comments_imageCOMMENTS: 54

How an 'Ex-Gay' Minister Saw the Light

Scott Harrison left the Christian "sexual orientation therapy" movement when he realized he couldn't pray away the gay.
December 26, 2007  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 
Scott Harrison desperately tried to change his sexual orientation in various "ex-gay" ministries for eight years, three of them as a ministry leader in Southern California. Most of his experience with ex-gay groups -- Christian organizations that see homosexuality as a choice that can be changed with proper therapy -- was with Living Waters and Desert Stream, two curricula of a national ex-gay network that has more than 80 branches today. When Harrison joined in 1982, he felt ex-gay ministers were then a band of compassionate outsiders attending to the first AIDS victims. But by the end of that decade, Harrison had taken note of the movement's increasing radicalism, symbolized for him by the minister at the Vineyard Christian Fellowship in San Pedro, Calif., who performed an exorcism on him in an attempt to cast out the "demons" said to be the cause of his homosexuality. Harrison finally quit the movement in 1990 after deciding he could, after all, reconcile his sexuality with his Christian faith. Today, he speaks to parents of gay and lesbian children about the dangers he sees in the ex-gay movement. Harrison says the relatively recent alignment of Exodus International, one of the largest ex-gay groups with some 120 ministries in North America alone, with anti-gay Christian "dominionists" -- people who want to impose Christian rules on the secular institutions of society -- has led to ex-gay ministers pursuing a hard-line message with young people that can only end in mental anguish and failure.


Casey Sanchez: Scott, how did you first get involved with the ex-gay movement?


Scott Harrison: I grew up in the '60s in a conservative evangelical home, in a Baptist environment. From a young age, I learned homosexuality was not only bad but was the worst sin a person could do. It was worse than murder. For me, the two options I saw, once I realized I was gay, were to commit suicide and go to heaven or to come out as gay and go to hell. [The ex-gay movement] offered a third option.



Sanchez: You started attending ex-gay ministries in 1982. Those were the early days of the movement. What was a typical meeting like?

Harrison: They would open with a prayer. Andy Comiskey [founder of Living Waters/Desert Stream, a neo-Pentecostal ex-gay ministry], or whoever the particular person leading the session was, would present the teaching. These teachings later became the chapters in Comiskey's book, Pursuing Sexual Wholeness.

We were separated into small groups that would stay together for the entire duration of the class. It was a three-and-a-half-hour segment every Saturday. We would break up into our small groups, and we would do a discussion.



There would be praying to break "one-flesh unions." That was the language they used to describe anything that involved having sex that they considered sinful, whether it was premarital sex or homosexual behavior or someone having sex with someone who was in the occult.



The small groups were meant to create Platonic, healthy, same-sex relationships with other Christians. And so you got really close to these people who were in the group. You'd call them every day just to see how they were doing. It was really similar to a recovery group. Homosexuality was viewed as a temptation, not as an orientation.



Sanchez: Back in the 1980s, many Christian churches wanted nothing to do with ex-gay ministries. They saw them as shameful. What was your experience?


Harrison: [The Vineyard Christian Fellowship in San Pedro, Calif.] was completely different from any evangelical church you've ever been to. There was a strong emphasis on social justice issues -- feeding the homeless and doing whatever you could to help people. There was a strong emphasis on doing the things Jesus did and walking the talk.

Sanchez:So the first ex-gay movements considered themselves progressive?


Harrison: Yes. This was at the beginning of the AIDS epidemic. If you were struggling with feelings of being attracted to the same sex, regardless of whether you accepted yourself as gay or lesbian, you often were asked to leave your church. People tried to cast demons out of you if it was a Pentecostal or charismatic church. Some said that just through reading the Bible would make you change.

So Desert Stream comes along, and it was fairly innovative. Comiskey had a marriage and family therapy degree. He was versed in psychology. [The program] integrated his brand of psychology with theology. It was seen [in Desert Stream] that sexuality was a gift from God, but certain expressions of sexual behavior are not proper and are not blessed by God. The message was a mixed message -- it had progressed from a view you heard in evangelical churches, that homosexuals are all going to hell. It was a message that was hopeful, in a sense.



Sanchez: In 1987 you became an ex-gay minister. Why?


Harrison: I still believed that change was possible or I wouldn't have done it. I didn't believe change was an easy process. People would have said, if you asked them in private, [that] the option was one of celibacy, as opposed to accepting oneself as gay and lesbian. When [ex-gay ministers] talked about change at that time, they were talking about behavior modification. A person submitted his or her life to God and believed in the power of Christ to transform all elements of his or her life. It was a hope that was held out there, that [one's] desires would become more and more heterosexual. I dated [women] a little bit but it just didn't happen.



b> A minister in your church performed an exorcism on you to root out your homosexuality. How did that happen?


Harrison: There was a particular associate minister who was pretty out there. But the problem was he was also extremely intuitive. He would know stuff about you without you ever having told him.

When you're coming from a perspective that you believe God can give messages to people, words of prophecy, then it's very easy to become prey. This guy got a team of people together. One of the aspects that is pretty strong in Vineyard, still, is that they believe that people can be "demonized." Not meaning that a person is fully possessed by Satan, but that a person has given him or herself over to Satanic strongholds in his or her life, so that it may take an exorcism to release the various demons that this person has given over their lives to.

Sanchez: What happened as you went through it?


Harrison: It was very intense, dramatic, group prayer. It lasted at least three hours. At the end, I was drenched in sweat. There were some real areas of psychological wounding. All I can really describe it as -- because of how it happened and the incorrectness of the theology -- is that it felt like a spiritual rape to me.

I'm not saying he [the minister] didn't have good intentions, but it amounted to a spiritual rape. The exorcism occurred that afternoon, and then we ran into the evening church service. I've got hearing issues. I'm fairly hard of hearing; I had hearing aids at the time. This person was convinced that God had given word that I was supposed to give up my hearing aids, that God would heal my hearing. He did this in front of 300 people. I was psychologically vulnerable. I didn't follow my better hunches. Even though it happened over 20 years ago, it's hard to still not blame myself. ... I knew there wasn't a demon of homosexuality.

The [minister] said that if I let him crush my hearing aids, then God would give me back my hearing. He said he would pay for them if God didn't give me back my hearing. Then, he later reneged on that. For the next several weeks, I was faking that my hearing had been healed.

Sanchez: Nowadays, you speak to groups like PFLAG, Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays, about ex-gay ministries. What do you tell them?
Harrison: I always start out by saying what I am not doing is trying to bash people or say negative things about anyone who's involved with these ministries as a person. My goal is to educate people [as to] what their theology is, what they do and also what some of the things I see as dangerous [are] about the movement, both when I was involved and currently.

There's psychological damage when change doesn't occur, when sexual orientation remains homosexual. I certainly heard stories and knew people who committed suicide. I've seen what I believe is a higher incidence of risky behavior and alcohol and drug use among a lot of people who go through an ex-gay ministry. A lot of it is because of spiritual conflict that emerges going through that, feeling betrayed by God, feeling betrayed by the church.

Sanchez: Since you left in 1990, the ex-gay movement has become much more political, hiring lobbyists and meeting with lawmakers. How did this come about?
Harrison: Around 1997, the ex-gay movement started to get funding from Focus on the Family [a huge Christian Right group led by James Dobson and based in Colorado Springs, Colo.] and from what I'll call other fundamentalist Christian organizations. Exodus International began receiving a lot of their funding from these organizations. As a result, [the ex-gay groups] began to tell a different story. Ex-gays became a vital part of the battle against gay and lesbian civil rights in society.

Sanchez: At the Exodus Revolution ex-gay conference this summer, you saw a speech by Michael Brown in which he encouraged people to "give up their lives" in the fight against homosexuality. What do you think of that?
Harrison: When you have a keynote speaker like Michael Brown, to me that's unacceptable. It's preaching a message of Christians not just simply opposing gay civil rights and believing a spiritual revival is necessary for this country, but actually calling on Christians to lay down their lives in a spiritual revolution to set up civil laws based on one extreme interpretation of biblical laws from the Old Testament [that calls for the death penalty for homosexuals]. It's Christian Reconstructionism [a doctrine that calls for imposing harsh Old Testament laws on civil society], Christian dominionism. It's abhorrent, and it's dangerous, not just for LGBT people but for our entire society. Because if civil laws are based on [Brown]'s interpretation of the Bible, it's not going to be a democratic society.

Sanchez: Should ministries like Exodus exist?
Harrison: Legally, I believe they should be allowed to exist. But I don't believe they should be state-sanctioned. Ex-gay ministries are primarily religious. They should not be allowed to go into public schools any more than representatives of a church, mosque or synagogue. But Exodus Youth [an Exodus International outreach group] is distributing brochures and flyers in public high schools. They are telling teenagers that they should be willing to sacrifice their sexuality because Jesus sacrificed his life for us. So they should be willing to give whatever God asks in exchange for salvation.

Sanchez: What's the problem with that message?
Harrison: I don't think that's healthy for anyone, but especially not for high school students. Teenagers are idealistic. They're going to grab for that, believing they can actually change their sexuality, when we have plenty of evidence showing it's not possible. What's going happen when they don't change? More youth suicides, more youths engaging in risky behaviors, feeling betrayed by the church and by God and giving up on their faith. If I'd heard that message as a teenager, I don't know if I'd be here today.

I think the healthier option is to encourage them to accept themselves and find ways of maintaining a faith relationship while encouraging relationships that are healthier than promiscuity. For some people, that might be a monogamous same-sex relationship. For other people it might mean that they are celibate. Speaking from my own experience, I never witnessed anybody [in the ex-gay movement] who would acknowledge to me privately that they did not still have attractions towards people of the same sex. I can't tell you how many people come out of the ex-gay movement with their faith wrecked and they have to rebuild it from scratch.

Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: "ex-gay"


Comments are closed-

Good Article
Posted by: mcstewey on Dec 26, 2007 12:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These stories are good to hear. These theologies and methods are not only dangerous to homosexuals, but to our civil society. Because of the widely varying levels of acceptance of homosexuality over time and across cultures (see some Native American tribal customs and of course the ancient Greeks), I see one main way to view this issue: homosexuality is not the problem, the problem is the way our society views it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Our society's view of it Posted by: Jasonix
» RE: Our society's view of it Posted by: redfrog
» RE: Our society's view of it Posted by: Jasonix
» RE: Our society's view of it Posted by: Richard House
» RE: Our society's view of it Posted by: Jasonix
» RE: Our society's view of it Posted by: Richard House
» RE: Our society's view of it Posted by: lepidopteryx

Comments are closed-

Ex-Fornication Therapy?
Posted by: CatDad on Dec 26, 2007 3:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First...it's almost 2008 and the issue of "changing" gays is still being discussed?

As a gay man I'm growing weary of being lectured to by fundamentalists/Right Wing polticians with their multiple marriages, adulteries and airport bathroom escapades....among other things. Fundamentalists are actually quite the tree-hugging liberals when it comes to applying Biblical principles against heterosexual fornication/adultery. They seem to have edited out scriptures that condemn their own behaviors....it's Cafeteria Christianity. Will we ever see ex-fornication therapy? Probably not...when it's so much easier to blame everything that has gone wrong in the straight world on gays.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: x-Fornication Therapy? Posted by: goeswithness

Comments are closed-

Christian Fundamentalist is the same as Islamic Fundamentalism
Posted by: kgs1947 on Dec 26, 2007 5:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's happening in these movements is the same as what's happening within Islam. The same tactics and radical hatred toward anyone who thinks differently than they think. It's tantamount to brain washing! And, Christian history is full of such inquisitions and methods of rejecting anyone who believes differently. This is sick, dangerous, frightening to experience in person, let alone as a movement within our own country based on religious liberty. Wow! When are we ever going to wake up?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

It is all about money and power.
Posted by: leland61 on Dec 26, 2007 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What people sometimes forget is that theology is secondary to the religious right wingnuts. What is always primary is money, power and influence.

Everyone of those so called ministries makes millions of dollars for a few people. The gullible multitudes give up their dollars and their power to these religious freaks as easily as the multitudes give it up to the politicians.

Pat Robertson, James Dobson and all of the scam artists and religious snake oil salesmen should be in prison, not on TV.

Unfortunately even though millions call themselves Christians, very, very few actually understand what Jesus taught. The blame for this gap rests squarly with the unscruplous, pseudo-Christian clergy that dominate the religious scene in the USA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This has so many parallels to the war on drugs
Posted by: spacecadet on Dec 26, 2007 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This ex-gay thing is an obvious attempt to portray gays as "addicts" in need of "treatment". And also to convince us that gays don't deserve human rights because they haven't availed themselves of same "treatment".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

homophobic culture....
Posted by: davidg on Dec 26, 2007 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Homophobia is so deeply rooted in US culture for so many different reasons, many of them ironically righteous, it would take years of public education through media systems to change it,especially in the face of the holiest bigots. I should live so long! Alternet, and similar sites, however, are excellent models of how to begin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

It's all part of SEX IN GENERAL AS A BIG BUGABOO
Posted by: lydia cypher on Dec 26, 2007 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The effort to change sexual orientation is just another variation of a larger anti-sexualilty problem in theology in general. I'm a Christian and I have no problem with sexualilty. To me, all this fussing about what people do sexually is a GIANT WASTE OF TIME AND ENERGY. SEXUALITY IS NOT A PROBLEM, it's a perfectly lovely, natural part of being alive. When will we get over all this focus on how people share their bodies with one another and start focusing on the REAL PROBLEMS of our human existence? Problems like greed and social inequity and war and environmental exploitation and degradation? We are long overdue for a resurgence of the COYOTE movement ... as in Call Off Your Old Tired Ethics! Sexuality is NOT a problem! Yes, sexual violence and sexual exploitation and communicable diseases and unplanned pregnancies ARE PROBLEMS; but our sexuality itself is one of the great, joyful gifts of existence!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

So sad
Posted by: porgygirl on Dec 26, 2007 7:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's so sad that so many religions do so much damage to people with regard to sexuality. I grew up in a progressive Christian family (and still consider myself a progressive Christian), but even the relatively benign message I got of "Wait until marriage" did me some damage--because as soon as I decided that waiting wasn't right for me, I was rudderless.

When people internalize a black-and-white message about Sexuality A (marital, heterosexual, procreative) being the only good kind and Sexualities B-Z being sinful and perverse, the 95% of us whose desires don't fit the approved mold are left with self-loathing and trial and error--a potentially disastrous combination.

A more inclusive message about having self-respect and respecting others, whatever sexual path one is on--a message that strikes me as entirely compatible with Christ's teachings--would be a lot healthier.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

ex-gay ministries
Posted by: Johnboy on Dec 26, 2007 7:34 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting and informative piece. Of course, it gives more fodder to histrionic anti-Christians to further broad-brush all "fundamentalists" as deranged threats to democracy. As an evangelical, I, too, am concerned with the Dominionists (who embrace "Theonomy"). These people are generally very bright, but are a fringe of Christendom. Judging Christians by them is like judging homosexuals by John Wayne Gacy.

As to the issue at hand ("ex-gay" ministries), I have had experience with them, including twice as a speaker at annual meetings (I am heterosexual). I found the leaders and the attendees to be genuine, loving people who struggle with sexuality issues. My heart goes out to brother Harrison for the misguided attempts to "heal" him. Some of the Vineyard churches are "out there."

The dilemma for many Christians is to do justice to the Scriptures that are believed to be inspired by God, and the basis for faith an practice. If a person accepts the premise that the Scriptures are the Word of God, and that they set down God's ideal for sexuality, then those teachings need to be understood and followed. That is where the conflict comes in-Christians are to be loving, but to speak the truth as they understand it. That truth includes God's plan for sexuality, an issue with which most people (homo and hetero) struggle.

I have read both sides of the biblical debate on homosexuality (going back to Derrick Sherwin Bailey) and Scripture seems clear that homosexuality is not God's ideal, and homosexual behavior (as opposed to the orientation) is wrong for professing Christians to practice. So, what choices are there? Just like an unmarried heterosexual, practice celibacy. For many, this is unrealistic, etc., etc. But if this is, arguendo, God's plan for believers, then we should do our best to conform our desires and practices to His plan. No one said its easy. And those who struggle should not be driven away. Instead, the church needs to practice love, patience and kindness. And for those struggling with sexuality who believe in Christ as Savior, you are welcome in my church and my house. Come let us reason together.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: such garbage Posted by: davidg
» RE: in a petrie dish Posted by: davidg
» RE: in a petrie dish Posted by: YogiBear
» RE:very telling Posted by: davidg
» RE: very telling Posted by: YogiBear
» pure drivel Posted by: Richard House
» RE: pure drivel: exactly Posted by: davidg
» Cool down! It's a setup. Posted by: JoAnne
» RE: ex-gay ministries Posted by: TagsNOLA

Comments are closed-

And also....
Posted by: Libertine on Dec 26, 2007 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....let's not forget that there was no reliable birth control available during the Bible times. Perhaps the idea was to prevent people from having children before they were ready to support them, rather than banning sexual pleasure, per se.

Because we do have reliable birth control, DNA testing to determine paternity, and so on, those old rules are now largely a moot point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Bring back the Shakers!
Posted by: defrag on Dec 26, 2007 9:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps we could get evangelicals to stop reproducing with a bizarre interpretation of their own theology. It happened once. The Shakers were crazy but at least they were celibate.

And they made some FABULOUS furniture!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bring back the Shakers! Posted by: counterpoint

Comments are closed-

It's Amazing to me...
Posted by: Pirate1 on Dec 26, 2007 11:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that "Christians", so called believers in a god that according to them created everything here in a few days, can then turn around and judge parts of this god's creation they either don't like or can't understand as an abomination. I don't share belief in deities myself but homosexuality exists all through this "creation", and not just among humans either. These people seem profoundly ignorant, uneducated or basically foolish.
If you aren't gay, fine, neither am I, I live and let live. If same sex affection and love display bothers you, then look away or go within, as Jesus said to do, and examine what it is in you that makes you feel what you do but leave the people for whom this behavior is as natural as having blue eyes or curly hair alone. Those feelings you harbor are no more important in the great scheme of things than your dislike of Brussels Sprouts or fear of heights. You would never even know to respond the way you do were it not for some creep convincing you that the words in a book that was long ago profoundly edited to favor the notion of divine right of monarchy were somehow the "truth" written by this god itself. If you truly believe then it is clear that gays are all part of the "divine plan" Christians claim to know so much about. To say otherwise is by those same traditions blasphemy, is it not?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Really! Posted by: LeeAnnG

Comments are closed-

X gay or X christian?
Posted by: liviaturner on Dec 27, 2007 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stop worshiping the "Invisible man in the sky" and start living in reality. X gay movement is as ridiculous as the religion that sponsors it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: X gay or X christian? Posted by: Musked

Comments are closed-

Isn't it interesting that
Posted by: observing on Dec 29, 2007 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
all these so-called Christians, leaping over the new testament with speed, go immediately to the OLD testament to justify their position? Yet, observant Jews say these Christians regularly misinterpret the OT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Good Article
Posted by: mcstewey on Dec 26, 2007 12:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These stories are good to hear. These theologies and methods are not only dangerous to homosexuals, but to our civil society. Because of the widely varying levels of acceptance of homosexuality over time and across cultures (see some Native American tribal customs and of course the ancient Greeks), I see one main way to view this issue: homosexuality is not the problem, the problem is the way our society views it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Our society's view of it Posted by: Jasonix
» RE: Our society's view of it Posted by: redfrog
» RE: Our society's view of it Posted by: Jasonix
» RE: Our society's view of it Posted by: Richard House
» RE: Our society's view of it Posted by: Jasonix
» RE: Our society's view of it Posted by: Richard House
» RE: Our society's view of it Posted by: lepidopteryx

Comments are closed-

Ex-Fornication Therapy?
Posted by: CatDad on Dec 26, 2007 3:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First...it's almost 2008 and the issue of "changing" gays is still being discussed?

As a gay man I'm growing weary of being lectured to by fundamentalists/Right Wing polticians with their multiple marriages, adulteries and airport bathroom escapades....among other things. Fundamentalists are actually quite the tree-hugging liberals when it comes to applying Biblical principles against heterosexual fornication/adultery. They seem to have edited out scriptures that condemn their own behaviors....it's Cafeteria Christianity. Will we ever see ex-fornication therapy? Probably not...when it's so much easier to blame everything that has gone wrong in the straight world on gays.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: x-Fornication Therapy? Posted by: goeswithness

Comments are closed-

Christian Fundamentalist is the same as Islamic Fundamentalism
Posted by: kgs1947 on Dec 26, 2007 5:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's happening in these movements is the same as what's happening within Islam. The same tactics and radical hatred toward anyone who thinks differently than they think. It's tantamount to brain washing! And, Christian history is full of such inquisitions and methods of rejecting anyone who believes differently. This is sick, dangerous, frightening to experience in person, let alone as a movement within our own country based on religious liberty. Wow! When are we ever going to wake up?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

It is all about money and power.
Posted by: leland61 on Dec 26, 2007 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What people sometimes forget is that theology is secondary to the religious right wingnuts. What is always primary is money, power and influence.

Everyone of those so called ministries makes millions of dollars for a few people. The gullible multitudes give up their dollars and their power to these religious freaks as easily as the multitudes give it up to the politicians.

Pat Robertson, James Dobson and all of the scam artists and religious snake oil salesmen should be in prison, not on TV.

Unfortunately even though millions call themselves Christians, very, very few actually understand what Jesus taught. The blame for this gap rests squarly with the unscruplous, pseudo-Christian clergy that dominate the religious scene in the USA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

This has so many parallels to the war on drugs
Posted by: spacecadet on Dec 26, 2007 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This ex-gay thing is an obvious attempt to portray gays as "addicts" in need of "treatment". And also to convince us that gays don't deserve human rights because they haven't availed themselves of same "treatment".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

homophobic culture....
Posted by: davidg on Dec 26, 2007 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Homophobia is so deeply rooted in US culture for so many different reasons, many of them ironically righteous, it would take years of public education through media systems to change it,especially in the face of the holiest bigots. I should live so long! Alternet, and similar sites, however, are excellent models of how to begin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

It's all part of SEX IN GENERAL AS A BIG BUGABOO
Posted by: lydia cypher on Dec 26, 2007 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The effort to change sexual orientation is just another variation of a larger anti-sexualilty problem in theology in general. I'm a Christian and I have no problem with sexualilty. To me, all this fussing about what people do sexually is a GIANT WASTE OF TIME AND ENERGY. SEXUALITY IS NOT A PROBLEM, it's a perfectly lovely, natural part of being alive. When will we get over all this focus on how people share their bodies with one another and start focusing on the REAL PROBLEMS of our human existence? Problems like greed and social inequity and war and environmental exploitation and degradation? We are long overdue for a resurgence of the COYOTE movement ... as in Call Off Your Old Tired Ethics! Sexuality is NOT a problem! Yes, sexual violence and sexual exploitation and communicable diseases and unplanned pregnancies ARE PROBLEMS; but our sexuality itself is one of the great, joyful gifts of existence!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

So sad
Posted by: porgygirl on Dec 26, 2007 7:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's so sad that so many religions do so much damage to people with regard to sexuality. I grew up in a progressive Christian family (and still consider myself a progressive Christian), but even the relatively benign message I got of "Wait until marriage" did me some damage--because as soon as I decided that waiting wasn't right for me, I was rudderless.

When people internalize a black-and-white message about Sexuality A (marital, heterosexual, procreative) being the only good kind and Sexualities B-Z being sinful and perverse, the 95% of us whose desires don't fit the approved mold are left with self-loathing and trial and error--a potentially disastrous combination.

A more inclusive message about having self-respect and respecting others, whatever sexual path one is on--a message that strikes me as entirely compatible with Christ's teachings--would be a lot healthier.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

ex-gay ministries
Posted by: Johnboy on Dec 26, 2007 7:34 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting and informative piece. Of course, it gives more fodder to histrionic anti-Christians to further broad-brush all "fundamentalists" as deranged threats to democracy. As an evangelical, I, too, am concerned with the Dominionists (who embrace "Theonomy"). These people are generally very bright, but are a fringe of Christendom. Judging Christians by them is like judging homosexuals by John Wayne Gacy.

As to the issue at hand ("ex-gay" ministries), I have had experience with them, including twice as a speaker at annual meetings (I am heterosexual). I found the leaders and the attendees to be genuine, loving people who struggle with sexuality issues. My heart goes out to brother Harrison for the misguided attempts to "heal" him. Some of the Vineyard churches are "out there."

The dilemma for many Christians is to do justice to the Scriptures that are believed to be inspired by God, and the basis for faith an practice. If a person accepts the premise that the Scriptures are the Word of God, and that they set down God's ideal for sexuality, then those teachings need to be understood and followed. That is where the conflict comes in-Christians are to be loving, but to speak the truth as they understand it. That truth includes God's plan for sexuality, an issue with which most people (homo and hetero) struggle.

I have read both sides of the biblical debate on homosexuality (going back to Derrick Sherwin Bailey) and Scripture seems clear that homosexuality is not God's ideal, and homosexual behavior (as opposed to the orientation) is wrong for professing Christians to practice. So, what choices are there? Just like an unmarried heterosexual, practice celibacy. For many, this is unrealistic, etc., etc. But if this is, arguendo, God's plan for believers, then we should do our best to conform our desires and practices to His plan. No one said its easy. And those who struggle should not be driven away. Instead, the church needs to practice love, patience and kindness. And for those struggling with sexuality who believe in Christ as Savior, you are welcome in my church and my house. Come let us reason together.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: such garbage Posted by: davidg
» RE: in a petrie dish Posted by: davidg
» RE: in a petrie dish Posted by: YogiBear
» RE:very telling Posted by: davidg
» RE: very telling Posted by: YogiBear
» pure drivel Posted by: Richard House
» RE: pure drivel: exactly Posted by: davidg
» Cool down! It's a setup. Posted by: JoAnne
» RE: ex-gay ministries Posted by: TagsNOLA

Comments are closed-

And also....
Posted by: Libertine on Dec 26, 2007 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....let's not forget that there was no reliable birth control available during the Bible times. Perhaps the idea was to prevent people from having children before they were ready to support them, rather than banning sexual pleasure, per se.

Because we do have reliable birth control, DNA testing to determine paternity, and so on, those old rules are now largely a moot point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Bring back the Shakers!
Posted by: defrag on Dec 26, 2007 9:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps we could get evangelicals to stop reproducing with a bizarre interpretation of their own theology. It happened once. The Shakers were crazy but at least they were celibate.

And they made some FABULOUS furniture!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bring back the Shakers! Posted by: counterpoint

Comments are closed-

It's Amazing to me...
Posted by: Pirate1 on Dec 26, 2007 11:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that "Christians", so called believers in a god that according to them created everything here in a few days, can then turn around and judge parts of this god's creation they either don't like or can't understand as an abomination. I don't share belief in deities myself but homosexuality exists all through this "creation", and not just among humans either. These people seem profoundly ignorant, uneducated or basically foolish.
If you aren't gay, fine, neither am I, I live and let live. If same sex affection and love display bothers you, then look away or go within, as Jesus said to do, and examine what it is in you that makes you feel what you do but leave the people for whom this behavior is as natural as having blue eyes or curly hair alone. Those feelings you harbor are no more important in the great scheme of things than your dislike of Brussels Sprouts or fear of heights. You would never even know to respond the way you do were it not for some creep convincing you that the words in a book that was long ago profoundly edited to favor the notion of divine right of monarchy were somehow the "truth" written by this god itself. If you truly believe then it is clear that gays are all part of the "divine plan" Christians claim to know so much about. To say otherwise is by those same traditions blasphemy, is it not?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Really! Posted by: LeeAnnG

Comments are closed-

X gay or X christian?
Posted by: liviaturner on Dec 27, 2007 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stop worshiping the "Invisible man in the sky" and start living in reality. X gay movement is as ridiculous as the religion that sponsors it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: X gay or X christian? Posted by: Musked

Comments are closed-

Isn't it interesting that
Posted by: observing on Dec 29, 2007 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
all these so-called Christians, leaping over the new testament with speed, go immediately to the OLD testament to justify their position? Yet, observant Jews say these Christians regularly misinterpret the OT.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS