Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Pentagon, Big Pharma: Drug Troops to Numb Them to Horrors of War

By Penny Coleman, AlterNet. Posted January 10, 2008.


The DoD is flirting with the idea of medicating soldiers to desensitize them to combat trauma -- will an army of unfeeling monsters result?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Penny Coleman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

In June, the Department of Defense Task Force on Mental Health acknowledged "daunting and growing" psychological problems among our troops: Nearly 40 percent of soldiers, a third of Marines and half of National Guard members are presenting with serious mental health issues. They also reported "fundamental weaknesses" in the U.S. military's approach to psychological health. That report was followed in August by the Army Suicide Event Report (ASER), which reported that 2006 saw the highest rate of military suicides in 26 years. And last month, CBS News reported that, based on its own extensive research, over 6,250 American veterans took their own lives in 2005 alone -- that works out to a little more than 17 suicides every day.

That's all pretty bleak, but there is reason for optimism in the long-overdue attention being paid to the emotional and psychic cost of these new wars. The shrill hypocrisy of an administration that has decked itself in yellow ribbons and mandatory lapel pins while ignoring a human crisis of monumental proportion is finally being exposed.

On Dec. 12, Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif., chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee, called a hearing on "Stopping Suicides: Mental Health Challenges Within the Department of Veterans Affairs." At that hearing suggestions were raised and conversations begun that hopefully will bear fruit.

But I find myself extremely anxious in the face of some of these new suggestions, specifically what is being called the Psychological Kevlar Act of 2007 and use of the drug propranalol to treat the symptoms of posttraumatic stress injuries. Though both, at least in theory, sound entirely reasonable, even desirable, in the wrong hands, under the wrong leadership, they could make the sci-fi fantasies of Blade Runner seem prescient.

The Psychological Kevlar Act "directs the secretary of defense to develop and implement a plan to incorporate preventive and early-intervention measures, practices or procedures that reduce the likelihood that personnel in combat will develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or other stress-related psychopathologies, including substance use conditions. (Kevlar, a DuPont fiber, is an essential component of U.S. military helmets and bullet-proof vests advertised to be "five times stronger than steel.") The stated purpose of this legislation is to make American soldiers less vulnerable to the combat stressors that so often result in psychic injuries.

On the face of it, the bill sounds logical and even compassionate. After all, our soldiers are supplied with physical armor -- at least in theory. So why not mental? My guess is that the representatives who have signed on to this bill are genuinely concerned about the welfare of troops and their families. Patrick Kennedy, D-R.I., is the bill's sponsor, and I have no reason to question his genuine commitment to mental health issues, both within and outside of the military. Still, I find myself chilled at the prospects. To explain my discomfort, I need to go briefly into the history of military training.

Since World War II, our military has sought and found any number of ways to override the values and belief systems recruits have absorbed from their families, schools, communities and religions. Using the principles of operant conditioning, the military has found ways to reprogram their human software, overriding those characteristics that are inconvenient in a military context, most particularly the inherent resistance human beings have to killing others of their own species. "Modern combat training conditions soldiers to act reflexively to stimuli," says Lt. Col. Peter Kilner, a professor of philosophy and ethics at West Point, "and this maximizes soldiers' lethality, but it does so by bypassing their moral autonomy. Soldiers are conditioned to act without considering the moral repercussions of their actions; they are enabled to kill without making the conscious decision to do so. If they are unable to justify to themselves the fact that they killed another human being, they will likely -- and understandably -- suffer enormous guilt. This guilt manifests itself as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and it has damaged the lives of thousands of men who performed their duty in combat."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: mental kevlar, propanolol

Penny Coleman is the widow of a Vietnam veteran who took his own life after coming home. Her latest book, Flashback: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Suicide and the Lessons of War, was released on Memorial Day, 2006. Her blog is Flashback.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
When the first "mourning after" pill...
Posted by: Nigelthebriton on Jan 10, 2008 12:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...has been issued to these soldiers, won't that be an admission by the US Government that it's so-called "War on Drugs" is, in effect, LOST?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» When Johnny Comes Marching Home Posted by: Artkansas
» War on drugs lost? Never! Posted by: Livemike
US Death Toll from Iraq
Posted by: SENILEBIKER on Jan 10, 2008 12:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
6000 suicides of vets in one year alone!

Although the statistic does not say that the vets were all from Iraq, this number is seven times the number killed in the field in 2006! Even if only 50% were related to to this latest war in Iraq, then you could multply the death toll by 3.5 and this would bring the total death toll of US forces from this conflict to around 15000 so far.

Seems the "enemy" has found something more effective than IED's

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: US Death Toll from Iraq Posted by: CUnknown
» Here I found it. Posted by: abbadon2007
Largely, pentagon shrinks will use...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jan 10, 2008 1:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the same criteria to prescribe drugs to soldiers as public/private quacks use to determine and augment the mental health of six year olds.

Consistent? Yes.

Concerning? Umm, yeah.

A medicated nation is quite concerning...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» We're already a nation of addicts in denial. Posted by: Aposterioriperception
They deserve the pain
Posted by: El Hombre Malo on Jan 10, 2008 1:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't take me wrong, I am not implying all troops deserve punishment or are bad persons. But moral pain is the price you have to pay for violence, even justified violence.

Both personally and as a society, we must face the consecuences of our acts. As a society, these pains affect the political discourse and the way things are done, make us learn from experience, make us a better society. The fact soldiers from developed countries are less and less able to come back untouched from the atrocity of War speaks in favour of the moral position their societies adopt (note that I don't refer to goverments).

There is a reason Kurt Vonnegut was such a good spoker for the end of wars and that is his experience in Dresde. Through history we find many war veterans becoming "peacenicks", and thats because from moral pain comes moral growth. The drug the article describes is not just perverse because it tries to cripple the individual moral judgement in favour of combat effectivity. It is perverse because it would cripple society's learning mechanisms.

After all, armour, tactics and combat medicine have reduced casualties in developed armies to a minimum. If we minimize the moral impact too, soon wars would be so "cheap" to have that societies wouldnt hesitate declaring one for the smallest casus belli, given there is something to gain...for someone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: They deserve the pain Posted by: Longdream
» RE: They deserve the pain Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: They deserve the pain Posted by: donl51
» RE: They deserve the pain Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: They deserve the pain Posted by: EdinIowa
» RE: They deserve the pain Posted by: Livemike
» RE: They deserve the pain Posted by: Longdream
» RE: They deserve the pain Posted by: liber8usa
» RE: They deserve the pain Posted by: liber8usa
Take this article down.
Posted by: hellofriends on Jan 10, 2008 1:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Propranolol, and other beta-blockers, do not "morally amputate" victims of PTSD. What they do is dampen the never-before-experienced surge of adrenaline that accompanies a trauma. This drug does not alter your consciousness or your conscience in the slightest; it subdues the physiological surge that pulses through your brain and body at the moment of shock. This effect (which is largely somatic) enables a degree of existential presence to enable the mind to process the experience in "long-term" storage, which is where non-traumatic memory goes, rather than remain unprocessed as a trauma.

I am forever skeptical of psychiatry's advances, and always inclined to poeticize science, but I urge you to remove this article: you need to talk to doctors before writing something like this. I'm sure your intentions were good, but you clearly have no understanding of how this drug works, and your nightmarish predictions that this will create an army of remorseless monsters is impossible and extremely unhelpful to anyone who might dramatically benefit from this.

Talk about lithium and the arts, philosophize about paxil and social interaction, but not this. Not all prescription drugs are horrors that block one's engagement with real life. My experience of reading your article might be similar to a lot of readers here who watch a 1960s anti-marijuana propaganda video.


I take Propranolol. It saved my life; I wouldn't be alive if it weren't for this drug. It didn't save me from my past or excuse me from my morality, it enabled me to realize that i wasn't living in the past anymore, and I could find a way to come to terms with it, rather than be imprisoned by it (which, i assure you, creates far more dangerous societal problems than even the most dramatic fictions of desensitization you conjure.)

This IS an act of compassion. Not only for the soldiers whose experiences you do not understand, but for their families, and also (in direct contradiction to your fear) for everyone else on the battlefield. Panic with a gun in-hand is more dangerous than temporary and chemically-induced level-headedness.

Victims of PTSD can become either hypersensitized or desensitized, and both can happen on the battlefield. If the Propranolol removes the shock from the shell-shock, soldiers can actually feel LESS desensitized in the future, less numb to the hell that surrounds them. caring and knowledgeable psychologists and psychiatrists (not just Big Pharma and Big this Big that) have been urging the use of the drug for PTSD for years.

Again, please take this article down, or add a correction, an amendment--something. you are creating a false public misperception and demonizing a life-saving medication.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well said... Posted by: mjabele
» That's quite a caveat. Posted by: Longdream
» Not really... Posted by: mjabele
» RE: Not really... Posted by: Longdream
» I'm not "justifying" it... Posted by: mjabele
» RE: Take this article down. Posted by: Longdream
» RE:A borg war! Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: A borg war! Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Take this article down. Posted by: pcushniesr
» RE: Take this article down. Posted by: Lauren
» Guinea pig soldiers? 'Fraid so. Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» if this were about money Posted by: hellofriends
» dosage, dosage Posted by: hellofriends
» marijuana Posted by: hellofriends
» RE: marijuana Posted by: vegngrl
» RE: marijuana Posted by: hellofriends
» RE: marijuana Posted by: Raymonde
» Have any of you been in combat? Posted by: rraabrophy
» RE: Have any of you been in combat? Posted by: hellofriends
» RE: Have any of you been in combat? Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: Have any of you been in combat? Posted by: hellofriends
» I Don't Understand Posted by: pcushniesr
» RE: Take this article down. Posted by: ajagert
» Wyeth PR firm? Burson-Marsteller, is it? Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» RE: Take this article down. Posted by: mountain19
» RE: Take this article down. Posted by: wiegie
» RE: Take this article down. Posted by: hellofriends
» RE: Take this article down. Posted by: Longdream
Let me add two more important things:
Posted by: hellofriends on Jan 10, 2008 2:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1.) the only authority cited here is Leon Kass. First off, he's not the Chairman of the Presiden'ts Council on Bioethics, he's the Former chairman. Secondly, this is GEORGE W. BUSH'S bioethics council. Why would you go to this guy for advice on either biology or ethics?

Leon Kass is one of America's top leaders to prevent Stem Cell research and cloning. He calls homosexuality "one of the sexual abominations of Leviticus—incest, homosexuality, and bestiality." He's against birth control--all birth control--on the grounds that in interferes with a woman's "destiny" as a mother. He considers older bachelor's to be "self-indulgent." in his book "The End of Courtship" he writes:

"Thanks to technology, a woman could declare herself free from the teleological meaning of her sexuality—as free as a man appears to be from his. Her menstrual cycle, since puberty a regular reminder of her natural maternal destiny, is now anovulatory and directed instead by her will and her medications, serving goals only of pleasure and convenience, enjoyable without apparent risk to personal health and safety."


2.) What we should be focusing on here are other ways to treat PTSD. EMDR should be getting as much press as beta-blockers, and their usage is NOT mutually exclusive.

the real questionable drug the military uses is Lariam. this is something they use and should not use.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Risperidone is Risperdal Posted by: VannaLaRoche
First the troops, then ...
Posted by: A. Servant on Jan 10, 2008 2:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
guess who! Read Huxley's Brave New World if you don't know or can't guess.

We each have knowledge of too many outrageous facts of how the centralized system of corporate government has hurt us and others over the past decades. Wouldn't it be "nice" (and for whom?) if we were given a drug to not be bothered by such concerns so we could watch our sports or reality T.V. or news shows without being bothered by such trivialities ? Oh, I forgot, most of us live in metanoia, the opposite of paranoia, without resorting to drugs (hmmm... well maybe not... we do use lots of prescription drugs, alcohol, tabacco, etc.). Perhaps some of the forgetfulness drugs won't be needed until rioting becomes commonplace.

We have learned but a wee portion of the thousands of malevolent actions that have been planned and taken against us, over many decades, to create a playing field rigged against our liberty. If these were mere accidents, why hasn't there been a preponderance of good results with an occasional bad one instead of just the reverse? Have you seen enough to know that we must take a stand to protect ourselves, our loved ones, and future generations? Are you ready to take the lead in helping your communities organize and act?

Don't hope for a savior to create a "centralized solution" that will dissipate the accumulated ills. Historically, what you will receive won't be in your best interest. The media (including mainstream "alternative" media like AlterNet) presents mesmerizing staged theater (ala pro-wrestling) between the Demolican and Republicrat gangs who are paid by the same masters and their proxies. Our reality is that most of us are being kept as slaves in a matrix of control; and we are acting in ways that maintain this system of enslavement. Our voices are ignored by the powerful, and our true needs are overlooked. And as slaves, we are being dominated and imprisoned or threatened with imprisonment when we are bad producers or bad consumers. We are being sickened by limited access to pure air, uncontaminated water, nutritious foods, vital dietary supplementation, honest health information and health cures--not just treatment. And when our usefulness is over, we will be left to die or be killed. The lack of caring that we experience and too often fail to offer to others is not accidental--our indoctrination has been intentionally planned and executed by the proxies of the slave masters.

If you're tired of being enslaved and seeing others threatened with more enslavement, join us in Slaves Anonymous to start making grassroots changes that will improve the security of you and your family. You and your neighbors have the autonomy, creativity, diversity, passion and transcendence to become self-owners and create the conditions necessary for emancipation of your local community from the global tyranny of slavery or serfdom or corporatism or government or fascism or empire or debt-based money or psychopathy or whatever-you-want-to-call-it. You can create ways that lead to less bondage and more humane treatment for yourselves and your neighbors.

Solutions for the common person have been and forever will be grassroots ones that emerge organically from you and your communities. Let's work together: You stop it in your community; I'll stop it in mine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Remember Jello Biafra's rant? Posted by: nightgaunt
averageaussie
Posted by: averageaussie on Jan 10, 2008 3:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So what are they going to do about all the legal and illegal drugs and dope that these guys are already taking/ using? From what I have seen a lot of these guys are already "desensetisd".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PTSD CANNOT be Preventitively MEDICATED
Posted by: Prairie Waif on Jan 10, 2008 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
PTSD for the military CANNOT be preventatively MEDICATED. In order to say that you can prevent PTSD in the MILITARY you will need to screen ALL of those entering the military for their life experiences to the date of their putting their head on the bunk in boot camp.

You will need to make sure that:
They had no:
1. Childhood Physical Abuse
2. Childhood Emotional Abuse
3. Childhood Sexual Abuse
4. Childhood Bullying
5. Childhood Educational Learning Disorders
6. Undiagnosed Learning Disorders
7. Parental Divorce
8. Parental Remarriage
9. Parental Death
10. Sibling Death
11. Family Trauma
12. Teenage Trauma (Sexual Abuse/Sexual Assault)
13. Teenage Pregnancy
14. Teenage Abortion
15. Teenage Parenthood
16. Poverty
17. Malnutrition
18. Life Long Poverty until head hits pillow in
boot camp
19. Alcoholism
20. Illegal Drug Use
21. Legal Trouble causing a Juvenile/Adult
record
22. From a Ethnic Minority
23. Educationally Disadvantaged
24. Divorced themselves
25. Divorced with Children
26. Divorced Due to Domestic Abuse
27. Children in Custody of Grandparents while in
Bootcamp and Training Course
28. Family illness
29. Close Friend's Death
30. Fire

The list is as long as each trial each of us can think of; you cannot medicate away that which happened BEFORE military service that will accentuate and exacerbate the subconscious memories repressed to the point that "they don't exist" until exploded with the pink mist of a compatriot's blood.

This medication is used experimentally for PTSD and the success is questionable. I did find the Mayo Clinic site to provide some useful information, none of it related to PTSD http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/intermittent
-explosive-disorder/DS00730/DSECTION=1
.

I suffer from Severe Complex PTSD and after 14 years of treatment, I have learned that THERE IS NO CURE, ONLY MANAGEMENT. I have also learned that trauma affects everyone differently. On a plane of 100 people, experiencing the same emergency, only 20 people will develop PTSD, either immediately or Delayed-onset, such as mine; I was out of danger for 18 years before my life unraveled.

Who gets PTSD cannot be prevented because it cannot be predicted. This entire idea of "innoculating" the military against PTSD and the trauma of "war" began the day they were born and they needed to fight in a society that doesn't give a damn about the poor and under-priveleged in this society, starting with if they had pre-natal care or not, if they have medical care or not, daycare or not, school districts that are funded by each district's tax base and leave the rich with good schools and the poor with schools that "get by," and living on the edge of malnutrition in a two parent working-class family, etc, etc.

The only "military" innoculated against the trauma of war? Blackwater. Why? They all came from where the ordinary enlisted military did not, the officer's corp and the "elite" of society, the "entitled" who now feel "entitled" to their 100 billion dollar contracts etc. to fight a war free of the Geneva Convention.

We are innoculating the after effects of this administration's Vendetta, instead of innoculating the despair of a sector of society without hope or help.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wonderblob
Posted by: wonderblob on Jan 10, 2008 4:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
War is a mental illness period. We have all been brainwashed into such a state of irrationality that no drug will heal us. It will only make us more ill. The symptoms showing up in our military personnel are just that symptoms of a wholesale disease we all have, War

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: wonderblob Posted by: Lauren
» RE: wonderblob Posted by: vegngrl
» RE: wonderblob Posted by: vegngrl
Greg
Posted by: thebear on Jan 10, 2008 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about medical marijuana for civilians.
Don't hog the compassion. Spread the goodness back home too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sarcasm Forbidden Posted by: Axiom69
» RE: Greg Posted by: Longdream
» Pot? Why not smack? Posted by: colinmeister
» RE: Pot? Why not smack? Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Pot? Why not smack? Posted by: pomes
Social militarism
Posted by: John Annis on Jan 10, 2008 5:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There has always been an upsurge in criminal violence wherever American troops are active - either as a base or a field of conflict. Even in England in the 1940s the rates of murder, manslaughter, rape and general violence went through the roof. And you were/supposed to be our allies. Ask the people of Okinawa how they feel about the casual violence still meted out to their citizens, and ask how many of the offenders stand trial in the country of the crime.

The problem has been compounded over the past decades because the US hasn't actually won - or helped, as in WWII - to win anything. I trust you'll forgive me if I ignore those stunning military triumphs in Grenada and Panama.

American jingoism and xenophobia has only got worse since the advent of worldwide TV reporting and the Internet, and the vast majority of Americans, never mind just the military, are trained from birth to believe that they enjoy some form of entitlement denied to the rest of the world. It's hardly surprising that when the bulk of American youth, having been trapped into enlistment by the foregoing and the ruses of the recruiters, encounter the real thing they fall apart mentally.

There is another, much cheaper solution than using drug-ridden cyborgs: why don't you stop being such a militaristic society? Why is it that you spend as much as the rest of the world combined on 'defence'? Why do you happily pay half of your federal taxes so a very few people running arms companies can become obscenely wealthy?

What is it that you're so very afraid of, that makes you welcome all these things, even to the extent of allowing a fascist state to begin its growth? Who do you think is going to invade the US, Iran?

It makes me sick to see the increasing use of the word 'warrior' in all things American. As a society we should be learning how we can get on with other people, rather than how to destroy them. The world has never been richer, but there is no cap on the amount of money some people calculate is their due.

If you started behaving like decent human beings instead of banging your chests and being happy to represent the 600lb gorilla, we could all lead more productive and rewarding lives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Social militarism Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Social militarism Posted by: babs
» RE: Social militarism Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Social militarism Posted by: John Annis
» RE: Social militarism Posted by: Longdream
» RE: Social militarism Posted by: VannaLaRoche
Veteran Suicide Rate
Posted by: Raybo on Jan 10, 2008 5:09 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Penny,

6,250 veteran suicides in a year (17 a day) sounds terrible. But, if this rate is for all 23.7 million vets, then it may not be as bad as it sounds. Taking into account that worldwide men commit suicide three times more than women and our military is 80% men, then our military, if like the rest of us, would have 14.3 suicides per 100,000 (the whole US is 11 per). This means that if the veterans were no worse of than the rest of us, there would be 3400 suicides anyway. So, our veterans committed suicide in 2005 at about 1.8 times what the rest of us do. Maybe this is just as bad as it sounds in your article. However, if you look up suicide rates, you would find that our vets commit suicide at a rate less than the country of Japan as a whole. All war suck in my book, and veteran suicides will always be higher; but many countries have higher suicide rates than our veterans.

...just for some perspective.

If, by the way, your figures are not for all Vets, but only for our ongoing wars, then that is a whole other story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Old Man of the Mountain?
Posted by: jmmartin on Jan 10, 2008 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is ironic to say the least. It harks back to Hassan ibn Sabbah ("the Old Man of the Mountain") who, during the Crusades, emboldened his troops by plying them with hashish; hence their name, the Hashshashin. Hassan's minions were promised much the same reward now meted out to jihadist martyrs: passage to paradise where beautiful gardens, flowing waters, and hot young virgins would await them. What awaits our U. S. troops? A new Disneyland on the Tigris?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AMPHETAMINES ARE BEING HANDED OUT LIKE CANDY...WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
Posted by: kc10ken on Jan 10, 2008 5:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Combat Veteran here. I did 3 tours in the middle east....13 years time in service before resigning in disgust because of Iraq.

Military doctors have been handing out all types of uppers and downers like candy for the past 5 years. Better to keep our guys doped up and happy lest they discover why they're REALLY in Iraq....right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There are not only psychological consequences...
Posted by: ekwhite on Jan 10, 2008 5:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there are physical ones. There are several contraindications for propanolol, including shock. See the link below:

Wikipedia entry

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

truglass
Posted by: terrapin on Jan 10, 2008 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They are taking away the soldiers' humanity, for their own greedy purposes.
This has to be a crime against humanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Spread the wealth
Posted by: rwmk12 on Jan 10, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe they can issue it to everyone so working at wendy's, bank of america, or ford isn't so brutally numbing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Spread the wealth Posted by: Longdream
Is there a black market for marijuana out in Iraq?
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 10, 2008 6:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If so, let's open it up to the troops. Marijuana cures lots of illnesses and can get the brain back to normal even if it feels a bit too high at first. At least it's not poisonous unlike any medication Big Pharma would love to shove down the troops' throats.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]