Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Fear and Loathing in Bolivia: New Constitution, Polarization

By Benjamin Dangl, AlterNet. Posted January 7, 2008.


Tensions run high as Bolivia's elite refuse to give up power peacefully.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Benjamin Dangl

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

"Let's go unblock the road, compaƱeros!" a man in an old baseball cap yells as he joins a group of people hauling rocks and tires from a central intersection in Cochabamba. This group of students and union activists are mobilizing against a civic strike led by middle class foot soldiers of the Bolivian right. These actions in the street are part of a political roller coaster which is dramatically changing Bolivia as it enters the new year.

Two major developments marked the close of the year in Bolivia: the passage of a new constitution and the worsening of political polarization in the country. The new constitution reflects the socialistic policies advocated by indigenous president Evo Morales, while racism, regional and political divisions still threaten to push Bolivia into a larger conflict.

In the final weeks of 2007, a variety of protest tactics were used by political factions to advocate competing visions for the future of the country. From November 24-25, clashes between security forces and opposition protesters in Sucre left three people dead and hundreds wounded, forcing the assembly rewriting the country's constitution to move to Oruro. Anarchists dressed in black and pounding drums marched against racism in Cochabamba, while older Bolivians in La Paz organized rallies in support of a new pension plan. In the town of Achacachi, Aymara indigenous leaders sacrificed two dogs in a ceremony declaring war on the wealthy elite in Santa Cruz.

Santa Cruz is a department with a capital city of the same name and is the center of the right's growing movement against the Morales government. The Bolivian right is led by four right wing governors in the eastern departments of Beni, Pando, Santa Cruz and Tarija, civic committees, business and land owners, and the political party Democratic and Social Power (PODEMOS). The right organized various civic strikes throughout 2007, while supporters of the Movement Toward Socialism, (MAS, the political party of Morales), also flexed their political muscle in protests, blockades and strikes. Though government and media battles often carve new policies and shape debates, street mobilizations remain a vital part of Bolivian politics.

Transformation Through a New Constitution?

On December 8-9, MAS assembly participants and their allies passed the new constitution in Oruro. Opposition party members boycotted the meeting. Representatives of neighborhood councils, mining unions, coca growers' unions, student and farmer groups mobilized in Sucre to defend the assembly from right wing intervention. Activists blew up dynamite to intimidate political opponents while assembly participants chewed coca to stay awake throughout the weekend-long gathering.

The new constitution paves the way for many of the changes the government has been working toward since Morales was elected in 2005. The document gives the state greater control over natural resources and the economy, and guarantees expanded autonomy for departmental governments and indigenous communities. It also calls for a mixed economy, where the rights of private, public and communal industries are protected. Indigenous community justice systems are better recognized through the new constitution and the document establishes that Supreme Court judges are to be elected instead of appointed by congress. The constitution also lifts the block on second consecutive terms for the president. This change would allow Morales to run again for two more terms in a row, in addition to his current time in office.

Though it was passed in the assembly in Oruro, the new constitution still has to be approved in a national referendum along with a vote on an article on land reform which is still in dispute. This controversial article puts a limit on private ownership of land to 100,000 hectares. Such a policy would greatly impact large land holdings in the department of Santa Cruz and other regions. On top of these challenges will be the difficulty of actually implementing these policy changes which so far only exist on paper.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bolivia, evo morales

Benjamin Dangl is the author of "The Price of Fire: Resource Wars and Social Movements in Bolivia" (AK Press, March 2007). For more information on his book and current book reading tour, visit www.boliviabook.com

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A misleading and inaccurate headline
Posted by: brunowe on Jan 8, 2008 2:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At no point does the author accuse the right-wing in Bolivia of terrorism.

His references to their tactics consists of phrase such as "a civic strike led by middle class foot soldiers of the Bolivian right.", "The right organized various civic strikes throughout 2007, while supporters of the Movement Toward Socialism, (MAS, the political party of Morales), also flexed their political muscle in protests, blockades and strikes" and "Meanwhile, strikes, road blockades and protests have been organized among all political factions and violence has often erupted throughout what has been a turbulent end to the year".

The reference to terroristic acts states that "most" of the bombings were targeted against the left, the implication being that others were targeted against the right. The tone of the article is that both sides are engaged in a turbulent process and are largely using relatively non-violent direct action.

I should mention some of the right's opposition is based on the argument that Under the existing constitution and the assembly's own rules, a two-thirds majority is needed to approve constitutional changes. The vote was only 53% yes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Misleading article
Posted by: boliviano100 on Jan 8, 2008 4:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article is very misleading from the headline down to the biased commentary. Where is the terrorism denoted in the article as mentioned in the headline? What about the word "polls"? The Constituion was not passed at the polls. And most use of dynamite can be traced back the miners and their union - definitely not "right wingers".

The author uses the term "right" or "right wing" more than 15 times in the article, but only once uses the term "left" to describe MAS or Morales and his government. There is no use of the term "left wing". Maybe it is just understood that socialism is extremely left wing, and therefore, the term is implied when referring to Morales and MAS, but it seems that the term "right wing" was purposefully used to degrade the opposition or stir emotion against them.

Most of the article gives a good description of what is happening here in Bolivia. The article failed to point out that the left wingers declared the new Constitution "passed" and ready for the next step when the needed 2/3 of the assembly persons did not indeed vote for it.

The country and people of Bolivia deserve better reporting of the facts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Didn't Pick this Title
Posted by: mangomundo on Jan 8, 2008 4:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hi,

I'm the author of the article and I didn't pick this title, AlterNet did. This is the first time I've seen it. I also think the title is misleading...

Ben Dangl

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Something cool
Posted by: SavageDissension on Jan 8, 2008 9:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just wanted to mention I think it's really neat to have the author of the piece step out in the comments. Regardless of the issue, it adds a bit of authenticity just knowing that you're not just posting the big articles but little comments as well.

Something I'd like to see more of. Just my two cents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Something cool Posted by: ScottP
Good Article, Well Balanced
Posted by: Marshalldoc on Jan 11, 2008 5:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Considering the leaders of the 'autonomous' provinces had chosen to boycott the constitutional convention (their rabble-rousers excepted) they've no complaint for being confronted with a document that fails to represent them. It is true, of course, that being the dominant minority (minority being the operative word) for so long, they're angry that, somehow, their desires no longer translate into policy regardless of their effects on the long-suffering people of Bolivia.

Viva Morales!

Viva Chavez!

Venceremos!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]