Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush in Your Bedroom

By Heather Wokusch, HeatherWokusch.com. Posted December 29, 2007.


The ten worst appointees for reproductive freedom.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Heather Wokusch

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Note: this column is partially excerpted from The Progressives' Handbook: Get the Facts and Make a Difference Now.

"On September 11, we saw clearly that evil exists in this world, and that it does not value life … Now we are engaged in a fight against evil and tyranny to preserve and protect life." - George W. Bush in 2002, linking abortion rights with terrorism, as he declared the 29th anniversary of Roe v. Wade to be "National Sanctity of Human Life Day."

Bush has used his Oval Office years to limit reproductive freedom and stack critical posts with right-wingers bent on rolling back the clock.

And now it appears yet another reactionary Bush appointee is on track to get a lifetime position as a federal judge…

Bush nominated Wyoming lawyer and former state representative Richard Honaker to the US District Court back in March, but the reproductive rights group NARAL believes he may soon get a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Honacker authored a 1991 bill which would have outlawed most abortions, and has said that abortion is "wrong, and no one should have the right to do what is wrong."

If the nomination goes through, Honacker will stay on the bench long after Bush is out of office, and he'll join a growing list of appointees eager to regulate your sexuality. A Top Ten list, so far…

1. Patricia Funderburk Ware

In 2001, Bush named abstinence-only proponent Patricia Funderburk Ware to be Executive Director of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS (PACHA). Ware's qualifications for the job of promoting "effective prevention of HIV disease" included criticizing condom use and lobbying against HIV/AIDS being in the Americans With Disabilities Act. Two years later, Ware recommended that a controversial character named Jerry Thacker join the PACHA panel. Thacker has called AIDS a "gay plague" and homosexuality a "deathstyle." Amid public protest, Thacker soon withdrew his nomination and Ware left her PACHA post.

2. Tom Coburn

Bush nominated then-Rep. Tom Coburn (R-OK) to be PACHA co-chair in 2003. Coburn supports mandatory reporting to public authorities of the names of those testing positive for HIV/AIDS. He favors "the death penalty for abortionists and other people who take life."

According to Coburn, the gay community "has infiltrated the very centers of power in every area across this country, and they wield extreme power… That agenda is the greatest threat to our freedom that we face today. Why do you think we see the rationalization for abortion and multiple sexual partners? That's a gay agenda." Who else would you want advising the Bush administration on AIDS?

3. David Hager

Hager was one of three religious conservatives that Bush put on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Advisory Committee for Reproductive Health Drugs in 2002 and only public outcry prevented him from becoming its chairperson. Critics argued that in his gynecology practice, Hager had refused to prescribe contraceptives to unmarried women and had recommended Scripture readings to alleviate headaches and premenstrual syndrome. A memo which Hager wrote helped persuade the FDA to overrule its own advisory panel in 2004, thus preventing the emergency contraceptive "Plan B" from being made more easily available. Critics assailed the FDA's decision as ignoring scientific evidence, but in Hager's assessment: "Once again, what Satan meant for evil, God turned into good." A downright criminal side of Hager emerged when his former wife went public with the fact that he had been emotionally, physically and sexually abusive during their 32-year marriage, forcibly sodomizing her on a regular basis. As Hager's ex-wife told The Nation magazine in May 2005, "it was the painful, invasive, totally nonconsensual nature of the [anal] sex that was so horrible."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bush, abortion

Heather Wokusch is the author of The Progressives' Handbook series. For a video of this article or to contact Heather, visit heatherwokusch.com

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Mental Gymnastics
Posted by: SENILEBIKER on Dec 29, 2007 3:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I shake my head in disbelief at anyone who can advocate the death penalty and claim to support the right to life in the same breath.

Advocating the death penalty for abortionists is so logically inconsistent that from this side of the Atlantic, it appears that the USA has finally detached itself from any rational thought process.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mental Gymnastics Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Why?
Posted by: rinthy on Dec 29, 2007 4:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I could report on the egregious assault on our Constitutional rights forever, and knowledgeably, but I still have to ask 'why'? Who benefits?

If I opt for abortion, because I find that I cannot, or will not...for reasons economic,or cultural, or through selfishness or vanity...deal with the birth of a child, who is harmed if I choose not to be a mother?

Not the State, which already houses all the cannon fodder it needs within its impoverished and endless ghettos.

Not the tax payers, who will be relieved of the burden of of warehousing my angry young man someday.

Possibly a couple anxious to adopt, but I find it difficult to think of myself as a baby mill for the infertile; harder still to believe that adoption fees net the State sufficient funds to justify concern.

There are other issues besides the takeover of a woman's right to choose, of course. and the Naomi's of current interest have given us a clear picture of 'how'. What I still wonder is 'why'? Why decimate our Constitutional protections?

Any thoughts?

Rinthy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why? Posted by: morticia
What Really Matters
Posted by: Sissy on Dec 29, 2007 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is the fact that when all is said and done, it is totally a personal decision about what you do with the most personal aspects of your life. You don't have to think about it or justify it to anyone,nor do you have to make excuses, you can look to others than who you want to for counsel if you want counsel, it simply shouldn't MATTER. That is what has been so frustrating.

My own thoughts are these. In my childbearing years I could have never, for all sorts of personal reasons, opted for an abortion, I just couldn't. But while I couldn't have personally, I would never dream of telling you or your daughters or any one else, they couldn't either.

Have you ever noticed who the greatest nay sayers to abortion are? 99% of the time it is the white upper-class male (more often than not the politician pandering to the evangelical base) or a pious, sanctimonious evangelical preacher, many of whom are shown later to be a hypocrital fraud.

I find it ironic that those who are militantly against abortion have used it to defend their need to blow up clinics and kill doctors and nurses. There is also a segment of the anti-abortion league who are trying to have abortion a capital offense. Most all of these people also push for state's rights and want government everywhere out of your lives but in your bedrooms.

My final thought is this. What you do with your personal life is your business,and that includes your life style, who you marry, where and how you live. Your life and the way you personally live it is up to you.

I worry more about health care, education, social security, the environment, trade, jobs, and taxes. Leave the other totally unimportant issues such as the former, alone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The thought of George Bush in my bedroom
Posted by: Gravitas on Dec 29, 2007 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is the most effective form of birth control they can come up with. Now excuse me as I vomit my breakfast!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Love it ? Posted by: zipper696
» RE: Love it ? Posted by: Sissy
Been There....Done That....Crony Appointments
Posted by: CatDad on Dec 29, 2007 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These people think that government must NEVER be seen as a positive, effective solution but rather as THE problem....Still, the government exists and positions have to be filled. Why bother putting qualified people in the posts (You're doing a heck of job...Brownie)? Crony appointments for the unqualified is one of the trademarks of the George Bush admin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I said it once
Posted by: walldodger1969 on Dec 29, 2007 12:39 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In another post...needs to be said here.Our president is a F%$KIN A$$HOLE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sam Alito is a liar and a criminal..
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Dec 30, 2007 12:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sam Alito is a liar and corrupt criminal and this I know to be true personally..!

He used his position as top Federal Attorney in New Jersey to cover up for the drunk West Caldwell cop that crashed into and crippled me and then launch a reign of terrorism that went on for over ten years by the very cop that was totally drunk when he crashed into me..

Sam Alito was a prime main ingredient of this criminal conspiracy and withheld from me a West Caldwell resident that while I was writing him and that corrupt office of the Federal Attorney's in Newark that he too the low life swine was a West Caldwell resident..

He also took it upon himself as a Federal Attorney to keep the rouge cops of his town informed as to my writing the "Feds" as they repeatedly taunted me...

These many retaliations also included terrorizing and the sexual assault upon my girl friend the mother of two little kids..who grew up in that town a den of corruption racism and deceit..

The cop that crashed into me after attending a bachelors party for 6 hours in the basement of a Go-Go bar had had 5 accidents in 7 months and 7 in less than 18 months but Sam Alito saw fit to break the law to cover up for this low life drunken scum bag now a ranking officer.. of that force..

These cops even dragged her and her little kids from their beds and made them homeless at 1:30 at night traumatizing them as well..

Sam Alito is a corrupt authoritarian pig who cares little for even women mothers who had a loved their children and sacrificed for them as did my girl and nothing less than a Tory Tyrant Federalist Society swine pig criminal..


Who perjured himself before our entire nation when he said over and over "Nobody's above the law and no ones beneath it..!"

What a lying pig swine scum Sam Alito is..!


And so say I TJ Colatrella...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush's Bedrooms
Posted by: Romantic Violence on Jan 2, 2008 5:12 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is nothing new..this type of nonsense crept upon folks in the form of fascist legislation in the form of Roe v. Wade, the establishment of the fascist OCSE in 1975, 'no fault' divorces, po-lice and radicalized 'feminist' sponsored 'domestic violence' decrees and more importantly, the strengthening of the family court system. All of this has served to do is destroy families and to distance people from one another; population control has been on the UN agenda since 1954 and has also been American foreign policy overtly until 1994..Clintonista Administration. It's amazing that this is among one of the courts where the Constitution doesn't matter because this structure generates plenty of money for everyone involved except for the defendant. Don't solely blame Bush; you know who is to blame? We are because of our acts of omission which means we did nothing. These folks can do no more than we allow them to. AT this rate, population control works.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]