Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Shocking Allegations From London: Corrupt U.S. Officials Sold Nuclear Weapons Secrets

The Times of London UK. Posted January 6, 2008.


A former FBI translator claims U.S. officials allowed Pakistan and other states to steal nuclear weapons secrets.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Hard to Believe: 73 U.S. Kids Sentenced to Life Without Parole at 14 or Younger, and All Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

A whistleblower has made a series of extraordinary claims about how corrupt government officials allowed Pakistan and other states to steal nuclear weapons secrets.

Sibel Edmonds, a 37-year-old former Turkish language translator for the FBI, listened into hundreds of sensitive intercepted conversations while based at the agency's Washington field office.

She approached The Sunday Times last month after reading about an al Qaeda terrorist who had revealed his role in training some of the 9/11 hijackers while he was in Turkey.

Edmonds described how foreign intelligence agents had enlisted the support of US officials to acquire a network of moles in sensitive military and nuclear institutions.

Among the hours of covert tape recordings, she says she heard evidence that one well-known senior official in the US State Department was being paid by Turkish agents in Washington who were selling the information on to black market buyers, including Pakistan.

The name of the official -- who has held a series of top government posts -- is known to The Sunday Times. He strongly denies the claims.

However, Edmonds said: "He was aiding foreign operatives against US interests by passing them highly classified information, not only from the State Department but also from the Pentagon, in exchange for money, position and political objectives."

She claims that the FBI was also gathering evidence against senior Pentagon officials -- including household names -- who were aiding foreign agents.

"If you made public all the information that the FBI have on this case, you will see very high-level people going through criminal trials," she said.

Her story shows just how much the West was infiltrated by foreign states seeking nuclear secrets. It illustrates how western government officials turned a blind eye to, or were even helping, countries such as Pakistan acquire bomb technology.

The wider nuclear network has been monitored for many years by a joint Anglo-American intelligence effort. But rather than shut it down, investigations by law enforcement bodies such as the FBI and Britain's Revenue & Customs have been aborted to preserve diplomatic relations.

Edmonds, a fluent speaker of Turkish and Farsi, was recruited by the FBI in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Her previous claims about incompetence inside the FBI have been well documented in America.

She has given evidence to closed sessions of Congress and the 9/11 commission, but many of the key points of her testimony have remained secret. She has now decided to divulge some of that information after becoming disillusioned with the US authorities' failure to act.

One of Edmonds's main roles in the FBI was to translate thousands of hours of conversations by Turkish diplomatic and political targets that had been covertly recorded by the agency.

A backlog of tapes had built up, dating back to 1997, which were needed for an FBI investigation into links between the Turks and Pakistani, Israeli and US targets. Before she left the FBI in 2002 she heard evidence that pointed to money laundering, drug imports and attempts to acquire nuclear and conventional weapons technology.

"What I found was damning," she said. "While the FBI was investigating, several arms of the government were shielding what was going on."

The Turks and Israelis had planted "moles" in military and academic institutions which handled nuclear technology. Edmonds says there were several transactions of nuclear material every month, with the Pakistanis being among the eventual buyers. "The network appeared to be obtaining information from every nuclear agency in the United States," she said.

They were helped, she says, by the high-ranking State Department official who provided some of their moles -- mainly PhD students -- with security clearance to work in sensitive nuclear research facilities. These included the Los Alamos nuclear laboratory in New Mexico, which is responsible for the security of the US nuclear deterrent.

In one conversation Edmonds heard the official arranging to pick up a $15,000 cash bribe. The package was to be dropped off at an agreed location by someone in the Turkish diplomatic community who was working for the network.

The Turks, she says, often acted as a conduit for the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), Pakistan's spy agency, because they were less likely to attract suspicion. Venues such as the American Turkish Council in Washington were used to drop off the cash, which was picked up by the official.

Edmonds said: "I heard at least three transactions like this over a period of 21⁄2 years. There are almost certainly more."

The Pakistani operation was led by General Mahmoud Ahmad, then the ISI chief.

Intercepted communications showed Ahmad and his colleagues stationed in Washington were in constant contact with attachés in the Turkish embassy.

Intelligence analysts say that members of the ISI were close to Al-Qaeda before and after 9/11. Indeed, Ahmad was accused of sanctioning a $100,000 wire payment to Mohammed Atta, one of the 9/11 hijackers, immediately before the attacks.

The results of the espionage were almost certainly passed to Abdul Qadeer Khan, the Pakistani nuclear scientist.

Khan was close to Ahmad and the ISI. While running Pakistan's nuclear program, he became a millionaire by selling atomic secrets to Libya, Iran and North Korea. He also used a network of companies in America and Britain to obtain components for a nuclear program.

Khan caused an alert among western intelligence agencies when his aides met Osama Bin Laden. "We were aware of contact between A Q Khan's people and Al-Qaeda," a former CIA officer said last week. "There was absolute panic when we initially discovered this, but it kind of panned out in the end."

It is likely that the nuclear secrets stolen from the United States would have been sold to a number of rogue states by Khan.

Edmonds was later to see the scope of the Pakistani connections when it was revealed that one of her fellow translators at the FBI was the daughter of a Pakistani embassy official who worked for Ahmad. The translator was given top secret clearance despite protests from FBI investigators.

Edmonds says packages containing nuclear secrets were delivered by Turkish operatives, using their cover as members of the diplomatic and military community, to contacts at the Pakistani embassy in Washington.

Following 9/11, a number of the foreign operatives were taken in for questioning by the FBI on suspicion that they knew about or somehow aided the attacks.

Edmonds said the State Department official once again proved useful. "A primary target would call the official and point to names on the list and say, 'We need to get them out of the US because we can't afford for them to spill the beans'," she said. "The official said that he would 'take care of it'."

The four suspects on the list were released from interrogation and extradited.

Edmonds also claims that a number of senior officials in the Pentagon had helped Israeli and Turkish agents.

"The people provided lists of potential moles from Pentagon-related institutions who had access to databases concerning this information," she said.

"The handlers, who were part of the diplomatic community, would then try to recruit those people to become moles for the network. The lists contained all their 'hooking points', which could be financial or sexual pressure points, their exact job in the Pentagon and what stuff they had access to."

One of the Pentagon figures under investigation was Lawrence Franklin, a former Pentagon analyst, who was jailed in 2006 for passing US defence information to lobbyists and sharing classified information with an Israeli diplomat.

"He was one of the top people providing information and packages during 2000 and 2001," she said.

Once acquired, the nuclear secrets could have gone anywhere. The FBI monitored Turkish diplomats who were selling copies of the information to the highest bidder.

Edmonds said: "Certain greedy Turkish operators would make copies of the material and look around for buyers. They had agents who would find potential buyers."

In summer 2000, Edmonds says the FBI monitored one of the agents as he met two Saudi Arabian businessmen in Detroit to sell nuclear information that had been stolen from an air force base in Alabama. She overheard the agent saying: "We have a package and we're going to sell it for $250,000."

Edmonds's employment with the FBI lasted for just six months. In March 2002 she was dismissed after accusing a colleague of covering up illicit activity involving Turkish nationals.

She has always claimed that she was victimised for being outspoken and was vindicated by an Office of the Inspector General review of her case three years later. It found that one of the contributory reasons for her sacking was that she had made valid complaints.

The US attorney-general has imposed a state secrets privilege order on her, which prevents her revealing more details of the FBI's methods and current investigations.

Her allegations were heard in a closed session of Congress, but no action has been taken and she continues to campaign for a public hearing.

She was able to discuss the case with The Sunday Times because, by the end of January 2002, the justice department had shut down the program.

The senior official in the State Department no longer works there. Last week he denied all of Edmonds's allegations: "If you are calling me to say somebody said that I took money, that's outrageous ... I do not have anything to say about such stupid ridiculous things as this."

In researching this article, The Sunday Times has talked to two FBI officers (one serving, one former) and two former CIA sources who worked on nuclear proliferation. While none was aware of specific allegations against officials she names, they did provide overlapping corroboration of Edmonds's story.

One of the CIA sources confirmed that the Turks had acquired nuclear secrets from the United States and shared the information with Pakistan and Israel. "We have no indication that Turkey has its own nuclear ambitions. But the Turks are traders. To my knowledge they became big players in the late 1990s," the source said.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: turkey, fbi, pakistan, state department, sibel edmonds, state secrets, nuclear secrets

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
HG
Posted by: hankgeorge on Jan 7, 2008 4:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only reason these allegations are shocking, sir, is that the servile American media has been kowtowed by the regime into denying Ms. Edmonds access to a wholly-appropriate forum for sharing her "shocking" evidence domestically. This is a shocking indictment of the US media every bit as much as the perps in the regime who did the treasonous things Ms. Edmonds allegates and can back up with a wealth of information!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

a joint Anglo-American intelligence unit is a good idea?
Posted by: Suzon on Jan 7, 2008 4:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, most people think that Elizabeth II is this gracious and dutiful old lady who is a benign force, if any force at all, in the world.

Actually, the monarchy founded in 1066 by William the Conquerer maintained itself by murderous force until the 18th century when it learned it could survive and prosper by using law for criminal purposes.

What do you think has been happening in the US in the last 30 years if not that? The "special relationship" has been a bad thing for America.

I didn't know there were nuclear secrets anymore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I stick to gin. Posted by: Suzon
» RE: I stick to gin. Posted by: brunowe
Apathy
Posted by: Lesha on Jan 7, 2008 4:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't believe the American people care about such issues. As long as they can get their quick fix on sport and play along with their gluttonous appetite for all the crap out there (including food), it doesn't matter to them.

Remember this population voted for Bush TWICE despite all of the corruption that manifested itself prior to his second term. This is what this generation of Americans want (unknowingly). If its really true that Obama (a CFR crony), Hillary who attends Bildeburg meetings, and McCain (who think we may be in Iraq for next 100 years and is a good thing), if these people are leading in the polls, then corruption is what people want.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Apathy Posted by: Floresta
Sibel Edmonds - Whistleblower at 9/11 cover-up
Posted by: LookOut on Jan 7, 2008 5:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The US attorney-general has imposed a state secrets privilege order on her, which prevents her revealing more details of the FBI's methods and current investigations."

This isn't about "methods and current investigations" but a 9/11 event and investigation that happens to be a bloody charade and national travesty responsible for genocidal fraud "war on terror".

Alberto Gonzales slapped an almost never used executive "state secrets privilege" order on behalf of Washington to – above all – gag Edmonds from revealing what she knew about 9/11 and government foreknowledge of the attacks.


http://www.nswbc.org/Press%20Releases/NSWBC-911Comm.htm

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0802-06.htm

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5197

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/
timeline.jsp?timeline=complete
_911_timeline&projects_and_programs=sibelEdmonds

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corruption?
Posted by: LANCE on Jan 7, 2008 7:32 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Corruption is what the American people want.
Nixon, Reagan, OldBush, TardBush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How does one find out which elected officials were present?
Posted by: kungfoofighterx on Jan 7, 2008 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like to know what elected officials were present at these closed sessions? Does anyone out there in internet land know how to come up with this information. It must be posted somewhere in the government records.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

None of this is shocking. This has been going on ever since Pakistan became a "nation".
Posted by: maxpayne on Jan 7, 2008 8:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All in all, the Pakistani commoners have the most to lose from the fundamentalists in that country. I'd hate to see what will happen to its neighboring countries once the US invades Pakistan because from what I can tell you, it ain't good. A REAL liberal would fight to ABOLISH THE CIA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FBI coverup of nuclear and biowarfare activity by the U.S. government and allies...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jan 7, 2008 10:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is just one more nail in the FBI's public image. However, this pales in comparison to the FBI's deliberately bungled and blatantly dishonest "investigation" of the anthrax letter attacks, mailed on 9/18 and 10/9 from Trenton, New Jersey. That was a deliberate coverup, intended to protect the U.S. biowarfare establishment, i.e. Battelle Memorial Institute, from exposure.

Right now, there are two competing companies that are trying to produce anthrax vaccine for sale to the U.S. and foreign governments. One is Vaxgen and the other is Emergent Biosolutions, formerly Bioport. Both companies subcontracted their anthrax vaccine production to Battelle Memorial Institute. BMI is the world's largest private research corporation, and manages U.S. biowarfare facilities at Pine Ridge in Arkansas, the Dugway Proving Ground in Utah, and they now run the National Institute for Allergens and Infectious Disease at Fort Detrick, Maryland. They also manage nuclear facilities at Oak Ridge, TN, among other places.

The initial investigation of the anthrax attacks quickly led to suspicions that a corporate entity was behind them, and that the primary motive was obtaining expanded government contracts. These stories all came out in late Dec 2001, for example: FBI Investigates Possible Financial Motive in Anthrax Attacks, By Susan Schmidt and Joby Warrick, Washington Post Dec 21, 2001

".Battelle is a contractor at Dugway, which last week acknowledged making a powdered form of anthrax to use in testing sensors and other equipment used to defend against biological attacks.

Soon afterwards, the leading FBI investigators were replaced and the FBI began promoting a 'lone terrorist' scenario. They targeted one Steven Hatfill, a previous biowarfare contract employee of the U.S. government. See Hatfill suit leads to reporters being subpoenaed, Juge calls case "remarkably similar to that of Wen Ho Lee", WP, 2007.

The FBI has repeatedly refused to brief Congressional committees on this, even in closed session, because they fear "leaks to the press."

Even more serious are the distortions of the scientific details of the anthrax attacks by Douglas Beecher, an FBI scientist at the FBI's Hazardous Materials Response Unit: FBI Is Casting A Wider Net in Anthrax Attacks, By Allan Lengel and Joby Warrick, Washington Post, 2006. The shoddy reporting by the Washington Post is equally outrageous, however - they parrot the FBI claims, and make no mention of their previous coverage.

Gary Matsumoto clearly showed that the anthrax preparation was a state-of-the-art powder with unusual additives that could only have come out a sophisticated laboratory - see Science magazine, Nov 28 2003. Richard Preston also described the high-tech nature of the anthrax in a few chapters in his book, The Demon in the Freezer (quotes) - which also details how Battelle Memorial Institute and the FBI tried to cover up the nature of the anthrax powder by steam-sterilizing it, after the USAMRIID scientists at Fort Detrick and at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology identified the high-tech characteristics (1 trillion spores per gram, plus nano-glass additives).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

maybe: Bushevik Backers consider DEMOCRACY a ROADBLOCK to domination?
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jan 7, 2008 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MAYBE cases like Edmonds, Shine& Seigelman are SYMPTOMS?

"corruption is why we win"
??
imagine the SOCIAL CONSEQUENCE IF the KKK took a swing @ Obama or WE *were simply made to believe* someone *might*
??:
US Congress believed there would be a Summer attack
& continues to reel under the Anthrax Killer

if you thought 9/11 sent Americans shrieking over the Brink
what would happen if the REAL Bushevik backers' desire was further reductions in freedoms & rights? what if Bush's backers want something sinister?

what if the point isn't POLITICAL PARTIES, but merely Security & Social Controls?
===
World's Top Surveillance Societies
"Privacy International, a UK privacy group, & the U.S.-based Electronic Privacy Information Center have put together a world map of surveillance societies, rating various nations for their civil liberties records.
Both the US... colored black for "endemic surveillance," as are Thailand, Taiwan, Singapore, Russia, China & Malaysia."
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA report
-No right to privacy in constitution, though search & seizure protections exist in 4th Amendment; case law on government searches has considered new technology
-No comprehensive privacy law, many sectoral laws; though tort of privacy
-FTC continues to give inadequate attention to privacy issues, though issued self-regulating privacy guidelines on advertising in 2007
-State-level data breach legislation has proven to be useful in identifying faults in security
-REAL-ID & biometric identification programs continue to spread without adequate oversight, research, & funding structures
-Extensive data-sharing programs across federal government & with private sector
-Spreading use of CCTV
-Congress approved presidential program of spying on foreign communications over U.S. networks ... & now considering immunity for telephone companies, while government claims secrecy, thus barring any legal action
-No data retention law as yet, but equally no data protection law
-World leading in border surveillance, mandating trans-border data flows
-Weak protections of financial & medical privacy; plans spread for 'rings of steel' around cities to monitor movements of individuals
-Democratic safeguards tend to be strong but new Congress & political dynamics show that immigration & terrorism continue to leave politicians scared & without principle
-Lack of action on data breach legislation on the federal level while REAL-ID is still compelled upon States has shown that states can make informed decisions
-Recent news regarding FBI biometric database raises particular concerns as this could lead to the largest database of biometrics around the world that is not protected by strong privacy law"
=
maybe the ELECTION & primaries are about the Republicans picking the MOST BELIEVABLE Republican 'win'
as wonderful as ANY Democrat might be
there is STILL ELECTION FRAUD.
Arrive with FIVE
& bring your vid'camera!

maybe there is more to this problem than simply WINNING back election integrity

THEN Bushevik BACKERS would be permanently in the position to do *whatever they want*, without bothering with meddlesome Democracy & political parties
=
BlueBerry Pick'n
ThisCanadian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"SHOCKING"
Posted by: andrewstromotich on Jan 7, 2008 1:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i'm not saying i had the inside track or anything, but it's pretty clear that the US leaks nuke info almost as often as it screams that the info is in the wrong hands...

let's see, israel has nukes (really? wow, you'd never know, would ya?), pakistan got nukes about the exact same time india did (amazing the world community had no idea while both of these countries were so close to gaining nukes)...

of course the cold war continues, it's just way more hidden thanks to our awesome media.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "SHOCKING" Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Push for Investigation; Make a Big Noise
Posted by: chorton on Jan 7, 2008 6:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story is really, really hot. The silence around it simply must be broken. Rep. Waxman made one attempt to launch a Congressional investigation. He needs to hear from people about the need to try again. Use your imagination about other ways to plant this story in the American public conversation: letters to newspapers, letters on blogs and newspaper sites, letters to congrespeople, send to your personal email list with request to pass it on, etc. How about letters in European newspapers alerting their readers to the fact that Americans aren't seeing this story and urging them to write to their American friends!

See also Justin Raimondo's column of 1/7 in antiwar.com for more info, links, and a You-tube video of an interview with Edmonds. I know we're all numb with overload from month after month, year after year of horror that goes on known to us and usually unreported in the MSM, but this one is the wakeup call to shake ourselves free of our torpor and start acting.

Acting as if our lives depended on it; they very well may.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corruption at the core
Posted by: Mystery Solver on Jan 7, 2008 8:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If these accusations are credible should anyone be surprised?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sibel's story is already years old - and it is a smoking gun
Posted by: kogwonton on Jan 7, 2008 8:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had the opportunity to speak to the Inspector General of the Justice Dept. during C-SPAN's 'Washington Journal' not long after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. As fortune would have it, I was the first caller into the show, and it set the tone for the rest of the hour. I'm sure he had no intention of answering 9/11 questions all night, but surprise surprise, he was hit hard.

I asked him a few questions that were on my mind, which raised the 'BS' alarm for me. I wanted to know how a passport belonging to one of the hijackers could possibly have survived the total collapse of three buildings - which collapsed due to heat (allegedly) and left molten steel smoldering for eight weeks beneath the rubble, and which sent paper, dust, and debris flying throughout the city.

I then asked him about the insider trading that went on through private brokers, one of which was A.B.Brown - headed till 1999 by Buzzy Krongard, who became the #2 spook at the CIA when Bush 'took' office. I asked him about reports that Mahmoud Ahmad, Chief of the Pakistan 'Inter-services Intelligence' (ISI), had authorized the payment to Mohammed Atta $100,000. It was reported that the payoff was physically performed by one of the chief surviving suspects in the 9/11 attacks - and who later is believed to have been involved in the murder of Daniel Pearl, the journalist from the WSJ who went to Pakistan to 'follow the money'. I asked him why ISI Chief Ahmad was in Washington D.C. on the morning of 911, having breakfast with Goss and Graham and other members of the Senate intelligence committee, and why subsequent reports of Ahmad's activities were not followed up. I wanted to know why, since there were so many obvious connections to various intelligence agencies and financial institutions - and personnel from within and without the US govt., State Dept., Intelligence, and military, that we were being fed a simplistic story such as 'we were attacked by islam because they hate our freedoms'.

Needless to say, he didn't answer a single question. He just sat there looking frightened.

Then comes Sibel Edmonds, talking about an organized crime syndicate comprised of folks from the U.S. State dept (someone was handing out visas to terrorists in Saudi Arabia like it was candy), the CIA, the NSA, the ISI, the GID, MI6, etc., as well as various terrorist groups, organized crime, multinational banking and insurance people, and drug traffickers. To top it off she is saying that these people are pilfering nuclear secrets and passing the out to every two bit dictator and terrorist on the planet. Does anyone remember a fairly recent story about some mis-shipped nuclear warheads, fully locked and loaded aboard a US military aircraft - within the U.S. and against EVERY protocol in existence for the transportation of such materials?

I think we've seen all the stops pulled out, and someone is really trying to start the apocalypse. They seem to be pulling it off successfully through a total blitzkrieg of fear and deception. If we don't get ourselves together democracy will have been proven to be a 'failed experiment' no less than the U.S.S.R. was an example of the 'failure of communism'. Lest we forget, the U.S.S.R. fell with a lot of help from cold warriors on the outside, and a LOT of help from the capitalists within the KGB. I cannot believe that every member of our military and intelligence services are the corrupt and blind followers of some global fascist movement. WHERE ARE THE GOOD GUYS? Does anyone remember that oath to defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States of America?

I hope Sibel's story makes big waves, and I hope to hear her actually name some names, finally. I also hope she lives to be old.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet finally does something right.
Posted by: johndoraemi on Jan 8, 2008 2:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sibel ALSO said:

"“If Counterintelligence receives information that contains money laundering, illegal arms sale, and illegal drug activities, directly linked to terrorist activities; and if that information involves certain nations, certain semi-legit organizations, and ties to certain lucrative or political relations in this country, then, that information is not shared with Counterterrorism, regardless of the possible severe consequences. In certain cases, frustrated FBI agents cited ‘direct pressure by the State Department,’ and in other cases ‘sensitive diplomatic relations’ is cited. ...Your hearings did not include questions regarding these unspoken and unwritten policies and practices. Despite your full awareness and understanding of certain criminal conduct that connects to certain terrorist related activities, committed by certain US officials and high-level government employees, you have not proposed criminal investigations into this conduct, although under the laws of this country you are required to do so."

Another FBI translator, who had been "shielding" the targets of FBI investigations, told Sibel Edmonds: "“Why are you doing this, Sibel? Why don’t you just drop it? You know there could be serious consequences. Why put your family in Turkey in danger over this?” Sibel Edmonds' sister was reportedly sought by Turkish police shortly after this incident.

70 DISTURBING FACTS ABOUT THE 9/11 ATTACKS

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Treasonous Administration? This is news?
Posted by: Snowpuppy on Jan 8, 2008 8:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From outing a CIA agent to looking the other way pre-9/11, this administration serves themselves, not the America that they are charged to serve.

The only difference between Cheney 1994 ("it would be a quagmire") and Cheney 2003 ("We will be greeted as liberators") are his Halliburton stock options, now worth millions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is a Murdoch newspaper that published this.
Posted by: pig on Jan 9, 2008 12:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The real story is much juicier and names names. The Sibel Edmonds story is way more sensational and has been around for years.

Come on Alternet, get with the program, you're starting to look like Kos or Crooks and Liars.

Oink

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SIBEL HAS NAMED NAMES
Posted by: johndoraemi on Jan 9, 2008 4:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On Sibel Edmond's website, she has posted:

Sibel Edmonds' State Secrets Privilege Gallery

If you view the source code, the individuals in the photos are named:

o:title="RichardPerle"

o:title="DouglasFeith"

o:title="EricEdelman"

o:title="Marc Grossman"

o:href="http://www.medaloffreedom.com/BrentScowcroft1.jpg"

o:title="Larry Franklin"

o:title="DennisHastert2"

o:title="RoyBlunt"

o:title="Dan Burton 2"

o:title="Tom Lantos"

o:title="BobLivingston"

o:title="StephenSolarz"

o:title="GrahamFuller"

o:title="DavidMakovsky"

o:title="AlanMakovsky"

o:title="EnverYusuf"

o:title="SabriSayari"

o:title="MehmetEymur"

More analysis:

Sibel Edmonds Blows Open the Cover Up

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement