Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Credit Crunch: China to the Rescue?

By Jill Treanor, Comment Is Free. Posted December 22, 2007.


That the biggest names on Wall Street are staying afloat thanks to huge injections of cash from China reveals how hard the debt crisis has hit.
Advertisement

The idea of China rushing to the rescue of the capitalist world seems so unlikely as to be unbelievable.

Except that it is happening. The China Investment Corporation - a newly-formed fund which helps control £100bn of China's foreign exchange reserves - yesterday ploughed $5bn into Morgan Stanley, the Wall Street firm. It has also taken stakes in US private equity firm Blackstone - owner in the UK of Cafe Rouge restaurants, Madame Tussauds and Center Parcs. Closer to home, the Chinese Development Bank, controlled by the Chinese state, owns 3% of Barclays.

The Chinese involvement in Wall Street is even more surprising given the protectionist stance of the Americans towards their own businesses until recently. When Dubai Ports World took over strategically important US ports last year, it caused a political furore. It was not enough to stop the deal, but it did require the bidder to sell off the US ports.

Until recently, it has been more common for Wall Street firms to take stakes in Chinese banks, in a search for exposure to the fast-growing economy and the burgeoning wealth of the Chinese population.

How times change, though. The involvement of the Chinese and other so-called sovereign wealth funds in US banks could well prove to be critical to their survival in the short term. Wall Street is suffering a painful hangover from the excesses of easy credit. The subprime mortgage crisis is causing huge dents in the financial sector's profits. The size of the problem is awesome. One bad bet by a group of traders caused Morgan Stanley to drop $8bn, and left the bank with a $3.6bn loss in the fourth quarter of the year.

Such holes are difficult to fill; hence Morgan Stanley welcomed the $5bn in cash from CIC with open arms. In return, it is handing over an estimated 9.9% stake to the Chinese investor. The deal comes hot the heels of the move by Citigroup to sell a £3.5bn stake to the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, and a step by Bear Stearns also to take investments off the Chinese from Citic Securities, another state-owned investment fund.

These are unlikely to be the last investments in a big US business, given that China has the world's biggest foreign exchange reserves, worth $1.3trillion and growing by $1m a minute. And neither should it be. When shares trade freely on stock markets, anyone is allowed to buy them - whatever their politics and whatever their nationality.

While its economy continues to remain unscathed by the current credit crisis, the Chinese may well take the chance to flash their cash and extend their influence. Wall Street may not like it, but it seems to be in no position to shut it out.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: china, subprime, debt crisis

Jill Treanor is deputy City editor for the Guardian.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Chinese funds stem from Foreign Direct Investment which can now save the system in which it got rich
Posted by: yellow on Dec 22, 2007 2:08 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well over half a trillion dollars have flowed into China since the capitalist road reforms. The international financial system centering around global currency and securities speculation, trade and investment and the new division of labor based on Walmart retail concentration and its link to global sweat shops is key to China's survival and current position as a regional power. Naturally, it will use the gains from the system to save and perpetuate it. What could be less suprising.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Re: I agree too Posted by: Angel1961
John McCarthy
Posted by: johnjmccarthy on Dec 26, 2007 4:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nee hau ma! (Just a friendly hello in Chinese)

Back in the fifties when I was in High School, one of my teachers made the suggestion that we would be well off to learn the Chinese language. Ironically, a friend of mine said she recieved the same advice in the mid-thirties.

Seems that was advice well given as the bogey man of communism has finally run it's course, only to be replaced by aggressive preemptive policies of the (capitalist) USA. That same advice is even more practical today.

Politically, the Chinese and Vietnamese communist's seem to be great trading partners now that the hot war of Vietnam is over (whee have all the domino's gone) and the cold war re China has all but disappeared.

No longer do we have the penetration flights by RB-47's from Okinawa testing the intercept radars of mainland China. Kadena Air Base on Okinawa will never be the same.

China has long been referred to in the business community as the "Jews of the Orient" when it comes to busines dealings. If doing business with the Chinese favors a fifty/fifty split, the Chinese will not be pleased and may not be an available business assets in the future. 60-40 or better in their favor is more to their liking and necessary for future trade relations.

Bests,
John

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Paranoid ramblings? Posted by: BrianOfNairobi
China is backing Wallstreet
Posted by: robchapman on Dec 26, 2007 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article implies that China will somehow be able to shape future US policy through the infusion of cash.

It seems that China is merely looking to protect the value of the vast dollar reserves they have accumulated and will continue to amass.

If America crashes, we can survive- our natural resource base will provide the resources and perhaps our political system is still resiliant enough to restore our economic vitality.

If America crashes, China will not survive. They are still expanding their economy and are relying on their dollar reserves to fund the expansion.

The Chinese have made extraordinary gains, but remain essentially backward and poor. They will require decades of steady progress to consolidate their growth into an enviable living standard.

The Chinese can live with the status quo in America and America's foreign policy. They may not be able to live with Chinese induced changes.

They certainly cannot live with being embargoed. As in east africa, Chinese money in America will be used to invest and purchase. They will not impose public political quid pro quos for their investment. They will expect merely that their commercial rights be respected.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wall Street is in trouble because it has abandoned sound accounting principles and regulation
Posted by: Rune on Dec 26, 2007 8:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Wall Street is suffering a painful hangover from the excesses of easy credit."

That is not the half of it, although the Wall Street spin machine is doing its best to make that myth the official story. If it was just a matter of too many loans to parties who could not pay them back, it would be a fairly simple matter to recognize that and write off the bad loans as one-time losses.

The situation is much worse than that. Wall Street has succeeded in removing effective regulatory oversight and has responded to that situation by bundling up good and bad loans and selling them off as securities in which it is not clear who is holding the bag or what is in the bag. That has led the big players in the financial markets to trust no one, so they are not lending and buying amongst each other as they normally would even in hard times. And it is that lack of trust driven by shady public reporting of where everyone stands that is the real heart of the credit and liquidity crises that are just starting to snowball.

It does a disservice to the public to repeat the tale that the financial meltdown enveloping the world is driven by American homeowners who took on variable rate loans that they cannot service now that the interest rates are rising. That is a just the tail end of the monster of corruption that was in full swing when Enron imploded and sucked down the pensions and nest eggs of vast numbers of employees and investors. Rather than correct the problem, Bush and his Republican cronies who controlled the Congress for many years thereafter, let the fraudulent and dangerous practices run their course. Well, now they have and there is hell to pay.

China cannot solve this problem by throwing money into the black hole of confusion and misinformation that Wall Street has created. Until trust and openness is significantly improved, this baby is going to keep consuming every bit of money tossed its way and keep pawing for more and more money to cover enormous expenses that are no longer balanced by revenues because the capitalist con game has been called a fraud by the cons themselves and they are no longer playing along with each other. Worse, they are not even acknowledging the problem to the wider public, which means that the government oversight and rule changes that are necessary to restore credibility to the capital markets is not yet forthcoming.

Hang on, folks. This one is going to hurt people far and wide and there is no super hero to save the day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CHINA - USA
Posted by: walterik on Dec 26, 2007 8:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One is State Capitalism on the way up - the other is private Capitalism on the way down. It is not much different in the world of private citizens. If you have a beautiful property, but mortgage it piece by piece to your neighbor - how long before the neighbor controls your property?
How do you stop a huge avalanche halfways down the mountain. If anyone can answer that question, he or she has the answer to fix the problem.
w.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ultimately U.S. money must be spent in the USofA
Posted by: billwald on Dec 26, 2007 10:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What should China do with their US money? Spend it as tourists? The only logical solution for China is to purchase our businesses or our real estate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Try this...
Posted by: Pirate1 on Dec 26, 2007 1:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The representative government of USA now answers to the Corporations that grew like viruses within her and not to her people whereas China IS a corporation in control of all that country's various and vast commercial output. Their model is superior to the squabbling competitive 19th and 20 century forms of the beast that run things here.

All these "China can't live with out America" scenarios I read here fail to incorporate what climate change is going to do to any of the current players ability to carry on in any way remotely like we do today. We will look back and wonder how we ever found any of this to be important when Earth is locked into a million years of climatic chaos and we realize way too late that we could have saved the planet but chose instead to be good calvinists and just kept working for the man and being good consumers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

R V MERCHANT
Posted by: merchant on Dec 28, 2007 3:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that China's huge foreign exchange reserves now being used to fund western institutions and corporations in view of the subprime crisis will in future change equations in the developed world and need careful watching.Such huge investments will be followed by influencing policies of the recipients as seen in Citibank top level changes. However, if as mentioned in the article it is growing at $ 1 million per minute it would meanin less than 3 years it will more than double as it would I believe mean over $ 526 billion increase a year. Is this true? Or is there an error in the figures?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]