Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Our Economic Crisis Must Become the Top Political Issue in 2008

By Danny Schechter, AlterNet. Posted January 11, 2008.


So far, none of the debates are focusing on solutions for the growing economic squeeze.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Danny Schechter

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Barack Obama's Iowa win has forcefully put the words "hope" and "change" on the national media agenda. His dynamic personality and uber-organized charismatic campaign galvanized attention and support even as his positions on issues seemed less clear.

The primary marathon continues with a retinue of pollsters and pundits trailing behind a diminishing number of candidates. They never lack in inane commentary or a barrel full of predictions that are rarely as accurate despite sounding so authoritative.

But there's another barrel to consider that's a lot less fun. It won't take us over the falls but, in fact, may lead us to a fall. That's the rise in the price for a barrel of oil and a set of deep economic pressures that will affect the country, the world, and every political race as unemployment goes up along with rising prices.

So far, none of the debates are focusing on solutions for the growing squeeze. It's easier to denounce immigrants or even corporations in the abstract. The business press is now debating when the recession will hit, or whether or not we are already in one. The optimism one sensed on the night Barack's last name was spelled BAM in the headlines is slowing giving way to trepidation that any new Administration will have to revive an economy that may, before November, be on the ropes.

There is a reason that American Dialect magazine chose "subprime'' as 2007's Word of the Year." Bear in mind that for the first seven months last year, the problem was downplayed, ignored, and minimized. It was only when the markets melted down in late July that the press and the pols took note. Even then, there was denial -- and in our media and political discourse, there still is among those who have yet to feel the sting.

There may be a reason for that, too, because most of the progressive world has been more engaged with the war than with issues of economic justice, so there has been little activist pressure on most politicians. Except for a speech here or a policy paper there, economic issues are not on the top of their lists. Bear in mind also that main industries still funding our political races are -- surprise, surprise -- real estate, finance and insurance.

So even as the media reports on inflation and foreclosures, they often do so as, the International Herald Tribute put it," with a "bad news is good news scenario." The paper quotes a Bear Stearns executive with comparing the current U.S. housing crisis to a recent natural disaster.

"Areas like Florida and Las Vegas are devastated," he said. "It is like Hurricane Katrina."

And, like refugees of that whirlwind of destruction, the subprime victims will simply pick up stakes and make new lives elsewhere: "People will move out to areas like Alabama and Idaho, where there are jobs and there is growth and there is not enough housing. So they will build more and that will add to economic growth."

This naive silver-lining thinking is riddled with illusions. Avinash Persaud, chairman of Capital Intelligence, an investment advisory firm in London, calls the housing bust a catastrophe. "American consumer boom was financed with real-estate debt: Americans have spent 130 percent of their income over the past five years. "They borrowed money against their property," he said.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: economy, election08, subprime, economic crisis

News Dissector Danny Schechter directed "In Debt We Trust" (StoptheSqueeze.org) and wrote the e-book SQUEEZED (coldtype.net). Comments to Dissector@mediachannel.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
No
Posted by: chlamor on Jan 11, 2008 7:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Top 5 Yes.

Number 1 is reserved for the children of Iraq who are being blown to bits, deprived and orphaned.

Then let's get to capitalism, military industrial looting and an entire restructuring of everything we've come to know as "The Economy."

There are no solutions within the existing framework.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: YES Posted by: gazooks
» RE: YES Posted by: Gakl
» RE: YES Posted by: gazooks
» RE: YES Posted by: edgeofnowhere
» RE: YES Posted by: Raymonde
Mr George
Posted by: georgebl on Jan 11, 2008 7:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a contradiction in terms. Either it's an economic issue or a political issue, but when economics becomes political all bets are off. That's how the economy got so bad in the first place

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe Nothing Should be Done
Posted by: dayahka on Jan 11, 2008 7:59 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of a call to action, maybe a call to inaction would be better. Action to "correct" or "stave off" the current economic situation would only result in perpetuating the current system of corporate (collective) ownership and consumer slavery (where no one owns anything, but only own debt for things). The current corporate (and invisible) ownership and consumer enslavement model, which is based on giving the slaves an illusion of wealth, should be destroyed; not doing anything would help.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Maybe Nothing Should be Done Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: Maybe Nothing Should be Done Posted by: edgeofnowhere
It's inextricably linked to Bush's Iraq and looting the future
Posted by: common intelligence on Jan 11, 2008 8:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ther congress just pulled another 700 Billion out of a hat and handed it over to support the future childrens nightmare to come.

There is no accountability anywhere in the nations economic nightmare or political smoke screen. And Taxation is not going to get us out of it either. If more people spend less there will be less revenues collected. It will be a wash in benefit.

Lowering interest rates will hardly make a difference if more asnd more people have less expendable income.

There seems to be no commitment to a way out while candidates are jockying for position. It all because as soon as one does suggest a away out the opponents will pounce on it. Of course routing money out of the Iraq debacle would be out of the question!

Do ya think all the money pissed down the toilet by Bush was intended to "trickle down" to us?

How about all that missing money in the billions that was lost and never accounted for, was it?
And how about the billions that Halliburton refuses to pay back because they moved to Dubai?

And how about the millions that troops conviscated during the invasion, they found in some bunker.

Ya see no one should forget how the governement under Bush has ransacked the whole Iraq nation and our nation here at home. Nor deny that the nations infrastucture is in serious dire straits.

There are many projects that could be initiated here at home to get the economy back on track. But there seems to be all kinds of reasons "we can't afford it". Yet the congress can can continue to just keep writing blank checks that help no one. But they do keep killing.

It all seems so highly planned to me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Learn how to discharge credit debt
Posted by: Chaos Inc. on Jan 11, 2008 9:38 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People who owe a credit debt to the banks need to change the way they pay... How, by using their own privately created credit.

A Pennsylvania woman has dischargwd a 1.3 million dollar tax debt with an I.O.U. made payable in the "Lawful Money of the United States" NOT FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES.

It is a matter of public record at U.S.A. vs Jessie M. Snyder, at 2007-cv-0331, U.S. District Court, W.D. Pa.

For Documentation e-mail kso8440@yahoo.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That Is Because They Have No Solution
Posted by: shinseiji on Jan 11, 2008 10:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"So far, none of the debates are focusing on solutions for the growing economic squeeze"

Remarkable how little attention the Left has paid to this unprecedented financial and economic crisis.

Yes, much better to flush the whole thing down the toilet and have the American people experience the reality of capitalism in the raw than to pray for a New New Deal that ain't going to come, because America is broke.

Watch out for a good dose of fascism, though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This Story Sidesteps the Real Crisis
Posted by: LookOut on Jan 12, 2008 12:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An economic debacle has been building for about a hundred years - since the private bank monopoly "Federal Reserve" Corporation (no reserves and not federal) hijacked the American economy for multinational oligarchs and their corporate crime networks. The 1929 “depression” was the forerunner of the real crash.

(Pundits quoted in this column virtually all work for the overclass system they pretend to critique so don’t look for legitimate analysis their)

Until the root cause of such self-serve distortion and corruption is pulled we can all look forward to this medieval extortion racket aided and abetted by those that pretend to serve us in public office.

In other words, the predatory overclass that owns the central banks will never volunteer to give up their illegal power over the gullible and brainwashed. In fact, when the crisis really comes down hard (and it must) the ruling class will merely distract and cast red herring blame to imaginary factors through monopoly corporate MSM and stooge globalist politicians (for example by whatever puppet wins the general election be it McCain, Hillary, Obama, et al)

A last note: the subprime meltdown and dollar crash are the candy-coated tip of the cesspit. With casino style global derivatives at about 20 times the size of the global economy (almost $700 trillion) this will be one very long and bumpy night.

Call it controlled demolition by the usual suspects…

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Bold Plan Would be to ....
Posted by: mmckinl on Jan 12, 2008 12:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fire the Federal Reserve and reinstitute the greenback currency ... Begin Medicare for all ... and rewrite the tax code to capture corporations and the super rich.

The Federal Reserve is a private corporation that will by it's corporate charter protect their largest shareholders, the money center banks and their related investment banks, brokerages, hedge funds and insurance arms. They need to be replaced by a public central bank beholden to currency and economic stability not Bank profitabllity.

Our current money supply is generated by leveraging debt, so when the economy stubs its toe the banks take a pratfall. Leverage works to add speculation and inflation on the way up and deflation and bankruptcy on the way down. We need to implement 'greenbacks', Money that is based on the GNP , or asset money, not the debt money that evaporates during times of crisis.

Medicare for everyone would help all government entities shed their health costs to help with lowered property taxes, put more cash in peoples hands, help citizens avoid health care bankruptcy and cover the 50 million uninsured.

And we all know the tax code is written by and for the coroporations and the super rich by tax lawyers and accountants that use it as a full employment guarantee.

Immediate steps are to extend unemployment insursnce, easier eligibilty for food stamps, emergency energy assistance, more section 8 housing grants, more assistance to food banks and lower prices on school meals.

Jackson like the rest have been coopted by the financial institutions that have enthrowned the the mega rich and corporations. We need a clean break from the privately owned and operated Federal Reserve and the debt money they create to line their pockets.

This is all possible, don't believe their lies ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When Greed Takes Over
Posted by: sofla100 on Jan 12, 2008 2:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Greed got the better of the banks/lending and mortgage industry during the real estate run-up to the tune of billions of unpaid debt. So eager to lend money during the boom that they even failed to check if borrowers had jobs or a credit history. Then later, all this debt was "packaged up" and sold off to other banks and investors. Of course, the fiasco collapsed. But, who is left holding the bag? The mega banks are all after Sammie Mae and Freddie Mac to take over bad loans under FHA so they won't be stuck with them. Just the taxpayers pay.And, they have their buddy, the Federal Reserve, readly to drop interest rates, at the cost of skyrocketing inflation, to help bail them all out with cheap money. When greed takes over it's the little guys that are made to pay.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: When Greed Takes Over Posted by: gazooks
Economics Is the Key Issue
Posted by: Southern Gal on Jan 12, 2008 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The economic crisis,the Iraq occupation by this country, the pre-emptive oil policies, fair trade and global warming are all global issues with financial and human rights implications.The United States is a major perpatrator and contributor in all of these issues. The Bush Administration has destroyed any credibility as a leader in global issues that this country once possessed. This country withdrew from the world stage and cloaked itself in military agression. If you are not for us and our policies you are against us. Do we really expect to get substantive discussion and action around these issues by candidates running for office? The president that we elect is going to have to be very smart and willing to place people in key positions who are experts and diplomats. We are going to have to elect a Congress that is willing to work with the Administration on hard issues. In the meantime the corporations are running the country and the political process that we use to elect our leaders. The economic crisis is the factor that brings all of the issues home to us in our daily lives. We must insist that the candidats address economic issues during this final year of the election. This whole mess is so scary that it makes me want to run and hide, but there has never been a time that it is more necessary to stay involved to fight for our future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Addressing national economic policy is hamstrung...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jan 12, 2008 7:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...by a certain 1 trillion pound gorilla in the room, if pounds are measured in dollars.

Economic stimulus and balancing tools at the federal level--tax cuts, tax hikes, savings programs, etc. can't be implemented very well at all when we're paying out our cash for a war and mortgaging our day-to-day infrastructure to the Chinese, Brazilian, Japanese, and Indian banks.

In a national forum, we would do well to put the war-and-lower taxes "conservatives" on the spot to find out when and how, exactly the costs of this war will be paid.

Don't get me wrong, I love a tax break that allows me to decide what to do with my money instead of a bloated bureaucracy, but I also hate credit, and I like to understand what what I'm buying will cost me before buying it. Heretical, I know.

This level of financing is lethal for our country's future; neither a borrower nor lender be is decent advice, especially useful for the borrower.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hooey
Posted by: profmarcus on Jan 12, 2008 8:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
no... no, no, no, no, no...

it is NOT the ECONOMY that should be the main issue any more than IRAQ should be the main issue... are both extremely important, urgent issues...? good lord, yes... no question, and they should be, without doubt, #'s 2 and 3 on the list at the very least... #1...? we have a presidential administration that has seized every opportunity to transform our democratic republic into a police state by violating the united states constitution, ignoring the rule of law, and obstructing accountability at every turn... we have a congress that has utterly failed to exercise its mandated, constitutional authority of oversight, checks and balances, and separation of powers... we have a court system seeded throughout with crony justices, all too willing to toe the line of an outlaw executive branch...

a large part of the reason we HAVE the iraq debacle and a trashed economy in the first place is precisely BECAUSE of the wholesale abuse of executive power... if we don't deal with THAT as priority #1, we can only expect more of the same... i totally fail to comprehend why that appalling fact remains below the radar of intelligent and well-meaning folks like yourself, who, along with the majority of the so-called "progressive," "liberal" netroots, insist on advocating for the treatment of the symptoms and not the disease...

And, yes, I DO take it personally

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Disagree with
Posted by: marid on Jan 12, 2008 8:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
title of the article, the Republicans have already presented their plans to help.

1. Cut Taxes on Corpse to stimulate the Economy

2. Cut taxes to fix the health care crisis.

3. Cut taxes to end the war in Iraq.

4. Cut taxes to stop gay marriage.

5. Cut taxes to fix illegal immigration

6. Cut taxes to enforce family values.

7. Cut taxes to promote Stem cell research.

8. Cut taxes to rebuild New Orleans

9. Cut taxes to end deficit spending

10. Cut taxes to fully fund Social Security

11. Sell all Federal assets to predatory Capitalists.

12. End all government environmental regulation.

13. End all govt. Working condition laws

14. Build the National Church on the Washington Mall to emphasize our commitment to Conservative Christians.

15. Politicians must prostitute themselves to any Corpse that comes calling so they can get a job with aforementioned Corpse when they leave govt.

16. Build private armies so that we can do away with messy National Defense, endless wars with anyone to continue to stimulate our economy. Making money off of death is a high return investment.

What do you mean there have been no plans presented? Pay attention.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ten Steps
Posted by: Spyder on Jan 12, 2008 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. Elect Edwards President and Obama V.P.

2. Get the puck out of Iraq.

3. Expand Medicare to all American citizens.

4. Raise the tax rates on the rich incrementally for each of the next ten years until the billionaires are paying at least remotely close to the same rates the richest Americans paid in the '60's.

5. Encourage, not discourage, the use of all types of birth control and sex education.

6. Punish corporations economically for all sorts of unnecessary insourcing, outsourcing, offshoring, and downsizing.

7. Reward corporations economically for rebuilding infrastructure, creating quality jobs, green technological advances, and support of worldwide humanitarian causes.

8. Encourage a new paradigm to develop in the minds of American citizens in support of conservation, community, efficient lifestyles, and active environmentalism. Get the massive numbers of unnecessary SUV's off our freeways. We are citizens, not consumers!

9. Encourage citizen involvement in government and encourage government to represent the citizens instead of the corporations. That means abolishing the massive lobbying juggernaut as well as all electronic voting machines.

10. Stop the stinking, wasteful War on Drugs. Give marijuana the same status as alcohol and make the possession and use of all other drugs a medical treatment issue. Downsize the repulsively oversized prison system and give those employees something really useful to do, such as rebuilding our infrastructure.

Thank you for reading my rant. Now ya'll can all tell me how John Edwards is either too liberal or not liberal enough. While ya'll are arguing about it, the media full of millionaires will make sure that a candidate who will change absolutely nothing takes the oath of office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ten Steps Posted by: marid
» RE: Ten Steps Posted by: nochicagoboys
So you want a solution to 20 years of economic mismanagement?
Posted by: Sojourner on Jan 12, 2008 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about asking for it in 25 words or less from a candidate? Even in view of the fact that no economic consensus yet exists? (Apart from the Bushites urging us lemmings to keep heading for the cliff.)

My hope is based on the memory of how some of the finest congress members resigned their offices without seeking reelection in 1992. Their rationale was that the Reagan-Bush years had so damaged the economy that congress could do nothing but manage the debt and entitlements.

Well, B. Clinton proved them wrong. Unfortunately, the electorate (with a big helping hand from the SCOTUS) preferred to return to the Reagan-Bush program. So here we are again facing a poverty-stricken government.

It is clearly happening at the state and local levels. My city and state are at the point of holding bake sales while they shut down public facilities. Not only are the young, minorities, and single-parent families desperate. Hold on to your hat! And "Watch out for that first step."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

edgeofnowhere
Posted by: edgeofnowhere on Jan 12, 2008 9:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suggest you read Naomi Klein's THE SHOCK DOCTRINE. If you think that all the problems in the world's "economy" are just random chance and that we can stave off a major depression if we just elect some ClintaBee democRAT or republiCON, you are not living in reality. Pumping more devalued fiat currency into the mess is like giving an alcoholic more booze. No, folks, this is a premeditated plan to create a level of economic chaos and social upheaval that will necessitate martial law and the suspension of our constitution. There appears to be no stopping this juggernaut, so lay in supplies, hunker down and get ready for the New World Disorder!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: edgeofnowhere Posted by: marid
A fool and his money are soon parted
Posted by: billwald on Jan 12, 2008 10:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As P. T. Barnum said, "Sucker born every minute." This has nothing to do with the economy or the government.
That being said, there are two economies, one for the rich (the lenders) and one for the poor (the borrowers) The rich economy is doing just fine.

The poor people, the working class are screwing themselves because they are to stupid to organize into labor unions. Just happenstance that the middle class grew as the unions grew and began to shrink as the union membership decreased?

Yes, there were some corrupt unions in the old days but unions don't HAVE to be corrupt. I was in an honest union for 30 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Money, Politics, & Religion are civilization by Flim-Flam !!
Posted by: SevenStarHand on Jan 12, 2008 3:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are you finally ready for real change, instead of smoke and mirrors promises that can't be kept because money, politics, and religion always come first? Tired of watching the multitudes struggle and suffer, while awaiting deceptive solutions from an illusory political shell game?

Here is Wisdom...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I would like at this time to present my 10 point progressive program to renew America.
Posted by: yellow on Jan 12, 2008 3:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I. Make all those who earn 200% or less of the national poverty line exempt from all federal income taxes except social security and the capital gains tax. No sales tax on food or medicine.

II. Restore progressive taxation on the rich moving the top bracket to 45%.

III. Move Social Security cap up to $110.000 annually.

IV. Increase the margin requirement for stock market purchases to 90% limiting stock purchase financing to only ten percent.

V. A one percent tobin tax on fincial speculation in international currency markets to raise revenue and stabilize exchange rates.

VI. Massive public investment in mass transit, education, health care, renewable energy and affordable housing.

VII. Fund a program of single payer universal health care to insure every US citizen regardless of income or employment.

VIII. Cut military spending in half. Eliminate all new weapons programs for star wars, new fight-bomber aircraft and maintain existing production of existing systems like the F-16. End the Iraq War. Close all foreign military bases. Solve all security problems multilaterally through the UN security council and with NATO allies. Demand Israel withdraw from all of the West Bank and Gaza and negotiate a two state solution on the basis of all the relevant UN resolutions. No to war and Imperialism. Secure peace through justice and democracy.

IX. Use peace dividend to fund economic growth and public investment. Increase R&D in new technologies in medical and information tech fields to build and develop new markets for US industries that locate and produce in the US. End runaway sweatshops with tariffs against their goods. No more import dependant Walmart led economic model.

X. Support a resurgence of organized labor to raise incomes, increase equality and spur economic growth.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sorry dude, dead on arrival! Posted by: aka_bozo
Neither the faux "liberals" or "conservatives" care about the economy to begin with.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 12, 2008 5:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Other than to help the wealthy and business elite, they don't represent you. Thank you Danny for pointing out the DYSFUNCTIONAL status of the "economy". This individualistic E-CON-UH-ME-ME-ME misnamed "capitalism" is already going through its roosting stage and there's more to come. Besides, why don't you try supporting 3rd, 4th, 5th, etc ... parties for a change and stop relying on the Ds or Rs to actually fix anything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Jan 12, 2008 7:07 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In so many of the stories about the economy why is there not a word about affordable housing and how it was decimated by this administration?

This is the real problem. Crackpot economics that pay more attention to Wall Street than to the needs of Main Street are the real force behind this travesty.

We need affordable housing, period. In a sensible and morally run country, it would be of the highest importance just like education and healthcare. Instead what citizens got was more and more insanely priced McMansions and then the inane media stoked the fires - but I must say, WHAT exactly was it everyone was busy getting in on? The highest prices ever in history for homes?...the worst mortgage loans ever created? We don't need crazy math loans - they will never mitigate the indensibly high cost of housing for everyday workers.

The great hype machine bankrupted the ordinary consumer again....they made all the citizens think they too were "in on it" but they were just out of it altogether. Now they'll be out of their overpriced homes...and where will they go? To tents?

What was the sense in this economic "policy"...rather, I mean travesty. Greenspan and the merry band of Wall Street henchmen pulled the wool over all of their eyes.

Remember, virtually nothing in this administration's agenda was actually engineered to deal with the financial needs of the median and under income citizen. After all, these people are not big time institutional investors.

And I don't believe an interest rate cut (yet another knee jerk panic move) will do what the mighty wizards of smoke and mirrors think. Why? Because they bankrupted the Americans who are their customers - ordinary citizens, who had their wages cut and their pensions raided, and their tax burden was much higher than that of any investor. And worst of all they were encouraged to buy overpriced mansions which are not by any stretch of the imagination relevant to the financial wherewithall of working America.

So again, I ask - where is the outrage that we don't have affordable housing? This is the cornerstone of a sane society. But this administration just acted as if everyone and their mother raked in $100K plus. Next election: let's hope someone sensible is installed in office who recognizes the need to build relevant housing for the "other half".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

first things first
Posted by: Lector on Jan 13, 2008 1:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sure, the economy is very important but it’s far from being a number one priority at the moment. Anyway, a healthy economy for who? An economy designed for the rich? What good does it do when citizens are slaves to an economy and in a police state to boot?

The first priority is to get our civil liberties restored, a repeal of the Patriot Act, or are Americans assuming it will go away by itself, no one here, with the exception of one poster (profmarcus) comes close to mentioning this. Damn a healthy economy when Democrats and Republicans alike are still pushing legislation restricting our rights like HR1955, another landmark bill under the guise of protecting us by shredding more of our rights (and in this bill you’ll see the first step toward eliminating the Internet as it is today – remember who owns the networks) Wake up people! Assuming a Democratic president in office will automatically follow a repeal the Patriot Act is just dreaming. Our civil rights can be restored at the same time as we nurse the economy.

Pointless

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Happy slaves... Posted by: aka_bozo
Free Trade as Bipartisan National Suicide
Posted by: Counselor1 on Jan 13, 2008 8:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's a world economic crisis coming much worse than a temporary recession - depression in major stock markets. Free Trade's endless consumption of resources and empowerment of China and India, and the eventual competition for energy is likey to lead to world war. Meantime, as the U.S. de-industrializes, the price of energy to transport formerly cheap imports will rise to make them prohibitively expensive.


There's no free lunch, free war or free trade. The difference between “tax and spend” liberals and “tax and borrow” conservatives is that “liberals” want to make you pay as you go, while “conservatives” like Bush want to make your kids pay in higher interest costs on the national debt. Both, having sponsored “free trade,” are making everybody pay in lost jobs, lowered wages, increased resource consumption and thus climate change adjustment expenses.

Free trade is industrializing and so empowering the next world empires, China and India, to surpass us. Industrializing governments over a billion people each, all wanting more products, can't resist the pressure of that many people to act in an aggressive nationalist manner rather than for an international wealthy class. They will expand either until the US and European Union give up a lot of control of resources or until there is/will be world war(s) that will be much worse than WW1 and WW2. Free trade for us is national suicide.

Progressives, Libertarians and Greens remain
irrelevant because we criticize each other's theories and values, e.g., being a “bleeding heart,” or “racist.” Meanwhile the actual harm done by governing Republicans and Democrats by free trade and aggressive war so exceeds any harm from differences of theory and values that Libertarians and Greens should set aside their differences and jointly demand a return to economic nationalism, whether to stop tearing our country down and empowering others, or to slow global resource use and environmental damage. But it won't help unless these powerless minorities cooperate and leverage masses of voters to crash the Republican and Democrat parties by de- registering from them, registering Independent and opening the political system to competition.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

YOUR NEW LEADER IS APPOINTED
Posted by: HANGTRAITORS on Jan 13, 2008 12:17 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHY DO YOU PEOPLE EVEN BOTHER , ITS ALL RIGGED AND THE WINNER HAS ALREADY BEEN DECIDED BY THE UNKNOWN STOCKHOLDERS OF THE PRIVATELY OWNED FEDERAL RESERVE AND THEIR CORPORATE PARASITE FRIENDS AT BILDEBERGER..... THE VOTING IS RIGGED PEOPLE AND SO IS YOUR MEDIA.. ITS A PHONY BROADWAY PLAY WITH BAD ACTING... VOTE DIEBOLD CAUSE THEY COUNT THE VOTES IN SECRET

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ron Paul supporter
Posted by: Robalt on Jan 13, 2008 1:30 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Each party has given their party line in regards to the debates. Democrats want to increase taxes and increase the size of the government and Republicans want to decrease taxes and decrease the size of the government. Economic growth is the only way to defeat poverty and the way that we will grow as a nation will be to continue to innovate here at home to grow the economy, help our trading partners develop economic strength to help strengthen future trade, and save for the future. Unfortunately, too many Americans are addicted to debt and entitlements. This is why you don't hear the candidates speak more about changing the economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Blame the victim Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: on Paul supporter Posted by: left_libertarian
» RE: on Paul supporter Posted by: aka_bozo
keep it simple
Posted by: richholland on Jan 13, 2008 7:43 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
reading books about all the wars of the last 100 years it is clear that the result of WAR was good for the warmongers but made the country poor.
This is an economical law so in USA their must be one issue: Stop the WAR in IRAQ.
if the money waisted in Vietnam and Iraq had been used for a social system equel to the civilised countries in the world the buying power would have prevented the present economical thread.
Stop wars and enjoy life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Number One: The Holocaust in Iraq
Posted by: Whistler on Jan 14, 2008 4:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Danny Boy. How short-sighted. The United States of America is presently in the midst of a murder spree unprecedented in the modern world and Mr. Schecter thinks the US economy should be the number one priority. Yes, it is A priority, but not, by a long, long, long shot is it number one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Number One: The Holocaust in Iraq Posted by: left_libertarian