Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

After Iowa, Huckabee Softens His Christian Image

By John Nichols, TheNation.com. Posted January 4, 2008.


Heading to New Hampshire, the candidate is toning down his God talk to appeal to a more secular electorate.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by John Nichols

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 

It is no secret that Southern Baptist preacher Mike Huckabee positioned himself as a "Christian leader" to win Thursday's Iowa Republican presidential caucuses.

Huckabee's campaign featured a glowing cross in one television commercial and the ancient Christian symbol of a fish as the backdrop in another. And he slipped Biblical quotes and paraphrases into his campaign rap -- even suggesting when he pulled an attack ad that he did so because "we want to do unto others as we wish they would do unto us."

It worked in Iowa, where evangelical Christians have been prime players in Republican politics for three decades.

A CNN survey of Republican caucusgoers Thursday found that six in 10 identified themselves as "born-again" Christians. Huckabee won the support of 46 percent of them, while just 19 percent backed Romney.

So it was that, while he was outspent by what he estimated to be a 15-1 margin, and while he faced a withering attacks from rival Mitt Romney's camp and independent groups, Huckabee was able to hold his position and score a remarkable statewide win in Iowa.

Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican who did not endorse a candidate, bluntly said after Huckabee beat Romney by 10 points that the victory of the former Arkansas governor could be attributed to "loyalty from evangelical Christians."

To Grassley's view, Huckabee's scripture-sampling campaign was a smooth "fit" with Iowa evangelicals -- both stylistically and emotionally.

But now the campaign moves to New Hampshire, a state where the religious right has never enjoyed a political foothold. New Hampshire Republicans are anti-tax and anti-government crusaders, but they have never been Christian crusaders.

They also vote in a primary, as opposed to caucuses that favor campaigns with committed supporters who are willing to give not just a vote but a full evening to the cause.

So the Huckabee campaign is retooling itself fast.

Suddenly, the "Christian leader" is just a "leader."

Huckabee arrived in New Hampshire Friday morning with new literature that drops the religious references used in Iowa and plans for a television advertising campaign that will eschew the crosses and fish that meant so much to his Iowa base.

Huckabee is nothing if not consistent. Sure, he losing the religious trappings that served him well in Iowa, but he's remaining every bit the crassly calculating and cynically manipulative politician that he has proven himself to be from the start of this campaign.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: secular, christian, mike huckabee, new hampshire, iowa

John Nichols is The Nation's Washington correspondent.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Theocrat
Posted by: dayenta on Jan 4, 2008 8:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He's a theocratic, evolution-denying nut job no matter what he says.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ROFL, laugh out loud & so on.....
Posted by: Smiggsy on Jan 4, 2008 9:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is why I get such a laugh out of US politics.

So this guy is born again christian southern baptist minister for one day, then the he tries to convince everyone to portray him as a "normal" pro-war, hard liner no-tax conservative the next....are US citizens that naive?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Apparently So! Posted by: Gravitas
dick
Posted by: rtmyth on Jan 4, 2008 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Huckabee is a dangerous, ignorant, religious fanatic, eager, and if elected able, to bring about Armageddon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: dick Posted by: TheDreamer
Come on
Posted by: Philip Newton on Jan 4, 2008 11:18 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a shock: Huckabee believes in the Bible. Christ, what nerve.

What a shock again: Huckabee is tailoring his message to fit his audience. (He stated plainly he was doing this: "You have to scratch what itches," to paraphrase.)

The tragedy of articles by religio-phobes such as this writer is that they attack people like Huckabee because of who they are. The author is so blinded by his fear of faith that he trashes the candidate, not on the issues he espouses, but on the religion he professes.

I doubt I am voting for Huckabee, not because he is a Christian (I am, too) but because he has not framed his views of Labor in a way that satisfies me. Nor does he have a health care plan that comes close to what is needed. Edwards is better on both these points.

Most Americans are comfortable with honest professions of faith, and most of us know that politicians tailor their remarks to reach their audience.

But you are so blinded by your fear of faith, Mister Socially Liberal Nation Writer that you must attack this candidate on the basis of his.

Get over your socially liberal little self, Mister Nation Writer.

Grade: F

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Come on Posted by: jareilly
» RE: Come on Posted by: Philip Newton
» Grow Up Posted by: Gravitas
» RE: Grow Up Posted by: Philip Newton
» Can't you read Posted by: wireup
» Mister Yuck: Posted by: Philip Newton
» Yucky politics Posted by: Philip Newton
» My God Posted by: bookie
» RE: My God Posted by: Philip Newton
Not Only Elephants Have Long Memories
Posted by: Libertine on Jan 4, 2008 11:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....but some of us Democrats do, too.

If Huckabee is elected, he'll do all in his power to take us further down the road to theocracy that Bush started.

No thanks.

I'd vote for Homer Simpson before I'd vote for Huckabee.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I hope
Posted by: JSquercia on Jan 4, 2008 11:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope that Huckabee does NOT win the Republican Nomination which will I believe lead to his running as an Independent backed by the likes of James Dobson . That hopefully will deprive the Republicans of enough votes to cause them to lose the election , in the same manner that the Green Party and Ralph Nader deprived the Democrats of votes in the Previous elections .
Should he win the Nomination I think that the Dems should " Willy Horton " him for his release convicted rapist Wayne Dormond who went on to rape and murder in Missouri .Huck claims that he felt that Dormond had repented and was concerned for his safety because he had been attacked and castrated in Prison . EXCEPT here's the problem : the attack took place prior to his incarciration and Huck was sooo confident of Dormond's repentence and rehabilitation that as a condition of his release Dormond was required to LEAVE the state . Of course Dormond was White unlike Willy Horton but other than that the circumstances seem pretty much the same .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I hope - not only that Posted by: UnEasyOne
hypocrisy
Posted by: nealrockett on Jan 4, 2008 12:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is most often wrapped in a flag or a bible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now You See Me, Now You Don't
Posted by: thehousedog on Jan 4, 2008 1:24 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Huckster-a-bee was a Christian, now he's not. Soon, he'll be Black, then not; Hispanic, then not, Progressive, then not, Liberal, then not - - but one thing he won't be is HONEST.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Baby don't fear the preacher
Posted by: doodahman on Jan 4, 2008 3:26 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really have to laugh at the fearmongering now whipping up the self described progressives. What a hoot. Oooo, Huckabee quotes the Bible! Huckabee uses a cross as a backdrop!

Riiiiiiiiight. Look, geniuses. If you haven't noticed, the evangelicals are stealing your agenda and, unlike us progressives, they have the organization, manpower, drive and values to actually implement it. They are increasingly gravitating toward a focus on social justice, environmental responsibility, and peacemaking. See, that's what their religion is actually all about.

Now, I know a lot of you are confused, because for a long time, evil, greed driven, power mad bastards have been at the forefront of the public face of evangelicism. You know, like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson were the annointed face of Black Power. Problem is, they ain't.

The reality is that the evangelicals follow their local preachers and pastors, and those folks are on the frontline of social justice. They see the poverty, they see the injustice, they see the death and destruction of war because it affects their flocks far more directly than it does a bunch of ivory tower psuedo intellectuals. And (get this!), they operate from a manifesto that demands social justice, mercy, charity and above all, a respect for all life. What commie bastards, huh?

Sure, they aren't going to let gays get married (oh boy, no marriage-- believe me, my gay friends, marriage ain't all that). And no, they aren't going to let your thirteen year old daughter get an abortion on demand. But you know, that stuff will work itself out because, God knows, the majority of folks need their gay marriages and their abortions.

But to see you people savage evangelicals when you don't have the foggiest notion of what they experience and what grounds them, is embarrassing as a progressive. Hell, I'm a renegade Roman Catholic progressive and even I can see the good values that those people have and that Huckabee, imperfectly, espouses.

He's a populist, people. He and his supporters are our natural allies on the big issues. So get over your gay loving, abortion mongering selves and come in for the big win.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lying for Christ
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Jan 4, 2008 4:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Romans 3:7

New American Standard Bible (©1995)
But if through my lie the truth of God abounded to His glory, why am I also still being judged as a sinner?

GOD'S WORD® Translation (©1995)
If my lie increases the glory that God receives by showing that God is truthful, why am I still judged as a sinner?

King James Bible
For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?

American Standard Version
But if the truth of God through my lie abounded unto his glory, why am I also still judged as a sinner?

Bible in Basic English
But if, because I am untrue, God being seen to be true gets more glory, why am I to be judged as a sinner?

Douay-Rheims Bible
For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie, unto his glory, why am I also yet judged as a sinner?

Darby Bible Translation
For if the truth of God, in my lie, has more abounded to his glory, why yet am I also judged as a sinner?

Etc, etc. Blah, blah, blah

=====================
What's the point here? Huckleberry knows he has a pass to LIE his way into the heart of the GOP. After all, the GOP is now dominated by Christian reconstructionists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lying for Christ Posted by: doodahman
Rancid Politics
Posted by: Philip Newton on Jan 5, 2008 11:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm struck by some of the comments here and it is a fascinating Civics exercise.

Newsweek's latest edition has an article on polarization in US politics: the demonizing and marginalizing of opposition views. The outright paranoia on both right and left.

The article asserts that only about 20% of Americans remain active in politics and these tend to be the hardcore flaks of the right/left divide.

It's not enough to respect or at least tolerate someone elses's views. We are required to embrace, "honor" and submit to them, be they the assertions of left or right or some other unknown dimension.

So the wingnuts shriek and babble about bedroom politics, guns and religion while the disenfranchised majority scratch their heads, wonder what that has to do with paying the rent, and go back to ESPN.

The scary part is this: in an ever-more strident and divided America, the wingnuts increasingly assert power and influence. They're the only ones who thrive in this poisoned environment.

The rest of us may say, "a pox on both their houses," but the fact is, it's our house they're looting, vandalizing and generally stinking up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

William Jennings Bryan Reincarnated
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Jan 5, 2008 5:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Huckster is a one-trick pony, a reincarnated William Jennings Bryan, a populist theocrat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Christianity is organized deception
Posted by: carl baydala on Jan 6, 2008 11:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Christian religion is a pervasive thing in America. So, it does not surprise me that, from time to time, some of its believers would wind up in the political process attempting to gain the highest political position in the land.

Pat Robertson tried it and he failed. And, thank God for that. God truly does work in mysterious ways. He seems to have a handle on right and wrong. But, he did make one mistake in letting George Bush slip through the cracks. But, then again, I do not think George Bush is a Christian anyway. It is just something political he does to get elected.

But, my point is that the U.S. really is a Christian nation. That is good thing if you are a Christian I suppose, but not such a good thing for the rest of us who have to endure all of the madness associated with the religion.

If you think madness is an explosive characterization then you truly are religious and at the mercy of the believers, or more particularly, the leaders of the religion.

If the article is true and Huckabee is changing his tune to suit the crowd then what can we make of Christianity if it has to deceive people to be successful? Think about the message that the religion is sending out to the crowd. It is a deceptive religion as practiced. The article is the proof.

The point is the leaders know that they are deceiving and their deception must therefore be contained within the religion, otherwise why would they do it? So, this represents a double whammy for the religion, in my opinion. Its leaders practice deception and the duped or believers in the religion accept the deception and hence remain as equally culpable in the charade know as Christianity.

And, you wonder why something like Atheism stands in such stark contrast to a religion such as Christianity. Because it is the opposite of what the religion sets out to teach us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]