Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Assassination of Benazir Bhutto

By Ali Eteraz, Huffington Post. Posted December 27, 2007.


Details about the attack that killed the two-time former Prime Minister of Pakistan are slowly coming via Pakistani media.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Ali Eteraz

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Benazir Bhutto, a two time former Prime Minister of Pakistan, and one of the leading voices of democratization, was assassinated in a suicide bombing in Rawalpindi, a garrison city near the capital, Islamabad. She was departing a political rally with her closest political advisors, in preparation of the January elections. Approximately thirty other people were killed. Al-Qaeda has claimed responsibility for the killing.

Details about the attack are slowly coming via Pakistani media. The bomber is described as a lone-individual who, before exploding himself, opened fire on Benazir's van. Pakistani officials have confirmed (to the BBC) that she was killed by a gun-shot to the neck. In fact, Pakistan's GEO-TV is currently panning to a picture of a handgun sitting (found quite miraculously) amidst the debris, presumably the one that killed Ms. Bhutto. However, some journalists are uncertain whether it was a gun shot, or pellets from the bomb, that killed her.

The jeep that Bhutto was traveling in, was armored and bullet-proof. However, tragically, at the moment of the attack, she had been standing with her head out of the sunroof, waving to supporters.

This was the second suicide bombing directly targeting Benazir since her return to Pakistan in October. The first, that targeted her at a rally in Karachi, killed more than 150 people. Prior to the first bombing, Pakistan's Daily Times wrote an editorial discussing Bhutto's fingering of people who had threatened her. This included Pakistan's highest Taliban leader, Baitullah Mehsud. The Daily Times editorial suggested there may be a connection between Mehsud and individuals in Pakistani military. In the aftermath of Bhutto's killing it would behoove international observers to see what kind of arrests and investigation, if any, President Musharraf engages in.

Bhutto was the leading democratic figure in Pakistan and head of Pakistan's People's Party. Her death, according to private intelligence agency, Stratfor, deals a crushing blow to the PPP's chances in the forthcoming elections. Her primary democratic opponent, Nawaz Sharif, himself a former Prime Minister (removed by Musharraf in 1999), had recently become on good terms with Bhutto. Together the two of them had signed a charter for democracy. The Washington Post has reported that a rally for Nawaz Sharif was targeted by a sniper, killing four. A quite frazzled looking Sharif called today the "saddest day in Pakistan's history." If the PPP suffers from disarray, the next two largest parties are the two different branches of Pakistan's Muslim League (Q & N). Q is affiliated with Musharraf, and N is affiliated with former prime minister Nawaz Sharif.

Unrest has already begun across the country. I am told that a train has been put to fire and explosions have been heard around Karachi -- hundreds of cars are already on fire. Riots are spreading to the populous Punjab province. The Army Rangers have been deployed in various areas.

Irrespective of one's views on Bhutto -- mine were mostly negative -- she was the primary secular-minded democratic leader of Pakistan. She had made statements about hunting Bin Laden, eradicating the pernicious madrassa system, as well as apologizing for allowing the Taliban to acquire power during her watch in the mid 90's. Her killing is a huge blow to the anti-extremist movement in Pakistan. Frankly, as it stands now, there are no other anti-extremist democratic leaders in Pakistan.

If this assassination is indeed the doing of elements connected to Taliban or Al-Qaeda, it would be the most prominent political assassination by the group. Bhutto was the first woman to be elected leader of a Muslim country.

President Musharraf is now on TV and says that this attack is caused by "those terrorists with whom we're at war." He is asking for Pakistan to "uproot terrorism and toss it aside." He calls terrorism the biggest obstacle to our progress." Further, he is appealing to Pakistanis to remain calm.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: pakistan, bhutto, benazir bhutto

Ali Eteraz is an international finance and human rights lawyer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It was a matter of time.
Posted by: Longdream on Dec 27, 2007 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She must have known it was a matter of time when she returned to Pakistan.

So, who was it? Islamic Extremists or Musharraf?

Let's think. The extremists hated her because she was their sworn enemy, and vowed a war on them. There she was, a woman, supposed to be subservient to any male in the vicinity instead of showing them all up shooting her mouth off about things that aren't a woman's concern. And crime of crimes, she kept on forgetting not to shake hands with men after she was married. They hated her, but did they take her seriously as a threat? Did they kill her? I'm going to say no. I think they would have just chopped off the offending hands to make an example.

The man extremists truly hate is Ashfaq Kayani, the hand-picked, US-trained general who, as of November, is in the most important seat of power in Pakistan--he's the Chief of Army Staff. He has a long record of "disappearing" civilians out of their homes, and is presently doing Bush's bidding in the Waziristans by exterminating Taliban, their family and friends.

So, Musharraf. There she was, speaking in front of crowds about real democracy, not the kind where a man gets rid of the judiciary in order to become a "popularly elected leader". His popular support? Ten billion bucks worth of guns courtesy of W, ready to keep Pakistan safe for the Pakistanis (which ones?).

Bhutto was making it a little difficult for him to re-invent himself as the People's Choice. The people, it seems, could see the uniform under the suit.

So the civil war that's coming is just Musharraf's thing. Who knows how to deal with such chaos better than he does? Never mind all the claptrap speechifying, vote-winning, hand-shaking that goes into an election. Ten billion bucks worth of guns is very handy in keeping order.

Is there even going to be an election, now? And do you think Bushco even gives a fuck? They're watching Iowa today, not Islamabad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It was a matter of time. Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: It was a matter of time. Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: It was a matter of time. Posted by: fraterm
» RE: It was a matter of time. Posted by: Longdream
Bhutto's Assasination
Posted by: writerman on Dec 27, 2007 12:55 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I met her a few decades ago a party in London. She was a charming, livly, mini-skirt wearing, beautiful, princess. I was quite smitten with her. Unfortunately I was dirt-poor at the time, and she came from one of the richest and most powerful ruling-class families in Pakistan. Coming from her background she knew where her duty lay, loyalty to her family/clan came first. She married a guy chosen by her family, Mr.10%. A guy who was a banker not a warrior. He was never going to put himself between her and a bullet. Queens need knights to protect them. Her father was murdered, her two brother's were murdered, and now she's gone to join them. The young princess I met turned into a powerful queen with many, many, enemies; and too few real friends.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bhutto's Assasination Posted by: compu
Now we know who ordered the hit
Posted by: CharliePatton on Dec 27, 2007 1:37 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Al-Qaeda has claimed responsibility for the killing."

"Al-Qaeda" is a creation of the US "intelligence" establishment; hence, it's a safe bet that the orders to kill Bhutto came from the highest levels of the US executive/"intelligence" milieu.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Are you trying to make a point? Posted by: CharliePatton
» RE: Are you trying to make a point? Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: "logic", or a red herring? Posted by: CharliePatton
» RE: "logic", or a red herring? Posted by: CharliePatton
» RE: "logic", or a red herring? Posted by: CharliePatton
» RE: "logic", or a red herring? Posted by: CharliePatton
» RE: "logic", or a red herring? Posted by: CharliePatton
» Qui bono-- BIG TOBACKGO Posted by: tokerdesigner
Pakistan autodestruction
Posted by: Falang on Dec 27, 2007 2:02 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take out the nuclear weapon out of the country, put a electrical fence around Pakistan and let them kill each other until the last one since they don't have any respect for life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» way to show your respect for life Posted by: hurricane hugo
» Pakistan has no respect for life? Posted by: woodford54
» RE: Pakistan autodestruction Posted by: carbon-based
Women Are Targets of Assasination By Religious Fundamentalists
Posted by: drricklippin on Dec 27, 2007 2:24 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Bhutto was the first woman to be elected leader of a Muslim country"

Her gender as well as the threat she represented played roles in this tragic outcome.

I fear for strong women in politics with armed and dangerous religious fundamentalists (from ALL religions)who seek to repress women out of fear roaming the streets of our nations-including the US!

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SHE SEEMED FEARLESS TO ME
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Dec 27, 2007 2:36 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wondered about her vulnerability and the fact that she didn't avoid public appearances. She endeared herself to the people by going out there among them. They seemed to like her. What a shame. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pakistan civil war?
Posted by: andabottleof_rum on Dec 27, 2007 2:43 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just yahoo-ed "Pakistan civil war"

I got three yahoo headlines.

Pakistan Civil War - News Results

* Pakistan civil war fears overblown in wake of Bhutto killing Market Watch - 22 minutes ago
linked text
* 'Pakistan will plunge into civil war' IANS via Yahoo! India News - 4 hours ago
linked text
* Pakistan faces horror of civil war after Benazir Bhutto is assassinated in suicide attack Daily Telegraph - 13 minutes ago
linked text

Notice the financial news agency is already trying to pacify fears of war and diminish the threat. The others are concerned about this for non-financial, human reasons. It just shows how opportunistic and materialistic the world of economics is. The major concern among financial types regarding war is how it will affect markets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anyone else
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Dec 27, 2007 2:19 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
have visions of Archduke Ferdinand going through their head when they heard about this?

plur

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

tokerdesigner
Posted by: tokerdesigner on Dec 27, 2007 4:15 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Current news confirms idea that "Pakistan" has been problem country no.1 for some time now, and my guess is that the original misnaming of the country has something to do with it. Anything that nearly rhymes with "tobacco stand" can be expected to be deadly.

Like tobacco itself, the "suicide bomber" is an American invention. To most of us, the main instance of it is the drunk driver who may be in the next car approaching you around the next bend-- in your lane. But the cigaret smoker is a perfect example. They all know about the warnings, and have a casual idea about it because the process is slow and death a few decades away. Meanwhile there's the side-stream smoke... Pakistan is like something a tobacco addict like D. MacArthur, FDR or J. Stalin would invent. In fact that's who did invent it.

My proposal is that the name be changed to Hashistan. Despite the slanders associated with supposed medieval meanings of the word, hashish has not once in the twentieth century been accused of being involved in an assassination, an act of terrorism or a civil war. Add an anti-overdose utensil with a narrow screened crater, and warnings against mixing it with tobacco, and hashish could and should be the dream crop that will get that country on its feet economicswise and freedomwise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: tokerdesigner Posted by: truthseeker426
Dingbat Democrats and Republicans are destroying Pakistan, the most populous Muslim country
Posted by: logansafi on Dec 27, 2007 4:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You gotta to give credit to the monolingual idiots that run America. They want to run the world yet are total dingbats. They are good at destruction and unable to construct. Everywhere they intervene these regions are turned into chaos and decimation. Nothing has changed since Korea and SE Asia. Our leaders have merely gotten stupider and more venal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hey - there's buttloads of $$$ Posted by: hurricane hugo
kathaksung
Posted by: kathaksung on Dec 27, 2007 6:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So what. US does samething. JFK, Robert Kennedy, Martin L. King..... Senator Wellstone. If necessary, they'll do it any time.

Quote, "Elitists Consider Assassinating Ron Paul

Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007

Paul Joseph Watson Best-selling author and Bilderberg sleuth Daniel Estulin says he has received information from sources inside the U.S. intelligence community which suggests that people from the highest levels of the U.S. government are considering an assassination attempt against Congressman Ron Paul because they are threatened by his burgeoning popularity.

http://prisonplanet.com/audio/141207estulin.mp3

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where are ellie1 and johngary
Posted by: meetmeineleusis on Dec 27, 2007 6:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to turn this into an anti-ron paul thread?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Covert Action Again
Posted by: deaconjones on Dec 27, 2007 7:31 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is obvious that Al CIAda is responsible for
this assassination. Corporate Washington has
time and time again opted for dictatorship over
democracy–even the pro-Washington “democratic”
pluralism offered by Bhutto. Only recently
Bush announced that Pakistan’s nukes had been
irreversibly “secured”. How secure could this
be when the long-time State Department’s sponsored dictator Mushareff is almost universally hated.

Bush’s neo-con morons not only believe that
history is a liberal construct which really doesn’t exist apart from ivory tower ruminations…they resolutely refuse to learn
anything from it. Like their ideological mentor
Goebbles they have become intoxicated from inhaling their own intellectual poop…

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GW Bush Depleted American Ground Power in Iraq, Now he Cannot Handle Pakistan
Posted by: sofla100 on Dec 27, 2007 7:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the real terrorist threat was apparent, the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan after 911, GW Bush choose instead to treat this as a sideshow to his conquest program in Iraq. The result, American ground power has been largely depleted in Iraq and the USA essentially has very little ground forces left, if necessary, for dealing with Pakistan. This is extremely dangerous because unlike Saddam, Pakistan is known to have 70-100 nuclear devices, also, the Taliban and extremists run half the country, and the security services and military have a large percentage of extremists in their ranks. Therefore, a very real danger is present that some of the nukes could get into the wrong hands. But, alas, America can do very, very little. Perhaps bomb some targets, but if the nukes get loose, it would take real ground power to track them down and secure them. Not a good situation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Man, you just KNOW... Posted by: hurricane hugo
I wonder if her kids think Pakistan was worth it?
Posted by: macktan on Dec 27, 2007 7:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She had to know that going back would make her a martyr. I wonder if the U.S. was involved in her decision to return? Clearly, Mushie heard the bells tolling and his power ebbing. He'd been forced to resign from the army, but he knew that not even that would secure the backing of the country that gave him 10 billion dollars without even asking for a receipt. Did Bhutto and Narif actually believe Mushie would concede to democracy if it meant losing his job?

But wouldnt we (our celebrated state dept and clandestine agencies) have guessed this would happen? Did it seem too far fetched? "Nah, they wouldn't dare touch Benazir--that would be going too far!"

Funny, how we can predict with certainty the biological and nuclear threats posed by Saddam Hussein, but we are shocked when this drama plays out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who benefited the most?
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Dec 27, 2007 8:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not that that will tell you who pulled the strings, but it is revealing.

Elections have been cancelled and the general gets to stay in power (along with all of his cronies and subordinates, including the honchos of the Pakistan ISI). Pakistan's ISI has many links to domestic Islamic militants. See Juan Cole's comments.

"The Pakistan People's Party (PPP) faithful will almost certainly blame Pervez Musharraf, and sentiment here is more important than reality, whatever the reality may be. The PPP is one of two very large, long-standing grassroots political parties in Pakistan, and if its followers are radicalized by this event, it could lead to severe turmoil."

Others are pointing to domestic militant Islamic groups, but those groups probably all have ties to the Pakistani ISI.

In the first attempt on Bhutto's life, bomb attacks killed well over a hundred people. Bhutto blamed on the army: Bhutto points finger at army over blasts, Oct 19, BBC

After that, Musharraf placed Bhutto under house arrest: See the Nov 10 story, Bhutto under house arrest, then released, by Pakistan authorities, BBC. Pakistan authorities? Musharraf, right?

See also Bhutto calls on Musharraf to quit, Nov 13 2007

So, who is the short-term winner? Musharraf and his cronies, who now no longer have to deal with an election in January and who have thereby solidified their grip on power. His Islamic militant cronies may be the biggest winners, as they have cut off any possible shift towards democratic reforms, thereby maintaining their influence in the government.

One other point: the U.S. is now backing Islamic fundamentalists across the Middle East (worked in Saudi Arabia, didn't it?). See: US signals support for talks with Taliban

That's right - the Taliban who harbored Osama bin Laden are now potential U.S. allies in the "War on Terror". The British are doing the same thing: Gordon Brown pressured to explain Taliban talks.

I think that the current U.S. presidential team would prefer fundamentalist Islamic regimes ruled by corrupt crony dictators and savage religious police to real democracy in the Middle East - all so that they can more easily control the oil and gas fields and the pipeline routes. Who knows? Maybe Bhutto started signing the wrong tune - Condi Rice intended her to be a Musharraf ally, not an enemy, right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Owlman1
Posted by: mjksoul on Dec 29, 2007 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I recently watched David Frost's interview with Mrs Buhhto, and was shocked to hear her say Osama Bin Laden was dead. This was told to her by the man who had killed him, she mentioned his name and not one question was asked by Mr. Frost about it.
When the General of the Pakastani Army sends 100,000 dollars to Atta, with both the FBI and CIA knowing this fact, it shows the game we are being suckered into. The first comments from Rice and the rest of our Administration shows we love war, make billions from war, and it is not money as much as it is our aquisition of land. We are the terrorists of the world body I believe, until we take our country back from the fascists who govern, the next president will play into the hands of our enimies..OURselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Owlman1 Posted by: britknee
World View
Posted by: EventHorizonEvent on Dec 30, 2007 9:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One day after Benajir was assasinated, the Pakistan government is trying to give it a look like of an accident by declaring that Benajir died of head injuries caused by the force of the bomb blast. May be that after a few days, they will say that those 20 or so other people killed in the incident all died of heart attacks panicked by the bomb blast.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]