1/4 cup dry-roasted army worms
Directions:
Mix together all ingredients. Bake in greased loaf pan at 350 degrees for about 1 hour.
*******
Mealworm Fried Rice
Compliments of Iowa State University Entomology Club
Ingredients:
- 1 egg, beaten
- 1 tsp. oil
- 3/4 c. water
- 1/4 c. chopped onions
- 4 tsp. soy sauce
- 1/8 tsp. garlic powder
- 1 c. minute rice
- 1 c. cooked mealworms
Directions:
Scramble egg in a saucepan, stirring to break egg into pieces. Add water, soy sauce, garlic and onions. Bring to a boil. Stir in rice. Cover; remove from heat and let stand five minutes.
*******
Rootworm Beetle Dip
Compliments of Iowa State University Entomology Club
Ingredients:
- 2 cup low-fat cottage cheese
- 1 1/2 teaspoon lemon juice
- 2 tablespoons skim milk
- 1/2 cup reduced calorie mayonnaise
- 1 tablespoon parsley, chopped
- 1 tablespoon onion, chopped
- 1 1/2 tsp. dill weed
- 1 1/2 tsp. Beau Monde
- 1 cup dry-roasted rootworm beetles
Directions:
Blend first 3 ingredients. Add remaining ingredients and chill.
*******
Ant Brood Tacos
Compliments of EatBug.com
Ingredients:
- 2 tablespoons butter or peanut oil
- 1/2 pound ant larvae and pupae
- 3 serrano chilies, raw, finely chopped
- 1 tomato, finely chopped
- Pepper, to taste
- Cumin, to taste
- Oregano, to taste
- 1 handful cilantro, chopped
- Taco shells, to serve
Directions:
Heat the butter or oil in a frying pan and fry the larvae or pupae. Add the chopped onions, chilies, and tomato, and season with salt. Sprinkle with ground pepper, cumin, and oregano, to taste. Serve in tacos and garnish with cilantro. (Not living in an area exceptionally prolific with ants, I have never been able to try this recipe. But it sounds perfectly delicious! I found it in 'Creepy Crawly Cuisine', an excellent recipe book.)
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jan 14, 2008 12:08 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please buy LA bugs. And college football championship paraphernalia, as I understand that we're number one-ish.
Chinese mudbugs are communist...at least...according to unnamed sources.
So...er...check your sources!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Crawfish etouffee...
Posted by: phatkhat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jparsons on Jan 14, 2008 12:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
insects, when actually the expert was referring
to developing countries' food programs.
"We" don't need our food sources to be efficient -
our obesity epidemic shows the opposite. And I
doubt the pampered Westerners would change from
steak to grasshoppers unless forced. Which
is not impossible in the years to come.
In my years here in New Zealand, I admit I've
never tried a huhu grub, but I understand they're
not unpalatable. And if someone would like to
eat the snails that are munching my tomatoes
I'd be very grateful. (yes, I know they're not
insects but they're also not land-guzzling cows!)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aethr on Jan 14, 2008 1:41 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I didn't read past this.
Global warming is caused by the burning of fossil fuels, so unless livestock are eating oil and coal...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Carbon already in the carbon cycle???
Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: Carbon already in the carbon cycle???
Posted by: PaulR
» Corn is now the problem???
Posted by: mgmyers79
» RE: Corn is now the problem???
Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: Carbon already in the carbon cycle???
Posted by: daniel347x
» RE: Carbon already in the carbon cycle???
Posted by: daniel347x
Comments are closed-
Posted by: unity1 on Jan 14, 2008 3:32 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: unconscious humanity
Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: unconscious humanity
Posted by: goeswithness
» RE: unconscious humanity
Posted by: daniel347x
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PJT on Jan 14, 2008 3:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Go organic, eh! Get 'em from your own backyard or form a co-op with your neighbours ...
Posted by: SayBlade
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nitsed on Jan 14, 2008 4:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Where to buy
Posted by: VannaLaRoche
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CricketDave on Jan 14, 2008 5:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To address other comments: I think that van Huis suggested that developing countries should develop insect cultivation because the practice may already be part of their cultures, yet entomophagy makes a lot of sense for all of humanity by virtue of efficient uses of resources, especially water. And yes, research demonstrates that the flatulence of cows and other large food-animals is a significant contibutor to greenhouse gases, though not as much as mechanical emissions.
Dave Gracer
Sunrise Land Shrimp
www.slshrimp.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There are options for insect consumption
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tygress on Jan 14, 2008 6:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Tygress
Posted by: goeswithness
Comments are closed-
Posted by: indradawn on Jan 14, 2008 6:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cicadas, crickets, grasshoppers, even ants, perhaps. Worms, uh, dunno about that....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hmmm... Maybe
Posted by: VannaLaRoche
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Forrest on Jan 14, 2008 6:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jasonix on Jan 14, 2008 6:45 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I actually agree with most of this...amazingly...
Posted by: jparsons
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on Jan 14, 2008 6:51 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Talk about an abundant, no-fuss, self-replicating food supply that regularly flies (or crawls) itself in and is easily captured.
Maybe "manna from heaven" was about insects all along.
If my region ever sees a plague of locusts, I'll have my butterfly net out. We'll get there, I have no doubt. Especially since insect-killing hard frosts are fewer and farther between.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vasumurti on Jan 14, 2008 7:06 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I assume van Huis is being tongue-in-cheek? His arguments support vegetarianism or veganism, rather than consuming insects.
Half the water consumed in the U. S. goes to irrigate land growing feed and fodder for livestock. Huge amounts of water are also used to wash away their excrement. U. S. livestock produce twenty times as much excrement as does the entire human population, creating sewage which is ten to several hundred times more concentrated than raw domestic sewage. Animal wastes cause ten times more water pollution than does the U. S. human population; the meat industry causes three times as much harmful organic water pollution than the rest of the nation's industries combined.
Meat producers are the number one industrial polluters in our nation, contributing to half the water pollution in the United States. The water that goes into a thousand-pound steer could float a destroyer. It takes 25 gallons of water to produce a pound of wheat, but 2,500 gallons to produce a pound of meat. If these costs weren't subsidized by the American taxpayers, the cheapest hamburger meat would be $35 per pound!
The burden of subsidizing the California meat industry costs taxpayers $24 billion annually. Livestock producers are California's biggest consumers of water. Every tax dollar the state doles out to livestock producers costs taxpayers over seven dollars in lost wages, higher living costs and reduced business income. Seventeen western states have enough water supplies to support economies and populations twice as large as the present.
Overgrazing of cattle leads to topsoil erosion, turning once-arable land into desert. We lose four million acres of topsoil each year and eighty-five percent of this loss is directly caused by raising livestock. To replace the soil we've lost, we're destroying our forests. Since 1967, the rate of deforestation in the U. S. has been one acre every five seconds. For each acre cleared in urbanization, seven are cleared for grazing or growing livestock feed.
One-third of all raw materials in the U. S. are consumed by the livestock industry and it takes three times as much fossil fuel energy to produce meat than it does to produce plant foods. A report on the energy crisis in Scientific American warned: "The trends in meat consumption and energy consumption are on a collision course."
On a vegetarian diet, the world could easily support a population several times its present size. The world's cattle alone consume enough to feed 8.7 billion humans.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: tongue in cheek?
Posted by: goeswithness
» RE: tongue in cheek?
Posted by: vasumurti
» RE: Not tongue-in-cheek at all
Posted by: Jasonix
» RE: Not tongue-in-cheek at all
Posted by: bornxeyed
» reading aritcles like yours makes me appreciate peak energy
Posted by: Missing Piece
Comments are closed-
Posted by: John Annis on Jan 14, 2008 7:23 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mgmyers79 on Jan 14, 2008 7:43 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: humans didn't evolve eating beans and grain
Posted by: Jasonix
» Solution: Don't make unwanted domesticated animals.
Posted by: aouie01
» RE: Solution: Don't make unwanted domesticated animals.
Posted by: Jasonix
Comments are closed-
Posted by: phatkhat on Jan 14, 2008 10:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no problem with vegetarian, but I draw the line at eating bugs.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm going to say it...YUCK!!!!!
Posted by: vasumurti
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Hovey on Jan 14, 2008 11:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drricklippin on Jan 14, 2008 12:03 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since cicadia only appear every 16 years I'll have to wait- at least for these insects.
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Violetflame11 on Jan 14, 2008 2:05 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zooeyhall on Jan 14, 2008 2:38 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember the old Life cereal commericial, where the older kids go "Hey Mikee, YOU try it" to their little brother?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: you go first--I'll be busy barfing
Posted by: EdinIowa
Comments are closed-
Posted by: abstractedaway on Jan 14, 2008 7:27 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now, the cons of eating meat that matter to me are ecological damage and cruelty to higher animals that comes of industrial farming. I think some insect consumption would do us good! Besides, I've heard good things about the flavor of grasshoppers and locusts. They're comparable to lobster and shrimp. Don't knock it until you try it, folks.
Seriously, think through the "yuck" reaction. It's actually pretty irrational.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Biflspud on Jan 15, 2008 6:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What this article misses the point on is that insects are not a realistic foodstuff for humans.. but we waste good biomass not feeding them to our domestic animals. Chickens are very simple to raise, and you can easily turn a compost pile or backyard full of grasshoppers into a ready and free source of nutrition for your birds. We poison our environment spraying ChemLawn all over our property; why not let a few cute chickens do that work for you and get some free eggs in return?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Biflspud on Jan 15, 2008 10:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jack in the box on Jan 16, 2008 10:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jan 14, 2008 12:08 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please buy LA bugs. And college football championship paraphernalia, as I understand that we're number one-ish.
Chinese mudbugs are communist...at least...according to unnamed sources.
So...er...check your sources!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Crawfish etouffee...
Posted by: phatkhat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jparsons on Jan 14, 2008 12:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
insects, when actually the expert was referring
to developing countries' food programs.
"We" don't need our food sources to be efficient -
our obesity epidemic shows the opposite. And I
doubt the pampered Westerners would change from
steak to grasshoppers unless forced. Which
is not impossible in the years to come.
In my years here in New Zealand, I admit I've
never tried a huhu grub, but I understand they're
not unpalatable. And if someone would like to
eat the snails that are munching my tomatoes
I'd be very grateful. (yes, I know they're not
insects but they're also not land-guzzling cows!)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: aethr on Jan 14, 2008 1:41 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I didn't read past this.
Global warming is caused by the burning of fossil fuels, so unless livestock are eating oil and coal...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Carbon already in the carbon cycle???
Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: Carbon already in the carbon cycle???
Posted by: PaulR
» Corn is now the problem???
Posted by: mgmyers79
» RE: Corn is now the problem???
Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: Carbon already in the carbon cycle???
Posted by: daniel347x
» RE: Carbon already in the carbon cycle???
Posted by: daniel347x
Comments are closed-
Posted by: unity1 on Jan 14, 2008 3:32 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: unconscious humanity
Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: unconscious humanity
Posted by: goeswithness
» RE: unconscious humanity
Posted by: daniel347x
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PJT on Jan 14, 2008 3:45 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Go organic, eh! Get 'em from your own backyard or form a co-op with your neighbours ...
Posted by: SayBlade
Comments are closed-
Posted by: nitsed on Jan 14, 2008 4:46 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Where to buy
Posted by: VannaLaRoche
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CricketDave on Jan 14, 2008 5:09 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To address other comments: I think that van Huis suggested that developing countries should develop insect cultivation because the practice may already be part of their cultures, yet entomophagy makes a lot of sense for all of humanity by virtue of efficient uses of resources, especially water. And yes, research demonstrates that the flatulence of cows and other large food-animals is a significant contibutor to greenhouse gases, though not as much as mechanical emissions.
Dave Gracer
Sunrise Land Shrimp
www.slshrimp.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: There are options for insect consumption
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tygress on Jan 14, 2008 6:14 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Tygress
Posted by: goeswithness
Comments are closed-
Posted by: indradawn on Jan 14, 2008 6:15 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cicadas, crickets, grasshoppers, even ants, perhaps. Worms, uh, dunno about that....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hmmm... Maybe
Posted by: VannaLaRoche
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Forrest on Jan 14, 2008 6:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Jasonix on Jan 14, 2008 6:45 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I actually agree with most of this...amazingly...
Posted by: jparsons
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on Jan 14, 2008 6:51 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Talk about an abundant, no-fuss, self-replicating food supply that regularly flies (or crawls) itself in and is easily captured.
Maybe "manna from heaven" was about insects all along.
If my region ever sees a plague of locusts, I'll have my butterfly net out. We'll get there, I have no doubt. Especially since insect-killing hard frosts are fewer and farther between.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vasumurti on Jan 14, 2008 7:06 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I assume van Huis is being tongue-in-cheek? His arguments support vegetarianism or veganism, rather than consuming insects.
Half the water consumed in the U. S. goes to irrigate land growing feed and fodder for livestock. Huge amounts of water are also used to wash away their excrement. U. S. livestock produce twenty times as much excrement as does the entire human population, creating sewage which is ten to several hundred times more concentrated than raw domestic sewage. Animal wastes cause ten times more water pollution than does the U. S. human population; the meat industry causes three times as much harmful organic water pollution than the rest of the nation's industries combined.
Meat producers are the number one industrial polluters in our nation, contributing to half the water pollution in the United States. The water that goes into a thousand-pound steer could float a destroyer. It takes 25 gallons of water to produce a pound of wheat, but 2,500 gallons to produce a pound of meat. If these costs weren't subsidized by the American taxpayers, the cheapest hamburger meat would be $35 per pound!
The burden of subsidizing the California meat industry costs taxpayers $24 billion annually. Livestock producers are California's biggest consumers of water. Every tax dollar the state doles out to livestock producers costs taxpayers over seven dollars in lost wages, higher living costs and reduced business income. Seventeen western states have enough water supplies to support economies and populations twice as large as the present.
Overgrazing of cattle leads to topsoil erosion, turning once-arable land into desert. We lose four million acres of topsoil each year and eighty-five percent of this loss is directly caused by raising livestock. To replace the soil we've lost, we're destroying our forests. Since 1967, the rate of deforestation in the U. S. has been one acre every five seconds. For each acre cleared in urbanization, seven are cleared for grazing or growing livestock feed.
One-third of all raw materials in the U. S. are consumed by the livestock industry and it takes three times as much fossil fuel energy to produce meat than it does to produce plant foods. A report on the energy crisis in Scientific American warned: "The trends in meat consumption and energy consumption are on a collision course."
On a vegetarian diet, the world could easily support a population several times its present size. The world's cattle alone consume enough to feed 8.7 billion humans.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: tongue in cheek?
Posted by: goeswithness
» RE: tongue in cheek?
Posted by: vasumurti
» RE: Not tongue-in-cheek at all
Posted by: Jasonix
» RE: Not tongue-in-cheek at all
Posted by: bornxeyed
» reading aritcles like yours makes me appreciate peak energy
Posted by: Missing Piece
Comments are closed-
Posted by: John Annis on Jan 14, 2008 7:23 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mgmyers79 on Jan 14, 2008 7:43 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: humans didn't evolve eating beans and grain
Posted by: Jasonix
» Solution: Don't make unwanted domesticated animals.
Posted by: aouie01
» RE: Solution: Don't make unwanted domesticated animals.
Posted by: Jasonix
Comments are closed-
Posted by: phatkhat on Jan 14, 2008 10:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no problem with vegetarian, but I draw the line at eating bugs.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm going to say it...YUCK!!!!!
Posted by: vasumurti
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Hovey on Jan 14, 2008 11:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: drricklippin on Jan 14, 2008 12:03 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since cicadia only appear every 16 years I'll have to wait- at least for these insects.
Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Violetflame11 on Jan 14, 2008 2:05 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zooeyhall on Jan 14, 2008 2:38 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember the old Life cereal commericial, where the older kids go "Hey Mikee, YOU try it" to their little brother?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: you go first--I'll be busy barfing
Posted by: EdinIowa
Comments are closed-
Posted by: abstractedaway on Jan 14, 2008 7:27 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now, the cons of eating meat that matter to me are ecological damage and cruelty to higher animals that comes of industrial farming. I think some insect consumption would do us good! Besides, I've heard good things about the flavor of grasshoppers and locusts. They're comparable to lobster and shrimp. Don't knock it until you try it, folks.
Seriously, think through the "yuck" reaction. It's actually pretty irrational.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Biflspud on Jan 15, 2008 6:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What this article misses the point on is that insects are not a realistic foodstuff for humans.. but we waste good biomass not feeding them to our domestic animals. Chickens are very simple to raise, and you can easily turn a compost pile or backyard full of grasshoppers into a ready and free source of nutrition for your birds. We poison our environment spraying ChemLawn all over our property; why not let a few cute chickens do that work for you and get some free eggs in return?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Biflspud on Jan 15, 2008 10:19 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jack in the box on Jan 16, 2008 10:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




